BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Children with medical complexity (CMC) have significant chronic health conditions that involve congenital or acquired multisystem disease associated with medical fragility, functional limitations, dependence on technology, and high health care utilization. The objective of this study was to describe the indications, applications, and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) findings in this population.

METHODS

A descriptive study of POCUS scans performed for clinical purposes in CMC admitted to a single pediatric postacute care hospital. All children for whom a POCUS was requested by a medical team provider were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

One hundred and four POCUS evaluations were performed for 33 patients. Diagnostic groups for the 33 patients included multiple congenital anomalies (41%), neurologic or neuromuscular (31%), prematurity (25%) and cardiac (3%). Lung, cardiac, and diaphragmatic ultrasound accounted for 57% of POCUS requested. POCUS was abnormal in 82% of diaphragmatic, 73% of lung, and 11% of cardiac ultrasounds. Twenty-three percent of POCUS studies were requested to answer a specific clinical question, 56% for follow-up information, and 21% for baseline evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung, diaphragmatic, and cardiac ultrasound were the most prevalent POCUS studies requested in a postacute care hospital. POCUS may offer an expanded role in such patients and settings by answering clinical questions and by providing baseline and follow-up information.

Children with medical complexity (CMC) have significant chronic health conditions that may involve congenital or acquired multisystem disease associated with medical fragility, functional limitations, dependence on technology, and high health care utilization, including frequent and/or prolonged hospitalizations.13  CMC have been reported to account for more than 50% of PICU admissions,4,5  and those that require respiratory support, including tracheostomy and ventilator dependency, are among the highest users of hospital resources.68 

Pediatric postacute care hospitals (PACHs) admit children from acute care hospitals and provide long-term (>25 days average length of stay) inpatient care for CMC. Children are transferred to a PACH as they continue to require daily ongoing hospital level of care to reduce respiratory support, wean medications, and to recover from illness, injury, or surgery.9 

Although the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is prevalent in pediatrics, there are few reports describing its applicability in CMC.10,11  The objective of this study was to describe the use of POCUS in CMC at 1 PACH. In addition, we describe the indications, applications, and POCUS findings at our single center PACH in this population.

This was a descriptive study evaluating the use of POCUS performed for clinical purposes in CMC admitted to a 50-bed pediatric PACH located in the northeastern United States. The PACH has plain radiography and x-ray availability 4-hours per day. Advanced imaging modalities, including radiology performed ultrasound, CT, and MRI, are not available and require transport to another local hospital when clinically indicated. All children for whom a POCUS was requested by a medical team provider (pediatric pulmonologist, pediatrician, and/or pediatric nurse practitioner) were eligible for inclusion. The study was performed over a 9-month period from May 2021 to January 2022. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic medical record and included sex, age at time of POCUS, and admitting diagnosis. Because of the complexity of the clinical profiles, PACH primary admitting diagnosis retrieved from the patient’s history and physical in the electronic health record was used to assign a previously reported diagnostic category (prematurity, multiple congenital anomalies, neurologic or neuromuscular disease, other) for CMC in a pediatric postacute care hospital.1214  Technology dependence included ongoing dependence to sustain vital functions or multiple organ system involvement.

The number and specific type of POCUS application(s) performed (eg, cardiac, diaphragm, soft tissue), reason for POCUS referral (baseline, new clinical question, follow-up), and POCUS findings (within normal limits [WNL], abnormal) were recorded. Technically limited studies were deemed inadequate for analysis. Baseline referrals were sought for points of future comparison with POCUS in those patients assessed to be at risk for future changes (eg, lung and cardiac evaluation for those requiring long-term mechanical ventilation [MV]). Examples of clinical questions leading to POCUS referral included suspicion of pneumonia, soft tissue infection, diaphragmatic dysfunction, or cholecystitis. Follow-up studies were performed for previously identified abnormalities during the study period (eg, newly diagnosed pleural or pericardial effusion, atelectasis, or diaphragmatic dysfunction) or for abnormalities identified before transfer to the PACH (eg, hydronephrosis, hydrocephalus). All data were entered into a REDCap database.

An emergency medicine ultrasound fellowship-trained faculty member with 4-years of POCUS experience in a large academic center performed all ultrasound exams with an M8 ultrasound system (Mindray North America, Mahwah, NJ). The POCUS physician participated in daily ward rounds 1 to 2 times per week with the inpatient team. When a specific POCUS question was posed, the POCUS physician provided relevant background regarding the specific utility of the POCUS application requested, performed the scan if appropriate and within the scope of his training, provided immediate feedback to the inpatient team regarding the results, and documented a note in the patient chart regarding the POCUS findings. All video clips and still images were stored digitally for review. POCUS studies were deidentified and reviewed independently by 4 emergency medicine ultrasound faculty at the primary investigator’s academic site. Disagreements in POCUS interpretation were resolved by consensus opinion.

All data were analyzed descriptively. Age at the time of POCUS is presented as the mean ± SD for the total sample. Clinical variables (eg, sex, diagnostic categories, hospitalization history, type of technology dependence) and POCUS-related data variables (eg, POCUS type, reason for referral, findings) are presented as number and percentage. The number of technically limited POCUS studies was calculated as a percent of the total.

One hundred and four POCUS evaluations were performed for 33 patients. Twenty-three percent (24 of 104) of POCUS studies were requested to answer a specific clinical question, 56% (58 of 104) for follow-up information, and 21% (22 of 104) for baseline evaluation. For follow-up information specifically, 5% (5 of 104) of POCUS evaluations were performed for abnormalities identified before transfer to the PACH and 95% (99 of 104) for abnormalities identified at the PACH. The mean age at POCUS was 5.23 years (SD = 6.56, range 0.18–20.41) and 55% were male. Diagnostic groups for the 33 children included multiple congenital anomalies (41%), neurologic or neuromuscular (31%), prematurity (25%) and cardiac (3%). All children met the criteria for medical complexity. Characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Study Sample

Sample Characteristicsn (%)
Infants, children, and youth who received ≥1 POCUS 33 (100) 
Male gender 18 (55) 
Diagnostic groups  
 Prematurity 7 (21) 
 Multiple congenital anomalies 15 (46) 
 Neurologic or neuromuscular 10 (30) 
 Cardiac 1 (3) 
History of hospitalization before or during PACH admission(s)  
 NICU stay, >28 d post-term 8 (24) 
 PICU stay, >14 consecutive days 3 (9) 
 Prolonged NICU or PICU stay and ≥2 acute or ICU admissions ≤12 mo 22 (67) 
Technology dependence (child may use more than one type)  
 Enteral feeding 33 (100) 
 Mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy 28 (84) 
 Noninvasive respiratory support 2 (6) 
 Ventriculoperitoneal shunt 5 (16) 
 Ostomy 2 (6) 
 Central venous line 1 (3) 
Reason for POCUS referral (n = 104)  
 Specific clinical question 24 (23) 
 Baseline evaluation 22 (21) 
 Follow-up evaluation 58 (56) 
Sample Characteristicsn (%)
Infants, children, and youth who received ≥1 POCUS 33 (100) 
Male gender 18 (55) 
Diagnostic groups  
 Prematurity 7 (21) 
 Multiple congenital anomalies 15 (46) 
 Neurologic or neuromuscular 10 (30) 
 Cardiac 1 (3) 
History of hospitalization before or during PACH admission(s)  
 NICU stay, >28 d post-term 8 (24) 
 PICU stay, >14 consecutive days 3 (9) 
 Prolonged NICU or PICU stay and ≥2 acute or ICU admissions ≤12 mo 22 (67) 
Technology dependence (child may use more than one type)  
 Enteral feeding 33 (100) 
 Mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy 28 (84) 
 Noninvasive respiratory support 2 (6) 
 Ventriculoperitoneal shunt 5 (16) 
 Ostomy 2 (6) 
 Central venous line 1 (3) 
Reason for POCUS referral (n = 104)  
 Specific clinical question 24 (23) 
 Baseline evaluation 22 (21) 
 Follow-up evaluation 58 (56) 

The frequency of normal and abnormal findings by type of POCUS application are seen in Fig 1. Lung (n = 30, 29%), cardiac (n = 18, 17%), and diaphragmatic (n = 11, 11%) ultrasound accounted for 57% of the POCUS applications requested. Seventy-three percent (22 of 30) of lung ultrasounds were abnormal and revealed bilateral B-lines (n = 19), unilateral B-lines (n = 1), bilateral pleural effusion (n = 1), and/or atelectasis (n = 1). Eleven percent (2 of 18) of cardiac ultrasounds were abnormal, revealing pulmonary hypertension (n = 1) and pericardial effusion (n = 1). Eighty-two percent (9 of 11) of diaphragmatic ultrasounds were abnormal and findings included unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis (n = 1), unilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction (n = 4), and bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction (n = 4). Forty three percent (3 of 7) of cranial ultrasounds were abnormal, indicating Grade II intraventricular hemorrhages (n = 1) and hydrocephalus (n = 2). All soft tissue, biliary, and liver-spleen measurements were normal. Examples of POCUS findings in our study are seen in Fig 2. Three of 104 (<3%) POCUS evaluations were technically limited studies.

FIGURE 1

Frequency of normal and abnormal findings by type of POCUS application.

FIGURE 1

Frequency of normal and abnormal findings by type of POCUS application.

Close modal
FIGURE 2

Examples of POCUS findings. (A) Pericardial effusion (arrow); (B) B-lines (Multiple vertical hyperechoic (bright) white lines originating from the pleural line (arrow); (C) Pleural effusion (arrow). Hypoechoic (black area) above the liver in the thorax. (D) Normal diaphragmatic excursion. Arrow pointing to diaphragm (bright white line in B-mode). Normal diaphragmatic excursion below seen in M-mode. (E) Diaphragmatic paralysis. Arrow pointing to diaphragm (bright white line in B-mode). In M-mode, flat line indicating diaphragmatic paralysis.

FIGURE 2

Examples of POCUS findings. (A) Pericardial effusion (arrow); (B) B-lines (Multiple vertical hyperechoic (bright) white lines originating from the pleural line (arrow); (C) Pleural effusion (arrow). Hypoechoic (black area) above the liver in the thorax. (D) Normal diaphragmatic excursion. Arrow pointing to diaphragm (bright white line in B-mode). Normal diaphragmatic excursion below seen in M-mode. (E) Diaphragmatic paralysis. Arrow pointing to diaphragm (bright white line in B-mode). In M-mode, flat line indicating diaphragmatic paralysis.

Close modal

Representative examples of POCUS applications, indications, findings, and integration into clinical follow-up care are seen in Table 2. In the examples listed, POCUS impacted clinical follow-up decisions including medication changes, imaging requirements, and hospital transfers.

TABLE 2

Examples of Clinical Follow-Up by POCUS Application and Findings

POCUS ApplicationIndication for POCUSPOCUS Finding(s)Clinical Follow-up
Lung Increased respiratory distress Bilateral pleural effusions Diuretic ordered 
Lung Pulmonary edema on chest x-ray No pulmonary edema Diuretic cancelled 
Lung Atelectasis on chest x-ray Atelectasis Repeat chest x-ray cancelled 
Lung Persistent pneumothorax on chest x-ray Pneumothorax resolved Further imaging cancelled 
Diaphragm Shortness of breath during MV weaning Right sided diaphragm paralysis Transfer or fluoroscopy ordereda 
Diaphragm Failure to wean >3 h Decreased diaphragm excursion (45%) Further weaning delayed 
Abdominal Fever, question of abdominal abscess No abscess Further imaging cancelled 
Gallbladder Increased liver function tests, discomfort Normal Further imaging cancelled 
Vascular Follow-up for prior femoral DVT Femoral DVT Transfer or further imaging orderedb 
Vascular Prior DVT, hip pain and leg swelling No DVT Further imaging cancelled 
Soft tissue Cellulitis or abscess? No cellulitis or abscess Medication cancelled 
Cardiac Re-evaluate pulmonary hypertension No Change Diuretic continued 
POCUS ApplicationIndication for POCUSPOCUS Finding(s)Clinical Follow-up
Lung Increased respiratory distress Bilateral pleural effusions Diuretic ordered 
Lung Pulmonary edema on chest x-ray No pulmonary edema Diuretic cancelled 
Lung Atelectasis on chest x-ray Atelectasis Repeat chest x-ray cancelled 
Lung Persistent pneumothorax on chest x-ray Pneumothorax resolved Further imaging cancelled 
Diaphragm Shortness of breath during MV weaning Right sided diaphragm paralysis Transfer or fluoroscopy ordereda 
Diaphragm Failure to wean >3 h Decreased diaphragm excursion (45%) Further weaning delayed 
Abdominal Fever, question of abdominal abscess No abscess Further imaging cancelled 
Gallbladder Increased liver function tests, discomfort Normal Further imaging cancelled 
Vascular Follow-up for prior femoral DVT Femoral DVT Transfer or further imaging orderedb 
Vascular Prior DVT, hip pain and leg swelling No DVT Further imaging cancelled 
Soft tissue Cellulitis or abscess? No cellulitis or abscess Medication cancelled 
Cardiac Re-evaluate pulmonary hypertension No Change Diuretic continued 
a

Diaphragm paralysis confirmed by fluoroscopy.

b

DVT confirmed.

The applications of POCUS in pediatric emergency medicine, pediatric critical care, and neonatology are extensive.1517  There are several reports on its use in diagnosis and management of pediatric patients with pneumonia,1820  bronchiolitis,21,22  pneumothorax,23  pleural effusion,24  diaphragmatic dysfunction,10,11  pericarditis and pulmonary hypertension,16  hydrocephalus,25  intussusception,26  appendicitis,27  bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD),28  and soft tissue infection.29  The objective of this study was to describe the use of POCUS in CMC at 1 PACH. In addition, we describe the indications, applications, and POCUS findings at our single center PACH. This is the first description of the general applicability of POCUS for CMC.

Lung ultrasound was the most frequent POCUS application requested to evaluate for clinical questions, such as presence of pneumonia, pulmonary edema, or pneumothorax. When clinically indicated, lung ultrasound is a feasible and safe substitute for chest radiography when evaluating children for pneumonia1820  and has high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of pneumothorax and pleural effusions in children.23,24  In the dyspneic patient, there is a substantial body of literature supporting the use of lung ultrasound for the presence of B-lines. B-lines (Fig 2B) are reverberation artifacts originating from the pleural line and can represent interstitial edema in clinical situations concerning for pulmonary edema, pneumonia, or viral disease in pediatrics including bronchiolitis and coronavirus disease 2019.20,21,30 

It was an unexpected finding that 61% of lung ultrasounds were found to have predominantly bilateral B-lines. B-lines have also been described in BPD as a consequence of interlobar septal scarring secondary to MV or oxygen supplementation.28,31  As no studies of lung ultrasound have been performed in this specific group of children, it is unclear at this time whether the findings of B-lines represent a forme fruste of chronic lung disease similar to BPD or other clinical entity.

Diaphragmatic ultrasound was requested for MV weaning difficulty in all cases and 82% identified unilateral or bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction or paralysis. Previous work by our group evaluated 24 children requiring long-term MV and identified 54% with ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction with POCUS, a finding that may have important implications for weaning readiness and prognosis.10 

Renal, vascular (DVT), and cranial POCUS exams were performed in 16% of cases. For clinical concerns of obstructive uropathy, point-of-care renal ultrasound has a high specificity for detecting hydronephrosis because of obstructive ureteral stones.32  In patients with risk factors for DVT, POCUS has high sensitivity and specificity compared with radiology performed ultrasound.33,34  For clinical concerns of hydrocephalus in infants (poor feeding, vomiting, fussiness, full fontanelle), point-of-care cranial ultrasound use in the acute setting has been described for the detection of hydrocephalus.25  At this time, the literature is limited to descriptions of performing this POCUS application, case reports, and pilot studies.25,3538 

In our patient cohort, abnormal renal, DVT, and cranial ultrasounds were performed for follow-up of conditions diagnosed before transfer to the PACH and included hydronephrosis, DVT, hydrocephalus, and intraventricular hemorrhage. In these situations specifically, POCUS findings were compared with the referral hospitals ultrasound scans or reports. For the 3 abnormal cranial ultrasounds and 1 renal ultrasound, no change was noted on follow-up POCUS and no further interventions performed. For one of the previously known positive DVT ultrasounds, POCUS demonstrated persistence of a femoral DVT, and the patient was transferred back to the referring hospital for a repeat formal ultrasound study and further management of this finding.

Importantly, although POCUS was requested for specific clinical questions, it was predominantly requested to obtain baseline and follow-up information for previously performed POCUS studies at this PACH or at a referring facility. This finding is in marked contrast to current practice of POCUS in most settings (including emergency medicine and critical care) where POCUS use has been limited to addressing either acute clinical questions or changes in clinical status.39  POCUS may offer a broader scope of practice in the postacute care or ICU setting where children with complex chronic conditions, technology dependence, and recurrent or prolonged hospitalizations are cared for. In this study, lung and cardiac ultrasound were commonly requested to obtain baseline or follow-up information in children with long-term MV, or to follow clinically relevant pleural effusions, atelectasis, or persistent pneumothorax.

POCUS can provide information acquired immediately at the bedside that is noninvasive, rapidly performed, cost-effective, and does not require patient transport or ionizing radiation.40  However, several limitations and pitfalls in the use of POCUS specific applications have been identified and delineated extensively in the literature that can lead to misdiagnosis in the interpretation of POCUS findings with potentially negative consequences.15,41,42  Most importantly, appropriate use of POCUS requires knowledge and training by the practitioner. Training and proficiency in POCUS have been addressed in policy statements from national and international organizations, including the American College of Emergency Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine, the World Interactive Network Focused on Critical Ultrasound, as well as expert guidelines.39,43,44  Criteria for competency in the use of POCUS include: (1) recognizing the clinical indications and contraindications, (2) developing the technical skills for image acquisition, (3) having the ability to interpret images by distinguishing between normal anatomy, common variants, and a range of pathologic conditions, and (4) ability to integrate findings into clinical management.45  Competency assessment benchmarks for trainees includes completion of 25 to 50 quality-reviewed POCUS exams for each application (eg, cardiac, lung, gallbladder) with 20% to 30% of examinations demonstrating pathology.44 

With the rapid adoption and widespread use of POCUS across several subspecialities, recent concerns of overuse of this technology has given rise to the concept of point-of-care ultrasound stewardship. The goal of POCUS stewardship is to ensure safe and effective integration of POCUS in routine clinical practice by considering appropriate clinical indications and integration of POCUS results to prevent overuse or misuse, with consideration of the pretest probability of disease.46,47  Although this study is the first description of the use of POCUS in technology dependent CMC, POCUS stewardship is particularly applicable to this group of vulnerable children. In our study, we describe varied clinical indications for POCUS (eg, predominantly for baseline and follow-up information), as well as the use of less commonly performed POCUS applications (eg, cranial and diaphragmatic). Safe and impactful use of POCUS in CMC requires knowledge of potentially more diverse indications (as compared with the outpatient setting) as well as experience and skill in less commonly performed POCUS applications.

There were important limitations to our study. First, this was a single site study in a postacute care hospital, and the results may not be generalizable to other institutions or providers. Second, only 1 physician trained in POCUS performed all the ultrasound exams and although all scans were reviewed by 4 trained physicians, interrater reliability was not assessed. Third, our study does not address questions regarding the impact of POCUS on patient management decisions or further diagnostic testing.

POCUS use in a pediatric postacute care hospital can potentially be integrated into patient care decisions and may be useful in settings without access to radiology performed ultrasound. Lung, diaphragmatic, and cardiac ultrasound were the most prevalent POCUS studies requested in our postacute care hospital. POCUS may offer an expanded role for CMC in a PACH by answering clinical questions and, also, by providing baseline and follow-up information. POCUS training and proficiency, knowledge of indications and contraindications, and ability to integrate findings into clinical management are essential components of POCUS stewardship. Multicenter prospective studies should be performed to evaluate the impact of POCUS on patient management decisions and diagnostic testing in the postacute care setting for children with medical complexity.

Drs S. Kharasch and V. Kharasch conceptualized and designed the study, recruited participants, led data collection, analysis, and interpretation, and drafted the initial manuscript; Ms Dumas contributed to the design of the study and development of the data collection tool, and conducted analysis and interpretation of data; Drs Huang, Liteplo, and Shokoohi supervised the conceptualization and design of the study, supervised data collection, analysis, and interpretation; and all authors critically reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

FUNDING: All phases of this study were supported by The Thoracic Foundation, Boston, MA, and the Association for Medical Imaging Management (AHRA) and Canon Medical Systems USA, Inc. Putting Patients First Program, Marlborough, MA.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

1.
Cohen
E
,
Berry
JG
,
Sanders
L
,
Schor
EL
,
Wise
PH
.
Status complexicus? The emergence of pediatric complex care
.
Pediatrics
.
2018
;
141
(
Suppl 3
):
S202
S211
2.
Simon
TD
,
Berry
J
,
Feudtner
C
, et al
.
Children with complex chronic conditions in inpatient hospital settings in the United States
.
Pediatrics
.
2010
;
126
(
4
):
647
655
3.
Cohen
E
,
Kuo
DZ
,
Agrawal
R
, et al
.
Children with medical complexity: an emerging population for clinical and research initiatives
.
Pediatrics
.
2011
;
127
(
3
):
529
538
4.
Chan
T
,
Rodean
J
,
Richardson
T
, et al
.
Pediatric critical care resource use by children with medical complexity
.
J Pediatr
.
2016
;
177
:
197
203.e1
5.
Edwards
JD
,
Houtrow
AJ
,
Vasilevskis
EE
, et al
.
Chronic conditions among children admitted to U.S. pediatric intensive care units: their prevalence and impact on risk for mortality and prolonged length of stay
.
Crit Care Med
.
2012
;
40
(
7
):
2196
2203
6.
Chiang
J
,
Amin
R
.
Respiratory care considerations for children with medical complexity
.
Children (Basel)
.
2017
;
4
(
5
):
41
7.
Dumas
HM
,
Hughes
ML
,
O’Brien
JE
.
Children dependent on respiratory support: A 10-year review from one pediatric postacute care hospital
.
Pediatr Pulmonol
.
2020
;
55
(
8
):
2050
2054
8.
Murphy
NA
,
Alvey
J
,
Valentine
KJ
,
Mann
K
,
Wilkes
J
,
Clark
EB
.
Children with medical complexity: the 10-year experience of a single center
.
Hosp Pediatr
.
2020
;
10
(
8
):
702
708
9.
O’Brien
JE
,
Berry
J
,
Dumas
H
.
Pediatric post-acute hospital care: striving for identity and value
.
Hosp Pediatr
.
2015
;
5
(
10
):
548
551
10.
Kharasch
SJ
,
Dumas
H
,
O’Brien
J
, et al
.
Detecting ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction using point-of-care ultrasound in children with long-term mechanical ventilation
.
J Ultrasound Med
.
2021
;
40
(
4
):
845
852
11.
Kharasch
SJ
,
Selame
L
,
Dumas
H
, et al
.
Point-of-care respiratory muscle ultrasound in a child with medical complexity
.
Pediatr Pulmonol
.
2022
;
57
(
1
):
333
336
12.
Cohen
E
,
Kuo
DZ
,
Agrawal
R
, et al
.
Children with medical complexity: an emerging population for clinical and research initiatives
.
Pediatrics
.
2011
;
127
(
3
):
529
538
13.
Berry
JG
,
Hall
M
,
Dumas
H
, et al
.
Pediatric hospital discharges to home health and postacute facility care: a national study
.
JAMA Pediatr
.
2016
;
170
(
4
):
326
333
14.
O’Brien
JE
,
Haley
SM
,
Dumas
HM
, et al
.
Outcomes of post-acute hospital episodes for young children requiring airway support
.
Dev Neurorehabil
.
2007
;
10
(
3
):
241
247
15.
Marin
JR
,
Abo
AM
,
Arroyo
AC
, et al
.
Pediatric emergency medicine point-of-care ultrasound: summary of the evidence
.
Crit Ultrasound J
.
2016
;
8
(
1
):
16
16.
Singh
Y
,
Tissot
C
,
Fraga
MV
, et al
.
International evidence-based guidelines on Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC)
.
Crit Care
.
2020
;
24
(
1
):
65
17.
Frankel
HL
,
Kirkpatrick
AW
,
Elbarbary
M
, et al
.
Guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients-part 1: general ultrasonography
.
Crit Care Med
.
2015
;
43
(
11
):
2479
2502
18.
Shah
VP
,
Tunik
MG
,
Tsung
JW
.
Prospective evaluation of point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children and young adults
.
JAMA Pediatr
.
2013
;
167
(
2
):
119
125
19.
Pereda
MA
,
Chavez
MA
,
Hooper-Miele
CC
, et al
.
Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children: a meta-analysis
.
Pediatrics
.
2015
;
135
(
4
):
714
722
20.
Kharasch
S
,
Duggan
NM
,
Cohen
AR
,
Shokoohi
H
.
Lung ultrasound in children with respiratory infections: viral, bacterial or COVID-19? A narrative review
.
Open Access Emerg Med
.
2020
;
12
:
275
285
21.
Di Mauro
A
,
Ammirabile
A
,
Quercia
M
, et al
.
Acute bronchiolitis: is there a role for lung ultrasound?
Diagnostics (Basel)
.
2019
;
9
(
4
):
172
22.
Supino
MC
,
Buonsenso
D
,
Scateni
S
, et al
.
Point-of-care lung ultrasound in infants with bronchiolitis in the pediatric emergency department: a prospective study
.
Eur J Pediatr
.
2019
;
178
(
5
):
623
632
23.
Vasquez
DG
,
Berg
GM
,
Srour
SG
,
Ali
K
.
Lung ultrasound for detecting pneumothorax in injured children: preliminary experience at a community-based level II pediatric trauma center
.
Pediatr Radiol
.
2020
;
50
(
3
):
329
337
24.
Musolino
AM
,
Tomà
P
,
Supino
MC
, et al
.
Lung ultrasound features of children with complicated and noncomplicated community acquired pneumonia: a prospective study
.
Pediatr Pulmonol
.
2019
;
54
(
9
):
1479
1486
25.
Subramaniam
S
,
Chen
AE
,
Khwaja
A
,
Rempell
R
.
Identifying infant hydrocephalus in the emergency department with transfontanellar POCUS
.
Am J Emerg Med
.
2019
;
37
(
1
):
127
132
26.
Lin-Martore
M
,
Kornblith
AE
,
Kohn
MA
,
Gottlieb
M
.
Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for intussusception in children presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
West J Emerg Med
.
2020
;
21
(
4
):
1008
1016
27.
Sivitz
AB
,
Cohen
SG
,
Tejani
C
.
Evaluation of acute appendicitis by pediatric emergency physician sonography
.
Ann Emerg Med
.
2014
;
64
(
4
):
358
364.e4
28.
Mohamed
A
,
Mohsen
N
,
Diambomba
Y
, et al
.
Lung ultrasound for prediction of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extreme preterm neonates: a prospective diagnostic cohort study
.
J Pediatr
.
2021
;
238
:
187
192.e2
29.
Lam
SHF
,
Sivitz
A
,
Alade
K
, et al
;
Clinical Assessment Alone for Management of Pediatric Skin and Soft Tissue Infections
.
Comparison of ultrasound guidance vs. clinical assessment alone for management of pediatric skin and soft tissue infections
.
J Emerg Med
.
2018
;
55
(
5
):
693
701
30.
Lichtenstein
D
,
Mézière
G
,
Biderman
P
,
Gepner
A
,
Barré
O
.
The comet-tail artifact. An ultrasound sign of alveolar-interstitial syndrome
.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
.
1997
;
156
(
5
):
1640
1646
31.
Kurepa
D
,
Zaghloul
N
,
Watkins
L
,
Liu
J
.
Neonatal lung ultrasound exam guidelines
.
J Perinatol
.
2018
;
38
(
1
):
11
22
32.
Wong
C
,
Teitge
B
,
Ross
M
,
Young
P
,
Robertson
HL
,
Lang
E
.
The accuracy and prognostic value of point-of-care ultrasound for nephrolithiasis in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Acad Emerg Med
.
2018
;
25
(
6
):
684
698
33.
Burnside
PR
,
Brown
MD
,
Kline
JA
.
Systematic review of emergency physician-performed ultrasonography for lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis
.
Acad Emerg Med
.
2008
;
15
(
6
):
493
498
34.
Theodoro
D
,
Blaivas
M
,
Duggal
S
,
Snyder
G
,
Lucas
M
.
Real-time B-mode ultrasound in the ED saves time in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
.
Am J Emerg Med
.
2004
;
22
(
3
):
197
200
35.
Doctor
K
,
Cohen
JS
.
Diagnosis of intraventricular cyst using point-of-care cranial ultrasound in the pediatric emergency department
.
Pediatr Emerg Care
.
2017
;
33
(
3
):
216
218
36.
Yaeger
SK
,
Marin
JR
.
An infant diagnosed with hydrocephalus by point-of-care ultrasound
.
Pediatr Emerg Care
.
2017
;
33
(
4
):
287
289
37.
Clay
DE
,
Linke
AC
,
Cameron
DJ
, et al
.
Evaluating affordable cranial ultrasonography in East African neonatal intensive care units
.
Ultrasound Med Biol
.
2017
;
43
(
1
):
119
128
38.
Halm
BM
,
Leone
TA
,
Chaudoin
LT
, et al
.
Evaluation of ventricular size measurements in infants by pediatric emergency physicians
.
Pediatr Emerg Care
.
2021
;
37
(
2
):
77
81
39.
American College of Emergency Physicians
.
Ultrasound guidelines: emergency, point-of-care and clinical ultrasound guidelines in medicine
.
Ann Emerg Med
.
2017
;
69
(
5
):
e27
e54
40.
Moore
CL
,
Copel
JA
.
Point-of-care ultrasonography
.
N Engl J Med
.
2011
;
364
(
8
):
749
757
41.
American College of Emergency Physicians
.
Emergency ultrasound imaging criteria compendium
.
Ann Emerg Med
.
2006
;
48
(
4
):
487
510
42.
Blanco
P
,
Volpicelli
G
.
Common pitfalls in point-of-care ultrasound: a practical guide for emergency and critical care physicians
.
Crit Ultrasound J
.
2016
;
8
(
1
):
15
43.
Marin
JR
,
Lewiss
RE
;
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine
;
Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Academy of Emergency Ultrasound
;
American College of Emergency Physicians, Pediatric Emergency Medicine Committee
;
World Interactive Network Focused on Critical Ultrasound
.
Point-of-care ultrasonography by pediatric emergency medicine physicians
.
Pediatrics
.
2015
;
135
(
4
):
e1113
e1122
44.
Abo
AM
,
Alade
KH
,
Rempell
RG
, et al
.
Credentialing pediatric emergency faculty in point-of-care ultrasound: expert guidelines
.
Pediatr Emerg Care
.
2021
;
37
(
12
):
e1687
e1694
45.
Tolsgaard
MG
,
Todsen
T
,
Sorensen
JL
, et al
.
International multispecialty consensus on how to evaluate ultrasound competence: a Delphi consensus survey
.
PLoS One
.
2013
;
8
(
2
):
e57687
46.
Shokoohi
H
,
Duggan
NM
,
Adhikari
S
,
Selame
LA
,
Amini
R
,
Blaivas
M
.
Point-of-care ultrasound stewardship
.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open
.
2020
;
1
(
6
):
1326
1331
47.
Amini
R
,
Patanwala
AE
,
Shokoohi
H
,
Adhikari
S
.
Number needed to scan: evidence-based point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)
.
Cureus
.
2021
;
13
(
8
):
e17278