I have been an avid reader and admirer of the New England Journal of Medicine since I was a medical student many years ago. As an editor, I confess I envy the journal its large circulation and the many fine articles it publishes. Recently, however, the journal published an article by Schwartz et al entitled “Prolongation of the QT Interval and the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome,” (N Engl J Med.1998;338:1709–1714), and an editorial by Friedman and Towbin complimenting the study. The commentary cited the study as offering “compelling evidence” of a link between the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and prolonged QT interval, and suggested that “the development of a more useful tool that can be used in the physician's office to measure QT would be welcome.” Did they read the same article that I read? Even more alarming was the suggestion implying “some patients should receive β-blockers.”...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 April 1999
Special Commentaries|
April 01 1999
Comments on a Sudden Infant Death Article in Another Journal
Jerold F. Lucey, MD
Jerold F. Lucey, MD
1Editor-in-Chief,Pediatrics
Search for other works by this author on:
Reprint requests to (J.F.L.) Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, McClure 718, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05401.
Pediatrics (1999) 103 (4): 812.
Article history
Received:
November 20 1998
Accepted:
November 20 1998
Citation
Jerold F. Lucey; Comments on a Sudden Infant Death Article in Another Journal. Pediatrics April 1999; 103 (4): 812. 10.1542/peds.103.4.812
Download citation file:
0 Comments
Comments Icon
Comments (0)
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Pay-Per-View Access
$25.00