The recently announced decision of the Supreme Court in the Dobbs v. Jackson case has left health care providers, researchers, and administrators struggling to defend reproductive health care against legal restrictions. Although some hospital-based providers may not consider reproductive health care as part of their “wheelhouse,” anyone who cares for adolescents and young adults must see this as a call to action. Reproductive health screening is often missed in the primary care setting,1 which has led to recommendations to provide this care wherever adolescents and young adults present for care.2 Because adolescents are under the legal age of majority and typically have less experience, education, and resources to help them access reproductive health care when needed, these new abortion laws will create disproportionate burdens on the adolescent population. For low-income youth and adolescent and young adults of color, this will likely worsen the disparities that already exist with...
Dobbs v. Jackson Decision: It’s Time to Get Uncomfortable
FUNDING: No external funding.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: Dr Goldstein is a Nexplanon Clinical Trainer for Organon. Drs Carlson and Tyson have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Rachel L. Goldstein, Jennifer L. Carlson, Nichole A. Tyson; Dobbs v. Jackson Decision: It’s Time to Get Uncomfortable. Hosp Pediatr 2022; e2022006829. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2022-006829
Download citation file: