CONTEXT

The utilization of Child Life Services is influenced by interprofessional collaboration and perceptions of other members of the medical team.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize studies which address pediatric health care team perspectives on Child Life Services and their utilization in the hospital setting.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive literature search was conducted with controlled vocabularies and key terms in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Web of Science.

STUDY SELECTION

Primary studies published before November 2021 were screened using a predetermined set of inclusion and exclusion criteria.

DATA CHARTING

Data charting was performed by 2 independent reviewers. Data extracted include baseline study characteristics, common themes, main outcomes, strengths, and limitations. Because this is not a systematic review, data from included studies was not quantitatively analyzed, but carefully summarized in the manner of a standard scoping review.

RESULTS

Nine studies met criteria for inclusion. Common qualitative themes on certified child life specialists include: (1) their broad responsibilities, (2) their positive impact on patients and families, (3) challenges with interprofessional collaboration and integration, and (4) the value of educating others on their roles and responsibilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical subject headings, controlled vocabulary, or other standardized subject headings that index literature on Child Life Services is limited. However, the existing body of literature supports the positive impact certified child life specialists have on patients and families, despite challenges with complete integration into the interdisciplinary care team. Additional research is required to fully understand and overcome these challenges in continued efforts to further drive patient and family-centered care.

In the 1950s, Nobel Prize-winning physician Frederick C. Robbins noticed that the social, emotional, and educational needs of families and children in Cleveland City Hospital were largely unmet.1,2  He recruited Emma Plank, an expert on child development, to develop a program that better addressed these psychosocial and developmental needs. By the 1960s, Plank equipped child care workers at Cleveland City Hospital with sufficient understanding of medical matters and hospital structure.3  With the formation of an independent Child Life Council in 1982, this discipline became a distinct medical entity and is now formally known as the Association of Child Life Professionals (ACLP). Since then, Child Life Services (CLS) has become a widely accepted professionally licensed field worldwide, with members practicing in >25 countries.4 

As of 2019, a master’s degree is no longer required to be eligible for the ACLP certification exam. However, certification as a child life specialist still requires a minimum of a bachelor’s degree, either in child life from an ACLP-endorsed academic child life program or in the subject of their choice with minimum required coursework that includes in-depth studies on child development, family systems, therapeutic play, loss and bereavement, research literacy, and ethics, among many others. After completion of required coursework, they must then participate in a competitive, 600 hour clinical internship under the direct supervision of a certified child life specialist (CCLS), and pass the standardized Child Life Professional Certification Exam before the ACLP issues the credential of CCLS.5  There are also requirements for continuing education and maintenance of certification once initial certification has been granted. As such, CCLS are more than equipped with skills to improve the pediatric patient and family experience in the hospital through interventions that include psychological preparation for procedures, coping strategies, nonpharmacologic pain management, and therapeutic play.6,7 

Several studies have demonstrated the positive impact of CCLS. Kinnebrew and colleagues,8  for example, found that CCLS increased departmental operational efficiency and revenue by decreasing procedure times and improving imaging quality in the radiology department. CCLS accomplished this through various modalities, including conducting prescheduling preparation phone calls to improve workflow and arming patients with knowledge, expectations, and coping mechanisms that helped them remain cooperative during the procedure. Additionally, studies investigating CLS utilization have demonstrated that CCLS services decreased the need for sedation use during pediatric body MRI9  and improved overall staff, patient, and family satisfaction survey scores.10  Alongside the more traditional roles of CLS, CCLS are also involved in developing age-appropriate protocols for children undergoing surgical procedures (ie, awake craniotomies),11  individualizing an adolescent’s treatment experience,12  and supporting children whose parents are seriously ill patients.13  These findings underscore the importance of CLS and the significant impact CCLS can have on both the patient and family experience, as well as the overall hospital course.

Although many studies have reinforced the value of CLS in the health care environment, maximizing this benefit may be a challenge. Among the first to evaluate interprofessional collaboration were Thompson and Stanford,14  who reported that barriers to CLS utilization include “role conflicts” with other professions, including administration, nursing, and occupational therapy. Although the field has come a long way since then, additional, more-recent studies report that optimal utilization and incorporation of CLS into the interdisciplinary care team may depend on the team’s knowledge of the scope of CLS practice.15,16  Gaynard17  additionally suggests that the amount of contact professionals have with Child Life personnel impact their utilization. Lastly, Pillai18  advocates for the role of CLS in medical education and further reports that early exposure increases appreciation for specialists.

To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview that aims to describe the extent and range of the existing body of research addressing how CLS are understood and used in the hospital setting. It is the intent for this scoping review to help guide future efforts in improving the understanding and utilization of CLS in the inpatient setting.

Only a limited body of published data exist regarding the role and integration of CLS into the inpatient team. Therefore, a scoping review of the existing literature was conducted on the basis of the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews.1921  The patient/population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes framework was used to identify the primary research question, with CCLS as the population, other health care team members’ perspectives as the inquiry, and hospital setting as the context. The aims for performing a scoping review on CCLS in team settings were to:

  1. identify and assess common themes;

  2. provide an overview of available information within the primary literature; and

  3. identify trends to inform future study and guide efforts in improving the understanding and utilization of CLS.

A literature search from the inception of each database to the date of study initiation (November 10, 2021) was conducted. Following guidance of a medical research librarian, literature searches using a combination of keyword and database-specific controlled vocabulary terms was performed for 5 databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Web of Science. Search quality was ensured by adhering to the guidelines provided by Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies.22  After these databases were reviewed, Google Scholar was surveyed for gray literature in fields not encapsulated in the 5 databases above. Lastly, the cited references from any article obtained for any additional research were manually reviewed.

A mix of controlled vocabulary and text words was used to identify relevant literature associated with the concepts of CCLS, health care perspectives, and hospital settings within the patient/population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes framework. These concepts were combined using Boolean operators. Details of the full search strategy for the 5 databases are outlined in Supplemental Table 2. The initial database searches yielded 132 articles (MEDLINE, 10; Embase, 11; CINAHL, 16; PsycInfo, 6; Web of Science, 89). Results were exported from all queries into Zotero and duplicates were removed on that platform.23  An additional 9 articles met inclusion criteria and were considered after manual citation searching and gray literature searching in Google Scholar. After deduplication, 123 unique articles remained. Using Rayyan software,24  title and abstracts were screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were included if they contained themes of CLS as a subject of interest, original data on hospital staff attitudes in the inpatient setting, and discussion on interdisciplinary collaboration and/or interactions within the medical team. Therefore, studies were excluded if:

  1. CLS were not a subject of interest

  2. there was no original data on hospital staff attitudes in the inpatient setting; and

  3. discussion on interdisciplinary collaboration and/or interactions within the medical team were missing.

In addition, studies that were not published in English or studies where the full text could not be retrieved were excluded. After initial screening, 75 full-text articles were reviewed for relevance following strictly to criteria established a priori. At final assessment, 9 articles met the inclusion criteria and were thematically analyzed by 2 independent reviewers (Fig 1, Supplemental Table 3).2533 

FIGURE 1

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram, adapted for this scoping review.

FIGURE 1

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram, adapted for this scoping review.

Close modal

Two independent researchers extracted data from each included article, such as article title, date of publication, journal, authors, subject demographics, study setting, primary outcome measures, analytic methods, main outcomes, strengths, and limitations. Disagreements or questions regarding data were discussed in weekly meetings and consensus was established. Major findings organized by common themes among the selected articles were described and summarized. The data charting tool can be found in Supplemental Table 4.

Nine primary research articles were included in the final review. Studies ranged in publication dates from 2001 to 2021, with the majority (78%) published in various pediatric specialty journals after 2017 (Fig 2, Supplemental Table 5). Most articles were published in different journals, with only 2 commonly found in Children’s Health Care.25,26  Of the 9 included articles, 7 (78%) were questionnaires or survey studies, 1 (11%) involved focus groups, and 1 (11%) involved in-person interviews (Fig 3A, Supplemental Table 6). In the 9 articles, multiple health care professional groups were represented, in addition to frontline clinical providers, including social work, medical assistants, respiratory therapists, and administration. Each group had the potential of appearing 9 times, with the viewpoints of CCLS, nurses, and physicians studied more frequently than the other groups (Fig 3B, Supplemental Table 7) (Supplemental Table 7). Study method, main outcomes, and authors’ conclusions are summarized in Table 1. Participant information, strengths, limitations, and other pertinent information for each article are summarized in Supplemental Table 4.

FIGURE 2

Studies included by year of publication and color-coded by peer-reviewed journal.

FIGURE 2

Studies included by year of publication and color-coded by peer-reviewed journal.

Close modal
FIGURE 3

(A) Frequency of types of studies included in review (n = 9); (B) frequency of professions surveyed within literature included in review.

FIGURE 3

(A) Frequency of types of studies included in review (n = 9); (B) frequency of professions surveyed within literature included in review.

Close modal
TABLE 1

Study Design and Main Outcomes as Mentioned by the Authors

SourceStudy MethodMain Outcomes and Author’s Conclusion
Cole et al (2001)25  Questionnaires sent through hospital mailboxes at a primary children’s medical center with University of Utah Most perceived responsibilities of CLS include preparation and orientation. Areas of discrepancy among responders include:
• amuse and entertain;
• children’s growth and development;
• patient and family support as a responsibility;
• CLS, highest rating for psychosocial well-being; and
• CCLS rated with “little power” in the team dynamic.
Discrepancies demonstrate the need to educate others on CLS. 
Smith et al (2014)26  Qualtrics on an online forum Documented current practices and perceptions of CCLS regarding their role in the NICU, including:
• developmental care tasks prioritized the most;
• nonpharmacologic pain management support is another role;
• NICU, palliative care, and bereavement support to families; and
• infant discharge and follow-up care.
Team integration is an area of improvement. 
Drayton, Whaddups, and Walker (2018)27  Qualitative design: focus groups at a 24-bed pediatric unit in New South Wales, Australia 5 themes:
1. distraction as part of everyday nursing practice;
2. influence of CCLS in preparing procedure;
3. contrast of roles between nursing and CCLS;
4. value of collaboration for positive health care experiences; and
5. nurses’ perception of the child’s experience with distraction improved with the presence of CCLS.
Necessity for CCLS as members of the multidisciplinary team in providing advice and education on needs of the child. Stresses the importance of distraction practice throughout the child’s hospitalized journey. 
Lookabaugh and Ballard (2018)28  Online survey: demographics, work environments and settings, range of services provided, and perceived levels of competence Revealed little racial (white) and gender (female) diversity among child life specialists. Balance between knowledge and skills is necessary to be an effective child life professional. Consistent with previous research discussing the need to clearly define work roles as responsibilities of child life continue to expand. Common thematic concern that other members of the health care team do not recognize child life as an important part of patient and family care. 
Mistry et al (2019)29  5-item questionnaire sent virtually through e-mail Need for more consistent use of CCLS by pediatric urologists. A total of 33.7% reported using CCLS every time in the inpatient setting, 22.1% in ambulatory setting. A total of 63.8% at least half the time in the outpatient radiologic testing setting. A total of 95% of providers felt that CCLS offered positive contribution to their health-related quality of life. 
Stenman et al (2019)30  In-person meetings scheduled for interviews (20–70 min) by 8 team members trained in qualitative methods that were transcribed and reviewed. Research team consisted of 3 psychologists, 2 social workers, 3 CCLS, and 1 master’s psych professional. A total of 11 interviews in Delaware Valley and 19 in central Florida children’s hospitals. Education for multidisciplinary staff about trauma-informed care and play is necessary. Offering simple, child-familiar experiences to alleviate traumatic aspects of care may benefit the patient and family. Play is potentially a readily implementable approach. Communication among providers and patients/families is essential. Aspects of pediatric medical care that are potentially traumatic, including specific events, consequences of illness, and treatments. Various uses of play, including general purposes, alleviate trauma, or prevent trauma, with a positive view on the use of play where CCLS are the experts on play and stress coping. Barriers to play include infection control, lack of provider training, and situations where play would not be beneficial. 
Hailu et al (2020)31  Shadow program at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Pre- and postshadowing survey for participants. Hosts of the shadow experience also completed a survey. This pilot program is an achievable type of wellness initiative to improve intraprofessional relationships between clinical and nonclinical staff, and increase understanding between various roles involved in health care. 
Hoelscher and Ravert (2021)32  Online survey containing Caplan Social Support Instrument, Maslach’s Burnout Inventory, and open-ended question related to burnout Positive relationship with supervisor (strongest association), peer CCLS, and nonchild life medical staff each had significant positive associations with lower levels of emotional exhaustion. Possibly multiple burnout causes. Suggests a need for education on the child life profession and how to use CCLS in pediatric health care settings 
Wittenberg and Barnhart (2021)33  Cross-sectional survey study at a freestanding children’s hospital via e-mail to the hospital unit managers and lead physicians Most identified roles: patient support and patient education responsibilities. Themes found in the 2 previous studies cited were also found in their papers, except for patient advocacy. Behind-the-scenes tasks were less-recognized responsibilities of CCLS. Some did not view meeting regularly with health care members as a normal task for CCLS. Previous misconceptions about the CCLS role may be diminishing, but continued education will increase awareness and understanding. 
SourceStudy MethodMain Outcomes and Author’s Conclusion
Cole et al (2001)25  Questionnaires sent through hospital mailboxes at a primary children’s medical center with University of Utah Most perceived responsibilities of CLS include preparation and orientation. Areas of discrepancy among responders include:
• amuse and entertain;
• children’s growth and development;
• patient and family support as a responsibility;
• CLS, highest rating for psychosocial well-being; and
• CCLS rated with “little power” in the team dynamic.
Discrepancies demonstrate the need to educate others on CLS. 
Smith et al (2014)26  Qualtrics on an online forum Documented current practices and perceptions of CCLS regarding their role in the NICU, including:
• developmental care tasks prioritized the most;
• nonpharmacologic pain management support is another role;
• NICU, palliative care, and bereavement support to families; and
• infant discharge and follow-up care.
Team integration is an area of improvement. 
Drayton, Whaddups, and Walker (2018)27  Qualitative design: focus groups at a 24-bed pediatric unit in New South Wales, Australia 5 themes:
1. distraction as part of everyday nursing practice;
2. influence of CCLS in preparing procedure;
3. contrast of roles between nursing and CCLS;
4. value of collaboration for positive health care experiences; and
5. nurses’ perception of the child’s experience with distraction improved with the presence of CCLS.
Necessity for CCLS as members of the multidisciplinary team in providing advice and education on needs of the child. Stresses the importance of distraction practice throughout the child’s hospitalized journey. 
Lookabaugh and Ballard (2018)28  Online survey: demographics, work environments and settings, range of services provided, and perceived levels of competence Revealed little racial (white) and gender (female) diversity among child life specialists. Balance between knowledge and skills is necessary to be an effective child life professional. Consistent with previous research discussing the need to clearly define work roles as responsibilities of child life continue to expand. Common thematic concern that other members of the health care team do not recognize child life as an important part of patient and family care. 
Mistry et al (2019)29  5-item questionnaire sent virtually through e-mail Need for more consistent use of CCLS by pediatric urologists. A total of 33.7% reported using CCLS every time in the inpatient setting, 22.1% in ambulatory setting. A total of 63.8% at least half the time in the outpatient radiologic testing setting. A total of 95% of providers felt that CCLS offered positive contribution to their health-related quality of life. 
Stenman et al (2019)30  In-person meetings scheduled for interviews (20–70 min) by 8 team members trained in qualitative methods that were transcribed and reviewed. Research team consisted of 3 psychologists, 2 social workers, 3 CCLS, and 1 master’s psych professional. A total of 11 interviews in Delaware Valley and 19 in central Florida children’s hospitals. Education for multidisciplinary staff about trauma-informed care and play is necessary. Offering simple, child-familiar experiences to alleviate traumatic aspects of care may benefit the patient and family. Play is potentially a readily implementable approach. Communication among providers and patients/families is essential. Aspects of pediatric medical care that are potentially traumatic, including specific events, consequences of illness, and treatments. Various uses of play, including general purposes, alleviate trauma, or prevent trauma, with a positive view on the use of play where CCLS are the experts on play and stress coping. Barriers to play include infection control, lack of provider training, and situations where play would not be beneficial. 
Hailu et al (2020)31  Shadow program at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Pre- and postshadowing survey for participants. Hosts of the shadow experience also completed a survey. This pilot program is an achievable type of wellness initiative to improve intraprofessional relationships between clinical and nonclinical staff, and increase understanding between various roles involved in health care. 
Hoelscher and Ravert (2021)32  Online survey containing Caplan Social Support Instrument, Maslach’s Burnout Inventory, and open-ended question related to burnout Positive relationship with supervisor (strongest association), peer CCLS, and nonchild life medical staff each had significant positive associations with lower levels of emotional exhaustion. Possibly multiple burnout causes. Suggests a need for education on the child life profession and how to use CCLS in pediatric health care settings 
Wittenberg and Barnhart (2021)33  Cross-sectional survey study at a freestanding children’s hospital via e-mail to the hospital unit managers and lead physicians Most identified roles: patient support and patient education responsibilities. Themes found in the 2 previous studies cited were also found in their papers, except for patient advocacy. Behind-the-scenes tasks were less-recognized responsibilities of CCLS. Some did not view meeting regularly with health care members as a normal task for CCLS. Previous misconceptions about the CCLS role may be diminishing, but continued education will increase awareness and understanding. 

Four unique, but not mutually exclusive, themes were identified among the articles of interest (Fig 4, Supplemental Table 8). Six articles (66%) state that responsibilities of CCLS extend beyond those commonly recognized, and another 6 (66%) include the positive impact CCLS have on patients and families. Seven articles (78%) describe the challenges of interprofessional collaboration between CCLS and other team members. Nine articles (100%) discuss the value in educating others on the role of CLS.

FIGURE 4

Unique themes across literature included in the scoping review.

FIGURE 4

Unique themes across literature included in the scoping review.

Close modal

The aim of this scoping review was to summarize published literature on how CLS are understood and used in the hospital setting to date. The review was conducted to help provide a framework for future study by:

  1. identifying and assessing common themes; and

  2. providing an overview of information currently available on this topic to help guide future efforts in improving the understanding and utilization of CLS.

Child Life Responsibilities are Broad

Six studies conclude that CLS responsibilities are broad.2528,30,33  Cole et al25  first noted that there is a discrepancy in health care professionals’ knowledge of CLS responsibilities. For example, psychological preparation was a more well-known responsibility among the clinical team than patient and family support. Although a recent study by Wittenberg and Barnhart33  demonstrated this no longer to be the case, they noted a handful of other behind-the-scenes duties, such as medical record documentation, that were largely underrecognized. Although therapeutic play is commonly associated with CLS,6  a study by Stenman et al30  concluded that play is a broad term with a wide range of applications for patients and families in different settings. Nurses surveyed by Drayton et al27  believed that CLS had better distraction techniques for pediatric patients and eased the burden for nurses who were simultaneously also assisting physicians during procedures. Smith et al26  specifically researched the expanded roles of CCLS with families who had children in the NICU. They reported the top 3 responsibilities in this department to be sibling care, palliative care and bereavement support, and family education. Furthermore, the CCLS participants in a study by Lookabaugh and Ballard28  similarly state that their responsibilities have also expanded to settings beyond pediatric inpatient units to areas such as imaging, neonatal intensive care, dental clinics, early intervention, parent education, and more.

Positive Impact CCLS Have on Patients and Families

Six articles of interest had data that points to the positive impact of CLS in the clinical setting.2527,29,30,33  Cole et al25  noted that nurses, physicians, social workers, and administration members rated CLS the highest on average in improving psychosocial well-being compared with 15 other professions, most likely related to their well-accepted role in psychological preparation. In their study on the role of play in trauma-informed care, Stenman et al30  demonstrate that play is an important CLS tool that helps with patient experiences, teaches patients to gain control of their environment, and improves communication between patient and provider. This aligns with findings by Wittenberg and Barnhart,33  where CLS provides patients with emotional support and developmentally appropriate education. Nurses from a pediatric unit in New South Wales participating in a focus group agreed that CCLS improve procedural experience, are well received by the patients, and are essential members of the team by providing education on various aspect of child development.27  CCLS also play a role in providing nonpharmacological pain management, including environmental stimuli regulation and kangaroo care in the NICU.26 

The positive impact of incorporating CLS into new settings within the hospital may also have monetary value. Mistry et al29  surveyed pediatric urologists within the Society of Pediatric Urology who report that CCLS help to reduce traumatic experiences and the need for anesthesia, which may offset the costs associated with implementing CLS.34 

Challenges With Interprofessional Collaboration and Integration

Even though CCLS play a crucial role in the health care team, there are barriers when it comes to team integration. Cole et al25  first reported that CLS were rated among other professions in the health care setting as having little power even though they were previously rated as having the greatest impact on psychosocial well-being. When surveying CCLS in the NICU, <50% of participants felt fully integrated and visible in the team, especially in the presence of physicians.26  These findings were similarly echoed by other CCLS who responded to the survey by Lookabaugh and Ballard.28  They believed that many members did not see CLS as an integral part of the team. Interestingly, although Wittenberg and Barnhart33  reported that CCLS and other health care professionals were mostly aligned in their perception of the CCLS role in patient education, play, and normalization of the hospital experience, they found that regular communication between CCLS and the medical team was not perceived to be important by some health care providers. Lastly, Hoelscher and Ravert32  report that a perceived “lack of respect or understanding of their role” from other medical professionals and hospital staff was the second of 6 most-common perceived causes of CCLS burnout.

Value in Educating Others on the Roles of Child Life

All 9 publications of interest mention the value in educating others about child life responsibilities. Although CCLS have clearly defined work roles, their responsibilities continue to expand.28  As a result, despite increased awareness of their responsibilities over the years, misconceptions still exist within the care team.33  Through education that better articulates child life competencies, others may better understand the depth and diversity of the CLS role.2527,32  This can provide better insight into the utility of CCLS,29  increase team support,32  decrease burnout,32  and improve staff perceptions and attitudes toward CCLS.27  With increased interprofessional collaboration, CLS can more effectively care for patients and families.25,30,31 

Most databases did not have a controlled vocabulary term or subheading for CLS. Embase is the only 1 of the 5 databases to have “child life specialist” as an index term. Thus, a combination of other terms and key words were used to fully encapsulate the CLS concept in the majority of databases. This included “child welfare,” “child guidance,” and “pediatric advocate.” Given an increase in publications on CLS, it will be important to designate a heading or term specifically for CLS for these types of reviews. It was found that interprofessional concepts and clinic-setting concepts had adequate terms and subheadings.

The most popular method of gauging perceptions and understanding within the medical team was with a questionnaire or survey distributed through mail or e-mail.25,26,28,29,3133  Among the groups that were studied, CCLS, nurses, and physicians/providers were the most frequent groups studied. Social work was the next most frequent and was studied in a third of the papers included. Feedback and information from other, unspecified groups only occurred in 2 studies.

A common limitation was that the study was being conducted in a single hospital25,27,33  or had a small sample size.28,29,31,33  A few of the studies attempted to address sampling bias in reaching a larger audience by utilizing professional listserves of their respective national societies.28,29,32  One study included data from 2 hospitals in 2 different locations in the United States.30  However, the studies that do reach a broader audience also experience low response rates, as is common to survey design.28,29,32,33  Although these studies all individually have their own limitations, taken together, they highlight some consistent themes and considerations for future work.

This scoping review has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting these results. First, although the search was extensive, it is not certain that all literature on this subject was identified, in part because of the lack of controlled vocabulary to represent the concept of CLS. To address this, 5 comprehensive databases were searched, and manual searching was conducted through publication references with the guidance of a medical librarian. Our results are also limited to publications written in the English language. Lastly, this is not a systematic review, so critical appraisal of the results of these papers was not included in the methodology. Inherent to a scoping review, the goal was to survey and summarize available literature. Despite these limitations, a better understanding of CLS, how they are perceived by others, their integration into the interdisciplinary medical team, and directions for future research on overcoming the barriers to optimal utilization of CLS was gained.

This scoping review found 9 articles addressing how CCLS are perceived by members of the medical team in the hospital setting. Although there is a paucity of data available on this topic, thematic analysis revealed that CCLS responsibilities are broad, they have a significant positive impact on patients and their families, and underscored the value in educating others on the roles of CCLS. However, most interestingly, there are challenges to interprofessional collaboration and complete integration of CCLS into the health care team. We hypothesize that this is largely because of a gap in our understanding of the child life profession as a whole. One way we can begin to address this is by incorporating more opportunities that increase exposure and education during the formative years of training across all clinical programs. This may also provide a path to increasing CLS utilization and reducing total hospital and patient costs of treatment. However, further studies are needed to carefully examine the overall cost reduction associated with CLS implementation in various departments.

CLS is a growing profession in the medical field, with expanding responsibilities and scope of practice that add significant value to our hospitals, patients, and families. In an effort to further drive patient and family-centered care, additional research is required to fully understand and overcome the challenges to optimizing their utilization and full incorporation into the interdisciplinary medical team.

Mr Wong conceptualized the study, designed the study, extracted data, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Ms Lee extracted data and assisted in drafting the initial manuscript; Ms Saragossi designed the study and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Dr Post conceptualized the study, reviewed the manuscript, and was an important thought contributor; Dr Glaubach mentored Mr Wong through the project writing along with the analysis, interpretation, and representation of important intellectual content, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

FUNDING: No external funding.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLAIMER: The authors have indicated they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

1.
The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
.
Frederick C. Robbins
. .
2.
Wolf
J
.
What patient experience can learn from child life professionals
.
The Beryl Institute of Patient Experience
.
2018
3.
Plank
EN
.
Working with Children in Hospitals: A Guide for the Professional Team
, 2nd ed.
Cleveland, OH
:
Press of Case Western Reserve University
;
1971
4.
International Child Life Groups
.
5.
Association of Child Life Professionals
.
Becoming certified/eligibility
.
6.
Romito
B
,
Jewell
J
,
Jackson
M
.
AAP Committee on Hospital Care
;
Association of Child Life Professionals
.
Child Life Services
.
Pediatrics
.
2021
;
147
(
1
):
e2020040261
7.
Committee on Hospital Care and Child Life Council
.
Child Life Services
.
Pediatrics
.
2014
;
133
(
5
):
e1471
e1478
8.
Kinnebrew
SL
,
Dove
CG
,
Midwin
CM
,
Olson
TM
,
Guimaraes
CVA
.
The role of child life in pediatric radiology
.
Pediatr Radiol
.
2020
;
50
(
11
):
1509
1513
9.
Jaimes
C
,
Gee
MS
.
Strategies to minimize sedation in pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging
.
Pediatr Radiol
.
2016
;
46
(
6
):
916
927
10.
Tyson
ME
,
Bohl
DD
,
Blickman
JG
.
A randomized controlled trial: child life services in pediatric imaging
.
Pediatr Radiol
.
2014
;
44
(
11
):
1426
1432
11.
McDowell
MM
,
Ortega Peraza
D
,
Abel
TJ
.
Development and implementation of a novel child life protocol to enhance psychosocial support for pediatric awake craniotomies: technical note
.
Neurosurg Focus
.
2020
;
48
(
2
):
E5
12.
Sisk
C
,
Walker
E
,
Gardner
C
,
Mandrell
B
,
Grissom
S
.
Building a legacy for children and adolescents with chronic disease
.
J Pediatr Nurs
.
2012
;
27
(
6
):
e71
e76
13.
Sutter
C
,
Reid
T
.
How do we talk to the children? Child life consultation to support the children of seriously ill adult inpatients
.
J Palliat Med
.
2012
;
15
(
12
):
1362
1368
14.
Thompson
RH
,
Stanford
G
.
Coping with resistance to child life programming
.
J Assoc Care Child Hosp
.
1979
;
7
(
4
):
12
18
15.
Babiker
A
,
El Husseini
M
,
Al Nemri
A
, et al
.
Health care professional development: Working as a team to improve patient care
.
Sudan J Paediatr
.
2014
;
14
(
2
):
9
16
16.
Rosen
MA
,
DiazGranados
D
,
Dietz
AS
, et al
.
Teamwork in healthcare: key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care
.
Am Psychol
.
2018
;
73
(
4
):
433
450
17.
Gaynard
LL
.
Child life specialists as perceived by health care professionals (medical, sociology, occupation)
.
Dissertations available from ProQuest
.
1985
:
1
320
18.
Pillai
RLI
.
We all need a little TLC: an argument for an increased role of Child Life Services in patient care and medical education
.
Hosp Pediatr
.
2020
;
10
(
10
):
913
917
19.
Aromataris
E
,
Munn
Z
, eds.
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis
.
JBI
;
2020
20.
Tricco
AC
,
Lillie
E
,
Zarin
W
, et al
.
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation
.
Ann Intern Med
.
2018
;
169
(
7
):
467
473
21.
Munn
Z
,
Peters
MDJ
,
Stern
C
,
Tufanaru
C
,
McArthur
A
,
Aromataris
E
.
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
.
BMC Med Res Methodol
.
2018
;
18
(
1
):
143
22.
McGowan
J
,
Sampson
M
,
Salzwedel
DM
,
Cogo
E
,
Foerster
V
,
Lefebvre
C
.
PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement
.
J Clin Epidemiol
.
2016
;
75
:
40
46
23.
Coar
JT
,
Sewell
JP
.
Zotero: harnessing the power of a personal bibliographic manager
.
Nurse Educ
.
2010
;
35
(
5
):
205
207
24.
Ouzzani
M
,
Hammady
H
,
Fedorowicz
Z
,
Elmagarmid
A
.
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews
.
Syst Rev
.
2016
;
5
(
1
):
210
25.
Cole
W
,
Diener
M
,
Wright
C
,
Gaynard
L
.
Health care professionals’ perceptions of child life specialists
.
Child Health Care
.
2001
;
30
(
1
):
1
15
26.
Smith
JG
,
Desai
PP
,
Sira
N
,
Engelke
SC
.
Family-centered developmentally supportive care in the neonatal intensive care unit: exploring the role and training of child life specialists
.
Child Health Care
.
2014
;
43
(
4
):
345
368
27.
Drayton
NA
,
Waddups
S
,
Walker
T
.
Exploring distraction and the impact of a child life specialist: perceptions from nurses in a pediatric setting
.
J Spec Pediatr Nurs
.
2019
;
24
(
2
):
e12242
28.
Lookabaugh
S
,
Ballard
SM
.
The scope and future direction of Child Life
.
J Child Fam Stud
.
2018
;
27
(
6
):
1721
1731
29.
Mistry
PK
,
Morganstern
BA
,
Ahmed
H
,
Palmer
LS
.
Attitudes towards child life specialists and their utilization within pediatric urology
.
Can J Urol
.
2019
;
26
(
6
):
10022
10025
30.
Stenman
K
,
Christofferson
J
,
Alderfer
MA
, et al
.
Integrating play in trauma-informed care: Multidisciplinary pediatric healthcare provider perspectives
.
Psychol Serv
.
2019
;
16
(
1
):
7
15
31.
Hailu
TA
,
Ginader
AS
,
Nigro
AM
,
Lee
DD
,
Sze
RW
.
‘Walk in my shoes’: intradepartmental role shadowing to increase workplace collegiality and wellness in a large pediatric radiology department
.
Pediatr Radiol
.
2020
;
50
(
4
):
476
481
32.
Hoelscher
L
,
Ravert
R
.
Workplace relationships and professional burnout among certified child life specialists
.
The Journal of Child Life
.
2021
;
2
(
1
):
15
25
33.
Wittenberg
BM
,
Barnhart
D
.
How are Certified Child Life Specialists perceived by healthcare professionals? A call for interprofessional collaboration
.
J Interprof Care
.
2021
;
0
(
0
):
1
9
34.
Scott
MT
,
Todd
KE
,
Oakley
H
, et al
.
Reducing Anesthesia and health care cost through utilization of Child Life specialists in pediatric radiation oncology
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
.
2016
;
96
(
2
):
401
405

Supplementary data