Recently been updated, neonatal resuscitation guidelines1  continue to recommend (level 2A) delayed cord clamping (DCC) in preterm newborns not requiring resuscitation at birth. Since the publication of the last guidelines2  the level of evidence has strengthened from limited data on efficacy and safety to moderate quality of evidence from randomized trials and their meta-analysis.3  Preterm infants receiving DCC were less likely to receive red blood cell transfusion and medications for hypotension, and the most important DCC was associated with improved survival.

While the guidelines advocate for DCC in infants who do not require resuscitation, this is not found in the Neonatal Resuscitation Algorithm, where the recommendations are operationalized by delivery room staff. The first observation pertains to the algorithm questions that should anticipate resuscitation needs. It is our opinion that “term gestation” should no longer have been present in the 2020 algorithm because it may promote an excessive conservative attitude, leading to clamp immediately the umbilical cord of any preterm newborns (including late preterm infants) that could safely benefit from placental transfusion during routine care while staying with the mother. The algorithm also does not encourage drying and stimulation of preterm infants that would benefit for 30–60 seconds of delayed cord clamping.

The 2020 guidelines considered DCC a reasonable option for any gestational age infant that does not require resuscitation at birth.

It would be extremely helpful for providers if the indications for cord clamping to be included in the algorithm's last version. Specifically, based on recommendations, the cord's clamping might be postponed until the first stabilization of warming and drying the infant.

As part of the algorithm delayed cord clamping may be better implemented by improving communication between obstetricians and neonatologists and engagement across the delivery team.4  Delayed cord clamping is performed widely at all gestational ages, as recently evidenced by a US survey,5  but variations about timing, method, and performance in higher risk deliveries. The inclusion of cord clamping management in the predelivery team briefing and the risk stratification assessment for advanced neonatal resuscitation would be a great service to all deliveries.

1
Aziz
K
,
Lee
CHC
,
Escobedo
MB
, et al
.
Part 5: Neonatal Resuscitation 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care
.
Pediatrics
.
2021
;
147
(
Suppl 1
):
e2020038505E
2
Wyckoff
MH
,
Aziz
K
,
Escobedo
MB
, et al
.
Part 13: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care
.
Circulation
.
2015
;
132
(
18
Suppl 2
):
S543
S560
3
Fogarty
M
,
Osborn
DA
,
Askie
L
, et al
.
Delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
.
2018
;
218
(
1
):
1
18
4
Perrone
B
,
Ghirardello
S
;
Italian Survey on Placental Transfusion Group
.
Placental Transfusion Strategies in Italy: A Nationwide Survey of Tertiary-Care Delivery Wards
.
Am J Perinatol
.
2017
;
34
(
7
):
722
728
5
Chiruvolu
A
,
Mallett
LH
,
Govande
VP
,
Raju
VN
,
Hammonds
K
,
Katheria
AC
.
Variations in umbilical cord clamping practices in the United States: a national survey of neonatologists [published online ahead of print October20, 2020
.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
.
2020
;
10.1080/14767058.2020.1836150

Competing Interests

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None declared.