Video Abstract

Video Abstract

Close modal
OBJECTIVES

To assess infant breastfeeding initiation and any breastfeeding at 8 weeks and safe sleep practices (back sleep position, approved sleep surface, and no soft objects or loose bedding [“soft bedding”]) by select paternal characteristics among a state-representative sample of fathers with new infants.

METHODS

Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) for Dads, a novel population-based cross-sectional study, surveyed fathers in Georgia 2–6 months after their infant’s birth. Fathers were eligible if the infant's mother was sampled for maternal PRAMS from October 2018 to July 2019.

RESULTS

Of 250 respondents, 86.1% reported their infants ever breastfed and 63.4% reported breastfeeding at 8 weeks. Initiation and breastfeeding at 8 weeks were more likely to be reported by fathers who reported wanting their infant’s mother to breastfeed than those who did not want her to breastfeed or had no opinion (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–1.68; aPR = 2.33; 95% CI, 1.59–3.42, respectively) and fathers who were college graduates than those with ≤high school diploma (aPR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06–1.46; aPR = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.08–1.91, respectively). Although about four-fifths (81.1%) of fathers reported usually placing their infants to sleep on their back, fewer fathers report avoiding soft bedding (44.1%) or using an approved sleep surface (31.9%). Non-Hispanic Black fathers were less likely to report back sleep position (aPR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54–0.90) and no soft bedding (aPR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30–0.89) than non-Hispanic white fathers.

CONCLUSIONS

Fathers reported suboptimal infant breastfeeding rates and safe sleep practices overall and by paternal characteristics, suggesting opportunities to include fathers in promotion of breastfeeding and infant safe sleep.

What’s Known on This Subject:

Improving breastfeeding rates and safe infant sleep practices are public health and clinical priorities. Growing evidence links paternal characteristics and childcare involvement with positive child outcomes. There is limited information collected from fathers on infant breastfeeding and safe sleep practices.

What This Study Adds:

Using population-based data, 86.1% of fathers reported their infants ever breastfed, 63.4% reported any breastfeeding at 8 weeks, and 15.7% reported placing infants to sleep on their back, on an approved surface, without soft bedding. Practices varied by paternal characteristics.

Breastfeeding and safe sleep are 2 infant health measures of national public health and clinical importance.13  Breastfeeding provides maternal and infant health benefits, and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends exclusive breastfeeding through about 6 months and supports continued breastfeeding through 2 years or beyond, as mutually desired by mother and child.4  Despite the AAP’s longstanding support for breastfeeding, 25.6% of infants are exclusively breastfed through 6 months and 35.0% are breastfed at 1 year, compared with the Healthy People 2030 targets of 42.4% and 54.1%, respectively.5,6  Additionally, there are racial and ethnic disparities in breastfeeding rates.7  Similarly, 79.8% of infants are placed on their back to sleep, which is below the national target of 88.9%.8  In 2020, there were 3356 cases of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) in the United States and racial and ethnic disparities persist.9  To prevent SUID, select AAP recommendations for safe sleep include: back sleep position, use of a firm, flat, noninclined sleep surface (ie, a crib, bassinet, or a pack-and-play), room sharing without bed sharing, and avoidance of soft objects and loose bedding in the sleep environment.10 

In the past 50 years, fathers have tripled the time they spend engaging in childrearing activities,11  and there is growing evidence linking paternal involvement to positive child health outcomes.12  For example, paternal involvement in childcare is associated with breastfeeding initiation and continuation,13,14  with less infant nighttime awakenings15  and improved maternal sleep.16  For these reasons, educational campaigns for breastfeeding17  and safe sleep18,19  have begun to include fathers. There is limited information, however, collected from fathers about their attitudes toward and experiences with infant breastfeeding and safe sleep practices.20  The objectives of this study were to (1) assess father-reported rates of infant breastfeeding and safe sleep practices and (2) identify associations between paternal sociodemographic characteristics with (a) breastfeeding initiation and any breastfeeding at 8 weeks and (b) infant safe sleep practices (back sleep position, approved sleep surface, and no soft objects or loose bedding).

This analysis is from survey responses from fathers who participated in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) for Dads study.21  The PRAMS for Dads protocol was modeled after maternal PRAMS22  and surveyed a statewide-representative sample of fathers from Georgia 2 to 6 months after their infant’s birth.21  The survey collected data on paternal attitudes, behaviors, and experiences before, during, and shortly after their infant’s birth.21  Prevalence estimates accounted for the PRAMS for Dads sampling design and weights (sample, nonresponse, and noncoverage weights) to be representative of fathers of live-born infants who were either married or unmarried (with a completed paternity acknowledgment form) in Georgia. All fathers for whom the infant's mother had been randomly sampled for PRAMS in Georgia from October 15, 2018 to July 3, 2019, were eligible for the PRAMS for Dads sample. During the study period, Georgia PRAMS sampled 1074 women with a live birth, and eligible fathers could be identified by marriage or paternity acknowledgment (PA) form for 857 (79.8%) births. Among the 857 sampled fathers, 266 fathers completed the survey (31.0% unweighted response rate, 31.7% weighted response rate). This study was approved by both the Georgia Department of Public Health Institutional Review Board and the Northwestern University Institutional Review Board.

Breastfeeding

Breastfeeding outcomes were based on established PRAMS indicators.23  To assess breastfeeding initiation and any breastfeeding at 8 weeks, respondents were asked ‘‘Did your baby’s mother ever breastfeed or pump breast milk to feed your new baby, even for a short period of time?” and “How many weeks or months did your baby’s mother breastfeed or pump breast milk to feed your baby?” Breastfeeding initiation was categorized as (1) ever breastfed or pumped breast milk or (2) never breastfed or pumped breast milk. Any breastfeeding at 8 weeks was categorized as (1) breastfed or pumped breast milk for ≥8 weeks in any amount or (2) never breastfed or stopped breastfeeding or pumping breast milk before the infant was 8 weeks of age. Respondents selecting “I don’t know” were categorized as missing. Paternal breastfeeding attitude was assessed by asking “When your new baby was born, what did you think about your baby’s mother breastfeeding your baby?” Responses were categorized as (1) “I wanted her to breastfeed” and (2) “I did not want her to breastfeed” or “I had no opinion.”

Safe Sleep

Safe sleep outcomes were modeled after previous analyses23,24  and included paternal report of 3 infant sleep practices: (1) back sleep position, (2) approved sleep surface, and (3) no soft objects or loose bedding (hereafter referred to as “soft bedding”). Sleep position was assessed by the question, “In which 1 position do you most often lay your baby down to sleep now?” Back sleep position was defined as responding affirmatively to “on his or her back” and not on his or her “stomach” or “side.”

Information on the other sleep practices was assessed by the question “Listed below are some things about how babies sleep. How did your new baby usually sleep in the past 2 weeks? For each item check No if your baby did not usually sleep like this and Yes if he or she did.” Binary composite variables were created: (a) approved sleep surface was defined as the infants usually sleeping in a crib, bassinet or pack-and-play, but not in a twin or larger mattress or bed, couch, sofa, or armchair, or infant car seat or swing; and (b) no soft bedding was defined as infants who slept without blankets, toys, cushions, or pillows, including nursing pillows or crib bumper pads (mesh or nonmesh). Fathers were recorded as practicing all 3 recommended safe sleep measures if they were categorized as “yes” to back sleep position, approved sleep surface use, and no soft bedding.

We examined reported receipt of advice on the 3 measured safe sleep practices: fathers reported whether they were told by a healthcare provider (“doctor, nurse, or other healthcare worker”) (1) to “place my baby on his or her back to sleep;” (2) to “place my baby to sleep in a crib, bassinet, or pack-and-play;” and (3) “what things should and should not go in bed with my baby.” Responses were categorized into (1) “yes” and (2) “no” or “I don’t know.” A composite variable was calculated as, “received advice on all sleep measures,” if fathers answered “yes” to advice received for the above 3 measures.

Covariates

Based on literature examining breastfeeding and infant sleep practices,24,25  covariates included paternal age, race and ethnicity, education, and marital status (from birth certificate), and paternal health insurance status (from PRAMS for Dads survey). For paternal race and ethnicity, respondents were grouped as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Non-Hispanic other. Because of small sample size (n = 22), “non-Hispanic other” included all other reported races (Asian, Native Hawaiian, other Pacific Islander, multiple, or other) (n = 19) and unknown race or ethnicity (n = 3). Fathers were asked “what kind of health insurance do you have now,” and were categorized as insured (all types) or uninsured (“I don’t have health insurance now”).

Statistical analysis was conducted via Stata.26  Analysis included descriptive statistics for paternal characteristics, breastfeeding practices, and safe infant sleep practices, along with 95% confidence intervals, and multivariable logistic regression analyses for 5 main outcomes: ever breastfed, any breastfeeding at 8 weeks, back sleep position, approved sleep surface, and no soft bedding. Multivariable models included age, race and ethnicity, health insurance status, education, and marital status. We ran an additional multivariable model examining the association between age, race and ethnicity, health insurance status, education, and marital status and receipt of safe sleep information. The sample size determination for each outcome is detailed in Fig 1. To maintain correct standard errors from our survey design, we used the subpopulation command in Stata to exclude fathers with missing outcome data during our prevalence estimates and regression analysis.

FIGURE 1

Flow diagram for determining the sample size of breastfeeding and infant safe sleep outcomes.

FIGURE 1

Flow diagram for determining the sample size of breastfeeding and infant safe sleep outcomes.

Close modal

Among 250 respondents, 56.5% were aged 25 to 34 years, 44.7% were non-Hispanic white, 37.1% were college graduates, and 65.2% were married (Table 1). Most fathers (86.1%) reported their infant was ever breastfed; a smaller proportion (63.4%) reported any breastfeeding at 8 weeks (Table 1). Of infants who were ever breastfed, 26.1% were no longer breastfed at 8 weeks. About two-thirds (67.8%) reported they wanted the infant’s mother to breastfeed. Fathers who reported wanting their infant’s mother to breastfeed were more likely to report breastfeeding initiation (95.4% vs 68.7%, adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–1.68) and breastfeeding at 8 weeks (77.5% vs 33.3%, aPR = 2.33; 95% CI, 1.59–3.42) than their counterparts (Table 2).

TABLE 1

Paternal Characteristics, Breastfeeding Practices and Safe Infant Sleep Practices, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) for Dads Study, Georgia, USA, 2018 to 2019

VariableUnweighted Sample Sizea (n = 250)Weightedb % (95% CI)
Age (n = 250)   
 <25 30 13.6 (8.9–20.1) 
 25–34 136 56.5 (48.6–64.1) 
 ≥35 84 29.9 (23.3–37.5) 
Race and Hispanic origin (n = 250)   
 Non-Hispanic white 114 44.7 (37.1–52.6) 
 Non-Hispanic Black 69 28.5 (21.7–36.3) 
 Hispanic 46 18.4 (13.1–25.2) 
 Non-Hispanic other or unidentifiedc 21 8.4 (4.9–14.1) 
Health insurance status (n = 250)   
 Uninsured 73 29.2 (22.4–37.1) 
 Insured 177 70.8 (62.9–77.6) 
Education (n = 250)   
 ≤High school or GED 111 43.7 (36.1–51.6) 
 Some college, no degree 44 19.2 (13.4–26.5) 
 College graduated 95 37.1 (30.0–44.8) 
Marital status (n = 250)   
 Married 183 65.2 (56.8–72.7) 
 Unmarried with PA form 67 34.8 (27.3–43.2) 
Breastfeeding outcomes   
 Ever breastfed (n = 245) 211 86.1 (79.3–90.9) 
 Breastfeeding at 8 wk (n = 246) 158 63.4 (55.3–70.7) 
 Initiated breastfeeding but stopped by 8 wk (n = 211) 55 26.1 (19.2–34.3) 
Breastfeeding attitude (n = 249)   
 “I want her to breastfeed” 180 67.8 (59.8–74.8) 
 “I didn’t want” or “no opinion” 69 32.2 (25.2–40.2) 
Safe sleep outcomes   
 Back sleep positione (n = 237) 189 81.1 (74.0–86.6) 
 Approved sleep surface usef (n = 241) 78 31.9 (24.9–39.7) 
 No soft beddingg (n = 239) 103 44.1 (36.4–52.2) 
Sleep surface use   
 Crib, bassinet or pack-and-play (n = 245) 222 90.7 (85.1–94.4) 
 Twin or larger bed (n = 236) 78 35.2 (27.8–43.4) 
 Sofa, couch or armchair (n = 236) 30 9.6 (5.8–15.5) 
 Infant car seat or swing (n = 239) 133 58.4 (50.3–66.0) 
Soft bedding use   
 Blanket (n = 238) 110 47.1 (39.2–55.1) 
 Toys, cushions, or pillows (n = 234) 29 10.7 (6.7–16.8) 
 Crib bumper pads (n = 231) 45 19.4 (13.8–26.6) 
Practicing all 3 recommended sleep practicesh (n = 227) 34 15.7 (10.8–22.3) 
Type of safe sleep advice received   
 Place infant in back sleep position (n = 247) 210 84.7 (78.2–89.5) 
 Place infant to sleep in a crib, bassinet, or pack-and-play (n = 248) 197 78.7 (71.3–84.5) 
 What things should and should not go in bed with my baby (n = 247) 197 79.1 (72.1–84.7) 
 On all 3 above safe sleep measures (n = 247) 175 68.4 (60.6–75.3) 
VariableUnweighted Sample Sizea (n = 250)Weightedb % (95% CI)
Age (n = 250)   
 <25 30 13.6 (8.9–20.1) 
 25–34 136 56.5 (48.6–64.1) 
 ≥35 84 29.9 (23.3–37.5) 
Race and Hispanic origin (n = 250)   
 Non-Hispanic white 114 44.7 (37.1–52.6) 
 Non-Hispanic Black 69 28.5 (21.7–36.3) 
 Hispanic 46 18.4 (13.1–25.2) 
 Non-Hispanic other or unidentifiedc 21 8.4 (4.9–14.1) 
Health insurance status (n = 250)   
 Uninsured 73 29.2 (22.4–37.1) 
 Insured 177 70.8 (62.9–77.6) 
Education (n = 250)   
 ≤High school or GED 111 43.7 (36.1–51.6) 
 Some college, no degree 44 19.2 (13.4–26.5) 
 College graduated 95 37.1 (30.0–44.8) 
Marital status (n = 250)   
 Married 183 65.2 (56.8–72.7) 
 Unmarried with PA form 67 34.8 (27.3–43.2) 
Breastfeeding outcomes   
 Ever breastfed (n = 245) 211 86.1 (79.3–90.9) 
 Breastfeeding at 8 wk (n = 246) 158 63.4 (55.3–70.7) 
 Initiated breastfeeding but stopped by 8 wk (n = 211) 55 26.1 (19.2–34.3) 
Breastfeeding attitude (n = 249)   
 “I want her to breastfeed” 180 67.8 (59.8–74.8) 
 “I didn’t want” or “no opinion” 69 32.2 (25.2–40.2) 
Safe sleep outcomes   
 Back sleep positione (n = 237) 189 81.1 (74.0–86.6) 
 Approved sleep surface usef (n = 241) 78 31.9 (24.9–39.7) 
 No soft beddingg (n = 239) 103 44.1 (36.4–52.2) 
Sleep surface use   
 Crib, bassinet or pack-and-play (n = 245) 222 90.7 (85.1–94.4) 
 Twin or larger bed (n = 236) 78 35.2 (27.8–43.4) 
 Sofa, couch or armchair (n = 236) 30 9.6 (5.8–15.5) 
 Infant car seat or swing (n = 239) 133 58.4 (50.3–66.0) 
Soft bedding use   
 Blanket (n = 238) 110 47.1 (39.2–55.1) 
 Toys, cushions, or pillows (n = 234) 29 10.7 (6.7–16.8) 
 Crib bumper pads (n = 231) 45 19.4 (13.8–26.6) 
Practicing all 3 recommended sleep practicesh (n = 227) 34 15.7 (10.8–22.3) 
Type of safe sleep advice received   
 Place infant in back sleep position (n = 247) 210 84.7 (78.2–89.5) 
 Place infant to sleep in a crib, bassinet, or pack-and-play (n = 248) 197 78.7 (71.3–84.5) 
 What things should and should not go in bed with my baby (n = 247) 197 79.1 (72.1–84.7) 
 On all 3 above safe sleep measures (n = 247) 175 68.4 (60.6–75.3) 

GED, General Educational Development.

a

Unweighted total sample size for variable; sample size may vary because of missing data.

b

Weighted percentage. Father analysis wt is the product of his sampling wt, nonresponse wt, and noncoverage wt.

c

Non-Hispanic other included all other reported races and fathers who left race unanswered.

d

Associate degree, bachelor’s degree, or higher.

e

Defined as most often placing their infant to sleep on the back versus side or stomach.

f

Defined as infants usually sleeping in a “crib, bassinet, or pack-and-play” but not in a “twin or larger bed,” “sofa, couch or armchair,” or “infant car seat or swing.”

g

Defined as infant usually sleeping without blankets; toys, cushions, or pillows; and crib bumper pads.

h

Three practices included back to sleep, approved sleep surface, and no soft bedding.

TABLE 2

Adjusted Prevalence and Prevalence Ratios for Breastfeeding Practices and Paternal Characteristics, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) for Dads Study, Georgia, USA, 2018 to 2019

CharacteristicEver Breastfed (n = 245)Any Breastfeeding at 8 wk (n = 246)
Adjusteda PrevalenceaPR (95% CI)Adjusteda PrevalenceaPR (95% CI)
Age(y)     
 <25 93.1 Ref 71.5 Ref 
 25–34 82.7 0.89 (0.78–1.02) 59.5 0.83 (0.62–1.12) 
 ≥35 87.9 0.94 (0.83–1.07) 66.7 0.93 (0.67–1.29) 
Race and Hispanic origin     
 Non-Hispanic white 80.0 Ref 59.3 Ref 
 Non-Hispanic Black 83.4 1.04 (0.87–1.25) 61.9 1.04 (0.77–1.42) 
 Hispanic 96.4 1.20 (1.05–1.39) 67.3 1.13 (0.81–1.58) 
 Non-Hispanic other or unidentified 96.4 1.20 (1.05–1.38) 79.9 1.35 (0.97–1.87) 
Health insurance status     
 Uninsured 85.8 Ref 72.2 Ref 
 Insured 86.2 1.00 (0.89–1.14) 59.0 0.82 (0.64–1.03) 
Education     
 ≤High school or GED 75.1 Ref 52.0 Ref 
 Some college, no degree 93.2 1.24 (1.06–1.45) 67.1 1.29 (0.93–1.79) 
 College graduateb 93.6 1.25 (1.06–1.46) 74.7 1.44 (1.08–1.91) 
Marital status     
 Unmarried with PA form 79.7 Ref 47.2 Ref 
 Married 89.6 1.12 (0.95–1.33) 71.8 1.52 (1.01–2.29) 
Breastfeeding attitude     
 “I didn’t want” or “no opinion” 68.7 Ref 33.3 Ref 
 “I want her to breastfeed” 95.4 1.39 (1.15–1.68) 77.5 2.33 (1.59–3.42) 
CharacteristicEver Breastfed (n = 245)Any Breastfeeding at 8 wk (n = 246)
Adjusteda PrevalenceaPR (95% CI)Adjusteda PrevalenceaPR (95% CI)
Age(y)     
 <25 93.1 Ref 71.5 Ref 
 25–34 82.7 0.89 (0.78–1.02) 59.5 0.83 (0.62–1.12) 
 ≥35 87.9 0.94 (0.83–1.07) 66.7 0.93 (0.67–1.29) 
Race and Hispanic origin     
 Non-Hispanic white 80.0 Ref 59.3 Ref 
 Non-Hispanic Black 83.4 1.04 (0.87–1.25) 61.9 1.04 (0.77–1.42) 
 Hispanic 96.4 1.20 (1.05–1.39) 67.3 1.13 (0.81–1.58) 
 Non-Hispanic other or unidentified 96.4 1.20 (1.05–1.38) 79.9 1.35 (0.97–1.87) 
Health insurance status     
 Uninsured 85.8 Ref 72.2 Ref 
 Insured 86.2 1.00 (0.89–1.14) 59.0 0.82 (0.64–1.03) 
Education     
 ≤High school or GED 75.1 Ref 52.0 Ref 
 Some college, no degree 93.2 1.24 (1.06–1.45) 67.1 1.29 (0.93–1.79) 
 College graduateb 93.6 1.25 (1.06–1.46) 74.7 1.44 (1.08–1.91) 
Marital status     
 Unmarried with PA form 79.7 Ref 47.2 Ref 
 Married 89.6 1.12 (0.95–1.33) 71.8 1.52 (1.01–2.29) 
Breastfeeding attitude     
 “I didn’t want” or “no opinion” 68.7 Ref 33.3 Ref 
 “I want her to breastfeed” 95.4 1.39 (1.15–1.68) 77.5 2.33 (1.59–3.42) 

GED, General Educational Development.

a

All models adjusted for age, race or Hispanic origin, health insurance status, education, and marital status.

b

Associate degree, bachelor’s degree, or higher.

Hispanic fathers were more likely to report their infant was ever breastfed than non-Hispanic white fathers (96.4% vs 80.0%, aPR = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05–1.39), but there were no differences in breastfeeding at 8 weeks by race and ethnicity (Table 2). Fathers who were college graduates were more likely to report their infant ever breastfed (93.6% vs 75.1%, aPR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06–1.46) and breastfed at 8 weeks (74.7% vs 52.0%, aPR = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.08–1.91) than those with a high school diploma or less.

Nearly all fathers (99.4%) reported placing their infant to sleep. About four-fifths (81.1%) reported placing their infant on their back to sleep, 31.9% using an approved sleep surface, 44.1% reported using no soft bedding, and 15.7% reported following all 3 recommended practices (Table 1). Most fathers reported receiving advice from a healthcare provider to place their infant on their back (84.7%), to use a crib, bassinet, or pack-and-play (78.7%), and what things should and should not go in bed with the baby (79.1%); about two-thirds (68.4%) received advice on all 3 safe sleep measures. Non-Hispanic Black fathers were less likely to place their infant on their back to sleep (62.5% vs 89.5%; aPR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54–0.90) and avoid soft bedding (28.1% vs 54.1%; aPR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30–0.89) than non-Hispanic white fathers (Table 3). Fathers who were college graduates were more likely to avoid soft bedding (61.4% vs 31.9%; aPR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.25–2.95) (Table 3), receive advice on the back sleep position (94.3% vs 73.6%; aPR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.09–1.51) and receive advice on what should and should not go in their infant’s bed (88.1% vs 68.5%; aPR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.06–1.57) than fathers with a ≤high school diploma (results not shown). There was no difference in receipt of safe sleep advice by age, race, health insurance status, or marital status (results not shown).

TABLE 3

Adjusted Prevalence and Prevalence Ratios for Infant Safe Sleep Practices and Paternal Characteristics, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) for Dads Study, Georgia, USA, 2018 to 2019

CharacteristicBack Sleep Position (n = 237)aApproved Sleep Surface Useb (n = 241)No Soft Objects or Loose Beddingc (n = 239)
Adjustedd PrevalenceaPR (95% CI)Adjustedd PrevalenceaPR (95% CI)Adjustedd PrevalenceaPR (95% CI)
Age       
 <25 77.0 Ref 33.1 Ref 45.5 Ref 
 25 − 34 76.2 0.99 (0.78–1.26) 32.1 0.97 (0.46–2.04) 41.5 0.91 (0.56–1.48) 
 ≥35 90.5 1.18 (0.93–1.48) 30.9 0.93 (0.40–2.16) 48.9 1.08 (0.63–1.83) 
Race and Hispanic origin (n = 263)       
 Non-Hispanic white 89.5 Ref 30.1 Ref 54.1 Ref 
 Non-Hispanic Black 62.5 0.70 (0.54–0.90) 36.6 0.82 (0.46–1.46) 28.1 0.52 (0.30–0.89) 
 Hispanic 82.6 0.93 (0.77–1.11) 24.6 0.67 (0.29–1.54) 54.4 1.00 (0.67–1.51) 
 Non-Hispanic other or unknown 81.1 0.91 (0.70–1.18) 25.1 0.68 (0.24–2.00) 25.5 0.47 (0.21–1.10) 
Health insurance status       
 Uninsured 89.0 Ref 24.3 Ref 42.5 Ref 
 Insured 76.2 0.86 (0.73–1.01) 34.9 1.44 (0.76–2.71) 44.8 1.05 (0.68–1.63) 
 Education       
 ≤High school or GED 75.8 Ref 32.8 Ref 31.9 Ref 
 Some college, no degree 86.2 1.14 (0.94–1.37) 35.2 1.07 (0.58–1.98) 39.2 1.23 (0.69–2.18) 
 College graduatee 84.4 1.11 (0.94–1.32) 29.2 0.89 (0.50–1.60) 61.4 1.92 (1.25–2.95) 
Marital status       
 Unmarried with PA form 79.6 Ref 27.9 Ref 47.8 Ref 
 Married 82.0 1.03 (0.85–1.24) 33.8 1.21 (0.62–2.37) 42.3 0.88 (0.59–1.32) 
Received advice on all safe sleep measuresf       
 No 82.8 Ref 27.4 Ref 38.9 Ref 
 Yes 81.0 0.98 (0.85–1.12) 33.9 1.24 (0.71–2.17) 46.4 1.19 (0.80–1.79) 
Received advice on back sleep position       
 No 78.8 Ref NA NA Ref Ref 
 Yes 82.1 1.04 (0.86–1.27) NA NA NA NA 
Received advice on using crib, bassinet or pack-and-play       
 No NA NA 28.6 Ref NA NA 
 Yes NA NA 32.8 1.15 (0.61–2.17) NA NA 
Received advice on what should and should not go in baby’s bed       
 No NA NA NA NA 52.4 Ref 
 Yes NA NA NA NA 41.9 0.80 (0.55–1.17) 
CharacteristicBack Sleep Position (n = 237)aApproved Sleep Surface Useb (n = 241)No Soft Objects or Loose Beddingc (n = 239)
Adjustedd PrevalenceaPR (95% CI)Adjustedd PrevalenceaPR (95% CI)Adjustedd PrevalenceaPR (95% CI)
Age       
 <25 77.0 Ref 33.1 Ref 45.5 Ref 
 25 − 34 76.2 0.99 (0.78–1.26) 32.1 0.97 (0.46–2.04) 41.5 0.91 (0.56–1.48) 
 ≥35 90.5 1.18 (0.93–1.48) 30.9 0.93 (0.40–2.16) 48.9 1.08 (0.63–1.83) 
Race and Hispanic origin (n = 263)       
 Non-Hispanic white 89.5 Ref 30.1 Ref 54.1 Ref 
 Non-Hispanic Black 62.5 0.70 (0.54–0.90) 36.6 0.82 (0.46–1.46) 28.1 0.52 (0.30–0.89) 
 Hispanic 82.6 0.93 (0.77–1.11) 24.6 0.67 (0.29–1.54) 54.4 1.00 (0.67–1.51) 
 Non-Hispanic other or unknown 81.1 0.91 (0.70–1.18) 25.1 0.68 (0.24–2.00) 25.5 0.47 (0.21–1.10) 
Health insurance status       
 Uninsured 89.0 Ref 24.3 Ref 42.5 Ref 
 Insured 76.2 0.86 (0.73–1.01) 34.9 1.44 (0.76–2.71) 44.8 1.05 (0.68–1.63) 
 Education       
 ≤High school or GED 75.8 Ref 32.8 Ref 31.9 Ref 
 Some college, no degree 86.2 1.14 (0.94–1.37) 35.2 1.07 (0.58–1.98) 39.2 1.23 (0.69–2.18) 
 College graduatee 84.4 1.11 (0.94–1.32) 29.2 0.89 (0.50–1.60) 61.4 1.92 (1.25–2.95) 
Marital status       
 Unmarried with PA form 79.6 Ref 27.9 Ref 47.8 Ref 
 Married 82.0 1.03 (0.85–1.24) 33.8 1.21 (0.62–2.37) 42.3 0.88 (0.59–1.32) 
Received advice on all safe sleep measuresf       
 No 82.8 Ref 27.4 Ref 38.9 Ref 
 Yes 81.0 0.98 (0.85–1.12) 33.9 1.24 (0.71–2.17) 46.4 1.19 (0.80–1.79) 
Received advice on back sleep position       
 No 78.8 Ref NA NA Ref Ref 
 Yes 82.1 1.04 (0.86–1.27) NA NA NA NA 
Received advice on using crib, bassinet or pack-and-play       
 No NA NA 28.6 Ref NA NA 
 Yes NA NA 32.8 1.15 (0.61–2.17) NA NA 
Received advice on what should and should not go in baby’s bed       
 No NA NA NA NA 52.4 Ref 
 Yes NA NA NA NA 41.9 0.80 (0.55–1.17) 

NA, not applicable; GED, General Educational Development.

a

Defined as most often placing their infant to sleep on the back versus side or stomach.

b

Defined as infants usually sleeping in a “crib, bassinet, or pack in play” but not in a “twin or larger bed,” “sofa, couch or armchair,” or “infant car seat or swing.”

c

Defined as infant usually sleeping without blankets; toys, cushions, or pillows; and crib bumper pads.

d

All models adjusted for age, race or Hispanic origin, health insurance status, education, and marital status.

e

Associate degree, bachelor’s degree, or higher.

f

The 3 sleep advice measures were: “place my baby on his or her back sleep position,” “place my baby to sleep in a crib, bassinet, or pack-and-play,” and “what things should and should not go in bed with my baby”.

In this representative sample of fathers from Georgia, we present father-reported prevalence estimates of breastfeeding and infant safe sleep practices. We found multiple associations between paternal characteristics and infant breastfeeding, with increased likelihood among fathers who wanted their infant’s mother to breastfeed and those with higher educational attainment. Our infant safe sleep practices prevalence estimates are similar to maternal PRAMS data in Georgia27  and nationwide,23,24  which suggests mothers and fathers use similar infant sleep practices and identifies that many fathers in Georgia are not following AAPs evidence-based safe sleep recommendations.10 

The paternal reported prevalence estimates of breastfeeding initiation (86%) and any breastfeeding at 8 weeks (63%) are similar to maternal reported rates in Georgia (80% to 83% and 55% to 61%, respectively)27  and nationwide (range by site: 84% to 88% and 69% to 76%).23,28  There was no difference in breastfeeding initiation and any breastfeeding at 8 weeks between infants of non-Hispanic Black fathers and non-Hispanic white fathers, which differs from national data and data from Georgia, demonstrating that non-Hispanic white mothers breastfeed more often than non-Hispanic Black mothers.29 

Our study adds to previous literature that shows fathers who have a positive attitude toward breastfeeding report higher infant breastfeeding rates.3032  In our sample, among fathers who wanted their infant’s mother to breastfeed, 95% reported breastfeeding initiation and 78% reported breastfeeding at 8 weeks, which is significantly higher than fathers who had no opinion or did not want their infant’s mother to breastfeed, of whom 69% reported breastfeeding initiation and 33% reported breastfeeding at 8 weeks. Fathers have endorsed various concerns around breastfeeding, such as breastfeeding potentially impacting the father-infant relationship,31  decreased intimacy with the mother, feeling uncomfortable about their partners breastfeeding in public, and feeling inadequate as a parent.33  Furthermore, mothers take father’s attitudes into consideration when making decisions about breastfeeding as demonstrated by a US survey of 123 mothers that found that “father’s feelings” were the primary reason women chose to bottle-feed.34 

We estimated paternal educational attainment was associated with breastfeeding initiation and breastfeeding at 8 weeks. Similarly, previous maternal surveys have found higher paternal educational attainment35  and maternal educational attainment25  are associated with higher breastfeeding rates. Educational attainment, a predictor of health literacy,36  is associated with less breastfeeding knowledge among fathers internationally,37  but this relationship needs to be explored in the United States. A meta-analysis of father-focused interventions to promote breastfeeding found a significant benefit in all measured breastfeeding outcomes.38  Additionally, few fathers report receiving information directly from healthcare providers, whereas most report information is passed through their partners.33,39  Father focused interventions and healthcare professionals may be able to improve breastfeeding rates by directly engaging fathers (or nonbirthing parents) in breastfeeding discussions and offering suggestions for how partners can support mothers and infants throughout breastfeeding.31,33,40 

Regarding sleep practices in this study sample of fathers, 99% reported placing their infant to sleep, suggesting they are an important audience for safe infant sleep information and practices. We found a similar proportion of fathers reported placing their infants to sleep on their backs compared with overall estimates from maternal PRAMS,8,24  but slightly higher than Georgia maternal PRAMS estimates.27  Furthermore, our findings are similar to other studies showing differences in patterns by race and ethnicity reported by mothers,24  as we report that non-Hispanic Black fathers are less likely to use the back sleep position and more likely to use soft bedding than non-Hispanic white fathers. Nationally, the rate of SUID of non-Hispanic Black infants is more than twice that of non-Hispanic white infants9,41 ; differences in unsafe sleep position and environment may contribute to this disparity.10,24,42  To reduce racial and ethnic disparities in SUIDs, strategies to increase safe sleep practices in the Black community, including communication campaigns, home visiting programs, and provider counseling of safe infant sleep practices, are key.10,43  For example, the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development’s Safe to Sleep campaign for specific communities has partnered with local community organizations to design tailored and effective safe sleep messaging and used national summits to disseminate their resources.44 

Reported paternal behaviors around sleep and sleep environment were also suboptimal, with only 32% reporting use of an approved sleep surface and 44% avoiding soft bedding, estimates that mirror practices in mothers.24  The majority of fathers reported being told to place their infant on their back to sleep (85%), but this percentage is lower than overall PRAMS estimates that 93% of mothers receive back to sleep position advice.24  Most fathers (68%) reported receiving advice on all 3 measures (back sleep position, sleep surface, and soft bedding), but almost a third of respondents were missing at least 1 key component of safe sleep education.10  Although we found no associations between receipt of sleep advice and sleep practices, we found fathers with a college degree were more likely to report receiving advice on the back sleep position and what items should and should not go in baby’s crib, compared those with a high school degree or less. Since fathers who were college graduates were more likely to avoid soft bedding, these findings suggest receipt of provider advice may be a contributing factor to paternal sleep practices. Moreover, all parents should receive safe sleep guidance,10  and to promote healthy equity, it is important to ensure safe sleep advice is provided to fathers of lower educational attainment.

Several limitations exist for this study. First, although the response rate (31.7%) was less than optimal, it is similar to studies designed to reach new fathers.4547  Additionally, PRAMS for Dads survey respondents did not differ significantly on measured paternal age, education, race and Hispanic origin, and marital status as compared with the target population of fathers in Georgia.21  Furthermore, in 2019, 7 states had maternal PRAMS response rates below 50%,48  Georgia had a response rate of 61%,48  and generally fathers have lower response rates than mothers.49,50  Second, the PRAMS for Dads study relied on birth certificate records, for which information on unmarried men without a paternity acknowledgment form was not available and were therefore excluded from the study sample. Unmarried men without a paternity acknowledgment form represented 20% of live births in Georgia during the study period. Third, since fathers completed the survey 2 to 6 months postpartum, as with maternal PRAMS, we were unable to measure breastfeeding at 6 months and 1 year, which are key national breastfeeding metrics.5,6  Fourth, we do not have information on how frequently fathers placed their infants to sleep, which would be important data to collect in future surveys of new fathers. Finally, the sample size in this secondary analysis makes it difficult to ascertain significant difference among subgroups, as the original PRAMS for Dads study was powered to detect difference in methodological approaches to survey delivery21  but not differences among demographic groups for survey questions.

In this analysis of a representative sample of fathers, 86% reported their infant initiated breastfeeding; however, of those who reported their infant was ever breastfed, approximately one-quarter reported their infant was not being breastfed at 8 weeks. Father’s attitude toward breastfeeding and educational attainment were associated with breastfeeding rates. Only 16% of fathers implemented all 3 recommended infant sleep practices (using the back sleep position, an approved sleep surface, and avoiding soft bedding) and two-thirds received advice on all 3 practices from a healthcare provider. These findings reveal that father-reported breastfeeding and safe sleep practices do not meet national recommendations4,10,51  and emphasize the key role fathers can play in facilitating breastfeeding and safe infant sleep. There is evidence that tailored educational interventions improve breastfeeding and safe sleep rates,52  and additional research is needed to further explore how father-focused interventions and educational campaigns can improve infant health practices. Including fathers and birth partners in strategies to improve infant health, such as public health programs and engaging them directly in clinical settings, can help narrow disparities and promote child health.

Dr Parker conceptualized and designed the study, conducted the primary analyses, and drafted the initial manuscript; Drs Simon and Garfield conceptualized and designed the study and designed the data collection instruments; Ms Bendelow conceptualized and designed the study and conducted analyses; Drs Bryan, Smith, Kortsmit, Dieke, and Warner, Ms Salvesen von Essen, and Ms Williams designed the data collection instruments and contributed to the study design; and all authors reviewed and revised the manuscript, approved the final manuscript as submitted, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

FUNDING: This project was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Cooperative agreement #U38OT00140) and CDC Innovation Fund, Office of Science/Office of Technology and Innovation. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: The authors have indicated they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

AAP

American Academy of Pediatrics

PRAMS

Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System

SUID

sudden unexpected infant death

1
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
Safe sleep for babies
.
Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/safesleep/index.html. Accessed October 27, 2022
2
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
Breastfeeding
.
Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/index.htm. Accessed October 27, 2022
3
US Department of Health and Human Services
.
Healthy People 2030: overview and objectives for infants
.
4
Meek
JY
,
Noble
L
;
Section on Breastfeeding
.
Policy statement: breastfeeding and the use of human milk
.
Pediatrics
.
2022
;
150
(
1
):
e2022057988
5
Healthy People
.
2020 objectives: increase the proportion of infants who are breastfed exclusively through age 6 months — MICH-15
.
6
Healthy People
.
2030 objectives: increase the proportion of infants who are breastfed at 1 year — MICH-16
.
7
Chiang
KV
,
Li
R
,
Anstey
EH
,
Perrine
CG
.
Racial and ethnic disparities in breastfeeding initiation — United States, 2019
.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
.
2021
;
70
(
21
):
769
774
8
Healthy People
.
2030 objectives: increase the proportion of infants who are put to sleep on their backs — MICH-14
.
9
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
Data and statistics for SIDS and SUID
.
Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/sids/data.htm. Accessed October 27, 2022
10
Moon
RY
,
Carlin
RF
,
Hand
I
;
Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
;
Committee on Fetus and Newborn
.
Sleep-related infant deaths: updated 2022 recommendations for reducing infant deaths in the sleep environment
.
Pediatrics
.
2022
;
150
(
1
):
e2022057990
11
Livingston
G
,
Parker
K
.
8 facts about American dads
.
12
Yogman
M
,
Garfield
CF
;
Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health
.
Fathers’ roles in the care and development of their children: the role of pediatricians
.
Pediatrics
.
2016
;
138
(
1
):
e20161128
13
Abbass-Dick
J
,
Stern
SB
,
Nelson
LE
,
Watson
W
,
Dennis
CL
.
Coparenting breastfeeding support and exclusive breastfeeding: a randomized controlled trial
.
Pediatrics
.
2015
;
135
(
1
):
102
110
14
Pisacane
A
,
Continisio
GI
,
Aldinucci
M
,
D’Amora
S
,
Continisio
P
.
A controlled trial of the father’s role in breastfeeding promotion
.
Pediatrics
.
2005
;
116
(
4
):
e494
e498
15
Tikotzky
L
,
Sadeh
A
,
Glickman-Gavrieli
T
.
Infant sleep and paternal involvement in infant caregiving during the first 6 months of life
.
J Pediatr Psychol
.
2011
;
36
(
1
):
36
46
16
Tikotzky
L
,
Sadeh
A
,
Volkovich
E
,
Manber
R
,
Meiri
G
,
Shahar
G
.
Infant sleep development from 3 to 6 months postpartum: links with maternal sleep and paternal involvement
.
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev
.
2015
;
80
(
1
):
107
124
17
Office of the Surgeon General (US)
;
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
;
Office on Women's Health (US)
.
The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding
.
Rockville, MD
:
Office of the Surgeon General
;
2011
18
Eunice Kenney Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
.
3 key ways dads can help baby sleep safe
.
19
Safe Sleep Academy
.
Dad’s corner
.
Available at: https://www.safesleepacademy.org/dads-corner/. Accessed October 27, 2022
20
Garfield
CF
,
Simon
CD
,
Harrison
L
, et al
.
Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System for Dads: public health surveillance of new fathers in the perinatal period
.
Am J Public Health
.
2018
;
108
(
10
):
1314
1315
21
Garfield
CF
,
Simon
CD
,
Stephens
F
, et al
.
Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System for Dads: a piloted randomized trial of public health surveillance of recent fathers’ behaviors before and after infant birth
.
PLoS One
.
2022
;
17
(
1
):
e0262366
22
Shulman
HB
,
D’Angelo
DV
,
Harrison
L
,
Smith
RA
,
Warner
L
.
The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): overview of design and methodology
.
Am J Public Health
.
2018
;
108
(
10
):
1305
1313
23
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
Selected 2016 through 2019 maternal and child health (MCH) indicators
.
24
Hirai
AH
,
Kortsmit
K
,
Kaplan
L
, et al
.
Prevalence and factors associated with safe infant sleep practices
.
Pediatrics
.
2019
;
144
(
5
):
e20191286
25
Ahluwalia
IB
,
Morrow
B
,
Hsia
J
.
Why do women stop breastfeeding? Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System
.
Pediatrics
.
2005
;
116
(
6
):
1408
1412
26
StataCorp
.
Stata Statistical Software: Release 17
.
College Station, TX
:
StataCorp LLC
;
2021
27
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
Prevalence of selected maternal and child health indicators for Georgia, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2016–2020
.
28
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
Breastfeeding among US children born 2012-2019, CDC National Immunization Survey
.
Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/nis_data/results.html. Accessed October 27, 2022
29
Beauregard
JL
,
Hamner
HC
,
Chen
J
,
Avila-Rodriguez
W
,
Elam-Evans
LD
,
Perrine
CG
.
Racial disparities in breastfeeding initiation and duration among U.S. infants born in 2015
.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
.
2019
;
68
(
34
):
745
748
30
Vaaler
ML
,
Castrucci
BC
,
Parks
SE
,
Clark
J
,
Stagg
J
,
Erickson
T
.
Men’s attitudes toward breastfeeding: findings from the 2007 Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
.
Matern Child Health J
.
2011
;
15
(
2
):
148
157
31
Atkinson
L
,
Silverio
SA
,
Bick
D
,
Fallon
V
.
Relationships between paternal attitudes, paternal involvement, and infant-feeding outcomes: mixed-methods findings from a global on-line survey of English-speaking fathers
.
Matern Child Nutr
.
2021
;
17
(
Suppl 1
):
e13147
32
Bar-Yam
NB
,
Darby
L
.
Fathers and breastfeeding: a review of the literature
.
J Hum Lact
.
1997
;
13
(
1
):
45
50
33
Sihota
H
,
Oliffe
J
,
Kelly
MT
,
McCuaig
F
.
Fathers’ experiences and perspectives of breastfeeding: a scoping review
.
Am J Men Health
.
2019
;
13
(
3
):
1557988319851616
34
Arora
S
,
McJunkin
C
,
Wehrer
J
,
Kuhn
P
.
Major factors influencing breastfeeding rates: Mother’s perception of father’s attitude and milk supply
.
Pediatrics
.
2000
;
106
(
5
):
E67
35
Hackman
NM
,
Sznajder
KK
,
Kjerulff
KH
.
Paternal education and its impact on breastfeeding initiation and duration: an understudied and often overlooked factor in U.S. breastfeeding practices
.
Breastfeed Med
.
2022
;
17
(
5
):
429
436
36
Martin
LT
,
Ruder
T
,
Escarce
JJ
, et al
.
Developing predictive models of health literacy
.
J Gen Intern Med
.
2009
;
24
(
11
):
1211
1216
37
Banu
B
,
Khanom
K
.
Effects of education level of father and mother on perceptions of breastfeeding
.
J Enam Med Coll
.
2012
;
2
(
2
):
67
73
38
Mahesh
PKB
,
Gunathunga
MW
,
Arnold
SM
, et al
.
Effectiveness of targeting fathers for breastfeeding promotion: systematic review and meta-analysis
.
BMC Public Health
.
2018
;
18
(
1
):
1140
39
Brown
A
,
Davies
R
.
Fathers’ experiences of supporting breastfeeding: challenges for breastfeeding promotion and education
.
Matern Child Nutr
.
2014
;
10
(
4
):
510
526
40
Bennett
AE
,
McCartney
D
,
Kearney
JM
.
Views of fathers in Ireland on the experience and challenges of having a breast-feeding partner
.
Midwifery
.
2016
;
40
:
169
176
41
Boyer
BT
,
Lowell
GS
,
Roehler
DR
,
Quinlan
KP
.
Racial and ethnic disparities of sudden unexpected infant death in large US cities: a descriptive epidemiological study
.
Inj Epidemiol
.
2022
;
9
(
1
):
12
42
Hauck
FR
,
Moore
CM
,
Herman
SM
, et al
.
The contribution of prone sleeping position to the racial disparity in sudden infant death syndrome: the Chicago Infant Mortality Study
.
Pediatrics
.
2002
;
110
(
4
):
772
780
43
Bombard
JM
,
Kortsmit
K
,
Warner
L
, et al
.
Vital signs: trends and disparities in infant safe sleep practices - United States, 2009-2015
.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
.
2018
;
67
(
1
):
39
46
44
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
.
Outreach activities in specific communities
.
45
Avenilla
F
,
Rosenthal
E
,
Tice
P
.
Fathers of US Children Born in 2001: Findings From the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B)
.
Washington, DC
:
US Department of Education
;
2006
46
Carlson
MJ
,
McLanahan
SS
.
Fathers in Fragile Families. The Role of the Father in Child Development
. 5th ed.
Hoboken, NJ
:
John Wiley and Sons Inc
;
2010
:
241
269
47
Sherr
L
,
Davé
S
,
Lucas
P
,
Senior
R
,
Nazareth
I
.
A feasibility study on recruiting fathers of young children to examine the impact of paternal depression on child development
.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev
.
2006
;
36
(
3
):
295
309
48
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
2019 PRAMS response rate table
.
49
Phares
V
,
Lopez
E
,
Fields
S
,
Kamboukos
D
,
Duhig
AM
.
Are fathers involved in pediatric psychology research and treatment?
J Pediatr Psychol
.
2005
;
30
(
8
):
631
643
50
Hops
H
,
Seeley
JR
.
Parent participation in studies of family interaction: methodological and substantive considerations
.
Behav Assess
.
1992
;
14
(
3-4
):
229
243
51
U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
.
Dietary guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025
.
52
Moon
RY
,
Hauck
FR
,
Colson
ER
, et al
.
The effect of nursing quality improvement and mobile health interventions on infant sleep practices: a randomized clinical trial
.
JAMA
.
2017
;
318
(
4
):
351
359