BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Respiratory diseases are common in children with esophageal atresia (EA), leading to increased morbidity and mortality in the first year. The primary study objective was to identify the factors associated with readmissions for respiratory causes in the first year in EA children.

METHODS

A population-based study. We included all children born between 2008 and 2016 with available data and analyzed factors at birth and 1 year follow-up. Factors with a P value <.10 in univariate analyses were retained in logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 1460 patients born with EA, 97 (7%) were deceased before the age of 1 year, and follow-up data were available for 1287 patients, who constituted our study population. EAs were Ladd classification type III or IV in 89%, preterm birth was observed in 38%, and associated malformations were observed in 52%. Collectively, 61% were readmitted after initial discharge in the first year, 31% for a respiratory cause. Among these, respiratory infections occurred in 64%, and 35% received a respiratory treatment. In logistic regression models, factors associated with readmission for a respiratory cause were recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula, aortopexy, antireflux surgery, and tube feeding; factors associated with respiratory treatment were male sex and laryngeal cleft.

CONCLUSIONS

Respiratory morbidity in the first year after EA repair is frequent, accounting for >50% of readmissions. Identifying high risk groups of EA patients (ie, those with chronic aspiration, anomalies of the respiratory tract, and need for tube feeding) may guide follow-up strategies.

What’s Known on This Subject:

Retrospective monocentric studies have shown that respiratory diseases are common in patients with esophageal atresia, leading to increased morbidity and mortality in their first year.

What This Study Adds:

This study, the first to describe respiratory morbidity in the first year after esophageal atresia repair in a large population-based cohort, identified 3 main factors for respiratory readmission: chronic aspiration, anomalies of the respiratory tract, and need for tube feeding.

Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare congenital malformation, with an incidence of 1.8 per 10 000 live births, characterized by a lack of development of part of the esophagus during embryonic life, resulting in 2 esophageal cul-de-sacs, and associated with a tracheoesophageal fistula in ∼90% of cases.14  Lethal in the absence of treatment, improved surgical techniques and neonatal care currently allow for >90% survival at initial discharge.13 

Because both the esophagus and respiratory tract derive from the primitive foregut, this developmental disorder can be associated with respiratory affections, mainly tracheomalacia, (described in ∼80% of cases), as well as other laryngeal and bronchopulmonary malformations, leading to chronic respiratory symptoms.5,6  In addition, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), frequent in patients with EA, and recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula may increase both the risk of respiratory infections and readmission.7,8  The current literature provides evidence for healthy lungs at birth among these patients, with normal preoperative and postsurgical lung clearance index and functional residual capacity.9  However, early lung damage (in particular, recurrent respiratory infections) may interfere with proper lung growth. This may contribute to long-term respiratory morbidity and functional abnormalities observed in adulthood.10,11  However, studies on the early years of life have mostly been retrospective and based on small samples.7,1214  Thus, better knowledge of the factors associated with early respiratory morbidity in children with EA may help improve their respiratory management and prevent long-term pejorative evolution.

All children born with EA in France since 2008 have been included in a prospective, population-based register.15  Using data during the initial neonatal stay and at 1-year follow-up, the main objective of this study was to assess the factors associated with readmissions with respiratory diseases in the first year of age. The second objective was to assess the factors associated with needing respiratory treatment at the age of 1 year.

Data from the French register were used. This population-based study was designed within the framework of the French national plan for rare diseases, with the aim of prospectively collecting data from all children born with EA in France, as described in previous publications.1518  The register was approved by the National Informatics and Privacy Committee (Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés) and was qualified by the National Committee of Registers. All data were deidentified, with oral and written consent by the parents or caregivers. Data were collected prospectively by specialized physicians in each tertiary care center, during the initial hospitalization in the neonatal period and at 1-year follow-up, by using questionnaires validated by a multidisciplinary national committee of experts. A clinical research assistant contributed to data collection at each center, and all questionnaire responses were double checked by 2 professionals to ensure accuracy. The register was recorded in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02883725).

Inclusion criteria were children born with EA from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2016, and alive at the age of 1 year. Children for whom 1-year follow-up data were missing were excluded. The EA type was defined according to Ladd classification.4  A long-gap was defined as an inability to perform end-to-end anastomosis within the first 15 days after birth for anatomic reasons, thus excluding other reasons for delaying surgery, such as extreme prematurity or severe cardiac malformation. The existence of chromosomal abnormality and/or associated malformations (eg, neurologic, urogenital system, cardiovascular, anorectal, costovertebral, laryngeal cleft, or others) and whether they were part of vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, trachea-esophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb abnormalities (VACTERL)19  or another syndromic association (such as coloboma, heart defects, choanal atresia, growth retardation, genital abnormalities, and ear abnormalities [CHARGE])20  was noted.

During neonatal hospitalization, the following data were collected: antenatal hydramnios; term (preterm birth was defined as birth before 37 weeks of amenorrhea [WA]); birth weight (BW); small for gestational age (defined as a BW <10th percentile for term); season of birth; EA surgery details (ie, thoracotomy or thoracoscopy, colonic or gastric replacement, esophago-cervicostomy); length of invasive ventilation or noninvasive ventilation and oxygen therapy; need for tube feeding (ie, gastrostomy or nasogastric tube) and/or inhaled treatment at initial discharge; and length of hospital stay.

At 1-year follow-up, the following data were collected: history of fundoplication, cardiac surgery, or aortopexy; GERD (defined as a positive pH test result and/or esophagitis on endoscopy); complications (eg, recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula and/or a history of esophageal dilatation); and nutritional status at 1 year (eg, oral or tube feeding, a need for gastrostomy, undernutrition [defined as a weight-for-height z score ≤−2.0 SDs]). A history of readmission after the initial discharge (except for patients with an initial stay of 1 year), the number and length of each event, and the main reason for readmission (eg, respiratory or other) were noted. Readmissions were defined as hospitalizations for respiratory diseases if a respiratory cause was retained as the main cause by the physician and further classified as respiratory infections (eg, bronchiolitis or pneumoniae), a brief unexplained resolved event (BRUE) related to tracheomalacia or unexplained (excluding events linked to GERD or anastomotic stricture), or a hospitalization for airway fibroscopy. Respiratory treatment at 1 year included the following: inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatments, inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator, as-needed short-acting β-agonists, or chronic noninvasive mechanical ventilation.

Categorical variables are expressed as number (percentage), and quantitative variables are expressed as median (range). Normality was assessed by using histograms and the Shapiro-Wilk test. Between-group comparisons (ie, patients included versus deceased and patients included versus those with missing data at follow-up) and univariate analyses for the 2 outcomes (ie, readmission for respiratory cause and respiratory treatment at 1 year) were performed by using χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and Student’s t or Mann–Whitney U tests for quantitative variables. Factors with a P value <.10 in univariate analyses for the 2 outcomes were retained in logistic regression models. Full models were simplified with a backward selection procedure by using a removal criterion of 0.05. To avoid case deletion in multivariate analyses, missing data were imputed by multiple imputations by using the regression-switching approach (chained equations; m = 10 imputations).21  The imputation procedure was performed under the missing-at-random assumption by using all variables, with the predictive mean-matching method for continuous variables and logistic regression (binary, ordinal, or multinomial) models for categorical variables. Rubin’s rules were used to combine the estimates derived from multiple imputed data sets.22  All statistical tests were performed at the 2-tailed α level of .05 by using SAS software, release 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC).

Figure 1 shows a flowchart of the study population. Collectively, 1460 children were born with EA in France between 2008 and 2016. After excluding of 97 (7%) patients who were deceased at 1-year follow-up and 76 (5%) with missing data at 1 year, 1287 patients (59% male) were included in the main analysis. Their main characteristics are represented in Table 1. The children were born preterm in 38%, diagnosed as small for gestational age in 27%, and had a history of prenatal hydramnios in 48%. EA was classified as type III or IV in 89%, and the diagnosis of long-gap EA was retained in 170 (14%). At least 1 associated malformation was observed in 52%, including cardiovascular anomalies (26%) and VACTERL associations (18%). The median age at end-to-end esophageal anastomosis was 1 day (0; 368), and the median length of initial hospitalization was 28 days (6; 754). At discharge, 20% of children needed tube feeding, and 7% were prescribed an inhaled treatment.

FIGURE 1

Flowchart of the study population.

FIGURE 1

Flowchart of the study population.

Close modal
TABLE 1

Neonatal Characteristics of the Study and Excluded Populations

Total Study Population (N = 1287)Deceased (n = 97)P (Total Study Population Versus Deceased)Follow-up Data Missing (n = 76)P (Total Study Population Versus Follow-up Data Missed)
Male sex, n (%) 756 of 1286 (59) 61 of 97 (63) .43 41 of 76 (54) .41 
Hydramnios, n (%) 567 of 1176 (48) 57 of 91 (63) .008b 34 of 70 (49) .95 
Term at birth, median (range) 38 (25–43) (na = 1267) 35 (25–41) (na = 94) <.001b 38 (28–41) (na = 75) .53 
 Preterm <32 WA, n (%) 105 of 1267 (8) 20 of 94 (21) <.001b 7 of 75 (9) .75 
Born in tertiary care center, n (%) 454 of 1276 (36) 61 of 97 (63) <.001b 22 of 76 (29) .24 
BW, median (range), g 2620 (550–4340) (na = 1285) 1808 (675–3620) (na = 94) <.001b 2550 (1120–3900) .72 
 Small for gestational age (BW ≤10th percentile), n (%) 377 of 1275 (30) 36 of 92 (39) .054 28 of 75 (37) .15 
Type I EA (Ladd), n (%) 106 of 1278 (8) 9 of 90 (10) .73 6 of 75 (8) .93 
Type II EA (Ladd), n (%) 19 of 1278 (2) 1 of 90 (1) NA 0 of 75 (0) NA 
Type III or IV EA (Ladd), n (%) 1134 of 1278 (89) 78 of 90 (87) NA 68 of 75 (91) NA 
Type V EA (Ladd), n (%) 19 of 1278 (2) 2 of 90 (2) NA 1 of 75 (1) NA 
Long-gap EA, n (%) 170 of 1179 (14) 11 of 60 (18) .40 9 of 72 (13) .65 
Associated malformation, n (%) 668 of 1284 (52) 88 of 96 (92) <.001b 34 of 76 (45) .22 
 Neurologic malformation 82 of 1283 (6) 20 of 96 (21) <.001b 1 of 76 (1) .08 
 Cardiovascular malformation 333 of 1283 (26) 64 of 96 (67) <.001b 15 of 76 (20) .23 
 Costovertebral malformation 218 of 1283 (17) 22 of 96 (23) .14 9 of 76 (12) .24 
 Laryngeal cleft 30 of 1073 (3) 2 of 66 (3) .71 0 of 65 (0) .41 
 Other malformation 460 of 1284 (36) 70 of 96 (73) <.001b 23 of 76 (30) .32 
VACTERL association, n (%) 230 of 1286 (18) 27 of 96 (28) .015b 7 of 76 (9) .053 
Other syndromic association, n (%) 110 of 1287 (9) 39 of 97 (40) <.001b 6 of 76 (8) .84 
Age at end-to-end anastomosis surgery, median (range), d 1 (0–368) (na = 1244) 1 (0–365) (na = 55) .30 1 (0–160) (na = 75) .72 
Thoracotomy, n (%) 1118 of 1250 (89) 59 of 93 (63) <.001b 70 of 73 (96) .08 
Colonic replacement, n (%) 18 of 1287 (1) 0 of 92 (0) .63 0 of 73 (0) .62 
Gastric pull-up, n (%) 17 of 1287 (1) 2 of 90 (2) .36 1 of 73 (1) .99 
Esophago-cervicostomy, n (%) 17 of 1287 (1) 0 of 90 (0) .63 1 of 59 (2) .99 
Length of initial stay, d 28 (6–754) (na = 1213) NA NA 27 (3–380) (na = 72) .69 
 Initial hospital stay >90 d, n (%) 224 of 1224 (18) NA NA 13 of 73 (18) .92 
 No discharge before 1 y, n (%) 4 of 1213 (0.3) NA NA 0 of 72 (0) NA 
Length of invasive mechanical ventilation, median (range), d 3 (0–117) (na = 1208) 5 (0–102) (na = 70) <.001b 3 (0–29) (na = 74) .03b 
Length of noninvasive mechanical ventilation, median (range), d 0 (0–355) (na = 1103) 0 (0–210) (na = 58) .16 0 (0–30) (na = 71) .17 
Length of oxygen need, median (range), d 5 (0–250) (na = 787) 2 (0–231) (na = 39) .032b 5 (0–108) (na = 48) .06 
Tube feeding at discharge, n (%) 254 of 1254 (20) NA NA 14 of 72 (19) .87 
Inhaled treatment at discharge, n (%) 61 of 912 (7) NA NA 4 of 47 (9) .55 
Total Study Population (N = 1287)Deceased (n = 97)P (Total Study Population Versus Deceased)Follow-up Data Missing (n = 76)P (Total Study Population Versus Follow-up Data Missed)
Male sex, n (%) 756 of 1286 (59) 61 of 97 (63) .43 41 of 76 (54) .41 
Hydramnios, n (%) 567 of 1176 (48) 57 of 91 (63) .008b 34 of 70 (49) .95 
Term at birth, median (range) 38 (25–43) (na = 1267) 35 (25–41) (na = 94) <.001b 38 (28–41) (na = 75) .53 
 Preterm <32 WA, n (%) 105 of 1267 (8) 20 of 94 (21) <.001b 7 of 75 (9) .75 
Born in tertiary care center, n (%) 454 of 1276 (36) 61 of 97 (63) <.001b 22 of 76 (29) .24 
BW, median (range), g 2620 (550–4340) (na = 1285) 1808 (675–3620) (na = 94) <.001b 2550 (1120–3900) .72 
 Small for gestational age (BW ≤10th percentile), n (%) 377 of 1275 (30) 36 of 92 (39) .054 28 of 75 (37) .15 
Type I EA (Ladd), n (%) 106 of 1278 (8) 9 of 90 (10) .73 6 of 75 (8) .93 
Type II EA (Ladd), n (%) 19 of 1278 (2) 1 of 90 (1) NA 0 of 75 (0) NA 
Type III or IV EA (Ladd), n (%) 1134 of 1278 (89) 78 of 90 (87) NA 68 of 75 (91) NA 
Type V EA (Ladd), n (%) 19 of 1278 (2) 2 of 90 (2) NA 1 of 75 (1) NA 
Long-gap EA, n (%) 170 of 1179 (14) 11 of 60 (18) .40 9 of 72 (13) .65 
Associated malformation, n (%) 668 of 1284 (52) 88 of 96 (92) <.001b 34 of 76 (45) .22 
 Neurologic malformation 82 of 1283 (6) 20 of 96 (21) <.001b 1 of 76 (1) .08 
 Cardiovascular malformation 333 of 1283 (26) 64 of 96 (67) <.001b 15 of 76 (20) .23 
 Costovertebral malformation 218 of 1283 (17) 22 of 96 (23) .14 9 of 76 (12) .24 
 Laryngeal cleft 30 of 1073 (3) 2 of 66 (3) .71 0 of 65 (0) .41 
 Other malformation 460 of 1284 (36) 70 of 96 (73) <.001b 23 of 76 (30) .32 
VACTERL association, n (%) 230 of 1286 (18) 27 of 96 (28) .015b 7 of 76 (9) .053 
Other syndromic association, n (%) 110 of 1287 (9) 39 of 97 (40) <.001b 6 of 76 (8) .84 
Age at end-to-end anastomosis surgery, median (range), d 1 (0–368) (na = 1244) 1 (0–365) (na = 55) .30 1 (0–160) (na = 75) .72 
Thoracotomy, n (%) 1118 of 1250 (89) 59 of 93 (63) <.001b 70 of 73 (96) .08 
Colonic replacement, n (%) 18 of 1287 (1) 0 of 92 (0) .63 0 of 73 (0) .62 
Gastric pull-up, n (%) 17 of 1287 (1) 2 of 90 (2) .36 1 of 73 (1) .99 
Esophago-cervicostomy, n (%) 17 of 1287 (1) 0 of 90 (0) .63 1 of 59 (2) .99 
Length of initial stay, d 28 (6–754) (na = 1213) NA NA 27 (3–380) (na = 72) .69 
 Initial hospital stay >90 d, n (%) 224 of 1224 (18) NA NA 13 of 73 (18) .92 
 No discharge before 1 y, n (%) 4 of 1213 (0.3) NA NA 0 of 72 (0) NA 
Length of invasive mechanical ventilation, median (range), d 3 (0–117) (na = 1208) 5 (0–102) (na = 70) <.001b 3 (0–29) (na = 74) .03b 
Length of noninvasive mechanical ventilation, median (range), d 0 (0–355) (na = 1103) 0 (0–210) (na = 58) .16 0 (0–30) (na = 71) .17 
Length of oxygen need, median (range), d 5 (0–250) (na = 787) 2 (0–231) (na = 39) .032b 5 (0–108) (na = 48) .06 
Tube feeding at discharge, n (%) 254 of 1254 (20) NA NA 14 of 72 (19) .87 
Inhaled treatment at discharge, n (%) 61 of 912 (7) NA NA 4 of 47 (9) .55 

NA, not applicable.

a

Number of data available, when missing values.

b

P values <.05.

Comparing the 97 deceased patients’ characteristics with the study population (Table 1), they had higher rates of preterm birth (P < 10−3), hydramnios (P = .008), and associated malformations (P < 10−3); circumstances of death were reported in 80 (83%) patients and classified as follows: respiratory cause in 21 (26%), cardiovascular cause in 18 (23%), neurologic cause in 15 (19%), gastrointestinal cause in 7 (9%), severe breath-holding event leading to death in 3 (4%), other causes in 16 (20%), and limitations of life-sustaining treatments in 24 (30%).

A total of 76 (5%) patients had missing follow-up data at 1 year and were excluded. Overall, their neonatal characteristics were comparable with those of the study population, except for a shorter duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (P = .03) (Table 1).

At 1-year follow-up, 36 (3%) patients had recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula, 28 (2%) had undergone aortopexy, 141 (11%) had undergone antireflux surgery, and 454 (36%) had undergone esophageal dilatation (Table 2). A total of 95 (12%) had GERD despite proton pump inhibitor treatment at initial discharge among 1129 of 1235 (91%), 176 (16%) were diagnosed with undernutrition, 148 (16%) needed tube feeding, and 287 (23%) had a history of gastrostomy tube in the first year.

TABLE 2

One-Year Outcomes in the Study Population

Total Study Population (N = 1287)
Recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula, n (%) 36 of 1231 (3) 
Aortopexy, n (%) 28 of 1277 (2) 
GERD, n (%) 95 of 800 (12) 
Antireflux surgery, n (%) 141 of 1274 (11) 
History of esophageal dilatation, n (%) 454 of 1276 (36) 
 No. esophageal dilatations (na = 988) median (range) 0 (0 to 13) 
Wt at 1 y, z score (na = 1108), median (range) −1.0 (−4.5 to 3.7) 
Wt-for-height, z score (na = 881), median (range) −0.9 (−3.7 to 4.2) 
 Undernutrition (wt-for-height z score <−2.0 SDs), n (%) 176 of 1078 (16) 
Tube feeding at 1 y, n (%) 148 of 917 (16) 
 History of gastrostomy tube in the first y 287 of 1263 (23) 
Readmission after initial discharge, n (%) 776 of 1279 (61) 
 Length of hospitalization (cumulative d) in patients readmitted (na = 747), median (range) 11 (0 to 354) 
Readmission for respiratory cause, n (%) 399 of 1276 (31) 
 No. hospitalizations for respiratory causes in patients readmitted (na = 321), median (range) 1 (1 to 8) 
 Length of hospitalization (cumulative d) in patients readmitted (na = 313), median (range) 9 (0 to 354) 
Respiratory treatment at 1 y, n (%) 389 of 1126 (35) 
Maintenance inhaled treatment, n (%) 256 of 384 (67) 
 ICSs 253 of 382 (66) 
 Inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilators 26 of 382 (7) 
As-needed short-acting β-agonists, n (%) 123 of 382 (32) 
Chronic noninvasive mechanical ventilation, n (%) 7 of 383 (2) 
Total Study Population (N = 1287)
Recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula, n (%) 36 of 1231 (3) 
Aortopexy, n (%) 28 of 1277 (2) 
GERD, n (%) 95 of 800 (12) 
Antireflux surgery, n (%) 141 of 1274 (11) 
History of esophageal dilatation, n (%) 454 of 1276 (36) 
 No. esophageal dilatations (na = 988) median (range) 0 (0 to 13) 
Wt at 1 y, z score (na = 1108), median (range) −1.0 (−4.5 to 3.7) 
Wt-for-height, z score (na = 881), median (range) −0.9 (−3.7 to 4.2) 
 Undernutrition (wt-for-height z score <−2.0 SDs), n (%) 176 of 1078 (16) 
Tube feeding at 1 y, n (%) 148 of 917 (16) 
 History of gastrostomy tube in the first y 287 of 1263 (23) 
Readmission after initial discharge, n (%) 776 of 1279 (61) 
 Length of hospitalization (cumulative d) in patients readmitted (na = 747), median (range) 11 (0 to 354) 
Readmission for respiratory cause, n (%) 399 of 1276 (31) 
 No. hospitalizations for respiratory causes in patients readmitted (na = 321), median (range) 1 (1 to 8) 
 Length of hospitalization (cumulative d) in patients readmitted (na = 313), median (range) 9 (0 to 354) 
Respiratory treatment at 1 y, n (%) 389 of 1126 (35) 
Maintenance inhaled treatment, n (%) 256 of 384 (67) 
 ICSs 253 of 382 (66) 
 Inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilators 26 of 382 (7) 
As-needed short-acting β-agonists, n (%) 123 of 382 (32) 
Chronic noninvasive mechanical ventilation, n (%) 7 of 383 (2) 
a

Number of data available, when missing values.

Collectively, 776 (61%) patients were readmitted after initial discharge in the first year, 399 (31%) for a respiratory cause, corresponding to 51% of all readmission causes. The main causes of respiratory readmissions were as follows: infections in 249 (64%), BRUE in 48 (12% [among whom 6 (12%) underwent aortopexy]), and other causes in 91 (23%; Fig 2). Respiratory treatments were ongoing in 389 (35%) patients, maintenance inhaled treatment in 91%, ICS in 91%, inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilators in 9%, and chronic noninvasive ventilation in 7 (3%).

FIGURE 2

Main causes of readmission in the first year in children with EA.

FIGURE 2

Main causes of readmission in the first year in children with EA.

Close modal

A total of 140 (11%) patients had a history of >2 readmissions for respiratory causes, including respiratory infections in 103 (59%), airway fibroscopy in 27 (13%), BRUE in 25 (12%), and other causes in 20 (11%). Ninety-four (73%) of these patients had ongoing respiratory treatments at 1 year. The other characteristics of this population are described in Table 2.

Factors significantly associated with readmission for respiratory causes in bivariate analyses are represented in Table 3. Notably, there was no influence of season of birth, small for gestational age, type of EA, long-gap EA, or associated malformation, except for laryngeal cleft. In the multivariate logistic regression model, factors significantly associated with readmission for respiratory causes were recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula in the first year, aortopexy, antireflux surgery, and tube feeding at 1 year. Respiratory readmissions were also associated with inhaled treatment at 1 year. Although GERD was associated with readmission for respiratory causes in univariate analysis, it was not retained in the multivariate analysis.

TABLE 3

Factors Associated With Readmission for Respiratory Causes

Readmission for Respiratory Causes (n = 398)No Readmission for Respiratory Causes (n = 877)PMultivariate Analysisa
OR (95% CI)P
Male sex, n (%) 243 of 398 (61) 504 of 876 (58) .24   
Hydramnios, n (%) 194 of 371 (52) 368 of 795 (46) .056 — c 
Term of birth, n (%) 37 (26 to 41) (nb = 398) 38 (25 to 41) (nb = 857) .062 — c 
 Preterm <32 WA 37 of 398 (9) 68 of 857 (8) .42 — — 
BW, n (%), g 2578 (550 to 4180) (nb = 398) 2620 (600 to 4340) (nb = 875) .077 — c 
 Small for gestational age (BW ≤10th percentile) 113 of 398 (28) 261 of 865 (30) .52 — — 
Birth in spring, n (%) 108 of 398 (27) 217 of 877 (25) .55 — — 
Birth in summer, n (%) 107 of 398 (27) 229 of 877 (26) — — — 
Birth in fall, n (%) 98 of 398 (25) 213 of 877 (24) — — — 
Birth in winter, n (%) 85 of 398 (22) 218 of 877 (25) — — — 
Type I EA (Ladd), n (%) 31 of 394 (8) 72 of 872 (8) .18 — — 
Type II EA (Ladd), n (%) 9 of 394 (2) 10 of 872 (1) .30 — — 
Type III or IV EA (Ladd), n (%) 345 of 394 (87) 780 of 872 (89) .45 — — 
Type V EA (Ladd), n (%) 9 of 394 (2) 10 of 872 (1) .31 — — 
Long-gap EA, n (%) 57 of 359 (16) 110 of 809 (14) .33 — — 
Associated malformation, n (%) 213 of 397 (54) 450 of 876 (51) .052 — c 
 Neurologic malformation 29 of 397 (7) 51 of 875 (6) .11 — — 
 Cardiovascular malformation 110 of 397 (28) 220 of 875 (25) — — — 
 Laryngeal cleft 14 of 337 (4) 15 of 726 (2) — — — 
 VACTERL association 81 of 398 (20) 146 of 876 (17) — — — 
Age at end-to-end anastomosis surgery, median (range), d 1 (0 to 242) (nb = 380) 1 (0 to 235) (nb = 847) .82 — — 
Length of initial stay, median (range), d 37 (0 to 303) (nb = 385) 24 (7 to 365) (nb = 819) <.001d — c 
Initial hospital stay >90 d, n (%) 91 of 386 (24) 127 of 829 (15) <.001d — — 
Length of invasive mechanical ventilation, median (range), d 4 (0 to 92) (nb = 368) 3 (0 to 117) (nb = 829) .057 — c 
Length of noninvasive mechanical ventilation, median (range), d 0 (0 to 250) (nb = 330) 0 (0 to 355) (nb = 764) .016d — c 
Length of oxygen need, median (range), d 5 (0 to 250) (nb = 240) 4 (0 to 220) (nb = 544) .002d — c 
Tube feeding at initial discharge, n (%) 106 of 396 (27) 146 of 846 (17) <.001d — c 
Inhaled treatment at discharge, n (%) 32 of 302 (11) 29 of 607 (5) <.001d — c 
Recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula, n (%) 21 of 385 (6) 14 of 838 (2) <.001d 2.11 (1.23–3.62) .008d 
Aortopexy, n (%) 19 of 398 (5) 8 of 871 (1) <.001d 4.84 (1.95–12.04) <.001d 
GERD, n (%) 47 of 273 (17) 48 of 525 (9) <.001d — c 
Antireflux surgery, n (%) 72 of 397 (18) 67 of 870 (8) <.001d 1.80 (1.12–2.89) .015d 
History of esophageal dilatations, n (%) 114 of 398 (29) 185 of 851 (22) <.001d — c 
 No. esophageal dilatations, median (range) 0 (0 to 13) (nb = 327) 0 (0 to 13) (nb = 652) .068 — c 
Wt at 1 y, z score, median (range) −1.1 (−3.9 to 3.0) (nb = 365) −0.9 (−4.5 to 3.7) (nb = 733) <.001d — c 
Undernutrition (wt-for-height z score <−2.0 SDs), n (%) 74 of 360 (21) 101 of 717 (14) .007d 1.67 (1.05–2.67) .032d 
Tube feeding at 1 y, n (%) 67 of 302 (22) 80 of 612 (13) <.001d — — 
 History of gastrostomy tube in the first y 115 of 396 (29) 170 of 85 (20) <.001d — — 
Respiratory treatment at 1 y, n (%) 214 of 354 (61) 170 of 762 (22) <.001d 5.14 (3.85 to 6.87) <.001d 
Readmission for Respiratory Causes (n = 398)No Readmission for Respiratory Causes (n = 877)PMultivariate Analysisa
OR (95% CI)P
Male sex, n (%) 243 of 398 (61) 504 of 876 (58) .24   
Hydramnios, n (%) 194 of 371 (52) 368 of 795 (46) .056 — c 
Term of birth, n (%) 37 (26 to 41) (nb = 398) 38 (25 to 41) (nb = 857) .062 — c 
 Preterm <32 WA 37 of 398 (9) 68 of 857 (8) .42 — — 
BW, n (%), g 2578 (550 to 4180) (nb = 398) 2620 (600 to 4340) (nb = 875) .077 — c 
 Small for gestational age (BW ≤10th percentile) 113 of 398 (28) 261 of 865 (30) .52 — — 
Birth in spring, n (%) 108 of 398 (27) 217 of 877 (25) .55 — — 
Birth in summer, n (%) 107 of 398 (27) 229 of 877 (26) — — — 
Birth in fall, n (%) 98 of 398 (25) 213 of 877 (24) — — — 
Birth in winter, n (%) 85 of 398 (22) 218 of 877 (25) — — — 
Type I EA (Ladd), n (%) 31 of 394 (8) 72 of 872 (8) .18 — — 
Type II EA (Ladd), n (%) 9 of 394 (2) 10 of 872 (1) .30 — — 
Type III or IV EA (Ladd), n (%) 345 of 394 (87) 780 of 872 (89) .45 — — 
Type V EA (Ladd), n (%) 9 of 394 (2) 10 of 872 (1) .31 — — 
Long-gap EA, n (%) 57 of 359 (16) 110 of 809 (14) .33 — — 
Associated malformation, n (%) 213 of 397 (54) 450 of 876 (51) .052 — c 
 Neurologic malformation 29 of 397 (7) 51 of 875 (6) .11 — — 
 Cardiovascular malformation 110 of 397 (28) 220 of 875 (25) — — — 
 Laryngeal cleft 14 of 337 (4) 15 of 726 (2) — — — 
 VACTERL association 81 of 398 (20) 146 of 876 (17) — — — 
Age at end-to-end anastomosis surgery, median (range), d 1 (0 to 242) (nb = 380) 1 (0 to 235) (nb = 847) .82 — — 
Length of initial stay, median (range), d 37 (0 to 303) (nb = 385) 24 (7 to 365) (nb = 819) <.001d — c 
Initial hospital stay >90 d, n (%) 91 of 386 (24) 127 of 829 (15) <.001d — — 
Length of invasive mechanical ventilation, median (range), d 4 (0 to 92) (nb = 368) 3 (0 to 117) (nb = 829) .057 — c 
Length of noninvasive mechanical ventilation, median (range), d 0 (0 to 250) (nb = 330) 0 (0 to 355) (nb = 764) .016d — c 
Length of oxygen need, median (range), d 5 (0 to 250) (nb = 240) 4 (0 to 220) (nb = 544) .002d — c 
Tube feeding at initial discharge, n (%) 106 of 396 (27) 146 of 846 (17) <.001d — c 
Inhaled treatment at discharge, n (%) 32 of 302 (11) 29 of 607 (5) <.001d — c 
Recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula, n (%) 21 of 385 (6) 14 of 838 (2) <.001d 2.11 (1.23–3.62) .008d 
Aortopexy, n (%) 19 of 398 (5) 8 of 871 (1) <.001d 4.84 (1.95–12.04) <.001d 
GERD, n (%) 47 of 273 (17) 48 of 525 (9) <.001d — c 
Antireflux surgery, n (%) 72 of 397 (18) 67 of 870 (8) <.001d 1.80 (1.12–2.89) .015d 
History of esophageal dilatations, n (%) 114 of 398 (29) 185 of 851 (22) <.001d — c 
 No. esophageal dilatations, median (range) 0 (0 to 13) (nb = 327) 0 (0 to 13) (nb = 652) .068 — c 
Wt at 1 y, z score, median (range) −1.1 (−3.9 to 3.0) (nb = 365) −0.9 (−4.5 to 3.7) (nb = 733) <.001d — c 
Undernutrition (wt-for-height z score <−2.0 SDs), n (%) 74 of 360 (21) 101 of 717 (14) .007d 1.67 (1.05–2.67) .032d 
Tube feeding at 1 y, n (%) 67 of 302 (22) 80 of 612 (13) <.001d — — 
 History of gastrostomy tube in the first y 115 of 396 (29) 170 of 85 (20) <.001d — — 
Respiratory treatment at 1 y, n (%) 214 of 354 (61) 170 of 762 (22) <.001d 5.14 (3.85 to 6.87) <.001d 

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; —, not applicable.

a

Multivariate analysis was performed after handling missing values by multiple imputation (m = 10).

b

Number of data available, when missing values.

c

Variables with a P value <.10 in univariate analyses not selected in the final multivariate model, after using a backward selection procedure.

d

P values <.05.

Factors significantly associated with respiratory treatments at 1 year in bivariate analyses are represented in Table 4. There was no influence of the type of EA or long-gap EA. In the multivariate logistic regression model, factors associated with respiratory treatment at 1 year were male sex and laryngeal cleft.

TABLE 4

Factors Associated With Respiratory Treatment at 1 Year

Respiratory Treatment (n = 389)No Respiratory Treatment (n = 737)PMultivariate Analysisa
OR (95% CI)P
Male sex, n (%) 255 of 389 (66) 403 of 736 (55) .001b 1.58 (1.20–2.10) <.001b 
Hydramnios, n (%) 192 of 364 (53) 322 of 666 (48) .18 — — 
Term of birth, median (range) 37 (26 to 41) (nc = 387) 38 (28 to 41) (nc = 723) .079 — d 
 Preterm <32 WA, n (%) 31 of 387 (8) 55 of 723 (8) .81 — — 
BW, median (range), g 2630 (550 to 4340) (nc = 389) 2639 (800 to 4290) (nc = 735) .43 — — 
 Small for gestational age (BW ≤10th percentile), n (%) 108 of 388 (28) 224 of 727 (31) .30 — — 
Type I EA (Ladd), n (%) 28 of 387 (7) 68 of 732 (9) .58 — — 
Type II EA (Ladd), n (%) 6 of 387 (2) 9 of 732 (1) — — — 
Type III or IV EA (Ladd), n (%) 345 of 387 (89) 644 of 732 (88) — — — 
Type V EA (Ladd), n (%) 8 of 387 (2) 11 of 732 (2) — — — 
Long-gap EA, n (%) 47 of 354 (13) 98 of 683 (14) .64 — — 
Associated malformation, n (%) 221 of 388 (57) 368 of 737 (50) .025b — d 
 Neurologic malformation 33 of 387 (9) 41 of 737 (6) .057 — d 
 Cardiovascular malformation 114 of 387 (30) 176 of 737 (24) .042b — d 
 Laryngeal cleft 19 of 320 (6) 11 of 614 (2) .001b 2.40 (1.02–5.63) .045b 
 VACTERL association 78 of 388 (20) 120 of 737 (16) .11 — — 
Age at end-to-end anastomosis surgery, median (range), d 1 (0 to 366) (nc = 378) 1 (0 to 368) (nc = 713) .96 — — 
Length of initial stay, median (range), d 32 (0 to 754) (nc = 372) 26 (7 to 393) (nc = 701) .015b — d 
 Initial hospital stay >90 d, n (%) 78 of 374 (21) 117 of 706 (17) .082   
Length of invasive mechanical ventilation, median (range), d 3 (0 to 117) (nc = 363) 3 (0 to 48) (nc = 699) .095 — d 
Length of noninvasive mechanical ventilation, median (range), d 0 (0 to 355) (nc = 327) 0 (0 to 114) (nc = 638) .15 — — 
Length of oxygen need, median (range), d 5 (0 to 250) (nc = 227) 4 (0 to 178) (nc = 455) .067 — d 
Tube feeding at initial discharge, n (%) 98 of 382 (26) 122 of 721 (17) .001b — d 
Inhaled treatment at discharge, n (%) 38 of 280 (14) 15 of 526 (3) .001b 4.81 (2.69–8.61) <.001b 
Recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula, n (%) 18 of 377 (5) 14 of 727 (2) .007b — d 
Aortopexy, n (%) 13 of 388 (3) 12 of 734 (2) .064 — d 
GERD, n (%) 44 of 261 (17) 44 of 489 (9) .001b — d 
Antireflux surgery, n (%) 57 of 388 (15) 61 of 732 (8) .001b — d 
History of esophageal dilatations, n (%) 109 of 386 (28) 160 of 733 (22) .017b — d 
 No. esophageal dilatations, median (range) 0 (0 to 13) (nc = 313) 0 (0 to 13) (nc = 556) .083 — — 
Wt at 1 y, z score, median (range) −1.1 (−3.6 to 3.0) (nc = 355) −0.9 (−4.5 to 3.7) (nc = 650) .057 — d 
Undernutrition (wt-for-height z score <−2.0 SDs), n (%) 65 of 350 (19) 93 of 635 (15) .11 — — 
Tube feeding at 1 y, n (%) 65 of 294 (22) 77 of 561 (14) .002b — d 
 History of gastrostomy tube in the first y 103 of 389 (27) 144 of 736 (20) .008b — — 
Readmission for respiratory cause after initial discharge, n (%) 215 of 384 (56) 140 of 734 (19) .001b 5.14 (3.90–6.75) <.001b 
Respiratory Treatment (n = 389)No Respiratory Treatment (n = 737)PMultivariate Analysisa
OR (95% CI)P
Male sex, n (%) 255 of 389 (66) 403 of 736 (55) .001b 1.58 (1.20–2.10) <.001b 
Hydramnios, n (%) 192 of 364 (53) 322 of 666 (48) .18 — — 
Term of birth, median (range) 37 (26 to 41) (nc = 387) 38 (28 to 41) (nc = 723) .079 — d 
 Preterm <32 WA, n (%) 31 of 387 (8) 55 of 723 (8) .81 — — 
BW, median (range), g 2630 (550 to 4340) (nc = 389) 2639 (800 to 4290) (nc = 735) .43 — — 
 Small for gestational age (BW ≤10th percentile), n (%) 108 of 388 (28) 224 of 727 (31) .30 — — 
Type I EA (Ladd), n (%) 28 of 387 (7) 68 of 732 (9) .58 — — 
Type II EA (Ladd), n (%) 6 of 387 (2) 9 of 732 (1) — — — 
Type III or IV EA (Ladd), n (%) 345 of 387 (89) 644 of 732 (88) — — — 
Type V EA (Ladd), n (%) 8 of 387 (2) 11 of 732 (2) — — — 
Long-gap EA, n (%) 47 of 354 (13) 98 of 683 (14) .64 — — 
Associated malformation, n (%) 221 of 388 (57) 368 of 737 (50) .025b — d 
 Neurologic malformation 33 of 387 (9) 41 of 737 (6) .057 — d 
 Cardiovascular malformation 114 of 387 (30) 176 of 737 (24) .042b — d 
 Laryngeal cleft 19 of 320 (6) 11 of 614 (2) .001b 2.40 (1.02–5.63) .045b 
 VACTERL association 78 of 388 (20) 120 of 737 (16) .11 — — 
Age at end-to-end anastomosis surgery, median (range), d 1 (0 to 366) (nc = 378) 1 (0 to 368) (nc = 713) .96 — — 
Length of initial stay, median (range), d 32 (0 to 754) (nc = 372) 26 (7 to 393) (nc = 701) .015b — d 
 Initial hospital stay >90 d, n (%) 78 of 374 (21) 117 of 706 (17) .082   
Length of invasive mechanical ventilation, median (range), d 3 (0 to 117) (nc = 363) 3 (0 to 48) (nc = 699) .095 — d 
Length of noninvasive mechanical ventilation, median (range), d 0 (0 to 355) (nc = 327) 0 (0 to 114) (nc = 638) .15 — — 
Length of oxygen need, median (range), d 5 (0 to 250) (nc = 227) 4 (0 to 178) (nc = 455) .067 — d 
Tube feeding at initial discharge, n (%) 98 of 382 (26) 122 of 721 (17) .001b — d 
Inhaled treatment at discharge, n (%) 38 of 280 (14) 15 of 526 (3) .001b 4.81 (2.69–8.61) <.001b 
Recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula, n (%) 18 of 377 (5) 14 of 727 (2) .007b — d 
Aortopexy, n (%) 13 of 388 (3) 12 of 734 (2) .064 — d 
GERD, n (%) 44 of 261 (17) 44 of 489 (9) .001b — d 
Antireflux surgery, n (%) 57 of 388 (15) 61 of 732 (8) .001b — d 
History of esophageal dilatations, n (%) 109 of 386 (28) 160 of 733 (22) .017b — d 
 No. esophageal dilatations, median (range) 0 (0 to 13) (nc = 313) 0 (0 to 13) (nc = 556) .083 — — 
Wt at 1 y, z score, median (range) −1.1 (−3.6 to 3.0) (nc = 355) −0.9 (−4.5 to 3.7) (nc = 650) .057 — d 
Undernutrition (wt-for-height z score <−2.0 SDs), n (%) 65 of 350 (19) 93 of 635 (15) .11 — — 
Tube feeding at 1 y, n (%) 65 of 294 (22) 77 of 561 (14) .002b — d 
 History of gastrostomy tube in the first y 103 of 389 (27) 144 of 736 (20) .008b — — 
Readmission for respiratory cause after initial discharge, n (%) 215 of 384 (56) 140 of 734 (19) .001b 5.14 (3.90–6.75) <.001b 

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; —, not applicable.

a

Multivariate analysis was performed after handling missing values by multiple imputation (m = 10).

b

P values <.05.

c

Number of data available, when missing values.

d

Variables with a P value <.10 in univariate analyses not selected in the final multivariate model, after using a backward selection procedure.

Using data from the French national register, we report herein the largest series of children with EA, with the aim of assessing respiratory morbidity at 1 year. Our study clearly shows that respiratory morbidity is high during the first year of life, with respiratory causes representing >50% of readmissions, and one-third of the EA population receiving a respiratory treatment. In the logistic regression model, factors associated with readmission for respiratory causes were the need for antireflux surgery, tube feeding at 1 year, a recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula, and severe tracheomalacia requiring aortopexy; the factors associated with respiratory treatment at 1 year were male sex and laryngeal cleft.

The main criteria chosen to assess respiratory morbidity was history of readmission for respiratory cause, and, therefore, severe events. These analyses confirm our preliminary results from the same register, with assessment of 1-year outcomes in 301 children born between 2008 and 2009, among whom the readmission rate was 59%, with 52% linked to a digestive cause and 48% linked to a respiratory cause.18  In other studies, readmission rates after EA repair in the first 2 years have been 55%, with 75% for a digestive cause14  and 44% for respiratory problems in the first year.12  We also confirm that respiratory infections are the leading cause of respiratory readmissions in this population, which affected 64% of respiratory readmissions in our study. Although most previous studies in children with EA have been retrospective, they have shown an estimated 27% to 43% risk of pneumonia in the first 2 to 5 years of age,7,12,13,23,24  78% risk of recurrent episodes of bronchitis,25  46% risk of exacerbation,24  and 36% risk of wheezing or asthma symptoms in the first 3 years of life.24  In a prospective monocenter study, Gischler et al26  described that 74% of children with EA had >5 lower respiratory tract infections before the age of 5 years. In young infants, imprecise clinical diagnosis criteria, inconstant radiologic patterns, and low rates of microbiologic identification may lead to difficulty distinguishing between pneumonia, bronchitis and/or bronchiolitis, and wheezing and/or asthmalike symptoms, all of which are favored in EA because of the narrow airway, upper airway hypersecretion and clearance abnormalities, tracheal diverticulum, and aspiration.8,27,28  Although infections were the most common cause of readmission in our population, we did not observe the stratified risk of hospitalization for bronchiolitis by birth season that was previously described in the general pediatric population.29,30  The second leading cause of respiratory readmissions was a history of BRUE, which has also been described as a leading cause of mortality in the first months after EA repair.31  These episodes are favored by laryngotracheomalacia, preterm birth, small airway, and nutritional issues.32 

The significant population size herein allowed us to assess factors associated with respiratory morbidity. We observed an association between respiratory morbidity and antireflux surgery but not between respiratory morbidity and either GERD or esophageal stricture and need for dilatation. Previous studies have highlighted a higher risk in GERD7,12,24  and esophageal stricture cases,7  favoring chronic aspiration and esophageal motor abnormalities, which were not confirmed herein. Although our observational study does not allow causal deduction about the relations between these factors, it could be hypothesized either that frequent respiratory symptoms associated with GERD favor the indications for antireflux surgery, implying a causal relationship between GERD and respiratory manifestations, or that antireflux surgery itself (via aggravated esophageal dysmotility) could be responsible for frequent aspirations and, therefore, increased respiratory morbidity.33  Suspected respiratory manifestations of GERD, such as asthmalike symptoms and chronic cough, are commonly encountered in pediatrics, without evidence of a causal relation.34  Tube feeding at 1 year was also retained as a main factor associated with respiratory morbidity herein. This was not due to undernutrition, suggesting that feeding disorders leading to both chronic aspiration and dependency on tube feeding may explain this association. Feeding disorders are common in this population; although often related to delayed oral feeding, preterm birth, and esophageal stenosis or dysphagia, they can also be of anatomic origin.35  We did not have access to precise information about swallowing disorders, which are known to be associated with chronic aspiration.36  Fistula recurrence and laryngeal cleft were also associated with readmission for respiratory cause in the first year, further supporting the hypothesis that chronic aspiration is involved in children with EA who have respiratory morbidity. Although recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula is an infrequent complication after esophageal repair, it is a classic cause of respiratory morbidity in the first months after EA repair.33,37  The typical warning signs include cough precipitated by feeding, gaseous distention of the gastrointestinal tract, and pneumonia.38  These nonspecific, repeated manifestations can lead to hospitalizations and delayed diagnosis. Another factor associated with respiratory morbidity in the multivariate logistic regression model was aortopexy. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of preoperative airway fibroscopy to assess tracheomalacia and diagnose laryngeal malformations in patients with EA5,6,39  because these malformations increase the risk of dysphagia and direct aspiration leading to respiratory infections. Because aortopexy is required for severe and complicated tracheomalacia,40  its association with respiratory morbidity is unsurprising.

It was expected that respiratory readmissions would be associated with more frequent inhaled treatment, although their therapeutic effects remain unproven in EA.33  Interestingly, we found that the presence of cardiovascular malformations, a previously identified risk factor for respiratory morbidity in children with EA, was significantly associated with respiratory treatment.33,41  Our findings regarding the male sex are novel. Although previous studies have shown that EA is more frequent in male patients,42  male sex has not been associated with an increased morbidity in patients with EA.43  In the general population, young boys are known to be more at risk for bronchiolitis and wheezing episodes in the first years of life.44  Herein, EA type was not retained among the main factors associated with respiratory morbidity in the first year. Although previous findings have shown that patients with long-gap EA develop major digestive complications in the first year,45  we did not observe increased respiratory morbidity in this group. However, the limited size of this subpopulation may have limited statistical power. Previous studies have highlighted that preterm birth,41  smaller BW, and hydramnios12  impact respiratory outcomes in the first year of life. Our study did not confirm these early reports.

Our study’s main limitation was missing data, especially regarding bronchoscopy findings, causes of respiratory readmissions, and precise indications for inhaled treatment. Imprecise diagnostic criteria and additional chronic disorders, such as tracheomalacia, made it difficult to distinguish between pneumoniae, bronchitis, and asthmalike exacerbations. In current clinical practice, aspiration rates are not accurately estimated. Furthermore, because of its descriptive and midterm follow-up, our study provides information on respiratory morbidity using clinical outcomes, whereas data from lung imaging and function in subsequent years would allow a more complete evaluation of long-term respiratory consequences. Despite these limitations, our population is comparable to previous descriptions in terms of EA types,18,46,47  associated malformations,2,14,47  preterm birth,2,14,46  and mortality rates.2,14,46  Our study is, to our knowledge, the largest prospective real-life population-based description of children born with EA, a rare disease, using standardized and centralized national data collection.

Collectively, these findings show that respiratory impairment in patients with EA is complex and multifactorial and that respiratory and digestive complications are closely linked in this disorder of embryological developmental origins.8  Identifying patients with EA who are at high risk for increased respiratory morbidity (ie, those presenting with a history of tube feeding, aspiration, recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula, severe tracheomalacia, and laryngeal cleft) could lead physicians to refer to pediatric pulmonologists for close respiratory follow-up and care.27  Consistent with this, the recently published care recommendations for respiratory complications among patients with EA who have tracheoesophageal fistula states that regular long-term follow-up by a multidisciplinary team with a specialized pediatric pulmonologist is imperative.33  Upcoming data from our register that reflect assessments of chronic respiratory symptoms and lung function at the age of 6 years will provide additional insights into long-term respiratory evolutions. Additional evidence from large cohorts, national and international collaborations, are urgently needed to provide consensus guidelines for the respiratory monitoring of children born with EA.

Research assistant Katialine Groff provided invaluable help in managing the register data. We also thank Dr Laurent Michaud for his devotion to his patients and his EA expertise. Groupama Foundation provided financial support.

FUNDING: The Reference Center for Congenital Esophageal Anomalies provided funding for data collection and analysis. The register had institutional support from the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale and Groupama Foundation.

Ms Lejeune was involved in the conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, collection or assembly of data, drafting of the article or part of the article, and critical revision of the article for important intellectual content; Mr Sfeir was involved in the conception and design of the study; analysis and interpretation of data; collection or assembly of data; provision of study material or patients; critical revision of the article for important intellectual content; and administrative, technical, or logistic support and was a guarantor of the study; Ms Rousseau, Mr Bonnard, Mr Gelas, Ms Aumar, Ms Panait, Mr Rabattu, Ms Irtan, Ms Fouquet, Mr Le Mandat, Mr Cocci, Mr Habonimana, Mr Lamireau, Mr Lemelle, Mr Elbaz, Ms Talon, Ms Boudaoud, Mr Allal, Mr Buisson, Mr Petit, Mr Sapin, Mr Lardy, Ms Schmitt, Mr Levard, Mr Scalabre, Mr Michel, Mr Jaby, Ms Pelatan, Mr De Vries, Ms Borderon, Mr Fourcade, Ms Breaud, Ms Arnould, Ms Tolg, Mr Chaussy, Mr Geiss, Mr Laplace were involved in the conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, collection or assembly of data, provision of study material or patients, and critical revision of the article for important intellectual content; Ms El Mourad was involved in the conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, collection or assembly of data, and critical revision of the article for important intellectual content; Ms Drumez was involved in the analysis and interpretation of data, statistical expertise, drafting of the article or part of the article, and critical revision of the article for important intellectual content; Ms Thumerelle was involved in the conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, collection or assembly of data, drafting of the article or part of the article, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, and study supervision or coordination and was a guarantor of the study; Mr Gottrand was involved in the conception and design of the study; analysis and interpretation of data; collection or assembly of data; drafting of the article or part of the article; critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, obtaining of funding; administrative, technical, or logistic support; and study supervision or coordination and was a guarantor of the study; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Deidentified individual participant data will not be made available.

This trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02883725).

BRUE

brief unexplained resolved event

BW

birth weight

EA

esophageal atresia

GERD

gastroesophageal reflux disease

ICS

inhaled corticosteroid

VACTERL

vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, trachea-esophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb abnormalities

WA

weeks of amenorrhea

1
Sistonen
SJ
,
Pakarinen
MP
,
Rintala
RJ
.
Long-term results of esophageal atresia: Helsinki experience and review of literature
.
Pediatr Surg Int
.
2011
;
27
(
11
):
1141
1149
2
Pedersen
RN
,
Calzolari
E
,
Husby
S
,
Garne
E
;
EUROCAT Working group
.
Oesophageal atresia: prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and associated anomalies in 23 European regions
.
Arch Dis Child
.
2012
;
97
(
3
):
227
232
3
Sfeir
R
,
Bonnard
A
,
Khen-Dunlop
N
, et al
.
Esophageal atresia: data from a national cohort
.
J Pediatr Surg
.
2013
;
48
(
8
):
1664
1669
4
Ladd
WE
,
Swenson
O
.
Esophageal atresia and tracheo-esophageal fistula
.
Ann Surg
.
1947
;
125
(
1
):
23
40
5
Fayoux
P
,
Morisse
M
,
Sfeir
R
,
Michaud
L
,
Daniel
S
.
Laryngotracheal anomalies associated with esophageal atresia: importance of early diagnosis
.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
.
2018
;
275
(
2
):
477
481
6
Lejeune
S
,
Le Mee
A
,
Petyt
L
, et al
.
Bronchopulmonary and vascular anomalies are frequent in children with oesophageal atresia
.
Acta Paediatr
.
2020
;
109
(
6
):
1221
1228
7
Nurminen
P
,
Koivusalo
A
,
Hukkinen
M
,
Pakarinen
M
.
Pneumonia after repair of esophageal atresia-incidence and main risk factors
.
Eur J Pediatr Surg
.
2019
;
29
(
6
):
504
509
8
Fragoso
AC
,
Tovar
JA
.
The multifactorial origin of respiratory morbidity in patients surviving neonatal repair of esophageal atresia
.
Front Pediatr
.
2014
;
2
:
39
9
Landolfo
F
,
Conforti
A
,
Columbo
C
,
Savignoni
F
,
Bagolan
P
,
Dotta
A
.
Functional residual capacity and lung clearance index in infants treated for esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula
.
J Pediatr Surg
.
2016
;
51
(
4
):
559
562
10
Chetcuti
P
,
Phelan
PD
,
Greenwood
R
.
Lung function abnormalities in repaired oesophageal atresia and tracheo-oesophageal fistula
.
Thorax
.
1992
;
47
(
12
):
1030
1034
11
Donoso
F
,
Hedenström
H
,
Malinovschi
A
,
Lilja
HE
.
Pulmonary function in children and adolescents after esophageal atresia repair
.
Pediatr Pulmonol
.
2020
;
55
(
1
):
206
213
12
Chetcuti
P
,
Phelan
PD
.
Respiratory morbidity after repair of oesophageal atresia and tracheo-oesophageal fistula
.
Arch Dis Child
.
1993
;
68
(
2
):
167
170
13
Leibovitch
L
,
Zohar
I
,
Maayan-Mazger
A
,
Mazkereth
R
,
Strauss
T
,
Bilik
R
.
Infants born with esophageal atresia with or without tracheo-esophageal fistula: short- and long-term outcomes
.
Isr Med Assoc J
.
2018
;
20
(
3
):
161
166
14
Sulkowski
JP
,
Cooper
JN
,
Lopez
JJ
, et al
.
Morbidity and mortality in patients with esophageal atresia
.
Surgery
.
2014
;
156
(
2
):
483
491
15
Sfeir
R
,
Michaud
L
,
Sharma
D
,
Richard
F
,
Gottrand
F
.
National Esophageal Atresia Register
.
Eur J Pediatr Surg
.
2015
;
25
(
6
):
497
499
16
François
B
,
Michaud
L
,
Sfeir
R
, et al
.
Predictors of the performance of early antireflux surgery in esophageal atresia
.
J Pediatr
.
2019
;
211
:
120.e1
125.e1
17
Garabedian
C
,
Bonnard
A
,
Rousseau
V
, et al;
CRACMO
.
Management and outcome of neonates with a prenatal diagnosis of esophageal atresia type A: a population-based study
.
Prenat Diagn
.
2018
;
38
(
7
):
517
522
18
Schneider
A
,
Blanc
S
,
Bonnard
A
, et al
.
Results from the French National Esophageal Atresia Register: one-year outcome
.
Orphanet J Rare Dis
.
2014
;
9
:
206
19
Keckler
SJ
,
St Peter
SD
,
Valusek
PA
, et al
.
VACTERL anomalies in patients with esophageal atresia: an updated delineation of the spectrum and review of the literature
.
Pediatr Surg Int
.
2007
;
23
(
4
):
309
313
20
Kutiyanawala
M
,
Wyse
RK
,
Brereton
RJ
, et al
.
CHARGE and esophageal atresia
.
J Pediatr Surg
.
1992
;
27
(
5
):
558
560
21
van Buuren
S
,
Groothuis-Oudshoorn
K
.
mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R
.
J Stat Softw
.
2011
;
45
(
3
)
22
Toutenburg
H
,
Rubin
DB
.
Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys
.
Stat Hefte
.
1990
;
31
(
1
):
180
23
Little
DC
,
Rescorla
FJ
,
Grosfeld
JL
,
West
KW
,
Scherer
LR
,
Engum
SA
.
Long-term analysis of children with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula
.
J Pediatr Surg
.
2003
;
38
(
6
):
852
856
24
Jové Blanco
A
,
Gutiérrez Vélez
A
,
Solís-García
G
,
Salcedo Posadas
A
,
Bellón Alonso
S
,
Rodríguez Cimadevilla
JL
.
Comorbidities and course of lung function in patients with congenital esophageal atresia
.
Arch Argent Pediatr
.
2020
;
118
(
1
):
25
30
25
Dudley
NE
,
Phelan
PD
.
Respiratory complications in long-term survivors of oesophageal atresia
.
Arch Dis Child
.
1976
;
51
(
4
):
279
282
26
Gischler
SJ
,
van der Cammen-van Zijp
MHM
,
Mazer
P
, et al
.
A prospective comparative evaluation of persistent respiratory morbidity in esophageal atresia and congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors
.
J Pediatr Surg
.
2009
;
44
(
9
):
1683
1690
27
Mirra
V
,
Maglione
M
,
Di Micco
LL
,
Montella
S
,
Santamaria
F
.
Longitudinal follow-up of chronic pulmonary manifestations in esophageal atresia: a clinical algorithm and review of the literature
.
Pediatr Neonatol
.
2017
;
58
(
1
):
8
15
28
Fragoso
AC
,
Martinez
L
,
Estevão-Costa
J
,
Tovar
JA
.
Lung maturity in esophageal atresia: experimental and clinical study
.
J Pediatr Surg
.
2015
;
50
(
8
):
1251
1259
29
Grimwood
K
,
Cohet
C
,
Rich
FJ
, et al
.
Risk factors for respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis hospital admission in New Zealand
.
Epidemiol Infect
.
2008
;
136
(
10
):
1333
1341
30
Blanken
MO
,
Paes
B
,
Anderson
EJ
, et al
.
Risk scoring tool to predict respiratory syncytial virus hospitalisation in premature infants
.
Pediatr Pulmonol
.
2018
;
53
(
5
):
605
612
31
Tan Tanny
SP
,
Fearon
E
,
Hawley
A
, et al
.
Predictors of mortality after primary discharge from hospital in patients with esophageal atresia
.
J Pediatr
.
2020
;
219
:
70
75
32
Bergeron
M
,
Cohen
AP
,
Cotton
RT
.
The management of cyanotic spells in children with oesophageal atresia
.
Front Pediatr
.
2017
;
5
:
106
33
Koumbourlis
AC
,
Belessis
Y
,
Cataletto
M
, et al
.
Care recommendations for the respiratory complications of esophageal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula
.
Pediatr Pulmonol
.
2020
;
55
(
10
):
2713
2729
34
de Benedictis
FM
,
Bush
A
.
Respiratory manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children
.
Arch Dis Child
.
2018
;
103
(
3
):
292
296
35
Conforti
A
,
Valfré
L
,
Falbo
M
,
Bagolan
P
,
Cerchiari
A
.
Feeding and swallowing disorders in esophageal atresia patients: a review of a critical issue
.
Eur J Pediatr Surg
.
2015
;
25
(
4
):
318
325
36
Soyer
T
,
Yalcin
S
,
Arslan
SS
,
Demir
N
,
Tanyel
FC
.
Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool-10 as an indicator to predict aspiration in children with esophageal atresia
.
J Pediatr Surg
.
2017
;
52
(
10
):
1576
1579
37
Porcaro
F
,
Valfré
L
,
Aufiero
LR
, et al
.
Respiratory problems in children with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula
.
Ital J Pediatr
.
2017
;
43
(
1
):
77
38
Helmsworth
JA
,
Pryles
CV
.
Congenital tracheo-esophageal fistula without esophageal atresia
.
J Pediatr
.
1951
;
38
(
5
):
610
617
39
Fischer
J
,
Balleisen
J
,
Holzki
J
,
Cernaianu
G
,
Alejandre Alcàzar
M
,
Dübbers
M
.
Tracheoscopic findings and their impact on respiratory symptoms in children with esophageal atresia
.
Eur J Pediatr Surg
.
2020
;
30
(
4
):
371
377
40
Kay-Rivest
E
,
Baird
R
,
Laberge
J-M
,
Puligandla
PS
.
Evaluation of aortopexy in the management of severe tracheomalacia after esophageal atresia repair
.
Dis Esophagus
.
2015
;
28
(
3
):
234
239
41
Rayyan
M
,
Embrechts
M
,
Van Veer
H
, et al
.
Neonatal factors predictive for respiratory and gastro-intestinal morbidity after esophageal atresia repair
.
Pediatr Neonatol
.
2019
;
60
(
3
):
261
269
42
Black
AJ
,
Lu
DY
,
Yefet
LS
,
Baird
R
.
Sex differences in surgically correctable congenital anomalies: a systematic review
.
J Pediatr Surg
.
2020
;
55
(
5
):
811
820
43
Teimourian
A
,
Donoso
F
,
Stenström
P
, et al
.
Gender and birth weight as risk factors for anastomotic stricture after esophageal atresia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
BMC Pediatr
.
2020
;
20
(
1
):
400
44
Deshpande
D
,
Morgan
W
.
Wheezing disorders in children: are girls and boys different?
J Allergy Clin Immunol
.
2016
;
138
(
6
):
1569
1570
45
Stadil
T
,
Koivusalo
A
,
Svensson
JF
, et al
.
Surgical treatment and major complications within the first year of life in newborns with long-gap esophageal atresia gross type A and B - a systematic review
.
J Pediatr Surg
.
2019
;
54
(
11
):
2242
2249
46
Lal
DR
,
Gadepalli
SK
,
Downard
CD
, et al;
Midwest Pediatric Surgery Consortium
.
Perioperative management and outcomes of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula
.
J Pediatr Surg
.
2017
;
52
(
8
):
1245
1251
47
Spitz
L
.
Oesophageal atresia
.
Orphanet J Rare Dis
.
2007
;
2
:
24

Competing Interests

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.