To evaluate the association of the 2009 changes to the US Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) food package and childhood obesity trends. We hypothesized that the food package change reduced obesity among children participating in WIC, a population that has been especially vulnerable to the childhood obesity epidemic.
We used an interrupted time-series design with repeated cross-sectional measurements of state-specific obesity prevalence among WIC-participating 2- to 4-year-old children from 2000 to 2014. We used multilevel linear regression models to estimate the trend in obesity prevalence for states before the WIC package revision and to test whether the trend in obesity prevalence changed after the 2009 WIC package revision, adjusting for changes in demographics. In a secondary analysis, we adjusted for changes in macrosomia and high prepregnancy BMI.
Before the 2009 WIC food package change, the prevalence of obesity across states among 2- to 4-year-old WIC participants was increasing by 0.23 percentage points annually (95% confidence interval: 0.17 to 0.29; P < .001). After 2009, the trend was reversed (−0.34 percentage points per year; 95% confidence interval: −0.42 to −0.25; P < .001). Changes in sociodemographic and other obesity risk factors did not account for this change in the trend in obesity prevalence.
The 2009 WIC food package change may have helped to reverse the rapid increase in obesity prevalence among WIC participants observed before the food package change.
Changes to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) in 2009 decreased intake of foods and beverages associated with excess weight gain. Surveillance data suggest obesity prevalence among WIC-participating children declined from 2010 to 2014.
We quantify the association of the WIC package change and childhood obesity using a quasi-experimental study design and accounting for state-level differences, race and/or ethnicity, poverty trends, and trends in macrosomia and high prepregnancy BMI among WIC participants.
The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides vouchers for nutrient-dense foods and beverages to more than half of all US infants and one-quarter of low-income pregnant and postpartum women and children <5 years of age.1,2 To be eligible, households must have an income ≤185% of the federal poverty level or participate in several other federal aid programs and be at nutritional or medical risk.3 In addition to being at risk for poor nutritional status, WIC-eligible children have also been particularly vulnerable to the childhood obesity epidemic.4
In 2009, the lists of foods that could be purchased with WIC vouchers (known as the WIC food packages), which includes basic food categories, including milk, cheese, beans, peanut butter, eggs, juice, cereal, and grains, were updated to better align with dietary guidelines. The new package provides extra cash allowances for fruits and vegetables, cuts the previous juice allowance in half, requires low-fat or skim milk for 2- to 4-year-olds, reduces cheese, and requires whole-grain instead of refined-grain products (among other changes).2 Evidence suggests the revised WIC package has beneficially impacted household diets, including an increase in Healthy Eating Index scores,5 reductions in juice purchases, and increases in the intake of fruit and whole grains.6 A recent analysis of Nielsen Homescan Consumer Panel data found that WIC households’ purchases of total calories declined by 11% after the package change, whereas purchases of fruits and vegetables increased.7
On the basis of these well-documented improvements in nutrition after the WIC package change, the risk of childhood obesity among WIC-participating children may also have declined. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported a decline in the prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among WIC-participating children from 2010 to 2014 but did not directly test whether the WIC package change was associated with a change in childhood obesity trends.8 Given the variation in childhood obesity rates by state,9 evaluating longer-term trends in obesity prevalence and the potential differential impact of the WIC package change by state is critical. A focus on state-level trends is particularly important given the level of control that state WIC agencies have over program administration1; states had discretion for implementing certain aspects of the revised food packages and may have differed in the extent to which healthier foods were made available.10 In this article, we evaluate whether national and state-level trends in obesity prevalence among WIC-participating 2- to 4-year-old children changed after the 2009 WIC package revision, adjusting for sociodemographic composition and other risk factors for childhood obesity.
Methods
Study Design
This quasi-experimental study employed interrupted time-series analysis11 by using repeated cross-sectional measurements of obesity prevalence among WIC-participating children at the state level to test the potential impact of the 2009 WIC package change on childhood obesity trends. In interrupted time-series analysis, regression models estimate trends in population measures of an outcome before a prespecified time when a policy change (or other intervention) occurs and then test whether the trend changes afterward.11 In this study, we compared population trends in obesity prevalence among WIC-participating 2- to 4-year-olds before and after 2009 to estimate whether there were changes in obesity prevalence or changes in the trend in obesity prevalence that may be attributable to the package change.12 To reduce confounding from other concurrent trends, such as the Great Recession of 2007 to 2009, which occurred during a similar time period as the package change and which resulted in an increase in the use of federal food assistance and new populations using such assistance, we controlled for changes in racial-ethnic composition and child poverty at the state level. In an exploratory analysis including a subsample of states with complete data, we also examined whether changes in WIC-participating children’s birth weight and maternal BMI were confounders.
Measures and Data Sources
Our primary outcome is obesity prevalence, calculated as the percentage of 2- to 4-year-old children enrolled in the WIC in a given state or territory with sex-specific BMI for age ≥95th percentile on the 2000 CDC growth charts.13 We obtained the state-level prevalence of obesity among WIC-participating 2- to 4-year-olds in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014 from data.gov files14 derived from the WIC Participant and Program Characteristics (WIC-PC), a national census of participants in the WIC administered every 2 years by the US Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service.15 In addition, we used prevalence estimates from Pan et al13 for 2000, 2004, 2010, and 2014. In a comparison of data for the 2 years of overlap (2010 and 2014), we find negligible differences between the data sets (Supplemental Information). We excluded Hawaii from our main analyses given concerns about data quality.8 Our data set includes data from 49 states in 6 years, or 294 observations; these data were collected from all 2- to 4-year-olds for whom obesity prevalence was determined, a group that ranged in number from 2 253 471 children in 2000 to 3 152 137 children in 2012 in total across all 49 geographies.
To account for changes in the racial-ethnic composition of the WIC population, we calculated the percentage of 2- to 4-year-old WIC participants classified as white, African American, Asian American and/or Pacific Islander, American Indian, or Hispanic for each state and year. The WIC-PC reports for 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014 included state-level race-ethnic breakdowns for children between the ages of 2 and 4 years but not for 2000 and 2004. We obtained data on race and ethnicity for 2000 and 2004 from the WIC data16,17; when comparing these with the WIC-PC report data14 for the 3 years of overlap (2008, 2010, and 2012), we found high correlations between measures of racial and ethnic makeup (Supplemental Information).
To account for possible shifts in child poverty, we assessed state-level child poverty rates with the Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) for children ages 0 to 17 years,18 calculated by the Center on Poverty and Social Policy at Columbia University.18 The SPM is a posttax measure of poverty used by the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics that accounts for in-kind transfers and other benefits as well as nondiscretionary expenses, such as medical or child care costs.19 The SPM is considered an improvement over the official poverty measure in its use of a poverty threshold updated for contemporary expenditure patterns20; we use a measure anchored to nondiscretionary spending (for food, clothing, shelter, and utilities) from 2008 to 201220 and adjusted for geographic differences in costs of living.18
For the exploratory analysis of whether changes in the 2- to 4-year-olds’ history of macrosomia or maternal prepregnancy weight status could have played a role in changes in childhood obesity prevalence among WIC-participating children, we extracted the proportions of WIC participants with a birth weight >4000 g and of WIC-participating mothers with a prepregnancy BMI classified as obese (>29.1, the cutoff used by WIC agencies before Revision 10 of the Nutrition Risk Criteria)21 from the WIC-PC reports.14,16,17,22,–28 To address the lag between the measurement of maternal prepregnancy BMI and obesity in our population of 2- to 4-year-old children, we include prepregnancy BMI with a 4-year lag. We note that only 41 states reported data on birth weight and prepregnancy BMI in at least 2 time points, and 45.1% of state-year observations are missing data for at least 1 of the 2 variables. We assessed the robustness of our results to the use of state-level birth weight data from the CDC Wonder Database natality public-use data,29 but these data cover all children in the United States (rather than just the WIC population), and we were unable to identify a comparable data source for prepregnancy BMI. Because of the high incidence of missing data, we consider these analyses secondary and exploratory.
Statistical Analyses
We fitted segmented linear regression models to state-level obesity prevalence data as a function of year (centered at 2009), an indicator for post–WIC-package change (ie, 1 if year >2009 and 0 if otherwise), and an interaction term of the indicator and the number of years since the change. The coefficient for year can be interpreted as the annual percentage-point change in obesity per year on average across states, whereas the coefficient for the indicator of years after 2009 represents the average percentage-point drop in obesity for all years after 2009 (a level change), and the coefficient of the interaction of the indicator and the year represents the average annual percentage-point change for each year after 2009 (a change in slope).11 All models were fitted with state fixed effects to control for time-invariant differences in obesity prevalence between states as well as with state random effects. Hausman tests30 fail to reject the null hypothesis of no difference in coefficient estimates from fixed- versus random-effect specifications; thus, we report results from the more efficient random-effect models. The full model specification can be found in the Supplemental Information.
We first fit baseline models including just the year, level, and trend variables as well as the random effects. The level variable was not significant, suggesting there was no immediate drop in obesity prevalence after the year 2009; this variable was thus excluded from the models. We then fit models with controls for child poverty as well as racial-ethnic composition to assess whether changes in the demographics of WIC participants could explain changes in obesity level. Lastly, for our exploratory analysis of the potential impact of changes in trends in macrosomia and prepregnancy BMI on trends in childhood obesity prevalence in this population, we fit a model including the prevalence of macrosomia and high maternal prepregnancy BMI among those states with complete data for these variables. Because complete case analysis may produce biased results when data are not missing completely at random, we further used multiple imputation by chained equations to impute missing data.31 We imputed 20 data sets in which macrosomia and the percentage of mothers with high prepregnancy BMI were iteratively predicted with regression equations including all covariates used in our main analyses; the resultant model for this exploratory analysis was fit on each data set with results pooled to reflect the uncertainty in the predicted values.32
The main analyses were conducted in R 3.4.4. Fixed- and random-effects models were fitted with the plm package.33 Sensitivity analyses and multiple imputation were conducted by using Stata 14 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX). Two-sided P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Demographic characteristics of WIC participants from 2000 to 2014 are presented in Table 1. The average obesity prevalence among WIC-participating 2- to 4-year-old children across the states was 12.92% in 2000, rose to an average of 15.13% in 2008, stayed roughly the same in 2010, and then decreased to 14.24% by 2014. Although the sociodemographic composition of the 2- to 4-year-old WIC-participant population changed somewhat over this period, we did not identify statistically significant differences in the state-level mean racial makeup or percentage of children in poverty. The average percentage of 2- to 4-year-old WIC participants born with macrosomia declined from 2000 to 2008 and then leveled off from 2008 to 2014. Meanwhile, the percentage of WIC-participating women who had a prepregnancy BMI >29.1 increased steadily from 2000 to 2014.
State-Level Demographic and Anthropometric Characteristics of Participants in the WIC, 2000–2014
| 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | 2010 | 2012 | 2014 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of obesity among 2-to 4-y-old WIC participants, mean (SD) | 12.92 (2.40) | 14.80 (2.38) | 15.13 (2.19) | 15.24 (2.24) | 14.51 (2.27) | 14.24 (2.27) | <.001 |
| Race and/or ethnicity, %,a mean (SD) | |||||||
| American Indian | 3.14 (7.58) | 3.27 (7.85) | 3.62 (8.27) | 3.50 (7.93) | 3.63 (7.92) | 3.56 (7.64) | .999 |
| Asian American or Pacific Islander | 2.10 (2.18) | 2.25 (2.13) | 2.35 (2.15) | 2.61 (2.25) | 2.94 (2.33) | 3.37 (2.52) | .056 |
| African American | 21.29 (18.82) | 19.82 (7.03) | 19.37 (15.42) | 19.19 (14.70) | 19.95 (4.85) | 20.75 (14.97) | .986 |
| Hispanic | 20.67 (20.34) | 25.22 (21.39) | 29.94 (22.15) | 30.91 (21.33) | 30.79 (20.81) | 30.65 (20.37) | .086 |
| White | 52.79 (21.98) | 49.44 (21.87) | 44.72 (20.90) | 43.79 (20.21) | 42.70 (19.62) | 41.67 (19.25) | .059 |
| WIC-participating children with high birth wt, %,b mean (SD) | 13.22 (2.38) | 7.17 (1.78) | 6.49 (1.44) | 6.62 (1.59) | 6.43 (1.76) | 6.41 (1.68) | <.001 |
| WIC-participating women with high prepregnancy BMI, %,c mean (SD) | 21.95 (3.50) | 26.22 (2.91) | 28.55 (3.33) | 29.96 (3.12) | 30.66 (4.39) | 32.22 (4.31) | <.001 |
| Children in poverty, %,d mean (SD) | 15.83 (4.36) | 14.92 (3.98) | 14.14 (3.91) | 14.39 (4.01) | 14.81 (3.99) | 14.97 (4.12) | .412 |
| Total No. 2-to 4-y-old WIC participants | 2 253 471 | 2 550 533 | 2 790 527 | 3 206 995 | 3 152 137 | 2 915 253 | — |
| 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | 2010 | 2012 | 2014 | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of obesity among 2-to 4-y-old WIC participants, mean (SD) | 12.92 (2.40) | 14.80 (2.38) | 15.13 (2.19) | 15.24 (2.24) | 14.51 (2.27) | 14.24 (2.27) | <.001 |
| Race and/or ethnicity, %,a mean (SD) | |||||||
| American Indian | 3.14 (7.58) | 3.27 (7.85) | 3.62 (8.27) | 3.50 (7.93) | 3.63 (7.92) | 3.56 (7.64) | .999 |
| Asian American or Pacific Islander | 2.10 (2.18) | 2.25 (2.13) | 2.35 (2.15) | 2.61 (2.25) | 2.94 (2.33) | 3.37 (2.52) | .056 |
| African American | 21.29 (18.82) | 19.82 (7.03) | 19.37 (15.42) | 19.19 (14.70) | 19.95 (4.85) | 20.75 (14.97) | .986 |
| Hispanic | 20.67 (20.34) | 25.22 (21.39) | 29.94 (22.15) | 30.91 (21.33) | 30.79 (20.81) | 30.65 (20.37) | .086 |
| White | 52.79 (21.98) | 49.44 (21.87) | 44.72 (20.90) | 43.79 (20.21) | 42.70 (19.62) | 41.67 (19.25) | .059 |
| WIC-participating children with high birth wt, %,b mean (SD) | 13.22 (2.38) | 7.17 (1.78) | 6.49 (1.44) | 6.62 (1.59) | 6.43 (1.76) | 6.41 (1.68) | <.001 |
| WIC-participating women with high prepregnancy BMI, %,c mean (SD) | 21.95 (3.50) | 26.22 (2.91) | 28.55 (3.33) | 29.96 (3.12) | 30.66 (4.39) | 32.22 (4.31) | <.001 |
| Children in poverty, %,d mean (SD) | 15.83 (4.36) | 14.92 (3.98) | 14.14 (3.91) | 14.39 (4.01) | 14.81 (3.99) | 14.97 (4.12) | .412 |
| Total No. 2-to 4-y-old WIC participants | 2 253 471 | 2 550 533 | 2 790 527 | 3 206 995 | 3 152 137 | 2 915 253 | — |
Included were 49 states, excluding Hawaii. P values are from analysis of variance tests of differences in means. —, not applicable.
Demographic makeup is presented as the number of children with race reported in each category as a percentage of (for 2000 and 2004) all 1- to 4-y-old children enrolled in the WIC or (for 2008–2014) all 2- to 4-y-old WIC participants as a percentage of all children for whom a race in the 5 categories was reported.
The percentage of WIC-participating 1- to 4-y-old children with birth weights between 4001 and 6000 g. This measure is reported by state and local WIC agencies and thus is missing data for some states and territories (eg, n = 29 in 2000 and n = 37 in 2014).
The percentage of WIC-participating pregnant women with prepregnancy BMI ≥29.1 reported with a 4-y lag. This measure is reported by state and local WIC agencies and thus is missing data for some states (eg, n = 33 in 4 years before 2000 and n = 40 4 years before 2014).
Rate for children ages 0 to 17 y calculated with the anchored SPM available from the Center on Poverty and Social Policy at Columbia University for all US states.19
Results from the crude interrupted time-series analysis show that before 2009, national obesity prevalence among 2- to 4-year-old WIC participants was increasing 0.26 percentage points annually (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22 to 0.31; P < .001; Table 2). After 2009, the trend was reduced by 0.55 percentage points (95% CI: −0.66 to −0.43; P < .001). Observations are correlated within states, with ∼78% of the variance being attributable to variation between states. Predictions for each of the 49 states with complete data are presented in Fig 1.
Multivariate Random-Effects Models Predicting the State-Level Obesity Prevalence (Percentage Points) Among 2- to 4-Year-Old WIC Participants, 2000–2014
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Intercept (95% CI) | 15.55*** (14.93 to 16.17) | 16.01*** (15.30 to 16.71) |
| Annual trenda, yrs (95% CI) | 0.26*** (0.22 to 0.31) | 0.23*** (0.17 to 0.29) |
| Change in annual trend after 2009 (95% CI) | −0.55*** (−0.66 to −0.43) | −0.57*** (−0.69 to −0.44) |
| Race and/or ethnicity, %b (95% CI) | ||
| American Indian | — | 0.07 (−0.003 to 0.14) |
| Asian American | — | 0.19* (0.01 to 0.37) |
| African American | — | 0.03 (−0.00 to 0.06) |
| Hispanic | — | 0.03 (−0.001 to 0.05) |
| Children in poverty (standardized)c, % (95% CI) | — | 0.07 (−0.25 to 0.39) |
| ICC | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| N | 294 | 294 |
| N groups | 49 | 49 |
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Intercept (95% CI) | 15.55*** (14.93 to 16.17) | 16.01*** (15.30 to 16.71) |
| Annual trenda, yrs (95% CI) | 0.26*** (0.22 to 0.31) | 0.23*** (0.17 to 0.29) |
| Change in annual trend after 2009 (95% CI) | −0.55*** (−0.66 to −0.43) | −0.57*** (−0.69 to −0.44) |
| Race and/or ethnicity, %b (95% CI) | ||
| American Indian | — | 0.07 (−0.003 to 0.14) |
| Asian American | — | 0.19* (0.01 to 0.37) |
| African American | — | 0.03 (−0.00 to 0.06) |
| Hispanic | — | 0.03 (−0.001 to 0.05) |
| Children in poverty (standardized)c, % (95% CI) | — | 0.07 (−0.25 to 0.39) |
| ICC | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| N | 294 | 294 |
| N groups | 49 | 49 |
Results are reported for models with state random effects; Durbin-Wu-Hausman tests fail to reject the null hypothesis of no significant differences in consistency between models with fixed and random effects. —, not applicable.
The annual trend is calculated with the year centered in 2009.
Demographic makeup is presented as the number of children with race reported in each category as a percentage of (for 2000 and 2004) all 1- to 4-y-old children enrolled in the WIC or (for 2008–2014) all 2- to 4-y-old WIC participants as a percentage of all children for whom a race in the 5 categories was reported. We further subtract the population-weighted mean demographic makeup from each of these variables so the intercept in model 2 can be interpreted as the mean overall obesity prevalence in 2009 for a state with a demographic makeup comparable to the demographic makeup of our population across all observations (1.14% American Indian, 3.24% Asian American and/or Pacific Islander, 19.95% African American, 44.16% Hispanic, and 31.5% white) and a child poverty rate equal to the average across state-year observations (14.84).
Standardized rate for children ages 0 to 17 y calculated with the anchored SPM available from the Center on Poverty and Social Policy at Columbia University for all US states.19
P < .05; *** P < .001
Obesity prevalence and prediction by state. Black points indicate the measured obesity prevalence among children ages 2 to 4 years in each year; lines show the fit from model 1 in Table 2, with red indicating the predicted trend before 2009 and blue indicating the trend after 2009.
Obesity prevalence and prediction by state. Black points indicate the measured obesity prevalence among children ages 2 to 4 years in each year; lines show the fit from model 1 in Table 2, with red indicating the predicted trend before 2009 and blue indicating the trend after 2009.
After adjusting for changes in racial-ethnic composition and child poverty, the results were essentially unchanged. We estimated a pre-2009 annual trend of a 0.23 percentage-point increase in childhood obesity prevalence (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.29; P < .001) and a post-2009 change in slope of −0.57 percentage points annually (95% CI: −0.69 to −0.44; P < .001). On the basis of these adjusted results, we estimated that after the package revisions in 2009, there was a decline in childhood obesity of 0.34 percentage points per year. The intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC) was marginally reduced after controlling for sociodemographic variables (0.75), suggesting that between-state differences in sociodemographic makeup explained little of the between-state differences in obesity prevalence.
Our exploratory analysis of the potential influence of changes in macrosomia and high maternal prepregnancy BMI on trends in childhood obesity prevalence suggests that, although controlling for macrosomia and prepregnancy BMI may have slightly attenuated the change in trend, these 2 factors have little contribution to the observed drop in childhood obesity prevalence after 2009 (Supplemental Tables 3 and 4).
Discussion
We found, using an interrupted time-series analysis, that the 2009 WIC package change was associated with a shift in the trend of childhood obesity prevalence among 2- to 4-year-old WIC participants from a 0.23 -percentage-point annual increase to a 0.34 percentage-point annual decrease. Changes in the racial-ethnic and income composition of the WIC population did not explain this change in trend, nor did changes in maternal prepregnancy BMI or macrosomia prevalence.
A change in the trend in obesity prevalence related to dietary changes resulting from the 2009 package change is plausible. A substantial body of evidence has shown that the dietary habits of WIC participants improved from before to after the package change. Participating families purchased 11% fewer total calories after the package change compared with before7 and also improved overall diet quality in ways that may protect against obesity and facilitate healthier growth. Participants purchased and consumed less fruit juice, refined grains, grain-based desserts, and sugar-sweetened beverages while increasing purchases and consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains.5,–7,34 This dietary pattern has been associated with less weight gain in both children and adults.35,36 Small, beneficial reductions in total energy intake could result in small population-wide reductions in average BMI.12,37,38
Although overall our analysis revealed declining obesity prevalence after the package change, our results also suggest variation between states that was not explained by differences in racial-ethnic makeup or child poverty. Although the difference may be due to unmeasured heterogeneity in WIC populations across states, another possibility is that differences exist in how effectively the WIC package changes were implemented in each state. For example, recent research documents disparities across states in minimum stocking requirements for WIC-participating vendors.10 Future researchers should evaluate whether differences in fidelity to the WIC package changes or other implementation factors may have played a role in potential differences in childhood obesity prevalence trends across the states.
Our analysis is subject to a number of limitations. We lack individual-level BMI data over time as well as data on how energy intake and expenditure may have changed, which would provide a mechanistic explanation of our findings. Perhaps most importantly, we are unable to control for the possibility that some other event between 2008 and 2010 may be driving the results. The Great Recession, for example, may have led to changes in the WIC population such that families who had previously had higher incomes and lower obesity risk were newly enrolling. However, we included controls for socioeconomic and demographic variables to account for these changes. Furthermore, we might expect to see changes driven by the Great Recession manifest most strongly in states that were more strongly affected, but Fig 1 does not reveal evidence of heterogeneity in the change in trend between the most strongly affected states (FL, NV, AZ, and CA) and states considered more “recession proof,” such as North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas, or Oklahoma.39 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was another major policy change in 2009, but existing evidence suggests no relationship between increased access to health insurance and obesity risk.40,41 Although it has been suggested that the decline could be the result of other public health interventions, such as increased breastfeeding promotion in addition to that provided by WIC or obesity-prevention efforts in child care settings,13 this is unlikely. First, carefully controlled studies suggest no causal link between breastfeeding and childhood obesity.42,–44 Second, although there are promising child care initiatives to prevent obesity,45 these were not widely disseminated in 2009 and thus could not logically have influenced obesity trends at that point. Similarly, although the Head Start program, which also reaches 2- to 4-year-olds in poverty, has been linked with potential reductions in obesity risk,46 there was no substantial change in Head Start in 2009 that could explain such changes in obesity trends. The inclusion of a control group of non–WIC participants would improve our ability to control for non–WIC-related policies, societal trends, or interventions that could have been impacting obesity in this population at the same time, but we are unable to identify a control group similar in age and socioeconomic characteristics to our sample because such a high proportion of low-income children participate in the WIC. Although the NHANES can provide estimates for this age group overall, the sample sizes for this age group are small once children participating in the WIC are excluded.47 Comparing existing NHANES data on trends in childhood obesity prevalence with the WIC trends does not suggest that the overall trends in childhood obesity prevalence exactly mirrored the WIC trends. Although obesity prevalence leveled off between 2011 and 2014 for children ages 6 to 11 years, most of whom would have been too old to be affected by the WIC package change,48 changes in the prevalence of obesity for 2- to 5-year-olds were found to have declined from 2003 to 2004 and have had no clear trend since. As more years of data as well as data on state-level differences in program implementation become available, further research should continue to evaluate the effect by, for example, examining heterogeneity in the change in trend on the basis of differences in WIC package changes by state.
Conclusions
This analysis demonstrates that the 2009 WIC package was associated with a reversal of the increasing trend in obesity prevalence among WIC participants observed from 2000 to 2014.
Ms Daepp compiled the data, conducted the analyses, drafted components of the manuscript, and contributed to the conceptualization of the analytic approach; Dr Gortmaker conceptualized the study and contributed to the writing of the manuscript; Drs Long and Wang contributed to the conceptualization of the study and the writing and editing of the manuscript; Dr Kenney oversaw the analysis, contributed to the conceptualization of the analytic approach, and drafted components of the manuscript; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.
FUNDING: Ms Daepp is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (grant 1122374). Drs Gortmaker, Long, and Kenney were supported by The JPB Foundation. Dr Wang was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant 1R01CA172814-01A1). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Heidi Blanck of the Obesity Prevention and Control Branch at the CDC for her comments.
- BMI
Body Mass Index
- CDC
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- CI
confidence interval
- ICC
intraclass-correlation coefficient
- SPM
Supplemental Poverty Measure
- WIC
Special Supplemental Program for Women, Infants, and Children
- WIC-PC
Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Participant and Program Characteristics
Comments