“Vaccines save lives.” “Vaccines are safe.”1,,–3 These are critical concepts that pediatricians everywhere seek to convey to parents. However, for many reasons, primarily because of the successes in reduction of vaccine-preventable diseases, parents are increasingly concerned about the safety of and need for vaccines.4,5 Parents may come to well-child checkup appointments equipped with lists of questions about vaccine safety and effectiveness. In this context, pediatricians may struggle to explain the value of vaccines when confronted with a difficult situation: an actual untoward event after administration of childhood vaccines. Often referred to as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI),6 these events range from mild and uncommon to rare but serious. There are few experiences more challenging for a pediatrician than trying to convince a parent to continue vaccinating their child after they have witnessed a febrile seizure or a hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode (HHE) not long after a vaccination. Although studies have shown that these AEFI do not lead to adverse long-term consequences,7 and thus subsequent vaccination is not contraindicated,8,9 this information is often not enough to convince these parents that the benefits of future vaccination outweigh potential risks.
In this issue of Pediatrics, Zafack et al10 have provided valuable information to both pediatricians and parents confronted with such a situation. In the article, “Risk of Recurrence of Adverse Events Following Immunization: A Systematic Review,” the authors quantify recurrence risk for numerous adverse events, including rare life-threatening events such as anaphylaxis, as well as to more common benign events such as injection pain and redness. The article offers accurate, immediately useful information for the practicing pediatrician regarding AEFI and revaccination.
HHEs represent a good example of how information from this article will be useful to pediatricians. Originally described as a “collapse” or “shock-like state” by a British public health officer in the early 1960s,11 HHEs are characterized by the sudden onset of reduced muscle tone, hyporesponsiveness, and change of skin color, either pallor or cyanosis. These poorly-understood events can occur immediately after vaccination or up to 48 hours later, with a median of 3 to 4 hours, and most occurring with the first set of vaccines at ∼2 months of age. HHEs have been associated with several different types of vaccines but are most conclusively linked with whole-cell pertussis-containing vaccines, as in the original description. These adverse events are frightening for parents12 and may lead to extensive evaluation by providers to identify alternative causes, further compounding a parent’s negative vaccination experience. Unsurprisingly, parents whose children have experienced a vaccine-related adverse event may be reticent to revaccinate their child when the next set of immunizations is due. The question they want answered, of course, is, “Will it happen again?”
Before the publication of the article by Zafack et al,10 estimates of the risk of recurrence of an HHE after vaccination using data from previous studies were lacking. For example, the American Academy of Pediatrics Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases (Red Book) estimates the risk of HHE as 1 in 1750 doses but does not comment on the risk of recurrence after 1 has occurred.9 Even that estimate is based on administration of whole-cell diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine rather than the currently used acellular pertussis vaccine, which is thought to be associated with a lower risk for HHE. The Zafack article10 includes 530 children and provides an estimate of the risk of recurrence: not 0, but <1%, thus allowing both pediatricians and parents to be more comfortable with the decision to vaccinate. Equally useful and reassuring, information is now more readily available for other frightening events, such as the recurrence risk for seizures (0%) and anaphylaxis (0%). For more common but less severe AEFIs, such as redness, pain, and fever, more accurate estimates of the risks of AEFI recurrences are available for both pediatricians and parents.
This article also reinforces what vaccinologists and pediatricians have known for many years: vaccines are incredibly safe. Considering that the vaccines in the infant schedule are administered to millions of children each year, the list of known adverse events, even rare ones, is impressively short. Although this article does not address the recurrence risk for all known AEFIs, particularly rare ones such as immune thrombocytopenic purpura13 after measles-containing vaccines and intussusception after rotavirus vaccine,14 it is impressively comprehensive and will be a useful reference for practicing pediatricians everywhere for years to come. This article will also help to reaffirm the overwhelming value and safety of vaccines in protecting infants and children from complications and death due to infectious diseases.
All authors conceptualized and wrote the draft commentary, edited and finalized the final version, approved the final manuscript as submitted, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the manuscript.
Opinions expressed in these commentaries are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the American Academy of Pediatrics or its Committees.
FUNDING: No external funding.
COMPANION PAPER: A companion to this article can be found online at www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2016-3707.
References
Competing Interests
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr O’Leary is a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases and Subcommittee on Vaccine Policy and Vaccine Hesitancy, and Dr Maldonado is the vice chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases and member of the Subcommittee on Vaccine Policy and Vaccine Hesitancy. Dr Maldonado serves on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for a Pfizer vaccine trial.
To Whom it May Concern: There is a massive conflict of interest to the two authors of this study. Huge conflict. I don't understand how they were allowed to push this study through just based on the financial disclosure and the position they hold at the AAP. This is not a legitimate unbiased study from unbiased individuals per your own statement below:
"FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr O’Leary is a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases and Subcommittee on Vaccine Policy and Vaccine Hesitancy, and Dr Maldonado is the vice chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases and member of the Subcommittee on Vaccine Policy and Vaccine Hesitancy. Dr Maldonado serves on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for a Pfizer vaccine trial." -
Dr. Maldonado is a member of the "subcommittee one vaccine policy and vaccine hesitancy" and is writing a paper on adverse events happening again, why? To resolve vaccine hesitancy. This is not a legit paper and should not be allowed online. I will file a formal complaint against this paper.