Establishment of risk-appropriate care was first proposed in 1976 when leaders in perinatal health proposed a model system of regionalized care for obstetrical and neonatal patients, including definitions of graded levels of hospital care.1  Risk-appropriate care, in which infants with mild to complex critical illness or physiologic immaturity are cared for in a facility with the personnel and resources appropriate for their needs and condition, results in improved outcomes. This concept is supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) policy statement “Levels of Neonatal Care,” which provides a review of data supporting a tiered provision of neonatal care and reaffirms the need for nationally consistent standards of care to improve neonatal outcomes.2 

The work of the AAP NICU Verification Program began in 2013 when the state of Texas mandated that all Texas facilities caring for newborns required a neonatal level of care designation to receive Medicaid payment for neonatal services and announced a plan to engage survey agencies to verify levels of neonatal care. The AAP was identified as 1 of 2 Texas-approved survey agencies to pilot the verification survey process in 2016, and the NICU Verification Program was officially launched. Since 2016, the NICU Verification Program has provided third-party surveys by experienced and credentialed neonatologists, neonatal nurses, and pediatric surgeons to assess compliance with state-specific risk-appropriate neonatal care standards.

Since then, discussions were initiated with the Georgia Department of Public Health in 2019 to provide NICU verification surveys in Georgia. Additionally, the AAP NICU Verification Program is named as the approved neonatal survey agency for neonatal care services in Missouri’s code of state regulations for neonatal care designation. The AAP continues to be approached by additional states and independent facilities for verification services outside Texas, Georgia, and Missouri.

Although all states regulate health care facilities, specifications for levels of neonatal care and adherence to requirements vary widely.3,4  Data indicate that facilities often assess themselves at a higher level than an independent observer, yet only a few states require verification by a third-party surveying agency or health department official. Recognizing that a national neonatal verification program is vital to high-quality and equitable care, the AAP NICU Verification Program has developed the “Standards for Levels of Neonatal Care: II, III, and IV,” which have the potential to improve the quality and consistency of risk-appropriate neonatal care and is critical to the future growth of the AAP NICU Verification Program.

The AAP Standards for Levels of Neonatal Care are considered a complementary implementation tool as they are based on existing AAP policy; evidence-based literature; standards of professional practice from national neonatal, perinatal, and surgical organizations; published data; and, when no data existed, expert opinion. Developed by the AAP NICU Verification Program Leadership Team with the support of AAP staff, the Standards codify the minimum components of care expected for each level of neonatal care from Special Care Nursery (Level II), to complex subspecialty care including surgery (Level IV NICU). The NICU Verification Program also convened a virtual stakeholder meeting in September 2020, which included national leaders in neonatal intensive care, neurodevelopmental follow-up care, pediatric surgery, and quality and patient safety. The Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (SONPM) Clinical Leaders Group (CLG) and Follow-up Group provided additional input to the Standards, and published standards from nursing, pediatric surgery, and therapist organizations have been integrated as well.

The lack of standardized or state-specific risk-appropriate neonatal care policies is a barrier to the delivery of regulated and high-quality neonatal care. By establishing and implementing risk-appropriate neonatal care standards, the NICU Verification Program believes that the AAP will improve neonatal outcomes by ensuring that every infant receives care in a facility with the personnel and resources appropriate for the newborn’s needs and condition. Although the Standards are identified as minimum requirements for each level of neonatal care, the AAP NICU Verification Program encourages facilities to go beyond the minimum. The AAP NICU Verification Program upholds the AAP Equity Agenda and is committed to supporting efforts to improve health outcomes by encouraging facilities to further assess the health disparities of their patients, families, and community. The AAP values equity, diversity, and inclusivity and recognizes that family-centered care is essential for best outcomes and encourages facilities to amplify their focus on family members and staff to elevate the quality of neonatal care and improve the health outcomes of the nation’s most vulnerable population.3,4 

The AAP “Standards for Levels of Neonatal Care II, III, and IV” (the “Standards”) were developed through the cooperative efforts of the AAP NICU Verification Program Leadership Team and the Committee on Fetus and Newborn (COFN), the SONPM, and the SONPM CLG. The Standards delineate the components of care expected for each level of neonatal care from Special Care Nursery (Level II), to complex subspecialty care including surgery (Level IV NICU) by setting forth standards for institutional commitment, neonatal programing, personnel, ancillary services, patient and family care resources, and equipment required for each level of neonatal care. Compliance with the Standards will not guarantee that a particular neonatal program is in compliance with applicable state law or other requirements. In addition, the Standards are not designed to be an educational resource for clinicians related to treatment decisions or standards of patient care. Rather, the Standards set forth the minimum components to be included in any neonatal program desiring to be recognized as providing a particular level of neonatal care.

Ann R. Stark, MD, FAAP – Medical Director, NICU Verification Program

DeWayne M. Pursley, MD, MPH, FAAP

Lu-Ann Papile, MD, FAAP

Eric C. Eichenwald, MD, FAAP

Charles T. Hankins, MD, MBA, FAAP

Eric C. Eichenwald, MD, FAAP Charles T. Hankins, MD, MBA, FAAP Rosanne K. Buck, RN, MS, NNP-BC, C-ONQS Tamara J. Wallace, DNP, APRN, NNP-BC Patricia G. Bondurant, DNP, RN

Nicole Faster, MSN, RN, RNC-NIC Jaime Thomas, MHA

Sunnah Kim, MS, RN

Munish Gupta, MD, MMSc, FAAP

James Barry, MD, FAAP

Jessica Davidson, MD, FAAP

Jeffrey Meyers, MD, FAAP

Michael Posencheg, MD, FAAP

The authors of this paper comprise the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) NICU Verification Program’s Leadership Team. All are highly experienced clinicians with a long-standing interest in risk-appropriate care. The Standards for Levels of Neonatal Care: II, III, and IV are based on the AAP policy statement “Levels of Neonatal Care” and the AAP/ACOG textbook Guidelines for Perinatal Care. To compile the Standards, the NICU Verification Program Leadership Team collaborated with the AAP Committee on Fetus and Newborn (COFN), the Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (SONPM), the SONPM Clinical Leaders Group (CLG), and additional neonatal stakeholders. We also acknowledge important guidance from Dr. Keith Oldham and other members of the American College of Surgeons Children’s Surgery Verification Quality Improvement Program, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Association of Neonatal Nurses, and the National Association of Neonatal Therapists.

The content of this publication may be cited in academic publications, as well as downloaded and printed for individual use only. These materials may not be distributed, resold, nor used to create revenue generating content, software, or programs by any entity other than the American Academy of Pediatrics without the express written permission of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors have filed conflict of interest statements with the American Academy of Pediatrics. Any conflicts have been resolved through a process approved by the Board of Directors. The American Academy of Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any commercial involvement in the development of the content of this publication.

1
Committee on Perinatal Health
.
Toward Improving the Outcome of Pregnancy: Recommendations for the Regional Development of Maternal and Perinatal Health Services
.
White Plains, NY
:
March of Dimes National Foundation
;
1976
2
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn
.
Levels of neonatal care
.
Pediatrics
.
2012
;
130
(
3
):
587
597
3
Kroelinger
CD
,
Okoroh
EM
,
Goodman
DA
,
Lasswell
SM
,
Barfield
WD
.
Comparison of state risk-appropriate neonatal care policies with the 2012 AAP policy statement
.
J Perinatol
.
2018
;
38
(
4
):
411
420
4
Kroelinger
CD
,
Rice
ME
,
Okoroh
EM
,
DeSisto
CL
,
Barfield
WD
.
Seven years later: state neonatal risk-appropriate care policy consistency with the 2012 American Academy of Pediatrics Policy
.
J Perinatol
.
2022
;
42
(
5
):
595
602
5
Kilpatrick
SJ
,
Papile
L
,
Macones
GA
, eds;
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn
;
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Obstetric Practice
.
Guidelines for Perinatal Care
. 8th ed.
Itasca, IL
:
American Academy of Pediatrics
;
2017
6
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
.
Six domains of health care quality
.
7
Weiner
GM
,
Zaichkin
J
, eds;
American Academy of Pediatrics
;
American Heart Association
.
Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation
. 8th ed.
Itasca, IL
:
American Academy of Pediatrics
;
2021
8
American College of Radiology, American Association of Physicists in Medicine
.
ACR–AAPM technical standard for diagnostic medical physics performance monitoring of radiographic equipment
.
9
Association of Women’s Health Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses
.
Obstetric and neonatal nurses. Perinatal clinical nurse educator: clinical competencies and education guide
.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs
.
2021
;
50
(
3
):
e1
e10
10
Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses
.
Obstetric and neonatal nurses. Standards for professional registered nurse staffing for perinatal units
.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs
.
2022
;
51
(
4
):
e5
e98
11
Lober
A
,
Harmon
D
,
Thomas-Jackson
SC
;
United States Lactation Consultant Association
.
Position paper – professional lactation support staffing in the hospital setting
.
Clin Lat
.
2021
;
12
(
4
):
157
158
12
Craig
JW
,
Smith
CR
.
Risk-adjusted/neuroprotective care services in the NICU: the elemental role of the neonatal therapist (OT, PT, SLP)
.
J Perinatol
.
2020
;
40
(
4
):
549
559
13
Fierson
WM
;
American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Ophthalmology
;
American Academy of Opthalmology
;
American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
;
American Association of Certified Orthoptists
.
Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity
.
Pediatrics
.
2018
;
142
(
6
):
e20183061
14
Profit
J
,
Gould
JB
,
Bennett
M
, et al
.
Racial/ethnic disparity in NICU quality of care delivery
.
Pediatrics
.
2017
;
140
(
3
):
e20170918
15
Insoft
RM
,
Schwartz
HP
, eds;
American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Transport Medicine
.
Guidelines for Air and Ground Transport of Neonatal and Pediatric Patients Manual
. 4th ed.
Itasca, IL
:
American Academy of Pediatrics
;
2015
16
American College of Surgeons
.
Optimal resources for children’s surgical care: 2021 standards
.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn
.
Advanced practice in neonatal nursing
.
Pediatrics
.
2009
;
123
(
6
):
1606
1607
Committee on Nutrition
;
Section on Breastfeeding
;
Committee on Fetus and Newborn
.
Donor human milk for the high-risk infant: preparation, safety, and usage options in the United States
.
Pediatrics
.
2017
;
139
(
1
):
e20163440
Meyer
K
,
Fernandes
CJ
,
Schwartz
HP
, eds;
American Academy of Pediatrics
,
Section on Transport Medicine
.
Field Guide for Air and Ground Transport of Neonatal and Pediatric Patients: A Quick Reference for Transport Teams
.
Itasca, IL
:
American Academy of Pediatrics
;
2018
American Nurses Association
.
ANA’s Principles for Nurse Staffing
, 3rd ed.
Silver Springs, MD
:
American Nurses Association
;
2021
Azzuqa
A
,
Makkar
A
,
Machut
K
.
Use of telemedicine for subspecialty support in the NICU setting
.
Semin Perinatol
.
2021
;
45
(
5
):
151425
Barfield
WD
,
Krug
SE
;
Committee on Fetus and Newborn
;
Disaster Preparedness Advisory Council
.
Disaster preparedness in neonatal intensive care units
.
Pediatrics
.
2017
;
139
(
5
):
e20170507
Best Accredited Colleges
.
Physician assistant – neonatology: career overview
.
Bondurant
PG
,
Nielsen-Farrell
J
,
Armstrong
L
.
The journey to high reliability in the NICU
.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs
.
2015
;
29
(
2
):
170
178
Brady
CJ
,
D’Amico
S
,
Campbell
JP
.
Telemedicine for retinopathy of prematurity
.
Telemed J E Health
.
2020
;
26
(
4
):
556
564
Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems
.
Accreditation Standards of the Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems
. 11th ed.
Sandy Springs, SC
:
Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems
;
2018
Freed
GL
,
Dunham
KM
,
Lamarand
KE
,
Loveland-Cherry
C
,
Martyn
KK
;
American Board of Pediatrics Research Advisory Committee
.
Neonatal nurse practitioners: distribution, roles and scope of practice
.
Pediatrics
.
2010
;
126
(
5
):
856
860
Nandula
PS
,
Hudak
ML
.
Remove lactation support in the COVID-19 era
.
NeoReviews
.
2021
;
22
(
6
):
e392
e397
Beauman
SS
,
Bowles
S
, eds.
National Association of Neonatal Nurses
.
Policies, Procedures, and Competencies for Neonatal Nursing
. 6th ed.
Chicago, IL
:
National Association of Neonatal Nurses
;
2019
National Association of Neonatal Nurses
.
RN staffing in the NICU
.
Position statement #3074. NANN. Available at: http://nann.org/uploads/updated_RN_nicu_staffing.pdf. Accessed September 14, 2022
National Association of Neonatal Nurses
.
Standards for maintaining competence of neonatal nurse practitioners
.
Position Statement #3062. Available at: http://nann.org/uploads/Membership/NANNP_Pubs/Standard_for_Maintaining_the_Competence_of_NNPs-FINAL.pdf. Accessed September 14, 2022
Parker
LA
.
Neonatal nurse practitioners in interdisciplinary care of high-risk infants
.
NeoReviews
.
2010
;
11
(
1
):
e24
e32
Parker
MG
,
Stellwagen
LM
,
Noble
L
,
Kim
JH
,
Poindexter
BB
,
Puopolo
KM
;
Section on Breastfeeding, Committee on Nutrition, Committee on Fetus and Newborn
.
Promoting human milk and breastfeeding for the very low birth weight infant
.
Pediatrics
.
2021
;
148
(
5
):
e2021054272
Quinn
GE
,
Vinekar
A
.
The role of retinal photography and telemedicine in ROP screening
.
Semin Perinatol
.
2019
;
43
(
6
):
367
374
Romito
B
,
Jewell
J
,
Jackson
M
;
AAP Committee on Hospital Care; Association of Child Life Professionals
.
Child life services
.
Pediatrics
.
2021
;
147
(
1
):
e2020040261
Siegel
R
,
Simone
J
,
Sumrall
B
;
Standards Committee of the National Association of Perinatal Social Workers
.
Standards for Social Work Services in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit
.
San Diego, CA
:
National Association of Perinatal Social Workers
;
2007
Simone
J
,
Duncan
J
,
Derechin
H
,
Siegel
R
,
Sugatt
S
;
Standards Committee of the National Association of Perinatal Social Workers
.
Standards for Social Work Services in Obstetric Settings
.
San Diego, CA
:
National Association of Perinatal Social Workers
;
2007
The Leapfrog Group
.
Latest report shows too many high-risk, very-low birth weight babies are being delivered at hospitals ill-equipped to care for them
.
Van McCrary
S
,
Green
HC
,
Combs
A
,
Mintzer
JP
,
Quirk
JG
.
A delicate subject: the impact of cultural factors on neonatal and perinatal decision making
.
J Neonatal Perinatal Med
.
2014
;
7
(
1
):
1
12
Wang
KS
,
Cummings
J
,
Stark
A
, et al;
Section on Surgery, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
.
Optimizing resources in children’s surgical care: an update on the American College of Surgeons’ verification program
.
Pediatrics
.
2020
;
145
(
5
):
e20200708