Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) aged 15 to 24 years are uniquely at risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) from a behavioral and biological perspective. Although AYA compose only 27% of the sexually active US population, they composed 45% of all of the estimated 26.2 million incident STIs in 2018.1  However, most AYA never receive STI testing.2  The Guttmacher Institute has documented the decade of work accomplished before the COVID-19 pandemic to improve AYA access to STI testing by minimizing parental consent requirements and expanding sexual health services at locations AYAs frequent.3  Improvements and expansions of sexual health services in high schools, college student health centers, and pediatric emergency departments have been effective strategies to increase STI screening and treatment of AYAs.4  However, these efforts were disrupted by the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic.5 

The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed that STI testing is insufficient and that related inequalities may be exacerbated by a public health crisis.6  Although stay-at-home orders were in place, many individuals continued to engage in sexual activity and continued to require sexual health services.7  Conversely, national and state mandates directed many essential clinical settings to reduce or eliminate “routine” health care services, including sexual and reproductive health, with the most significant reductions in onsite visits.8  Understanding how this change may affect the sexually active AYAs is critical for planning youth reengagement strategies to address sexual health care and planning for sustained services through future pandemics. Therefore, we highlight the unique challenges facing AYA sexual health on a local level and discuss the probable repercussions on AYA STI outcomes with the goal to develop strategies to preserve youth-centered STI care for future pandemics.

AYA have unique challenges in accessing care that were exacerbated by the pandemic and not explicitly considered or addressed in the pandemic response. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released guidances and resources to address clinical STI services disruption during the pandemic.9  These guidances focused on delivering specialized sexual health care when in-person visits were limited and focused on treating symptomatic individuals with oral medications. Although critical to maximizing sexual health care during the pandemic, these guidelines failed to address the unique challenges that AYA patients face.

Although the guidelines prioritized oral treatment of symptomatic patients, obtaining medications is one challenge for AYAs. In one study, only 70% of AYA patients who received STI medication prescriptions from a pediatric emergency department filled their prescriptions.10  The closing of sexual and public health clinics, where uninsured and underinsured patients could receive medicines at no cost, represents a barrier that could prevent AYAs from obtaining treatment. Even insured AYAs, who are often covered on their parents’ insurance plan, may be concerned about their privacy with explanation of benefits sent to their parents, and may be hesitant to fill a prescription. Home-based medication delivery faces similar privacy concerns, with potential parental questions about arriving packages. The 21st Century Cures Act, requiring health information to be shared directly with patients, may exacerbate these privacy concerns if institutions do not develop specific record release policies that incorporate adolescent confidentiality protections per state laws. Furthermore, the recommended oral empirical treatment of syndromic management results in less precise diagnoses and could result in inadequate treatment, especially for pharyngeal gonorrhea. Inadequate treatment paired with testing challenges among youth could further propagate disease because youth may be less likely to return for a test of cure.

One solution to these challenges is to create community treatment or medication pickup sites that could remain open during a pandemic. Local pharmacies, supported by public health dollars, may be the ideal location for pharmacists to dispense oral medications or administer the intramuscular injections required for STI treatment. Opening community-based sites where patients could walk in for treatment may allow for limited interactions while still providing AYA standard-of-care treatment.

Providing empirical treatment may help those with symptomatic STIs, yet closing testing sites also reduces routine testing access. Many asymptomatic patients likely were not diagnosed or were diagnosed late because of testing site closures or STI test shortages. Missed or delayed STI diagnosis may lead to long-term complications of untreated STIs and additional opportunities for STIs to spread to others. Some clinics initiated home testing programs to address the lack of routine testing during the pandemic. However, without financial support, home-based testing remains out of reach and exacerbates inequalities because private companies often provide testing at a considerable individual cost, charging $39 to $522 without accepting insurance.10  Even if financially supported by local health departments, home-based STI testing presents a challenge for maintaining privacy because AYAs may fear parental inquiry regarding packages received or mailed from home.

Before the pandemic, there were efforts to expand sexual health care to community sites, such as school-based health centers in high schools and college health centers; however, many of these services closed during the pandemic. Although the pandemic increased interest in telemedicine, it also presents unique challenges for adolescent patients because confidentiality concerns remain a significant barrier to using STI services.11,12  AYAs living at home may not find the private space needed to conduct a telemedicine visit. Lack of privacy may increase hesitancy to disclose sexual health issues or sensitive topics, such as intimate partner violence. Although telemedicine is one approach to providing care outside the clinic setting, attention to redesigning telemedicine to meet adolescent needs is warranted. Reducing communication barriers by incorporating electronic surveys either before or during patient visits may provide a means to obtaining sensitive personal information within the home settings’ limitations. Text messaging or web-based interfaces could be approaches to effectively reach youth and provide the required privacy to complete an assessment while living in the family home.

Creating community-based express STI services sites is one option to improve access to STI services and prepare for future pandemics. Express services that use kiosks or questionnaires for triage and encourage self-testing may enhance STI screening and treatment access. These limited contact sites offer quick visits and limited patient-provider interactions and are perfect for providing sexual health to adolescents who may have limited needs and may have another pediatric provider. Furthermore, establishing STI services in communities may allow for the ongoing provision of regular sexual health services even during a pandemic because of limited patient-provider interactions. Sites could have modern testing methods such as nucleic acid amplification tests, but they could also be stocked with older, less costly methods of diagnosis such as the wet prep for Trichomonas vaginalis and Gram stain for diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhea in case of supply chain limitations during future pandemics.

Finally, as patients return to in-person care at clinical facilities, medication access could be expanded through Title X programs, including Expedited Partner Therapy. These sites could also offer critical sexual health vaccinations, such as human papillomavirus, which was neglected during the pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic could be seen as an opportunity to redesign the delivery of AYA STI care and optimizing it for future pandemics.

AYAs experience unique barriers to accessing STI care that were amplified during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the closure of care sites such as schools, and increased concerns around privacy that make telemedicine, home-based testing, and medication delivery less appealing. With guidelines supporting empirical treatment over screening and the need to pivot resources away from STI testing, many STIs likely went undetected during the pandemic. Identifying approaches to provide youth-friendly STI services as we emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic and plan for future pandemics will be critical to reversing increasing US STI rates and reducing STI-related health disparities facing youth.

All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

FUNDING: Dr Zucker is supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award K23AI150378, UM1AI069470.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

AYA

adolescents and young adults

STI

sexually transmitted infection

1.
Kreisel
KM
,
Spicknall
IH
,
Gargano
JW
, et al
.
Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2018
.
Sex Transm Dis
.
2021
;
48
(
4
):
208
214
2.
Leichliter
JS
,
Copen
C
,
Dittus
PJ
.
Confidentiality issues and use of sexually transmitted disease services among sexually experienced persons aged 15-25 years - United States, 2013-2015
.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
.
2017
;
66
(
9
):
237
241
3.
Guttmacher Institute
.
Minors’ access to STI services
.
4.
Oswalt
SB
,
Eastman-Mueller
HP
.
Chlamydia and gonorrhea screening and expedited partner therapy (EPT) practices of college student health centers
.
J Am Coll Health
.
2017
;
65
(
8
):
542
547
5.
Chang
JJ
,
Chen
Q
,
Dionne-Odom
J
,
Hechter
RC
,
Bruxvoort
KJ
.
Changes in testing and diagnoses of sexually transmitted infections and HIV during the COVID-19 pandemic
.
Sex Transm Dis
.
2022
;
49
(
12
):
851
854
6.
Johnson
KA
,
Burghardt
NO
,
Tang
EC
, et al
.
Measuring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexually transmitted diseases public health surveillance and program operations in the State of California
.
Sex Transm Dis
.
2021
;
48
(
8
):
606
613
7.
Harkness
A
,
Weinstein
ER
,
Atuluru
P
,
Vidal
R
,
Rodriguez-Diaz
CE
,
Safren
SA
.
“Let’s hook up when the pandemic is over:” Latinx sexual minority men’s sexual behavior during COVID-19
.
J Sex Res
.
2021
;
58
(
8
):
951
957
8.
Nagendra
G
,
Carnevale
C
,
Neu
N
,
Cohall
A
,
Zucker
J
.
The potential impact and availability of sexual health services during the COVID-19 pandemic
.
Sex Transm Dis
.
2020
;
47
(
7
):
434
436
9.
Bachmann
L
,
Thorpe
P
,
Bolan
G
,
Mermin
J
.
Dear Colleague Letter: Providing effective care and prevention when facility-based services and in-person patient-clinician contact is limited
.
10.
Lieberman
A
,
Badolato
GM
,
Tran
J
,
Goyal
MK
.
Frequency of prescription filling among adolescents prescribed treatment for sexually transmitted infections in the emergency department
.
JAMA Pediatr
.
2019
;
173
(
7
):
695
697
11.
Barney
A
,
Buckelew
S
,
Mesheriakova
V
,
Raymond-Flesch
M
.
The COVID-19 pandemic and rapid implementation of adolescent and young adult telemedicine: challenges and opportunities for innovation
.
J Adolesc Health
.
2020
;
67
(
2
):
164
171
12.
Wood
SM
,
White
K
,
Peebles
R
, et al
.
Outcomes of a Rapid Adolescent telehealth scale-up during the COVID-19 pandemic
.
J Adolesc Health
.
2020
;
67
(
2
):
172
178