Video Abstract

Video Abstract

Close modal
CONTEXT:

The eutectic mixture of lidocaine (EMLA) cream has been used to reduce the pain during venipuncture in infants.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the efficacy and safety of EMLA in infants <3 months of age requiring venipuncture in comparison with nonpharmacological interventions in terms of pain reduction, change in physiologic variables, and methemoglobinemia.

DATA SOURCES:

Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, and gray literature were searched from inception to August 2017, without language restrictions.

STUDY SELECTION:

We selected randomized controlled trials in which researchers compared EMLA with nonpharmacological interventions.

DATA EXTRACTION:

Two reviewers independently performed abstract screening and full-text review, and extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias.

RESULTS:

Ten randomized controlled trials (907 infants) were included. EMLA revealed little or no effect in reduction of pain (standardized mean difference: 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.17 to 0.45; 6 trials, n = 742; moderate-quality evidence) when EMLA was compared with sucrose, breastfeeding, or placebo. In comparison with placebo, EMLA revealed a small-to-moderate effect on increasing methemoglobin levels (mean difference: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.66; 2 trials, n = 134; low-quality evidence). There was an increased risk of blanching of the skin in the EMLA group (relative risk: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.58 to 4.38; 2 trials, n = 123; I2 = 84%, very low–quality evidence).

LIMITATIONS:

Our results may not be applicable to older infants.

CONCLUSIONS:

EMLA reveals minimal benefits in terms of reduction of pain due to venipuncture procedure in comparison with placebo and no benefit in comparison with sucrose and/or breastfeeding. Moreover, it produced an elevation in methemoglobin levels and skin blanching.

Hospitalized infants, including preterm and term infants, undergo many routine painful procedures such as venipuncture.1 Venipuncture is one of many invasive procedures used in neonates.2 Venipuncture is performed either for blood sampling or the insertion of venous catheters.3,4 In a large multicenter study, venipuncture was reported as the second-most common skin-breaking procedure in the NICU and often required multiple attempts to complete.4 

Both term and preterm infants have the physiologic and anatomic capacity to experience pain.5 In infants, acute response to pain is evaluated by physiologic, behavioral, and biochemical changes in their body.5,7 Earlier studies have revealed that if pain is managed poorly, it could lead to alterations in reaction, perception, coping strategies, and emotional changes to subsequent painful stimuli.8 There is growing evidence that untreated pain in infants could lead to hyperanalgesia, sleep disturbances, and decreased mother and infant bonding.9,10 Both the Canadian Pediatrics Society and American Academy of Pediatrics have endorsed guidelines for effective use of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for the prevention and management of pain associated with routine neonatal procedures.11 

The eutectic mixture of lidocaine (EMLA) is a mixture of lidocaine (25 mg/g) and prilocaine (25 mg/g) in a cream base, which provides dermal anesthesia and/or analgesia.12,13 Lidocaine and prilocaine are both amide-type local anesthetic agents. EMLA cream acts by diffusing through intact skin to block neuronal transmission from dermal receptors.14 EMLA stabilizes neuronal membranes by inhibiting the ionic fluxes required for the initiation and conduction of nerve impulses, thereby effecting local anesthetic action.13 

The use of EMLA in infants and children has been studied in the last 2 decades, and there is evidence that EMLA is an effective topical anesthetic for venipuncture in infants >3 months of age and in children.15,19 However, its use in infants <3 months of age, for venipuncture, has led to conflicting conclusions.20,22 Young infants have shown lower levels of capacity for nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide reductase, which reduces methemoglobin to hemoglobin,1,23,24 and therefore EMLA could potentially lead to methemoglobinemia in this group.23 

According to the US Food and Drug Administration and the manufacturer,13,25 EMLA is not recommended to be used in preterm infants; moreover, no more than 1 application site at a time is recommended for infants <3 months. Systematic reviews have been published on the use of EMLA cream for pain for all of the neonatal procedures.1,26 However, assessment of the efficacy and safety of EMLA in comparison with nonpharmacological interventions for pain, particularly pain due to venipuncture procedure in infants <3 months, has not been systematically summarized yet.

Our aim was to determine the anesthetic efficacy and safety of EMLA cream in term and preterm infants aged <3 months requiring venipuncture in comparison with standard nonpharmacological interventions.

This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42017065445). This report follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA).27 

Criteria included all types of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which researchers examined the effectiveness of EMLA cream (lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%), at any dose, location of the body, or length of time before venipuncture. The population of interest was infants who are term (37–42 weeks’ gestational age [GA]) and preterm (25–36 weeks’ GA) up to a postnatal age of 3 months who required venipuncture for blood drawing or venous catheter insertion, from both inpatient and outpatient settings. The nonpharmacological comparators were placebo, no EMLA (no treatment at all), sucrose, breastfeeding, and skin-to-skin care.

The primary outcomes were pain and methemoglobinemia. Pain was measured during the venipuncture and up to 1 hour postprocedure by either one of the following pain scales or other validated measures: Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP),28 Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS),29 Douleur Aigue Nouveau-ne behavioral scale (DAN),30 or Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS).31 The safety outcome was determined by the proportion of infants with methemoglobinemia measured after venipuncture. The threshold of >5% of methemoglobin was considered as positive methemoglobinemia in infants without clinical signs and symptoms.32 The secondary outcomes were total duration of crying (duration of crying measured in seconds from the beginning of the venipuncture until its cessation), heart rate and desaturation (during and after venipuncture), number of venipuncture attempts, and number of skin-blanching events (white or pale skin due to vasoconstriction).

We searched Medline and Embase via Ovid, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to August 2017. We did not apply any language restrictions. In Medline, a subject-specific search strategy was combined with the sensitivity-maximizing version of the Cochrane highly sensitive strategy and was modified for use in other databases (see Supplemental Information). We identified ongoing trials using Clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. In addition, we contacted experts and searched bibliographies for additional references. We also searched the Web of Science and Open SIGLE (System for information on Grey Literature in Europe) databases for conference proceedings. We used the standard systematic review methods recommended by Cochrane.33 

One author (S.S.) performed the search. The results were merged, and duplicate records were removed by using Endnote ×8 software.34 Two reviewers (S.S. and I.D.F.) independently and in duplicate screened the identified titles and abstracts to assess their eligibility. Full texts were reviewed by 2 authors (S.S. and I.D.F.) independently and in duplicate. We included studies for which both reviewers agreed about the eligibility. Disagreements were resolved by discussion.

For each eligible study, 2 reviewers (S.S. and I.D.F.) independently and in duplicate extracted data into a pilot-tested Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. We extracted the following data: participants’ characteristics, risk of bias (RoB) assessment, number of events, number of patients per arm (dichotomous outcomes), and mean, SD, and number of patients per arm (continuous outcomes) for all outcomes of interest.

For some studies, the results were presented only in graphs or figures without any numerical data, and we could not obtain the raw data from authors. For these studies, we extracted the data by using Plotdigitilizer software version 2.6.8.35 In some of the studies, the measures of variance were not reported for continuous data; hence, following the approach by Furukawa et al,36 we imputed the values, borrowing them from other studies similar in sample sizes and means.

RoB

Two reviewers (S.S. and I.D.F.) independently assessed RoB using the Cochrane RoB tool.33 The following domains were assessed: sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias), blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias), completeness of follow-up, and selective reporting bias or any other biases (Supplemental Table 4). The reviewers made judgments on every criterion toward high or low RoB and avoiding the use of unclear risk as much as possible, unless no judgment could be made on the basis of the information provided in the study.

Data Synthesis and Analysis

Effect estimates were reported as risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes and as means and SDs for continuous outcomes. For the pain outcome, we used the standardized mean difference (SMD) because researchers used different scales, such as the NFCS, NIPS, PIPP, and DAN. We standardized the results to a uniform scale before they were combined,37 using the NIPS pain scale, which is considered a reliable and widely used tool for pain assessment in infants.38 

We performed meta-analysis using the statistical package Review Manager version 5.339 and applied the generic inverse variance method.40 We used random effect models because we assumed that there was heterogeneity among studies, and heterogeneity can be better incorporated in random-effects models.33 

When studies had more than 2 arms and more than 1 comparator,41,43 data were extracted from each comparator and compared with the EMLA group. In these cases, the information from 2 non-EMLA groups (eg, sucrose and placebo groups) were compared separately with the EMLA group, creating 2 comparisons from 1 single study (eg, sucrose versus EMLA and placebo versus EMLA), but the information from the common EMLA (sample size and events, when applicable) group was divided out evenly among the 2 comparisons to avoid double counting patients.

We assessed heterogeneity with the χ2 test (P < .10) and the I2 statistic.44 The I2 value was assessed as “might not be important” (0%–40%), “moderate” (30%–60%), “substantial” (50%–90%), or “considerable” (75%–100%), as recommended by Cochrane.40,45 Publication bias was assessed by evaluating the degree of asymmetry of funnel plot.46 

Assessment of Quality of Evidence

We assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach,47 using the online Guidelines Developmental Tool.48 

We identified 3707 records from databases and 15 additional records through other sources. After removing duplicates, 2988 titles and abstracts were screened. Seventy-eight studies were identified for full-text screening. In Fig 1, we show the PRISMA flow diagram of study selection. In Table 1, we show the characteristics of included studies. After full-text review, we excluded 68 studies (Supplemental Table 5). Additional information on each included study is presented in Supplemental Tables 6 through 24. In total, 907 patients were randomly assigned: 412 patients received EMLA, and 495 received either placebo, sucrose, water, or breast milk. Most of these trials were performed in Sweden. A dose of 0.5 to 1 g of EMLA was used in all studies.

FIGURE 1

PRISMA study flow diagram. CINAHL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; WHO, World Health Organization.

FIGURE 1

PRISMA study flow diagram. CINAHL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; WHO, World Health Organization.

Close modal
TABLE 1

Summary of Included Studies

No.StudyLocationTotal No. PatientsIncluded in ReviewPatient CharacteristicsInterventionDetails of ComparatorsOutcomes
Abad et al41  Spain 51 51 GA: 37–42 wk 1 g of EMLA 2 mL of spring water, 2 mL of sucrose 24%, and 1 g of EMLA + 2 mL of sucrose Total crying duration, RR, O2 sat, HR 
BW: 2.8–3.7 kg 
PNA: <4 d 
Acharya et al20  United Kingdom 20 19 GA: 26–33 wk 0.5 mL of EMLA 0.5 mL of placebo cream HR, BP, O2 sat, NFCS score, methemoglobin level 
BW: 0.916–2.246 kg 
PNA: 3–65 d 
Aziznejad et al42  Iran 120 120 GA: 37–42 wk 1 g of EMLA No treatment, sucrose, breast milk HR, RR, O2 sat, DAN score, and crying time 
BW: 2.6–3.5 kg 
PNA: 2–18 d 
Biran et al49  France 80 76 GA: 25–36 wk 0.5 g of EMLA and 0.5 mL of sucrose 0.5 mL of sucrose + placebo cream (0.5 g) DAN and PIPP score 
BW: 0.810–3.0 kg 
PNA: 1–68 d 
Brisman et al50  Sweden 47 47 GA: 37–42 wk 1 g of EMLA 1 g of placebo cream Venous met-hemoglobin levels 
BW: 2.8–5.5 kg 
PNA: 1–74 d 
Gradin et al51  Sweden 201 196 GA: 32–42.3 wk 0.5 g of EMLA cream and 1 mL of water 0.5 g of placebo cream and 1 mL of sucrose PIPP score, HR, crying time, local skin changes, and time needed to complete the venipuncture 
BW: 1.1–5.5 
PNA: 1–30 d 
Larsson et al21  Sweden 120 111 GA: 37–43 wk 0.5 mL of EMLA 0.5 mL of placebo NFCS score, first cry latency, first cry duration, total cry time, and total time to complete venipuncture 
BW: 2.3–4.9 kg 
PNA: 3–8 d 
Lindh et al22  Sweden 60 46 GA: 37–42 wk 1 g of EMLA 1 g of placebo Incidence of crying, heart rate, and heart rate variability 
BW: 3.1–4.1 kg 
PNA: 3–4 d 
Marcatto Jde et al43  Brazil 30 21 GA: >28 to <37 wk 0.6 g of EMLA and 2 mL of water 0.6 g of placebo and 2 mL of sucrose NIPS score, HR, O2 sat, and BP 
BW: NR 
PNA: <7 d 
10 Noori-Sadkam52  Iran 220 220 GA: ≥38 wk 0.5 g of EMLA cream with 1 mL of water 0.5 g of placebo cream and 1 mL of sucrose NIPS and crying time 
BW: 2.3–4.5 kg 
PNA: 1–15 d 
No.StudyLocationTotal No. PatientsIncluded in ReviewPatient CharacteristicsInterventionDetails of ComparatorsOutcomes
Abad et al41  Spain 51 51 GA: 37–42 wk 1 g of EMLA 2 mL of spring water, 2 mL of sucrose 24%, and 1 g of EMLA + 2 mL of sucrose Total crying duration, RR, O2 sat, HR 
BW: 2.8–3.7 kg 
PNA: <4 d 
Acharya et al20  United Kingdom 20 19 GA: 26–33 wk 0.5 mL of EMLA 0.5 mL of placebo cream HR, BP, O2 sat, NFCS score, methemoglobin level 
BW: 0.916–2.246 kg 
PNA: 3–65 d 
Aziznejad et al42  Iran 120 120 GA: 37–42 wk 1 g of EMLA No treatment, sucrose, breast milk HR, RR, O2 sat, DAN score, and crying time 
BW: 2.6–3.5 kg 
PNA: 2–18 d 
Biran et al49  France 80 76 GA: 25–36 wk 0.5 g of EMLA and 0.5 mL of sucrose 0.5 mL of sucrose + placebo cream (0.5 g) DAN and PIPP score 
BW: 0.810–3.0 kg 
PNA: 1–68 d 
Brisman et al50  Sweden 47 47 GA: 37–42 wk 1 g of EMLA 1 g of placebo cream Venous met-hemoglobin levels 
BW: 2.8–5.5 kg 
PNA: 1–74 d 
Gradin et al51  Sweden 201 196 GA: 32–42.3 wk 0.5 g of EMLA cream and 1 mL of water 0.5 g of placebo cream and 1 mL of sucrose PIPP score, HR, crying time, local skin changes, and time needed to complete the venipuncture 
BW: 1.1–5.5 
PNA: 1–30 d 
Larsson et al21  Sweden 120 111 GA: 37–43 wk 0.5 mL of EMLA 0.5 mL of placebo NFCS score, first cry latency, first cry duration, total cry time, and total time to complete venipuncture 
BW: 2.3–4.9 kg 
PNA: 3–8 d 
Lindh et al22  Sweden 60 46 GA: 37–42 wk 1 g of EMLA 1 g of placebo Incidence of crying, heart rate, and heart rate variability 
BW: 3.1–4.1 kg 
PNA: 3–4 d 
Marcatto Jde et al43  Brazil 30 21 GA: >28 to <37 wk 0.6 g of EMLA and 2 mL of water 0.6 g of placebo and 2 mL of sucrose NIPS score, HR, O2 sat, and BP 
BW: NR 
PNA: <7 d 
10 Noori-Sadkam52  Iran 220 220 GA: ≥38 wk 0.5 g of EMLA cream with 1 mL of water 0.5 g of placebo cream and 1 mL of sucrose NIPS and crying time 
BW: 2.3–4.5 kg 
PNA: 1–15 d 

BP, blood pressure; BW, birth weight; HR, heart rate; O2 sat, oxygen saturation; PNA, postnatal age; RR, respiratory ra.

The RoB assessment is shown in Supplemental Tables 7 through 25. In Supplemental Figure 6A, we show the RoB assessment for each study, and in Supplemental Fig 6B, we display a summary of the RoB by domain. The domains judged to have lowest RoB were blinding of participants and personnel, incomplete outcome data, and selective reporting of the outcome. Randomization was judged to have low RoB, except for in 2 studies.42,52 Six studies had high RoB20,41,43,50,52 for concealment of allocation because there was no clear information provided regarding allocation concealment. Blinding of outcome assessors was judged to be at high RoB in 1 study.52 

In 6 studies, researchers reported pain during the venipuncture.21,42,43,49,51,52 There was little to no reduction in pain when EMLA cream was compared with placebo, sucrose, and breastfeeding. Heterogeneity was substantial (SMD: 0.14; 95% CI: −0.17 to 0.45; 6 trials, n = 742; I2 = 71%; moderate-quality evidence; Fig 2). In 4 studies, researchers reported pain at the end of the venipuncture.20,21,43,49 We found minimal-to-moderate reduction in pain score at the end of the venipuncture (SMD: −0.26; 95% CI: −0.59 to 0.07; 4 trials, n = 226; I2 = 25%; moderate-quality evidence; Fig 3). Overall, the quality of evidence for reduction of pain with EMLA cream is moderate quality because of inconsistency and imprecision (Table 2).

FIGURE 2

Forest plot of the comparison of EMLA versus control. The outcome was pain during venipuncture. df, degree of freedom; IV, inverse variance method.

FIGURE 2

Forest plot of the comparison of EMLA versus control. The outcome was pain during venipuncture. df, degree of freedom; IV, inverse variance method.

Close modal
FIGURE 3

Forest plot of the comparison of EMLA versus control. The outcome was pain at the end of venipuncture. df, degrees of freedom; IV, intravenous.

FIGURE 3

Forest plot of the comparison of EMLA versus control. The outcome was pain at the end of venipuncture. df, degrees of freedom; IV, intravenous.

Close modal
TABLE 2

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Evidence Profile and Summary of Findings

Certainty AssessmentNo. PatientsEffectCertaintyImportance
No. StudiesStudy DesignRoBInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther ConsiderationsEMLANo EMLARR (95% CI)Absolute (95% CI)
Pain during the venipuncture             
 6 Randomized trials Not seriousa Seriousb Not serious Not seriousc None 335 407 — SMD: 0.14, SD higher (0.17 lower to 0.45 higher) ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate Critical 
Pain at the end of the venipuncture             
 4 Randomized trials Not seriousd Not seriouse Not serious Seriousf None 111 115 — SMD: 0.26, SD lower (0.59 lower to 0.07 higher) ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate Critical 
Methemoglobinemia             
 2 Randomized trials Seriousg Not serioush Not serious Seriousi None 68 66 — MD: 0.35% higher (0.04 higher to 0.66 higher) ⨁⨁◯◯ Low Critical 
Total duration of crying             
 7 Randomized trials Seriousj Not seriousk Not serious Not seriousl None 299 325 — MD: 3.32 s higher (1.19 lower to 7.86 higher) ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate Critical 
Heart rate during the procedure             
 6 Randomized trials Seriousm Seriousn Not serious Not seriouso None 150 174 — MD: 1.22 beats per min lower (9.85 lower to 7.41 higher) ⨁⨁◯◯ Low Important 
Heart rate after the procedure             
 4 Randomized trials Seriousp Not seriousq Not serious Seriousr None 118 136 — MD: 3.74 beats per min higher (5.74 lower to 13.22 higher) ⨁⨁◯◯ Low Important 
Oxygen saturation             
 3 Randomized trials Seriouss Not serioust Not serious Very seriousu None 21 36 — MD: 0.35% higher (0.77 lower to 1.47 higher) ⨁◯◯◯ Very Low Important 
Skin blanching             
 2 Randomized trials Seriousv Seriousw Not serious Very seriousx None 47 out of 63 (74.6%) 11 out of 60 (18.3%) 2.63 (1.58 to 4.38) 299 more per 1000 (from 106 more to 620 more) ⨁◯◯◯ Very Low Important 
Certainty AssessmentNo. PatientsEffectCertaintyImportance
No. StudiesStudy DesignRoBInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther ConsiderationsEMLANo EMLARR (95% CI)Absolute (95% CI)
Pain during the venipuncture             
 6 Randomized trials Not seriousa Seriousb Not serious Not seriousc None 335 407 — SMD: 0.14, SD higher (0.17 lower to 0.45 higher) ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate Critical 
Pain at the end of the venipuncture             
 4 Randomized trials Not seriousd Not seriouse Not serious Seriousf None 111 115 — SMD: 0.26, SD lower (0.59 lower to 0.07 higher) ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate Critical 
Methemoglobinemia             
 2 Randomized trials Seriousg Not serioush Not serious Seriousi None 68 66 — MD: 0.35% higher (0.04 higher to 0.66 higher) ⨁⨁◯◯ Low Critical 
Total duration of crying             
 7 Randomized trials Seriousj Not seriousk Not serious Not seriousl None 299 325 — MD: 3.32 s higher (1.19 lower to 7.86 higher) ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate Critical 
Heart rate during the procedure             
 6 Randomized trials Seriousm Seriousn Not serious Not seriouso None 150 174 — MD: 1.22 beats per min lower (9.85 lower to 7.41 higher) ⨁⨁◯◯ Low Important 
Heart rate after the procedure             
 4 Randomized trials Seriousp Not seriousq Not serious Seriousr None 118 136 — MD: 3.74 beats per min higher (5.74 lower to 13.22 higher) ⨁⨁◯◯ Low Important 
Oxygen saturation             
 3 Randomized trials Seriouss Not serioust Not serious Very seriousu None 21 36 — MD: 0.35% higher (0.77 lower to 1.47 higher) ⨁◯◯◯ Very Low Important 
Skin blanching             
 2 Randomized trials Seriousv Seriousw Not serious Very seriousx None 47 out of 63 (74.6%) 11 out of 60 (18.3%) 2.63 (1.58 to 4.38) 299 more per 1000 (from 106 more to 620 more) ⨁◯◯◯ Very Low Important 

—, not applicable.

a

Of the 6 included studies, 2 studies were at high RoB for random sequence generation (Aziznejad et al,42 Noori-Sadkam 52), and 3 studies were at high RoB for allocation concealment (Aziznejad et al,42 Marcatto Jde et al,43 and Noori-Sadkam52); moreover, Noori-Sadkam52 was at high RoB for blinding of outcome assessor and randomization. Three studies were at low RoB for all the items (Biran et al,49 Gradin et al,51 and Larsson et al21). In sensitivity analysis, excluding the studies with high RoB does not change the results (point estimate and 95% CI), as such, we did not rate down for RoB.

b

The point estimate and 95% CI overlap in the sucrose or breast milk group; however, the P value is .03, and the I2 is 59%. For the placebo or no treatment group, point estimate and 95% CI overlap with a P value of .52, and I2 is 0%. When both groups were pooled together, the point estimates vary, and 95% CIs do not overlap, and there is a P value of .001, with I2 of 71%. As such, it was rated down, and likely heterogeneity is explained by the subgroup.

c

Most of the clinicians would consider 20% reduction in pain as minimal clinically important difference. The point estimate is 0.14 with the 95% CI of −0.17 to 0.45, which does not overlap the threshold line (effect size of 0.2) and crosses the no difference line; therefore, this precisely shows no effect, which would not change the decision about the use of EMLA for pain (we would be recommending against the use of EMLA). Moreover, the sample size appears adequate; hence, it was not rated down for imprecision.

d

Of the 4 included studies, 2 studies were at high RoB for allocation concealment (Acharya et al20 and Marcatto Jde et al43), and 2 studies (Biran et al49 and Larsson et al21) were at low RoB for all the items; however, both Biran et al49 and Larsson et al21 together have a weight of over 70%, and, excluding the high-risk studies, this does not change the results. As such, it was not rated down for RoB.

e

For pain at the end of procedure outcome, visually both point estimate and 95% CI overlap. Moreover, the P value is .20, and I2 is 25% (low). Hence, this outcome was not rated down for inconsistency.

f

The point estimate reveals the effect size of 0.26, which exceeds the MCID (minimal clinically important difference). However, the 95% CI (−0.59 to 0.07) overlaps the threshold and also crosses the no difference line; hence, it would change the decision regarding the use of EMLA. Moreover, the sample size does not meet the criteria of OIS (optimal information size) of at least 400; as such, this outcome was rated down for imprecision.

g

Both the trials (Acharya et al20 and Brisman et al50) were at high RoB for allocation concealment.

h

For this outcome, the point estimate of both studies does not overlap, but there is some overlap of 95% CI. The pooled P value was .07, and there was moderate heterogeneity on I2 (58%), although there is some heterogeneity between the studies, which is not explained by the time of methemoglobin measurement (<8 vs 8–24 h test of subgroup difference revealed a P value of .70 and an I2 of 0%); however, this inconsistency would not change the judgment regarding the safety concerns with the use of EMLA because point estimates from both studies are on the same side of harm. A likely explanation of this heterogeneity is the difference in patient and intervention. In Acharya et al’s20 trial, patient population was only preterm infants (26–33 wk gestation), and intervention was 0.5 mL of EMLA, whereas in Brisman et al’s50 trial, patient population was term infants (>37 wk gestation), and 1 g of EMLA was used.

i

Because OIS is <400, this outcome was rated down for imprecision.

j

Of the 7 trials, 4 of them were at high RoB for allocation concealment (Acharya et al,20 Abad et al,41 and Noori-Sadkam), and one of them (Noori-Sadkam) was at high risk for the blinding of outcome assessor and randomization. Three studies were at low RoB (Biran et al,49 Graddin and Larsson et al,21 and Noori-Sadkam). Noori-Sadkam had a weight of 69.1% and was a large trial with high RoB, and it appears that excluding high-RoB studies does not necessarily change the result; as such, it was rated down for RoB.

k

This outcome was presented in a subgroup of infants <37 wk versus infants >37 wk. Visually, point estimate and 95% CI overlap with a P value of .69 and an I2 of 0% in infants <37 wk gestation, whereas in infants >37 wk gestation, both point estimate and 95% CI overlap with a P value of .24 and an I2 of 27%. Overall, the pooled P value was .36, and I2 was 9%; as such, this outcome was not rated down for inconsistency.

l

For duration of crying, we do not have MCID from literature. The point estimate was 3.32 (increase in the duration of crying), and the 95% CI of −1.19 to 7.84 overlaps the no difference line; however, the sample size was ∼600, and as such, it was not rated down for precision.

m

There were 3 studies with high RoB for allocation concealment (Abad et al,41 Acharya et al,20 and Marcatto Jde et al43), and only 2 of them (Gradin et al51 and Lidh) were at low RoB for all the items.

n

There is variability in point estimates across studies, and some overlap of 95% CI; however, the P value of a χ2 test was .001, and I2 was 75%; as such, this outcome is rated down.

o

We do not have literature to guide the MID (mInimal important difference). The 95% CI is wide and overlaps the no difference line; however, the OIS is almost 400, and as such, it was not rated down for imprecision.

p

Two studies were at high RoB for allocation concealment (Abad et al41 and Marcatto Jde et al43), and only 1 study was at low RoB for all the items (Gradin et al51). Separating high-risk studies from low-risk studies (Gradin et al51) does not significantly change the point estimate and 95% CI; as such, it was not rated down for RoB.

q

For this outcome, there is little variability in point estimates across studies, and for most studies, 95% CIs overlap; moreover, the P value of a χ2 test was .11, with moderate heterogeneity of 50% (I2). As such, it was not rated down for inconsistency.

r

Because the 95% CI (−5.74 to 13.22) is wide and overlaps the no difference line, the upper boundary of CI suggests an increase in heart rate, whereas the lower boundary of CI reveals reduction in heart rate. As such, it would change our decision and recommendation. Moreover, sample size is not large; therefore, this outcome was rated down for imprecision.

s

All the studies were at high RoB for allocation concealment (Abad et al41 and Acharya et al20).

t

For this outcome, point estimates varied; however, 95% CIs overlap across studies with a P value of .29 and minimal heterogeneity of 20% (I2); hence, there are no major concerns related to inconsistency, and as such, it was not rated down.

u

The point estimate is 0.35, and 95% CI is −0.77 to 1.47, which crosses the no difference line. The sample size is small, and as such, this outcome was rated down by 2 levels.

v

One of the trials (Brisman et al50) was at high RoB for allocation concealment, and another trial was at low RoB for all the items (Biran et al49). The weight of Brisman et al’s50 study was more (55%) than Biran et al’s49 study (44%), and as such, it was rated down for RoB.

w

Point estimates vary widely across studies with no overlap of 95% CI; moreover, the P value of a χ2 test was .01 with a substantial heterogeneity of 84% (I2). As such, this outcome was rated down by 2 levels.

x

Sample size does not meet the criteria for OIS for binary outcome.

There was a moderate effect size in elevation of methemoglobin levels between 2 groups at 2 different time periods (mean difference [MD]: 0.35%; 95% CI: 0.04% to 0.66%, 2 trials, n = 134; I2 = 58%; low-quality evidence) favoring the placebo over EMLA20,52 (Table 2, Fig 4). In none of these studies did authors report methemoglobin levels of >5% or any clinical symptom.

FIGURE 4

Forest plot of the comparison of EMLA versus control. The outcome was methemoglobinemia. IV, intravenous.

FIGURE 4

Forest plot of the comparison of EMLA versus control. The outcome was methemoglobinemia. IV, intravenous.

Close modal

Total Duration of Crying

In 6 studies, authors reported total duration of crying during venipuncture in 624 patients.20,21,41,49,51,52 EMLA was compared with placebo or sucrose, and subgroup analysis was performed based on GA at birth. The duration of crying was comparable in both groups (MD: 3.32; 95% CI: −1.19 to 7.84, 6 trials, n = 624; I2 = 9%; moderate-quality evidence; Supplemental Fig 9, Table 2).

Heart Rate

Heart rate was assessed in 5 studies20,22,41,43,51 in which researchers compared EMLA versus placebo or sucrose and showed there was no difference in reduction in heart rate during the venipuncture (MD: −1.22; 95% CI: −9.85 to 7.41; 5 trials, n = 330; I2 = 75%; low-quality evidence; Supplemental Fig 10, Table 2) and after (MD: 3.74; 95% CI: −5.74 to 13.22; 3 trials, n = 254; I2 = 50%, very low–quality evidence; Supplemental Fig 10, Table 2).

Oxygen Saturation

In 2 studies,20,41 authors reported degree of oxygen saturation during venipuncture and revealed no difference in oxygen saturation when EMLA was compared to placebo or sucrose (MD: 0.35; 95% CI: −0.77 to 1.47; 2 trials, n = 57; I2 = 20%; very low–quality evidence; Supplemental Fig 11, Table 2).

Skin Blanching

In 2 studies, researchers reported skin blanching as an adverse effect of EMLA application.49,50 The meta-analysis under the random effects model revealed no statistical difference between EMLA and placebo (see Supplemental Fig 12A). However, we ran a post hoc sensitivity analysis with a fixed-effects model because the initial analysis revealed counterintuitive results (ie, both studies separately revealed statistical difference between EMLA and placebo, and when pooled together, they showed no statistically significant differences), and we found that EMLA increased the risk of skin blanching (RR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.58 to 4.38; 2 trials, n = 123; I2 = 84%, very low–quality evidence; Supplemental Fig 12B, Table 2).

A priori, we intended to perform subgroup analysis on the basis of GA at birth (37–42 and <37 weeks) and birth weight (< or > 2500 g). However, we only performed the analysis based on GA because of limited data.20,22,41 Additional post hoc subgroup analyses were performed on the different pain scales used for pain measurement and the type of comparators (placebo or sucrose or breast milk) and were based on 2 different time periods of serum methemoglobin levels (<8 hours or 8–24 hours after the EMLA application).

Pain

Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the effect of EMLA compared with placebo or no treatment and sucrose or breastfeeding and were also based on different pain scales. There was small-to-moderate effect size in reduction in pain favoring EMLA in comparison with placebo or no treatment (SMD: −0.34; 95% CI: −0.67 to −0.00; 2 trials, n = 149; I2 = 0%). There was no effect in reduction of pain with sucrose or breastfeeding when compared with EMLA in both preterm and term infants (SMD: 0.28; 95% CI: −0.02 to 0.58; 5 trials, n = 593; I2 = 59%; Fig 2). Interestingly, when subgroup analysis was done only for term infants, EMLA was inferior to sucrose or breast milk (SMD: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.58; 3 trials, 5 trials, n = 496; I2 = 0%; Supplemental Fig 7). Subgroup analysis by pain scale revealed no effect when using the DAN and PIPP scale, but when using NIPS, EMLA was inferior to control (MD: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.20; n = 241; I2 = 0%; Fig 5).

FIGURE 5

Forest plot of the comparison of EMLA versus control. The outcome was pain during venipuncture based on pain scales. df, degrees of freedom; IV, intravenous.

FIGURE 5

Forest plot of the comparison of EMLA versus control. The outcome was pain during venipuncture based on pain scales. df, degrees of freedom; IV, intravenous.

Close modal

Methemoglobinemia

Subgroup analysis was based on 2 different time periods of serum methemoglobin levels (<8 hours or 8–24 hours after EMLA application) and favored placebo over EMLA, with low-quality evidence.

We conducted a sensitivity analysis for pain outcome to explore the impact of bias by excluding studies at high risk for allocation concealment. We found a small-to-moderate reduction in pain with placebo, sucrose, or breast milk (SMD: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.64; 3 trials, n = 361; I2 = 0%), whereas low-risk bias studies revealed no reduction to moderate reduction in pain with EMLA cream when compared with placebo or sucrose (SMD: −0.14; 95% CI: −0.66 to 0.37; 3 trials, n = 381; I2 = 83%; Supplemental Fig 8).

We conducted post hoc sensitivity analysis for skin blanching with a fixed effects model and found that there was an increased risk of skin blanching with use of EMLA cream during venipuncture procedure (RR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.58 to 4.38; 2 trials, n = 123; I2 = 84%; Supplemental Fig 12B).

Topical anesthetics may provide relief in pain during neonatal procedures in the hospital. EMLA is one of the topical agents that has been most frequently studied in the last decades for neonatal pain management during venipuncture.53 In our review, we made an effort to synthesize all the evidence on EMLA efficacy for pain control in infants up to 3 months of age. We found that EMLA was similar to no treatment or placebo in most efficacy outcomes and inferior in safety outcomes.

EMLA revealed no reduction in pain scores (pooled effect) during and after venipuncture in comparison with all comparators (placebo, no treatment, sucrose, or breastfeeding); however, when EMLA was only compared with placebo or no treatment, it had a small effect on pain scores during the venipuncture. Hence, EMLA is better than placebo or no treatment. We found that pain scores were lower in the sucrose or breast milk intervention group when compared with EMLA; hence, clinicians can interpret this finding that in most of the cases, sucrose or breast milk will likely reduce the pain due to venipuncture as compared with EMLA. However, there is a possibility in some cases that sucrose or breast milk might not able to reduce the pain due to venipuncture procedure at all. Interestingly, it was noted that sucrose and breast milk were superior to EMLA for pain management when analysis was performed only in term infants.

We found no significant improvement in physiologic and behavioral changes. Furthermore, we found considerable clinical heterogeneity between studies in terms of variability of timing of assessments (during, at the end of the procedure, and a few minutes postprocedure). It is suggested that EMLA needs to be applied 60 minutes before venipuncture, which could be impractical in certain clinical settings such as acute care; however, it is suggested that in neonates, EMLA should be applied no longer than 30 minutes before skin puncture because of its faster clearance from immature skin.54 

Regarding concerns related to the safety of EMLA application in term and preterm infants during venipuncture procedure, such as methemoglobinemia, in a few studies, researchers reported this important outcome.20,50 Taddio et al1 have reported 12 safety studies with EMLA in neonates for different procedures, such as heel lancing, circumcision, lumber puncture, venipuncture, and other needle-insertion procedures. The meta-analysis of 4 studies in that review revealed that methemoglobin concentrations did not differ between EMLA-treated and placebo-treated infants (MD: −0.11%; 95% CI: −0.31% to 0.10%). These results were different from our findings. In Taddio et al’s review, the procedures for which EMLA was compared with placebo were heel lancing and circumcision, whereas we only analyzed venipuncture. Moreover, 3 of the trials combined measured the methemoglobin levels at <8 hours from EMLA application, which could explain the difference in findings.

The risk of methemoglobinemia with a single application of 0.5 g to 1 g of EMLA is low. However, there is no evidence in which it is suggested that applications of EMLA could lead to methemoglobinemia in neonates. Local skin reactions have been reported in the literature after application of EMLA.55 We also found a significant increase in the event rate of skin blanching with EMLA when compared with placebo. An updated policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics reported that EMLA has been shown to decrease measures of pain during venipuncture, percutaneous central venous catheter insertion, and peripheral arterial puncture; however, methemoglobinemia, skin irritation, and toxicity are the major concerns.53 With our findings, we support this statement.

Recently, Foster et al26 published a Cochrane review in which they evaluated the efficacy and safety of 2 commonly used topical anesthetic creams, including EMLA, for any needle-related procedures, including venipuncture. However, the authors were not able to pool the results for the pain outcome because of differing outcome measures and methods of reporting. We believe that these authors conducted a review based on a broad research question: all the needle-related procedures in neonates. In this review, we focused on one intervention, EMLA, in a specific population (venipuncture procedure in infants younger than 3 months).

Our study has several strengths. First, we performed a meta-analysis for patient-important outcomes such as pain, crying duration, physiologic variables, and methemoglobin levels. Also, we conducted a comprehensive literature search through 4 databases, gray literature, and manual searches, reducing risk of publication bias. Additionally, we performed subgroup (term versus preterm, methemoglobin levels [<8 vs 8–24 hours] and pain scales) and sensitivity analyses to explore the robustness of the results and effect of assumption about RoB. Lastly, we applied high methodological standards in the searches and analyses, following the recommendations by Cochrane.33 

There are a few potential limitations to describe. We included all the trials in which researchers compared EMLA with any nonpharmacological comparators. We were able to compare EMLA with sucrose and breast milk; however, we could not compare EMLA with other nonpharmacological interventions such as skin-to-skin care. Our study results are applicable to a specific patient population because we included studies limited to term and preterm infants with a postconceptional age of 3 months; however, we found that the mean age of patients for most of the studies in this review was <1 month of age, except for 3 studies in which infants >1 month of age were included.20,49,50 

We found that EMLA cream might help to reduce the pain in neonates during and at the end of venipuncture when compared with a placebo, with moderate-quality evidence. In addition, EMLA was inferior to sucrose or breastfeeding to control the pain. Lastly, in this review, we support the concerns on the elevation of methemoglobin levels and increased risk of skin blanching with EMLA use. On the basis of our assessment, we think clinicians may want to avoid the routine use of EMLA before venipuncture in both term and preterm infants and consider nonpharmacological interventions such as sucrose or breastfeeding. Future high-quality, blinded, randomized, and well-powered trials are needed in both term and preterm infants to address several important questions relating to different dosing of EMLA in term infants and other pharmacological and nonpharmacological strategies for pain management and their long-term effects, particularly in preterm infants.

CI

confidence interval

DAN

Douleur Aigue Nouveau-ne behavioral scale

EMLA

eutectic mixture of lidocaine

GA

gestational age

MD

mean difference

NFCS

Neonatal Facial Coding System

NIPS

Neonatal Infant Pain Scale

PIPP

Premature Infant Pain Profile

PRISMA

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines

RCT

randomized controlled trial

RoB

risk of bias

RR

risk ratio

SMD

standardized mean difference

Drs Shahid and Florez conceptualized and designed the systematic review and search strategy, screened the title and abstract, reviewed the full-text articles, collected and extracted the data, conducted the statistical analysis, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the final manuscript; Dr Mbuagbaw coordinated and supervised data collection and critically reviewed the methodology and manuscript for important intellectual content; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

This trial has been registered with PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/) (identifier CRD42017065445).

FUNDING: No external funding.

1
Taddio
A
,
Ohlsson
A
,
Einarson
TR
,
Stevens
B
,
Koren
G
.
A systematic review of lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) in the treatment of acute pain in neonates.
Pediatrics
.
1998
;
101
(
2
). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/101/2/e1
[PubMed]
2
Anand
KJ
,
Hickey
PR
.
Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus.
J Prenat Perinat Psychol Health
.
1988
;
3
(
2
):
103
123
3
Barker
DP
,
Rutter
N
.
Exposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
.
1995
;
72
(
1
):
F47
F48
[PubMed]
4
Carbajal
R
,
Rousset
A
,
Danan
C
, et al
.
Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units.
JAMA
.
2008
;
300
(
1
):
60
70
[PubMed]
5
Rushforth
JA
,
Levene
MI
.
Behavioural response to pain in healthy neonates.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
.
1994
;
70
(
3
):
F174
F176
[PubMed]
6
Johnston
CC
,
Strada
ME
.
Acute pain response in infants: a multidimensional description.
Pain
.
1986
;
24
(
3
):
373
382
[PubMed]
7
Ogawa
S
,
Ogihara
T
,
Fujiwara
E
, et al
.
Venepuncture is preferable to heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
.
2005
;
90
(
5
):
F432
F436
[PubMed]
8
Porter
FL
,
Grunau
RE
,
Anand
KJS
.
Long-term effects of pain in infants.
J Dev Behav Pediatr
.
1999
;
20
(
4
):
253
261
[PubMed]
9
Stevens
B
.
Management of painful procedures in the newborn.
Curr Opin Pediatr
.
1996
;
8
(
2
):
102
107
[PubMed]
10
Larsson
BA
.
Pain management in neonates.
Acta Paediatr
.
1999
;
88
(
12
):
1301
1310
[PubMed]
11
Batton
DG
,
Barrington
KJ
,
Wallman
C
;
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn
;
American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Surgery
;
Canadian Paediatric Society Fetus and Newborn Committee
.
Prevention and management of pain in the neonate: an update.
Pediatrics
.
2006
;
118
(
5
):
2231
2241
[PubMed]
12
Buckley
MM
,
Benfield
P
.
Eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream. A review of the topical anaesthetic/analgesic efficacy of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA).
Drugs
.
1993
;
46
(
1
):
126
151
[PubMed]
13
AstraZeneca
. EMLA. 2017. Available at: https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00040608.PDF. Accessed July 28, 2018
14
Gajraj
NM
,
Pennant
JH
,
Watcha
MF
.
Eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream.
Anesth Analg
.
1994
;
78
(
3
):
574
583
[PubMed]
15
Baxter
AL
,
Ewing
PH
,
Young
GB
,
Ware
A
,
Evans
N
,
Manworren
RC
.
EMLA application exceeding two hours improves pediatric emergency department venipuncture success.
Adv Emerg Nurs J
.
2013
;
35
(
1
):
67
75
[PubMed]
16
Lander
JA
,
Weltman
BJ
,
So
SS
.
EMLA and amethocaine for reduction of children’s pain associated with needle insertion.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
.
2006
;(
3
):
CD004236
[PubMed]
17
Choy
L
,
Collier
J
,
Watson
AR
.
Comparison of lignocaine-prilocaine cream and amethocaine gel for local analgesia before venepuncture in children.
Acta Paediatr
.
1999
;
88
(
9
):
961
964
[PubMed]
18
van Kan
HJ
,
Egberts
AC
,
Rijnvos
WP
,
ter Pelkwijk
NJ
,
Lenderink
AW
.
Tetracaine versus lidocaine-prilocaine for preventing venipuncture-induced pain in children.
Am J Health Syst Pharm
.
1997
;
54
(
4
):
388
392
[PubMed]
19
Robieux
I
,
Kumar
R
,
Radhakrishnan
S
,
Koren
G
.
Assessing pain and analgesia with a lidocaine-prilocaine emulsion in infants and toddlers during venipuncture.
J Pediatr
.
1991
;
118
(
6
):
971
973
[PubMed]
20
Acharya
AB
,
Bustani
PC
,
Phillips
JD
,
Taub
NA
,
Beattie
RM
.
Randomised controlled trial of eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics cream for venepuncture in healthy preterm infants.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
.
1998
;
78
(
2
):
F138
F142
[PubMed]
21
Larsson
BA
,
Tannfeldt
G
,
Lagercrantz
H
,
Olsson
GL
.
Alleviation of the pain of venepuncture in neonates.
Acta Paediatr
.
1998
;
87
(
7
):
774
779
[PubMed]
22
Lindh
V
,
Wiklund
U
,
Håkansson
S
.
Assessment of the effect of EMLA during venipuncture in the newborn by analysis of heart rate variability.
Pain
.
2000
;
86
(
3
):
247
254
[PubMed]
23
Nilsson
A
,
Engberg
G
,
Henneberg
S
,
Danielson
K
,
De Verdier
CH
.
Inverse relationship between age-dependent erythrocyte activity of methaemoglobin reductase and prilocaine-induced methaemoglobinaemia during infancy.
Br J Anaesth
.
1990
;
64
(
1
):
72
76
[PubMed]
24
Camp
NE
.
Methemoglobinemia.
J Emerg Nurs
.
2007
;
33
(
2
):
172
174
[PubMed]
25
FDA
. EMLA cream. Available at: www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2000/19941s11lbl.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2018
26
Foster
JP
,
Taylor
C
,
Spence
K
.
Topical anaesthesia for needle‐related pain in newborn infants.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
.
2017
;
2
:
CD010331
27
Moher
D
,
Liberati
A
,
Tetzlaff
J
,
Altman
DG
;
PRISMA Group
.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
PLoS Med
.
2009
;
6
(
7
):
e1000097
[PubMed]
28
Ballantyne
M
,
Stevens
B
,
McAllister
M
,
Dionne
K
,
Jack
A
.
Validation of the Premature Infant Pain Profile in the clinical setting.
Clin J Pain
.
1999
;
15
(
4
):
297
303
[PubMed]
29
Grunau
RV
,
Craig
KD
.
Pain expression in neonates: facial action and cry.
Pain
.
1987
;
28
(
3
):
395
410
[PubMed]
30
Carbajal
R
,
Paupe
A
,
Hoenn
E
,
Lenclen
R
,
Olivier-Martin
M
.
APN: evaluation behavioral scale of acute pain in newborn infants [in French].
Arch Pediatr
.
1997
;
4
(
7
):
623
628
31
Lawrence
J
,
Alcock
D
,
McGrath
P
,
Kay
J
,
MacMurray
SB
,
Dulberg
C
.
The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain.
Neonatal Netw
.
1993
;
12
(
6
):
59
66
32
Hjelt
K
,
Lund
JT
,
Scherling
B
, et al
.
Methaemoglobinaemia among neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit.
Acta Paediatr
.
1995
;
84
(
4
):
365
370
[PubMed]
33
Higgins
JPT
,
Green
S
, eds.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
.
Chichester, United Kingdom
:
John Wiley & Sons
;
2011
34
Clarivate Analytics
. EndNote X8. 2016. Available at: http://endnote.com/sites/en/files/m/pdf/en-x8-qrg-mac.pdf. Accessed April 30, 2017
35
SourceForge
. Plot Digitizer. Available at: http://plotdigitizer.sourceforge.net/. Accessed April 30, 2017
36
Furukawa
TA
,
Barbui
C
,
Cipriani
A
,
Brambilla
P
,
Watanabe
N
.
Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results.
J Clin Epidemiol
.
2006
;
59
(
1
):
7
10
[PubMed]
37
Thorlund
K
,
Walter
SD
,
Johnston
BC
,
Furukawa
TA
,
Guyatt
GH
.
Pooling health-related quality of life outcomes in meta-analysis-a tutorial and review of methods for enhancing interpretability.
Res Synth Methods
.
2011
;
2
(
3
):
188
203
[PubMed]
38
Bellieni
CV
,
Cordelli
DM
,
Caliani
C
, et al
.
Inter-observer reliability of two pain scales for newborns.
Early Hum Dev
.
2007
;
83
(
8
):
549
552
[PubMed]
39
The Cochrane Collaboration
.
Review Manager (RevMan)
.
Copenhagen, Denmark
:
The Nordic Cochrane Centre
;
2008
40
Deeks
JJ
,
Higgins
J
,
Altman
DG
.
Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses
. In:
Higgins
J
,
Green
S
, eds.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
.
2008
:
243
296 (b)
41
Abad
F
,
Díaz-Gómez
NM
,
Domenech
E
,
González
D
,
Robayna
M
,
Feria
M
.
Oral sucrose compares favourably with lidocaine-prilocaine cream for pain relief during venepuncture in neonates.
Acta Paediatr
.
2001
;
90
(
2
):
160
165
[PubMed]
42
Aziznejad
P
,
Pasha
YZ
,
Kacho
MA
, et al
.
Comparing the effect of oral sucrose, breast milk and EMLA cream on acute pain during venipuncture in full term neonates.
J Babol Univ Med Sci
.
2013
;
15
(
3
):
16
23
43
Marcatto Jde
O
,
Vasconcelos
PC
,
Araújo
CM
,
Tavares
EC
,
Pereira e Silva
Y
.
EMLA versus glucose for PICC insertion: a randomised triple-masked controlled study.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
.
2011
;
96
(
6
):
F467
F468
[PubMed]
44
Higgins
JP
,
Thompson
SG
,
Deeks
JJ
,
Altman
DG
.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.
BMJ
.
2003
;
327
(
7414
):
557
560
[PubMed]
45
Deeks
JJ
,
Higgins
J
,
Altman
DG
.
Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses
. In:
Higgins
J
,
Green
S
, eds.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
.
2008
:
243
296 (a)
46
Egger
M
,
Davey Smith
G
,
Schneider
M
,
Minder
C
.
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
BMJ
.
1997
;
315
(
7109
):
629
634
[PubMed]
47
Guyatt
G
,
Oxman
AD
,
Akl
EA
, et al
.
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
J Clin Epidemiol
.
2011
;
64
(
4
):
383
394
[PubMed]
48
GRADEpro
. Computer program. 2014. Available at: www.gradepro.org. Accessed October 10, 2018
49
Biran
V
,
Gourrier
E
,
Cimerman
P
,
Walter-Nicolet
E
,
Mitanchez
D
,
Carbajal
R
.
Analgesic effects of EMLA cream and oral sucrose during venipuncture in preterm infants.
Pediatrics
.
2011
;
128
(
1
). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/128/1/e63
[PubMed]
50
Brisman
M
,
Ljung
BM
,
Otterbom
I
,
Larsson
LE
,
Andréasson
SE
.
Methaemoglobin formation after the use of EMLA cream in term neonates.
Acta Paediatr
.
1998
;
87
(
11
):
1191
1194
[PubMed]
51
Gradin
M
,
Eriksson
M
,
Holmqvist
G
,
Holstein
A
,
Schollin
J
.
Pain reduction at venipuncture in newborns: oral glucose compared with local anesthetic cream.
Pediatrics
.
2002
;
110
(
6
):
1053
1057
[PubMed]
52
Lotfi
MN
.
Pain reducing in icteric newborns while venipuncturing: comparison of local anesthetic cream with orally glucose.
Acta Med Iran
.
2008
;
46
(
1
):
58
62
53
Committee on Fetus and Newborn
;
Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
.
Prevention and management of procedural pain in the neonate: an update.
Pediatrics
.
2016
;
137
(
2
):
e20154271
[PubMed]
54
Essink-Tjebbes
CM
,
Hekster
YA
,
Liem
KD
,
van Dongen
RTM
.
Topical use of local anesthetics in neonates.
Pharm World Sci
.
1999
;
21
(
4
):
173
176
[PubMed]
55
Stevens
B
,
Johnston
C
,
Taddio
A
, et al
.
Management of pain from heel lance with lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream: is it safe and efficacious in preterm infants?
J Dev Behav Pediatr
.
1999
;
20
(
4
):
216
221
[PubMed]

Competing Interests

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Supplementary data