Ensuring optimal health for children requires a population-based approach and collaboration between pediatrics and public health. The prevention of major threats to children’s health (such as behavioral health issues) and the control and management of chronic diseases, obesity, injury, communicable diseases, and other problems cannot be managed solely in the pediatric office. The integration of clinical practice with public health actions is necessary for multiple levels of disease prevention that involve the child, family, and community. Although pediatricians and public health professionals interact frequently to the benefit of children and their families, increased integration of the 2 disciplines is critical to improving child health at the individual and population levels. Effective collaboration is necessary to ensure that population health activities include children and that the child health priorities of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), such as poverty and child health, early brain and child development, obesity, and mental health, can engage federal, state, and local public health initiatives. In this policy statement, we build on the 2013 AAP Policy Statement on community pediatrics by identifying specific opportunities for collaboration between pediatricians and public health professionals that are likely to improve the health of children in communities. In the statement, we provide recommendations for pediatricians, public health professionals, and the AAP and its chapters.
The Health of a Nation can Be Judged by the Health of its Youngest Members
Many children and youth in the United States are not thriving. For example, in 2015, 19.7% of US children lived in families with incomes below the federal poverty level.1 Of children and teenagers in the United States from 2011 to 2014, ∼1 in 3 was overweight or obese; 17% were obese.2,3 Of children 9 to 17 years old, ∼1 in 5 may have a diagnosable mental or addictive disorder that could cause at least minimal impairment.4 As of early 2017, ∼4.8% of US children remained uninsured.5 In 2014, 4042 children and youth aged 0 to 21 years were killed by firearms in the United States.6
Although children’s health outcomes are influenced by access to quality health care in a medical home, social, economic, and environmental factors are critical determinants of child health.7 Pediatricians and public health professionals are particularly well suited to address these multifaceted issues in the community setting. Grounded in a shared commitment to prevention and population health, the 2 groups must leverage each profession’s strengths and expertise to promote prevention, improve the delivery of health services, and advance health at the community level. In the 2013 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Policy Statement “Community Pediatrics: Navigating the Intersection of Medicine, Public Health, and Social Determinants of Children’s Health,” researchers briefly described partnership with public health as a key component of practicing community pediatrics. However, it is critical for all pediatricians to recognize the importance and value of collaboration with public health colleagues to improve children’s health. In recent years, there has been a growing movement to increase collaboration between the fields of clinical medicine and public health.8,9 Recent child health emergencies (such as the 2015 measles outbreak that was associated with exposures in Disneyland; the water crisis in Flint, Michigan; and the emergence of Zika virus) further reinforce the need for medical and public health expertise to approach an urgent child health issue. The enhancement of this relationship is also critical because of the health care system’s increased focus on reducing health care costs by improving population health outcomes.
A Definition of Public Health for Pediatricians
In the National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) report “The Future of Public Health,” researchers describe public health as “fulfilling society’s interest in assuring conditions in which people can be healthy.” They further identify 3 core functions for public health: assessment, assurance, and policy development.10 In 1994, a consensus list of essential public health services was developed by federal health agencies in partnership with major national public health organizations and adopted by the Public Health Functions Steering Committee. These services, mapped to the 3 core functions, are illustrated in Fig 1.11
Ten essential public health services include the following: (1) monitor health status to identify and solve community health problems; (2) diagnose and investigate health problems and health hazards in the community; (3) inform, educate, and empower people about health issues; (4) mobilize community partnerships and action to identify and solve health problems; (5) develop policies and plans that support individual and community health efforts; (6) enforce laws and regulations that protect health and ensure safety; (7) link people to needed personal health services and ensure the provision of health care when otherwise unavailable; (8) ensure the presence of a competent public and personal health care workforce; (9) evaluate the effectiveness, accessibility, and quality of personal and population-based health services; and (10) research for new insights and innovative solutions to health problems. (Reprinted with permission from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The public health system and the 10 essential public health services. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nphpsp/essentialservices.html. Accessed March 21, 2017.)
Ten essential public health services include the following: (1) monitor health status to identify and solve community health problems; (2) diagnose and investigate health problems and health hazards in the community; (3) inform, educate, and empower people about health issues; (4) mobilize community partnerships and action to identify and solve health problems; (5) develop policies and plans that support individual and community health efforts; (6) enforce laws and regulations that protect health and ensure safety; (7) link people to needed personal health services and ensure the provision of health care when otherwise unavailable; (8) ensure the presence of a competent public and personal health care workforce; (9) evaluate the effectiveness, accessibility, and quality of personal and population-based health services; and (10) research for new insights and innovative solutions to health problems. (Reprinted with permission from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The public health system and the 10 essential public health services. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nphpsp/essentialservices.html. Accessed March 21, 2017.)
Many public health activities are conducted by local, state, and federal government agencies.12,–14 The primary roles of these agencies are to monitor health and disease, provide strategies for disease prevention, and promote healthy practices. Public health practitioners contribute to these functions by informing, educating, and mobilizing members of the public about current and emerging health issues; advocating for and enforcing laws and regulations that protect health and ensure safety; and addressing a number of specific conditions (Table 1).
Examples of Threats to Children’s Health Requiring Pediatrics and Public Health Collaboration to Prevent or Alleviate
Environmental health concerns, including climate disruption, air quality, water safety, environmental toxins, and natural disasters |
Food safety |
Vaccine refusal |
Communicable diseases |
Obesity epidemic |
Adverse childhood experiences resulting in toxic stress, including poverty, social isolation, and violence |
Health care access, especially for underserved groups (eg, children of undocumented immigrants) |
Injury prevention (including gun violence), education, regulation, and anticipatory guidance |
Substance abuse (including smoking, alcohol, and illicit drugs) |
Environmental health concerns, including climate disruption, air quality, water safety, environmental toxins, and natural disasters |
Food safety |
Vaccine refusal |
Communicable diseases |
Obesity epidemic |
Adverse childhood experiences resulting in toxic stress, including poverty, social isolation, and violence |
Health care access, especially for underserved groups (eg, children of undocumented immigrants) |
Injury prevention (including gun violence), education, regulation, and anticipatory guidance |
Substance abuse (including smoking, alcohol, and illicit drugs) |
However, many other entities (public and private, local and national) participate in maintaining and supporting public health.
Pediatricians’ Understanding of the Work of Major Entities Providing Recommendations in Public Health
Public health entities such as the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),15 the CDC Community Preventive Services Task Force,16 the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, and the US Preventive Services Task Force17 provide a portion of the evidence base for the content of well-child care. These public health entities synthesize, review, and provide information and recommendations about preventive care and policies. They often provide easily accessed, up-to-date information for children and families and can provide information to pediatricians about the monitoring of diseases and disease-prevention activities in communities. The efforts of these groups inform and assist AAP efforts to improve child health. The AAP informs pediatricians about the information and recommendations that many of these entities produce. Although individual pediatricians in primary-care practice and medical and surgical subspecialties need not maintain expertise in the work of these public health entities, they should be aware of the public health data and resources that they provide to support population health improvement.
Pediatricians’ Role in Public Health
Pediatricians function as an arm of public health by preventing diseases in their patients (eg, by promoting immunizations), treating diseases, and promoting healthy lifestyles (eg, by striving toward tobacco and substance abuse prevention and promoting healthy nutrition and physical activity). Pediatricians are often the first to know about a public health issue and must report it to the local or state department of health (eg, a child with meningitis, a family testing positive for tuberculosis, or a child in day care with lead poisoning). Starting with individual patient occurrences, these may be considered sentinel events, signaling problems that may require action by a public health agency. Additionally, pediatricians typically participate in ≥1 of the 3 core public health practice functions by assessing an individual’s health status and health needs, ensuring that necessary services are provided, or developing policy.10
However, the pediatrician can only partially address population health issues within the examination room.18 Pediatricians can also participate in a variety of population-based efforts that promote child health. The Title V Maternal and Child Health Block Grant Program needs assessment process is a key opportunity.19 This process is used to foster collaboration between the federal Maternal and Child Health Bureau, each state’s Department of Health, families, practitioners, and community organizations to work toward improving community-wide child and maternal health outcomes.
Pediatricians can also serve on the advisory boards of public health programs, school boards, and school-based clinics and partner with health-promotion projects in communities. Individual prevention approaches that are based in the pediatric examination room and population-based activities are complementary strategies that help advance the health and well-being of all children.
Pediatric and Public Health Collaborations
Public health and pediatrics are professions with a shared commitment to disease and injury prevention, anticipatory guidance, and early recognition and response to threats to lifelong health. Historically, the fields of pediatrics and public health have successfully collaborated on a variety of children’s health issues (Table 2). Collaborations can include a range of activities, including sharing information and data, developing joint health-promotion and planning initiatives, coordinating health care services, and implementing education and/or training activities.20
Examples of Activities in Which Pediatrics and Public Health Practitioners Currently Collaborate
Epidemic response and emergency preparedness |
Immunization endeavors, including education, administration, and tracking through registries |
Lead poisoning prevention |
Newborn screening |
Perinatal hepatitis B prevention |
Promotion of healthy lifestyles |
Protecting the health of travelers |
Recognition and reporting of new illness and outbreaks by pediatricians |
Substance use prevention and reduction, including tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs |
Epidemic response and emergency preparedness |
Immunization endeavors, including education, administration, and tracking through registries |
Lead poisoning prevention |
Newborn screening |
Perinatal hepatitis B prevention |
Promotion of healthy lifestyles |
Protecting the health of travelers |
Recognition and reporting of new illness and outbreaks by pediatricians |
Substance use prevention and reduction, including tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs |
Case Examples
The following cases are recent child health scenarios that required collaboration between pediatrics and public health.
Disneyland Measles Outbreak (December 2014 to February 2015)
During the 2014–2015 measles outbreak that was linked to exposures at Disneyland theme parks in Southern California, 125 confirmed cases were identified by the California Department of Public Health, 110 of which were in California residents. State Senator Richard Pan, MD, FAAP (Democrat-Sacramento) and State Senator Ben Allen (Democrat-Santa Monica) coauthored a bill (SB 277) that was introduced in the California State Legislature in early February 2015 (with support from AAP, California) that mandated that all children be vaccinated on school entry. This bill in effect only allowed for medical exemptions and did not allow parents to exempt their children from vaccinations on the basis of religious or personal beliefs. Hundreds of pediatricians across the state were joined by thousands of nonpediatrician physicians, all of whom educated legislators about the importance of this bill. California’s governor signed the bill into law in June 2015, and the law went into effect on January 1, 2016.21
Flint Water Contamination Crisis (April 2014 to Present)
Contamination of the drinking water in the city of Flint, Michigan, occurred after city officials changed the water supply to a local river without applying corrosion inhibitors. Pediatrician Mona Hana-Attisha, MD, MPH, FAAP, noticed that the number of children <5 years old with blood lead concentrations of >5 µg/dL22 increased after the change in water supply. By using hospital records, she was able to determine the percentage of Flint children with blood lead concentrations of >5 µg/dL (which is the concentration, based on the US population, of children ages 1–5 years who are in the top 2.5% of children when tested for lead in their blood). The percentage increased from 2.4% to 4.9%, and in areas with higher water-lead content, it increased from 4% to 10.6%.23 Because of her data and efforts by environmental advocates, in January 2016, both the state and federal governments declared the Flint water crisis a state of emergency and authorized aid toward resolving the crisis and ameliorating the effects on child development. At the time of this publication, efforts are ongoing.
Emergence of the Zika Virus (September 2015 to Present)
After a Zika virus outbreak was identified in January 2015 in northeast Brazil, 35 newborn infants with microcephaly were identified who were born between September and November 2015 to mothers from that area; by summer 2016, >1700 infants with microcephaly had been born in northeast Brazil since the beginning of the outbreak. The link between microcephaly in infants and Zika virus infection has been established with certainty.24 Zika is a Flavivirus that is transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, the same kind of mosquito that transmits yellow fever, dengue, and chikungunya virus infections. The CDC issued a report25 in January 2016 cautioning pregnant women who travel to areas with endemic Zika virus infection and recommending protection against mosquito bites, such as the use of mosquito nets while sleeping and the use of Environmental Protection Agency–approved insect repellents. The CDC has issued several updated guidance documents26 about the epidemic, which has reached many countries in the Caribbean and Central America as well as Puerto Rico and the Southern United States. In a summary of knowledge about Zika virus published in August 2016, Tom Frieden, MD, MPH, who was the director of the CDC at the time, and his colleagues24 cited work with the AAP on developing guidance for pediatricians on dealing with infants who are born to mothers who were exposed to the virus. Efforts to develop a Zika vaccine were showing early signs of success as of the summer of 2016.
Keys to Successful Collaborations
Many factors can influence the strength and effectiveness of primary care and public health collaborations. The 2012 report “Primary Care and Public Health: Exploring Integration to Improve Population Health”20 includes a series of principles for the successful integration of primary care and public health, including the following:
A shared goal of population health improvement;
Community engagement in defining and addressing population health needs;
Aligned leadership;
Sustainability; and
Sharing and collaborating in the use of data and analysis.
Pediatricians and public health professionals can draw on these principles for collaborative activities and use resources such as The Practical Playbook: Public Health and Primary Care Together (practicalplaybook.org) to help refine their collaboration strategies. This resource provides step-by-step guidance to assist public health and primary-care professionals in working together to improve population health.
Pediatric Advocacy for Child Public Health Issues
Pediatricians’ voices are important for effective advocacy on issues that affect children’s health. As described in the AAP Policy Statement “Community Pediatrics: Navigating the Intersection of Medicine, Public Health, and Social Determinants of Children’s Health,”27 pediatricians are well positioned to advocate for access to health care in a medical home as well as for the social, economic, educational, and environmental resources that are essential for every child’s healthy development. This advocacy is needed at local, state, and federal levels. Pediatricians can also serve as critical allies and advocates to support the public health infrastructure as part of the overall child health care system in the United States. Public health funding at the federal level has remained flat for the last several years, whereas most local and state public health department budgets have declined.28 A lack of investment in public health systems, services, and programs can hinder important activities for child health, including disease surveillance and reporting, health promotion, and emergency preparedness. Pediatricians can provide important insights about the need for public health investments to optimize child health at the individual and population levels.
Training Pediatricians in Public Health Principles
Many medical school and residency training programs have recently incorporated teaching into their curricula on the functions and activities of public health entities, such as epidemiologic investigation, public health surveillance, and assurance of safety. Targeted educational instruction in public health is important for pediatricians to address issues from the wider society and environment that affect the health of their individual patients. Pediatricians need training to understand the importance of the identification of sentinel public health events, understanding that such events may signal public health problems that require intervention. Pediatric residents should also know whom to notify of potential sentinel events and how to get support for their elucidation. To understand and help address community health issues, pediatricians should also have access to training on how to use community health data.
The Residency Review Committee of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education continues to strengthen pediatric training program requirements for education in community health and child advocacy.29,30 The Academic Pediatric Association,31 the AAP Community Pediatrics Training Initiative,32 the Council on Community Pediatrics, and others have developed educational goals and objectives, curricula, and other resources to support this training. After the publication of the 2012 National Academy of Medicine (formerly Institute of Medicine) recommendations in “Primary Care and Public Health: Exploring Integration to Improve Population Health,”20 the CDC launched a Primary Care and Public Health Initiative33 to foster relationships between physicians and local and state public health professionals through collaborations with residency program educators.
Collaboration to Improve Population Health and Reduce Health Care Costs
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (Public Law Number 111-148 [2010]) includes a number of insurance reforms and provisions that promote population health. The ACA also provides potential opportunities for pediatricians and public health professionals to collaborate more closely through provisions that focus on health promotion and the prevention of diseases in all individuals, including children. Although not an exhaustive list, some related ACA provisions include the following:
Requiring nonprofit, tax-exempt hospitals to conduct community health needs assessments every 3 years and involve those with expertise in public health;34
Funding the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program, which can provide support and education to individuals to promote positive parenting and early child development. Each state must complete a needs assessment to identify at-risk communities to receive any Title V Maternal and Child Health Block Grant funds;
Requiring private insurance plans to cover preventive services, prohibiting copayments and deductibles for preventive services, and allowing families the opportunity to access age-appropriate benefits for children, including coverage for all Bright Futures–recommended services with no cost sharing; and
Creating the National Prevention Council to coordinate and promote health and disease-prevention efforts among federal-level agencies and departments and develop a National Prevention Strategy.35
Children benefit from these provisions, and the continued implementation of these efforts will be improved by the involvement and collaboration of pediatricians and public health professionals. Any changes made to the ACA should maintain these important reforms.
An additional and critical opportunity for collaboration lies in the US health care system’s increased focus on improving the health of populations while reducing health care costs. As the system evolves to address this challenge through new models of payment, systems integrations, and the broader use of population health data, pediatricians and public health professionals must collaborate and participate in these efforts. Together, they can promote investments in prevention and attention to the social determinants of child health as strategies for developing a strong foundation for lifelong health. A strong foundation established in childhood can potentially reduce chronic disease, improve health outcomes, and ultimately, decrease health care costs across the life course.
A definition change in the provision of preventive services in Medicaid serves as an example of how new models of payment can strengthen the ties between clinical medicine and public health toward the improvement of population health. As of January 2014, the Preventive Services Rule Change issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services provides an opportunity for nonphysicians, such as community health workers, to become eligible for Medicaid payment as long as the services provided are recommended by a physician or other licensed practitioner within their states’ scope of practice.36 A state must proactively allow this change by submitting a state Medicaid plan amendment to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. For example, if the state permits it, this rule would allow asthma educators who are not licensed practitioners but provide services in a home or community setting to be eligible to be paid for their services by Medicaid if those services are recommended by a physician or other state-licensed practitioner as an extension of the medical home. Asthma educators have been shown to provide cost-effective asthma education and management services, working with children and families in their social and environmental contexts.37 This is an example of how an evolving model of payment may support a population health approach and collaborations between pediatricians and public health professionals.
Recommendations
The following recommendations are aimed at helping pediatricians and public health professionals work together optimally to improve child health at the individual and population levels.
Recommendations for Individual Pediatricians
Pediatricians should remain aware of reporting requirements for individual diseases, outbreaks, and vaccine adverse events that require reporting to public health agencies. They should also be aware of local and state health department resources (newsletters, Web sites, social media, etc) for information on diseases and outbreaks;
Pediatricians should make use of the resources and recommendations that are provided by public health agencies and organizations, including local and state health departments, the CDC and its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the US Preventive Services Task Force, the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, and the National Academy of Medicine;
Pediatricians should be aware of how to access local and state public health data to identify population health needs and trends;
Pediatricians can identify opportunities to collaborate with public health entities on community disease prevention and health promotion programs for children and adolescents;
Pediatricians can serve as advisors to public health entities, such as the Maternal and Child Health Bureau Title V Block Grant Program;
Pediatricians should consider advocating for population-based approaches to health within their own health care institutions and systems; and
Pediatricians who are training pediatric residents should include public health and population health curricula and incorporate public health practitioners into the training.
Recommendations for Collaboration Between Pediatricians and Public Health Professionals
Pediatricians and public health professionals can work together on sharing data and information about children’s health issues, including access to quality health care and health disparities. In partnership with public health and health care systems, they can also work together on mapping and analyzing community health data to identify geographic hot spots of health problems that are in need of targeted interventions;
Pediatricians and public health professionals should partner on prevention and health-promotion projects to address chronic disease and disability through complementary clinical and community-based approaches;
Pediatricians and public health professionals should collaborate with families to advocate for healthy environments in which children learn, live, and play;
Pediatricians and public health entities should work together to ensure that children and adolescents are specifically considered in disaster planning, including the development of strategic plans for communication, and in the management of the children, particularly children with special health care needs;
Pediatricians and public health professionals can partner to advocate for investments in public health systems and infrastructure at the local, state, and federal levels. Advocacy should emphasize the importance of public health investments for improving both individual and population health;
Pediatricians and public health professionals can partner to promote public and private efforts at the local, state, and federal levels that promote healthy community development; and
Public health professionals and pediatricians should work together to disseminate important public health information, such as immunization messages, to parents and families.
Recommendations for the AAP and AAP Chapters
The following recommendations address opportunities for the AAP and its chapters to promote pediatric and public health collaborations for child health and well-being:
The AAP and its chapters should include pediatrician members who serve in public health departments, National Health Service Corps facilities, Indian Health Service facilities, and federally qualified health care centers in AAP and chapter-level communications and activities;
AAP chapters should develop working relationships with state and local health departments so that important matters of joint interest (eg, outbreaks of infectious disease, disaster planning, newborn screening changes, needs assessments, and planning for anticipated health effects of climate change) are effectively communicated and, when a crisis occurs, they can work together effectively; and
The AAP should consider making continuing medical education opportunities in public health practice and priorities available to all of its members.
Conclusions
In the seminal report “Primary Care and Public Health: Exploring Integration to Improve Population Health,”20 researchers noted that “actors in both primary care and public health contribute to the promotion of health and well-being; the assurance of conditions in which people can be healthy; and the provision of timely, effective, and coordinated health care.” This is particularly relevant and important regarding issues of child health. Pediatricians and their public health colleagues are important actors in addressing the social determinants of health that have major consequences on childhood health and well-being. Greater communication, collaboration, and partnership between pediatricians and the public health sector have the potential to improve individual- and population-level child health outcomes.
Drs Kuo, Chilton, Thomas and Mascola conceptually outlined this statement, each wrote sections of the draft, and all authors reviewed and revised subsequent drafts (in conjunction with American Academy of Pediatrics staff) and approved the final manuscript as submitted.
This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors have filed conflict of interest statements with the American Academy of Pediatrics. Any conflicts have been resolved through a process approved by the Board of Directors. The American Academy of Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any commercial involvement in the development of the content of this publication.
Policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics benefit from expertise and resources of liaisons and internal (AAP) and external reviewers. However, policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics may not reflect the views of the liaisons or the organizations or government agencies that they represent.
The guidance in this statement does not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.
All policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffirmed, revised, or retired at or before that time.
FUNDING: No external funding.
References
Authors
Alice A. Kuo, MD, PhD, FAAP
Pauline A. Thomas, MD, FAAP
Lance A. Chilton, MD, FAAP
Laurene Mascola, MD, MPH
Council on Community Pediatrics Executive Committee, 2016–2017
Lance A. Chilton, MD, FAAP, Chairperson
Patricia J. Flanagan, MD, FAAP, Vice Chairperson
Kimberley J. Dilley, MD, MPH, FAAP
James H. Duffee, MD, MPH, FAAP
Andrea E. Green, MD, FAAP
J. Raul Gutierrez, MD, MPH, FAAP
Virginia A. Keane, MD, FAAP
Scott D. Krugman, MD, MS, FAAP
Julie M. Linton, MD, FAAP
Carla D. McKelvey, MD, MPH, FAAP
Jacqueline L. Nelson, MD, FAAP
Liaisons
Jacqueline R. Dougé, MD, MPH, FAAP, Chairperson, Public Health Special Interest Group
Kathleen Rooney-Otero, MD, MPH, Section on Pediatric Trainees
Staff
Camille Watson, MS
Section on Epidemiology Executive Committee, 2016–2017
Charles R. Woods Jr, MD, MS, FAAP, Chairperson
Ameth A. Aguirre, MD, MPH, FAAP
Mona A. Eissa, MD, FAAP
Lillianne M. Lewis, MD, MPH, FAAP
Christina A. Nelson, MD, MPH, FAAP
Sheila L. Palevsky, MD, MPH, FAAP
Michael J. Smith, MD, FAAP
Liaisons
Michael Leu, MD, MS, MHS, FAAP, Council on Quality Improvement and Patient Safety
Wade Harrison, MD, MPH, Section on Pediatric Trainees
Patty A. Vitale, MD, MPH, FAAP,US Preventive Services Task Force
Alex R. Kemper, MD, MPH, MS, FAAP, Pediatric Research in Office Settings
Staff
Kymika Okechukwu, MPA
Competing Interests
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr Chilton has indicated he has an advisory board relationship with Sanofi Pasteur. The other authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
Comments
RE: Emergency preparedness is equally important as response in optimizing the health and well-being of the nation’s children
We thank Dr. Peacock and colleagues for raising a very important issue at hand with respect to pediatric emergency preparedness. The study by Murthy et.al. cited in the comment showed a concerning trend of decreased congressional funding for public health emergency preparedness over time (1). Funding decreased from $4.41 per capita in 2003 to $1.75 per capita in 2016. Given this funding climate, we cannot overstate the importance of creating collaborative networks, as suggested by Dr. Peacock.
Coalitions between public health, local emergency response agencies (e.g., fire departments), healthcare agencies and community partners could result in better utilization of available resources and reduce unnecessary redundancies at the local level. These collaborative networks should be encouraged to engage in data use/data sharing agreements to create better surveillance systems and evaluation systems. Multiple stakeholders can further leverage collaborative data while pursuing various funding opportunities. Establishing a hub and spoke model (2) within these coalitions may prove to be most beneficial for disaster preparedness, particularly for the pediatric population, given unequitable resource allocation for children within healthcare and public health systems. A central hub (e.g., a children’s hospital) would take on higher acuity cases, while the spokes (e.g., community centers, hospitals with pediatric beds) would care for lower acuity cases and be equipped to transport to the hub when necessary.
An excellent example of a successful coalition is the New York City (NYC) Pediatric Disaster Coalition (3). The coalition was founded in 2008 under the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and has several partners who are experts in emergency preparedness, pediatric critical care, surgery, emergency medicine, and representatives from the Health Department, Emergency Management, and Fire Department. They have successfully administered joint tabletop exercises, conducted pediatric critical care surge planning and virtual communications exercises, and developed related toolkits. The NYC Pediatric Disaster Coalition may seem a far reach for most communities in the country. However, the joint commitment of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Pediatrics serves as an important launching board in improving collaborations towards better pediatric emergency preparedness despite a restrictive funding climate.
References:
1. Murthy BP, Molinari N-AM, LeBlanc TT, Vagi SJ, Avchen RN. Progress in Public Health Emergency Preparedness—United States, 2001–2016. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(S2):S180-S185. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.304038.
2. Elrod JK, Fortenberry JL. The hub-and-spoke organization design: an avenue for serving patients well. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(Suppl 1). doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2341-x.
3. Foltin G, Frogel M. NYC Pediatric Disaster Coaltion. http://www.programinfosite.com/pdc/. Published 2018. Accessed June 12, 2018.
RE: Emergency preparedness is equally important as response in optimizing the health and well-being of the nation’s children
To the Editor:
We commend the policy statement by Kuo and colleagues (February 2018, Vol. 141, No. 2) highlighting the critical need for collaboration between pediatric and public health sectors in safeguarding the health of our nation’s children (1), and in particular the authors’ emphasis on emergency management and response efforts surrounding the 2016 Flint water contamination crisis, 2015 Zika virus emergency, and 2015 Disneyland measles outbreak. Further, we agree that synergy between public health and pediatricians on emergency preparedness is a key opportunity for primary prevention and health promotion. In this letter, we highlight the crucial partnership between the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and discuss ongoing preparedness activities that address the call to action put forth by Kuo and colleagues.
Children are often disproportionately impacted in public health emergencies, as evidenced by the three responses described by Kuo et al., yet they remain underrepresented in preparedness planning and activities (2). To support and improve synergy between public health and the pediatric community, CDC and AAP have collaborated on several critical preparedness building activities. In 2016 and 2017, CDC and AAP collaborated to develop and facilitate a multi-state in-person tabletop exercise (2016) and virtual tabletop exercise (2017). These exercises were designed to pilot strategies intended to enhance preparedness capacity and collaboration between pediatric and public health professionals at the local level. Both exercises required participation by health department and AAP chapter staff, thus providing opportunities for AAP chapters to begin developing working relationships with state and local health departments. Systematic evaluations suggest the exercises were effective in determining approaches to improve pediatric emergency preparedness and enhanced participants’ knowledge and confidence surrounding pediatric emergency preparedness (3). In 2017, CDC and AAP collaborated on a 2017 large-scale, multi-agency exercise simulating a nuclear explosion incident, which helped to prioritize gaps in pediatric radiation medical countermeasures and consider key issues in the management of children during disaster response (4). By improving pediatric preparedness approaches with the use of emergency preparedness exercises and ongoing collaboration, both agencies are better prepared to respond efficiently and effectively to the needs of children in an actual crisis.
Kuo et al. discuss a lack of cross-sector collaborative investment in public health systems and services as an impediment to sufficient pediatric emergency preparedness. Relatedly, a recent study of CDC Public Health Emergency Preparedness awardees revealed declines in collaboration across healthcare systems and public health departments for emergency response, despite an increase in including vulnerable populations into state preparedness plans (5). Thus, we underscore the assessment by Kuo et al. and support efforts to stimulate collaboration across pediatric and public health sectors that could raise awareness of this gap and ultimately foster improved local preparedness that considers children’s vulnerabilities.
Natural and man-made disasters will continue to affect communities, and children will often bear a greater burden than other populations (2). CDC and AAP have a continuing joint commitment to support the integration of the public health and pediatric communities and to prioritize preparation for children’s needs in emergency preparedness to enable our nation’s children to thrive.
References
1. Kuo, A. A., Thomas, P. A., Chilton, L. A., & Mascola, L. (2018). Pediatricians and Public Health: Optimizing the Health and Well-Being of the Nation’s Children. Pediatrics, e20173848.
2. Dziuban EJ, Peacock G, Frogel M. A Child’s Health is the Public’s Health: Progress and Gaps in Addressing Pediatric Needs in Public Health Emergencies. Am J Public Health. 2017;107:S134–S137. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.303950
3. Chung, S., Gardner, A., Schonfeld, D., Franks, J., So, M., Dziuban, E., & Peacock, G. (2017). Addressing Children’s Needs in Disasters: A Regional Pediatric Tabletop Exercise. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 1-5. http://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2017.137
4. Disaster Preparedness Advisory Council. Medical countermeasures for children in public health emergencies, disasters, or terrorism. Pediatrics. 2016;137(2):e20154273pmid:26729737
5. Murthy, B. P., Molinari, N. A. M., LeBlanc, T. T., Vagi, S. J., & Avchen, R. N. (2017). Progress in public health emergency preparedness—United States, 2001–2016. American journal of public health, 107(S2), S180-S185.