In all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians are mandated to report suspected cases of abuse and neglect to social service or law enforcement agencies. The purpose of this clinical report is to review the oral aspects of abuse and dental neglect in children and the role of pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians in evaluating such conditions. This clinical report addresses recommendations on the evaluation of bite marks, as well as perioral and intraoral injuries, infections, and diseases that may raise suspicion for child abuse or neglect. Some physicians may have received less education pertaining to oral health, dental injury, and oral disease. These physicians may not detect the mouth and gum findings possibly related to abuse or neglect as readily as abuse injuries involving other areas of the body. Therefore, pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians are encouraged to collaborate to increase the prevention, detection, and treatment of these conditions in children.

Child abuse and neglect affect at least 1 out of 7 children in the United States each year.1  Maltreatment incidents may have been higher than observed during and after the global severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic because of factors such as increased family stressors, isolation away from community support systems, and underreporting.2 

Children may be exposed to multiple kinds of maltreatment that manifest in the mouth. Abuse can include physical and sexual abuse and may be evidenced by bite marks, dental neglect, and medical child abuse (MCA). Bullying and the human trafficking of children also occur and can have serious long-term effects. Abuse and neglect may be the presenting problem, noticed during a physical examination, or children or adolescents may disclose information about these experiences. It is important for pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians to be alert to and knowledgeable about signs and symptoms of child abuse and neglect and to know how to respond. Because of varying resources within different communities, not all physician or dental professionals of a certain job specification may be available everywhere, and thus, job roles may sometimes overlap.

All pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians in the United States have a legal requirement to report suspected child abuse and neglect to child protection authorities, although the specific requirements and procedures vary among jurisdictions. Racial, ethnic, and economic disparities in the reporting of child maltreatment to authorities have long been recognized3  and have been under closer scrutiny in recent years. Children with disabilities are a vulnerable population at increased risk of child abuse and neglect, and therefore, special attention should be paid to reduce this risk in these children and youth.4  The Joint Commission now requires health care organizations to use written criteria to identify patients who may have experienced physical assault, sexual assault, sexual molestation, domestic abuse, or elder or child abuse and neglect.5  A recognized bias among health care professionals is the failure to report suspected abuse when the family is of similar background to the professional.6  Recognition of implicit bias and its influence on diagnosing and reporting child maltreatment is also an important consideration.7–9 

According to the Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect, in 2006 (the most recent year evaluated) at least 323 000 US children experienced physical abuse.10  Identifying and reporting suspected abuse can be challenging for pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians but has the potential to interrupt the cycle of abuse, secure the child’s safety, and in some cases, save the child’s life.11  Missed opportunities to recognize and report physical abuse remain a significant problem; in one study,12  27.5% of abused infants had a previous minor but inflicted injury that had been recognized by a parent or physician but usually not reported to authorities. The majority of these “sentinel injuries” involved bruising to the face, forehead, or ear. The mnemonic TEN-4 (Torso, Ear, or Neck in children less than or equal to 4 years of age, and anywhere in an infant under 4 months of age) has been widely adopted to assist in identifying bruises concerning for abuse.13  An expanded mnemonic with improved sensitivity for identifying abusive bruise injuries has since been introduced: TEN-4-FACESp (Torso, Ear, Neck, Frenulum, Angle of jaw, Cheeks, Eyelids, Subconjunctivae in children younger than 4 years, bruising anywhere in infants younger than 5 months, or patterned bruising).14 

Craniofacial, head, face, and neck injuries occur in more than half of child abuse cases.12,15–18  All suspected individuals who have experienced abuse or neglect, including children in state custody or foster care, need to be examined carefully at some point during the evaluation for signs of oral trauma, caries, gingivitis, and other oral health problems. These conditions are more prevalent in children who are maltreated than in the general pediatric population.19 

Because of their exposed location on the body and anatomic complexity, the head and face are more vulnerable to serious injury than are other body regions.20  A review of 40 cases of child homicides resulting from family violence noted that 36 (90%) had orofacial injuries.21  Recent research has found that children younger than 4 years with orofacial (especially cheek, ear, jaw, and frenum) and torso bruising are at risk for having been physically abused and are at risk for future, more serious abuse.14  Of children up to age 5 years with oral injury who underwent skeletal imaging, 25% had occult fractures; 30% of 37 infants with oral injury who underwent neuroimaging had central nervous system injuries.22  Oral injuries may be inflicted with instruments such as eating utensils or a bottle during forced feedings, hands, fingers, scalding liquids, or caustic substances. Physical abuse may result in contusions; burns or lacerations of the tongue, lips, buccal mucosa, palate (soft and hard), gingiva, alveolar mucosa, or frenum; fractured, displaced, or avulsed teeth; or facial bone and jaw fractures. Naidoo23  cited the lips as the most common site for inflicted oral injuries (54%) followed by the oral mucosa, teeth, gingiva, and tongue. Lacerations to the oral frena in premobile infants are often the result of physical abuse and are frequently associated with other findings of serious physical abuse.22,24  Trauma to the teeth may result in pulpal necrosis, leaving the teeth gray and discolored.25  Gags applied to the mouth may result in bruises, lichenification, or scarring at the corners of the mouth.26  In some cases, serious injuries of the oral cavity, including posterior pharyngeal injuries and retropharyngeal abscesses, have been inflicted by caregivers who fabricate illness in a child27  to simulate hemoptysis or other symptoms requiring medical care. All findings in cases in which there is reasonable suspicion of abuse or neglect, regardless of mechanism, need to be reported for further investigation. Unintentional or accidental injuries to the mouth are common and may be distinguished from abuse by judging whether the history (including the timing and mechanism of the injury) is consistent with the characteristics of the injury and the child’s developmental capabilities. Multiple injuries, injuries in different stages of healing, or a discrepant history ought to arouse suspicion for abuse. In conjunction with reporting, consultation with or referral to a knowledgeable dentist or child abuse pediatrician may be helpful. The clinical report from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) titled “The Evaluation of Suspected Child Physical Abuse” provides additional guidance.11 

The oral cavity is a frequent site of sexual abuse in children, and acquisition of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) via this route can occur.28  Testing for STIs within the oral cavity may be considered when:

  • The child gives a history of oral–genital contact;

  • The child has experienced penetration or has evidence of recent or healed penetrative injury to the genitals, anus, or oropharynx;

  • The child has been abused by a stranger;

  • The child has been abused by an assailant known to be infected with or at high risk for STIs;

  • The child has a sibling, other relative, or household contact with an STI;

  • The child lives in an area with a high rate of STIs in the community;

  • The child has signs or symptoms of an STI (eg, vaginal discharge, genital itching or odor, urinary symptoms, or genital lesions);

  • The child or the parent of a prepubertal child requests STI testing; and

  • The child is unable to verbalize details of the assault.29 

Culture or nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) may be used to test for Neisseria gonorrheae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. NAATs are preferred to culture by most clinicians because of their superior sensitivity. Only Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-approved, US Food and Drug Administration-cleared NAAT assays should be used.29  Consultation with an expert is recommended for positive STI test results in infants and prepubertal children, because vertical and nonsexual transmission of certain pathogens can occur (eg, persistence of perinatally acquired Chlamydia, postnatal HIV exposure through infected human milk, and others).30,31 

In one series, STIs were detected in 22.9% of adolescents evaluated for sexual abuse and in 11.4% of preadolescents.32  Oropharyngeal STIs are detected less frequently than anogenital infections; they commonly do not present with pain, discharge, erythema, or other visible signs of injury or infection.33,34  When an STI is confirmed in a child or adolescent being evaluated for sexual abuse, testing of other sites, including the oropharynx, is indicated regardless of what contact the child disclosed may be indicated. In one study, NAATs for oropharyngeal Chlamydia and gonorrhea were positive in 6% of adolescent patients, despite more than half of these patients providing no history of genital–oral contact.34  Oral infection with Trichomonas vaginalis has never been described. Anogenital and oropharyngeal human papillomavirus infections may be transmitted sexually, vertically from birthing parent to infant during delivery, or horizontally through nonsexual contact from a child or caregiver’s hand to the genitals or mouth.35,36  In the setting of sexual abuse, national practice guidelines from the AAP and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention support postexposure vaccination against human papillomavirus for children 9 years and older if they have not already started the vaccine series.33,37 

Children who present acutely with a recent history of sexual abuse need to receive specialized forensic evidence collection for semen and other foreign materials resulting from the assault. Specialized hospitals and child protection clinics equipped with protocols and experienced personnel are best suited for collecting such specimens and maintaining a chain of evidence necessary for investigations. In many cases, oral swab specimens are collected irrespective of whether the child specifically discloses oral–genital contact. Typically, the buccal mucosa and tongue are swabbed with a sterile, cotton-tipped applicator; the swab can be air dried and packaged appropriately for laboratory analysis.

MCA, also known as “Munchausen syndrome by proxy” and “caregiver fabricated-illness,” is a form of child maltreatment in which a caregiver subjects a child to unnecessary and potentially harmful medical care because of the caregiver’s exaggeration, falsification, or induction of an illness or medical condition.38  These children are subjected to unnecessary medical interventions, diagnostic tests, repeated examinations, surgeries, and medications. There is no typical presentation of MCA, although commonly, the fabricated illness involves multiple organ systems. Apnea, seizures, feeding problems, bleeding, and rashes are frequently reported symptoms. One recent study found that gastrointestinal complaints in children who had experienced MCA led to 6 times more types of feeding complications compared with controls who were also being evaluated for gastrostomy tube placement. In this study, the majority of patients experienced resolution of their nonoral feeding issues after MCA intervention (ie, removal from potential offender).39 

MCA can also present with oral manifestations. One review described 4 cases of MCA involving the oral cavity in children ranging from 9 months to 6 years of age.40  In one case, recurrent mucosal bleeding and ulcerations were initially treated as Stevens Johnson syndrome and then cicatricial pemphigoid. This child died of poisoning and her oral manifestations were found to be caused by forced ingestion of toxic cleaning products. Another case presented with mucosal desquamation, drooling, and dysphagia and was eventually discovered to be caused by the caregiver placing an acid-based powder in the infant’s food and toys. In all 4 cases, and in most reports in the literature, the perpetrator was the mother.41 

Making a diagnosis of MCA can be difficult because of false information provided and/or induction of illness by the caregiver. Numerous medical professionals from various specialties and institutions are often involved in treating these patients. Diagnosing MCA may require a thorough review of all available medical records, which is often voluminous and can be time consuming, but is needed to discover concerning patterns and make the correct diagnosis.42 

Acute or healed bite marks on the skin may indicate abuse. Dentists trained as forensic odontologists can assist pediatricians, other dental professionals, and physicians in the detection and evaluation of bite marks related to physical and sexual abuse.43  Bite marks on the skin need to be suspected when ecchymoses, abrasions, or lacerations are found in an elliptical, horseshoe-shaped, or ovoid pattern.43  Frequently, bite marks are found on the cheeks, back, sides, arms, buttocks, and genitalia.44  Bites produced by dogs and other carnivorous animals tend to tear flesh, whereas human bites compress flesh and can cause abrasions, contusions, and lacerations, but rarely avulsions of tissue.45  An intercanine distance (ie, the linear distance between the central point of the cuspid tips) measuring more than 3.0 cm is suspicious for an adult human bite.45 

The pattern, size, contour, color, and evolution of a bite mark ideally can be evaluated by a forensic odontologist. If a specialist is unavailable, a child abuse pediatrician or pediatric dental professional experienced in identifying the patterns of child abuse injuries may examine and document the bite mark characteristics photographically with an identification tag and scale marker (eg, ruler) in the photograph. Further information is available on the American Board of Forensic Odontology (ABFO) Web site to locate an expert and review the standards and guidelines for evaluating bite marks (www.abfo.org).

Bite marks found on human skin are challenging to interpret and differentiate because of similarities in dentition, distortion on skin, and time elapsed between the injury and the analysis.43  Recent investigations have led to questions about the scientific validity and overapplication of forensic patterned evidence (bite mark analysis in particular) and its role in legal proceedings.46  In response, the ABFO has adopted more conservative guidelines and no longer endorses positive identification of a suspect dentition to a bitemark.46  More high-quality research is needed regarding bite mark analysis and its use in identifying potential perpetrators.

Because children with dental abnormalities are at increased risk for bullying, advocating for antibullying prevention programs in schools and other community settings by pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians may be beneficial. Thirty percent of children in the sixth through 10th grades report having been bullied and/or having bullied others.47  Investigators from numerous countries and cultures have found that children with orofacial or dental abnormalities (including malocclusion) are frequently subjected to bullying,48–50  and as a result, may suffer serious psychological consequences, including depression and suicidal ideation.51–53  Children who reported physical abuse, intimate partner violence, forced sex, and bullying were found to also report poor oral health.54  Some children and adolescents are at high risk for being bullied for reasons besides orofacial abnormalities but are likely to have interactions with pediatricians or dentists. These include LGBTQ+ youth,55  overweight children and adolescents,56  children from racially minoritized groups,57  and children with special health care needs.58  There are antibullying prevention programs in schools and other community settings, as well as AAP resources including HealthyChildren.org, which offers caregivers educational resources on bullying among many other topics (https://healthychildren.org/English/safety-prevention/at-play/Pages/Bullying-Its-Not-Ok.aspx).

Human trafficking is a major global child health issue with substantial medical, psychological, and dental ramifications. The term “human trafficking” is often confused with “human smuggling”; however, human trafficking requires exploitation and does not require any physical transportation from one location to another to meet the definition.59  This clinical report focuses on human sex trafficking, defined by the US Department of State as “a commercial sex act that is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such an act has not attained 18 years of age.”59  Precise numbers of children experiencing human or sex trafficking are difficult to obtain because of the complicated nature of these definitions, as well as underreporting and failure to recognize trafficking. The average age of children who are exploited for sex is 12 years, and children as young as 6 years are targeted.60  Children who are or have been in foster care,61  are experiencing homelessness, identify as LGBTQ+,62  run away from home,63  or are incarcerated in juvenile detention facilities64  are more likely to be trafficked. Advances in technology, with the Internet and mobile devices, have facilitated perpetrators’ ability to traffic children, often without requirement of the child to leave their own home.

Trafficking survivors often experience significant physical and sexual violence and may have observable injuries that are poorly explained. Survivors also are at higher risk for STIs, unsafe abortions, malnutrition, and untreated medical conditions. Posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, self-harm, and substance use concerns are common to people who have experienced human trafficking.64  Dental problems also rank high in this list: For women and adolescents who were trafficked in Europe, 58% reported tooth pain.65  In the United States, more than half (54.3%) of women and adolescents who were trafficked reported dental problems, most commonly tooth loss (42.9%).66  Children who have experienced trafficking may present to dental offices for care. It has been reported that child trafficking survivors have twice the risk for dental problems, because they “often suffer from inadequate nutrition leading to retarded growth and poorly formed teeth, as well as dental caries, infections, and tooth loss.”67  For older children, dental problems may trace back to their situation of origin, with limited access to or poor quality of care.

Trafficked children experience unique challenges in accessing medical and dental care. However, studies have shown that a large percentage of these youth do present for health care during the time they are being trafficked.68  One study found that 26.5% of trafficked individuals were seen by a dentist during the time they were being trafficked, despite the fact that few were identified by clinicians.69  Validated screening tools exist for health care settings but are still underutilized.70 

The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry recognizes the influence of social factors on children’s oral health including access to care, dental disease, behaviors, and oral health inequalities.71  Dental neglect, as defined by the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, is the “willful failure of parent or guardian, despite adequate access to care, to seek and follow through with treatment necessary to ensure a level of oral health essential for adequate function and freedom from pain and infection.”72  Dental caries, periodontal diseases, and other oral conditions can lead to pain, infection, loss of function, and systemic infection if left untreated.72  These undesirable outcomes can adversely affect learning, communication, nutrition, and other activities necessary for normal growth and development.18,73  Dental neglect is the most frequent type of abuse seen by dentists and can be challenging to identify because it is chronic and insidious in nature.74,75  Some children who present for dental care have severe early childhood caries (formerly termed “infant bottle” or “nursing” caries). It is important to differentiate caregivers with adequate knowledge but willful failure to seek care from caregivers with barriers to care or those without knowledge or awareness of their child’s need for dental care when determining the need to report such cases to child protective services. Pediatricians can play an important role in encouraging families to seek dental care and explaining benefits of completing needed dental treatment.76  Several factors are considered necessary for the diagnosis of neglect77 :

  • a child is harmed or at risk for harm because of lack of dental health care;

  • the recommended dental care offers significant net benefit to the child;

  • the anticipated benefit of the dental treatment is significantly greater than its morbidity, so parents would likely choose treatment over nontreatment;

  • access to health/dental care is available but not used; and

  • the parent understands the dental advice given.

Failure to seek or obtain proper dental care may result from factors such as family isolation (physical or cultural), lack of finances, transportation difficulty, ignorance, or lack of perceived value of oral health.78–80  The point at which to consider a parent negligent and begin intervention occurs after the parent has been properly alerted by a pediatrician, dental professional, or other physician about the nature and extent of the child’s condition, the specific treatment needed, and the mechanism of accessing that treatment.78  Many families face challenges in accessing dental care or insurance for their children, and dental services may not be readily available. A child’s social, emotional, and medical ability to undergo treatment, as well as cultural and religious differences, are important to consider.80 

Pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians can make a reasonable effort to help caregivers understand the explanation of the dental disease and its implications, the risks and benefits of dental treatment, and the use of the appropriate analgesic and anesthetic during the procedure to ensure the child’s comfort. Assistance can be provided to the family in finding financial aid, transportation, or public facilities for needed services. If, despite these efforts, the parent fails to obtain therapy, the case warrants reporting to the appropriate child protective services agency.78 

Physical or sexual abuse may also result in oral or dental injuries or conditions. Pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians can document suspicious injuries, obtain laboratory evidence, photo documentation, and/or consult with experts when appropriate. The role of forensic bite mark analysis in legal proceedings has been brought into question because of lack of scientific validity, and as a result, the ABFO no longer endorses positive identification of a suspect dentition to a bitemark.

Dental neglect has been recognized for years to be a significant child health issue. Pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians can be alert to children and youth at particular risk for orofacial and dental neglect and its psychosocial consequences, such as LGBTQ+ youth who are gender nonconforming, children who are overweight or obese, youth who are subjected to human trafficking, and children with special health care needs.55–57 

Medical and dental collaboration to prevent child maltreatment is important. The National Maternal and Child Oral Health Resource Center (Special Care | Module 3: Oral Health Supervision [mchoralhealth.org]) has resources for health care providers seeking information on this issue.81  Pediatric dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons, whose advanced education programs include a mandated child abuse curriculum, can provide valuable information and assistance to other health care providers about oral and dental aspects of child abuse and neglect. Physician members of multidisciplinary child abuse and neglect teams are encouraged to identify such dental providers in their communities to serve as consultants for these teams. In addition, physicians with experience or expertise in child abuse and tpdel neglect can make themselves available to dentists and dental organizations as consultants and educators. Such collaborative efforts will strengthen the ability to prevent and detect child abuse and neglect and enhance the ability to care for and protect children.

  1. Pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians must report injuries that are concerning for abuse or neglect to child protective services in accordance with local or state legal requirements. For more information about requirements in your state, contact the AAP state advocacy team (e-mail: [email protected]).

  2. In cases of sexual abuse that may involve the mouth, even without overt signs, pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians should know how to collect a history to elicit this information and to perform oral STI testing using appropriate tests to support forensic investigations. When sexual abuse is suspected or diagnosed in a child, the case needs to be reported to child protective services and/or law enforcement agencies for investigation.82–85  A multidisciplinary child abuse evaluation for the child and family is preferred when available.

  3. Consultation with a child abuse pediatrician may be helpful when a pediatrician, dental professional, or other physician suspects MCA.

  4. Because ABFO guidelines no longer endorse positive identification of a suspect dentition to a bitemark, pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians should consult with a forensic odontologist, pediatric dentist experienced in forensic issues, or child abuse pediatrician for help in evaluating bite marks. To locate an expert and review the standards and guidelines for evaluating bite marks, go to www.abfo.org.

  5. Because children with dental abnormalities are at increased risk for bullying, pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians should ask their patients about bullying and advocate for antibullying prevention programs in schools and other community settings.

  6. Because children who have experienced human trafficking may visit the health care setting (dental and medical), pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians are encouraged to be aware of human trafficking screening tools and the risk factors for human trafficking to identify children at risk (of all genders) and to safely report and connect patients to resources. They can also advocate for antitrafficking efforts.

  7. If parents fail to obtain necessary treatment of a child’s oral or dental disease after barriers to care have been addressed, the case must be reported to the appropriate child protective services agency as concerning for dental neglect.

  8. Pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians are encouraged to consult with colleagues on challenging cases and collaborate with them to provide education and support toward improved identification of child maltreatment.

  9. Pediatricians, dental professionals, and other physicians should recognize and acknowledge implicit bias and reduce its influence on diagnosing and reporting child maltreatment.

Anupama Rao Tate, DMD, MPH

Susan A. Fisher-Owens, MD, MPH, FAAP

Lora Spiller, MD, FAAP

Jillian Muhlbauer, DMD

James L. Lukefahr, MD, FAAP

Jeffrey M. Karp, DMD, MS, Chairperson

Eric L. Beyer, MD, IBCLC, FABM, FAAP

Chevon Brooks, MD, FAAP

Lauren M. Feldman, DMD

C. Eve Kimball, MD, FAAP

Anupama Rao Tate, DMD, MPH

Karen Sokal-Gutierrez, MD, MPH, FAAP

John H. Unkel, DDS, MD, MPA, FAAP

Matt Zaborowski, MPH, CPH, American Dental Association

Matt Crespin, MPH, RDH, American Dental Hygienists’ Association

Amr Moursi, DDS, PhD, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry

Kera Beskin, MPH, MBA

Suzanne Breen Haney, MD, MS, FAAP, Chairperson

Antoinette Laskey, MD, MPH, MBA, FAAP, Chairperson-elect

Andrea Asnes, MD, MSW, FAAP

Verena Brown, MD, FAAP

Rebecca G. Girardet, MD, FAAP

Nancy Heavilin, MD, FAAP

Amanda Bird Hoffert Gilmartin, MD, FAAP

Natalie Kissoon, MD, FAAP

Bethany Anne Mohr, MD, FAAP

Patricia Morgan, MD, FAAP

Shalon Marie Nienow, MD, FAAP

Norell Rosado, MD, FAAP

Rachael Keefe, MD, MPH, FAAP, Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care

Brooks Keeshin, MD, FAAP, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Jennifer Matjasko, PhD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Serena Wagoner, DO, Section on Pediatric Trainees

Elaine Stedt, MSW, ACSW, Administration for Children, Youth and Families, Office on Child Abuse and Neglect

Tammy Piazza Hurley

Jeff Hudson, MA

All authors were responsible for reviewing and updating of one or more sections. Drs Tate and Lukefahr were responsible for conceptualizing, writing, and revising the manuscript and considering input from all reviewers and the board of directors; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics benefit from expertise and resources of liaisons and internal (AAP) and external reviewers. However, clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics may not reflect the views of the liaisons or the organizations or government agencies that they represent.

The guidance in this report does not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.

All clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffirmed, revised, or retired at or before that time.

This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors have filed conflict of interest statements with the American Academy of Pediatrics. Any conflicts have been resolved through a process approved by the Board of Directors. The American Academy of Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any commercial involvement in the development of the content of this publication.

FUNDING: No external funding.

FINANCIAL/CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: Dr Fischer-Owens has disclosed a financial relationship with Colgate, as a DSMB member. Disclosures are reviewed and mitigated through a Conflict of Interest process approved by the AAP Board of Directors.

AAP

American Academy of Pediatrics

ABFO

American Board of Forensic Odontology

MCA

medical child abuse

NAAT

nucleic acid amplification test

STI

sexually transmitted infection

1
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
Fast facts: preventing child abuse and neglect
. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/childabuseandneglect/fastfact.html#:∼:text=At%20least%201%20in%207,neglect%20in%20the%20United%20States. Accessed November 29, 2023
2
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
.
Intimate partner violence and child abuse considerations during COVID-19
. Available at: https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/social-distancing-domestic-violence.pdf. Accessed November 29, 2023
3
Lane
WG
,
Rubin
DM
,
Monteith
R
,
Christian
CW
.
Racial differences in the evaluation of pediatric fractures for physical abuse
.
JAMA
.
2002
;
288
(
13
):
1603
1609
4
Legano
LA
,
Desch
LW
,
Messner
SA
,
Idzerda
S
,
Flaherty
EG
.
Council on Child Abuse and Neglect
;
Council on Children With Disabilities
.
Maltreatment of children with disabilities
.
Pediatrics
.
2021
;
147
(
5
):
e2021050920
5
The Joint Commission
;
Quick Safety
.
Addressing intimate partner violence and helping to protect patients
. Available at: https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/newsletters/quick-safety-63-addressing-ipv-final3-1-10-22.pdf. Accessed November 29, 2023
6
Jenny
C
,
Hymel
KP
,
Ritzen
A
,
Reinert
SE
,
Hay
TC
.
Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma
.
JAMA
.
1999
;
281
(
7
):
621
626
7
Wakeman
SE
,
Bryant
A
,
Harrison
N
.
Redefining child protection: addressing the harms of structural racism and punitive approaches for birthing people, dyads, and families affected by substance use
.
Obstet Gynecol
.
2022
;
140
(
2
):
167
173
8
Feely
M
,
Bosk
EA
.
That which is essential has been made invisible: the need to bring a structural risk perspective to reduce racial disproportionality in child welfare
.
Race Soc Probl
.
2021
;
13
(
1
):
49
62
9
Berkman
E
,
Brown
E
,
Scott
M
,
Adiele
A
.
Racism in child welfare: ethical considerations of harm
.
Bioethics
.
2022
;
36
(
3
):
298
304
10
Sedlak
AJ
,
Mettenburg
J
,
Basena
M
, et al
.
Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4): Report to Congress, Executive Summary
.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families
;
2010
11
Christian
CW
.
Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Academy of Pediatrics
.
The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse
.
Pediatrics
.
2015
;
135
(
5
):
e1337
e1354
12
Sheets
LK
,
Leach
ME
,
Koszewski
IJ
,
Lessmeier
AM
,
Nugent
M
,
Simpson
P
.
Sentinel injuries in infants evaluated for child physical abuse
.
Pediatrics
.
2013
;
131
(
4
):
701
707
13
Pierce
MC
,
Kaczor
K
,
Aldridge
S
,
O’Flynn
J
,
Lorenz
DJ
.
Bruising characteristics discriminating physical child abuse from accidental trauma
.
Pediatrics
.
2010
;
125
(
1
):
67
74
14
Pierce
MC
,
Kaczor
K
,
Lorenz
DJ
, et al
.
Validation of a clinical decision rule to predict abuse in young children based on bruising characteristics
.
JAMA Netw Open
.
2021
;
4
(
4
):
e215832
15
Cairns
AM
,
Mok
JY
,
Welbury
RR
.
Injuries to the head, face, mouth, and neck in physically abused children in a community setting
.
Int J Paediatr Dent
.
2005
;
15
(
5
):
310
318
16
Crouse
CD
,
Faust
RA
.
Child abuse and the otolaryngologist: part II
.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2003
;
128
(
3
):
311
317
17
Cavalcanti
AL
.
Prevalence and characteristics of injuries to the head and orofacial region in physically abused children and adolescents–a retrospective study in a city of the Northeast of Brazil
.
Dent Traumatol
.
2010
;
26
(
2
):
149
153
18
da Fonseca
MA
,
Feigal
RJ
,
ten Bensel
RW
.
Dental aspects of 1248 cases of child maltreatment on file at a major county hospital
.
Pediatr Dent
.
1992
;
14
(
3
):
152
157
19
Valencia-Rojas
N
,
Lawrence
HP
,
Goodman
D
.
Prevalence of early childhood caries in a population of children with history of maltreatment
.
J Public Health Dent
.
2008
;
68
(
2
):
94
101
20
Sarkar
R
,
Ozanne-Smith
J
,
Bassed
R
.
Systematic review of the patterns of orofacial injuries in physically abused children and adolescents
.
Trauma Violence Abuse
.
2021
;
22
(
1
):
136
146
21
Sarkar
R
,
Bassed
R
,
Dipnall
JF
,
Ozanne-Smith
J
.
Orofacial injuries in child family homicide: a population study
.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol
.
2021
;
17
(
4
):
553
564
22
Dorfman
MV
,
Metz
JB
,
Feldman
KW
,
Farris
R
,
Lindberg
DM
.
ExSTRA Investigators
.
Oral injuries and occult harm in children evaluated for abuse
.
Arch Dis Child
.
2018
;
103
(
8
):
747
752
23
Naidoo
S
.
A profile of the orofacial injuries in child physical abuse at a children’s hospital
.
Child Abuse Negl
.
2000
;
24
(
4
):
521
534
24
Maguire
S
,
Hunter
B
,
Hunter
L
,
Sibert
JR
,
Mann
M
,
Kemp
AM
.
Welsh Child Protection Systematic Review Group
.
Diagnosing abuse: a systematic review of torn frenum and other intraoral injuries
.
Arch Dis Child
.
2007
;
92
(
12
):
1113
1117
25
Keels
MA
.
Section on Oral Health, American Academy of Pediatrics
.
Management of dental trauma in a primary care setting
.
Pediatrics
.
2014
;
133
(
2
):
e466
e476
26
Griest
KJ
. Supporting evidence in physical child abuse. In:
Griest
KJ
, ed.
Pediatric Homicide: Medical Investigation
.
CRC Press
;
2010
:
144
146
27
Levin
AV
. Otorhinolaryngologic manifestations. In:
Levin
AV
,
Sheridan
MS
, eds.
Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: Issues in Diagnosis and Treatment
.
Lexington Books
;
1995
:
219
230
28
Woods
CRW
.
Gonococcal infections in neonates and young children
.
Semin Pediatr Infect Dis
.
2005
;
16
(
4
):
258
270
29
Workowski
KA
,
Bachmann
LH
,
Chan
PA
, et al
.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021
.
MMWR Recomm Rep
.
2021
;
70
(
4
):
1
187
30
De Jong
AR
.
Sexually transmitted diseases in sexually abused children
.
Sex Transm Dis
.
1986
;
13
(
3
):
123
126
31
Everett
VD
,
Ingram
DL
,
Flick
LAR
,
Russell
TA
,
Tropez-Sims
ST
,
McFadden
AY
.
A comparison of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) found in a total of 696 boys and 2973 girls evaluated for sexual abuse
.
Pediatr Res
.
1998
;
43
(
4 Pt 2
):
91A
32
Gavril
AR
,
Kellogg
ND
,
Nair
P
.
Value of follow-up examinations of children and adolescents evaluated for sexual abuse and assault
.
Pediatrics
.
2012
;
129
(
2
):
282
289
33
Nelson
JD
,
Mohs
E
,
Dajani
AS
,
Plotkin
SA
.
Gonorrhea in preschool- and school-aged children. Report of the prepubertal gonorrhea cooperative study group
.
JAMA
.
1976
;
236
(
12
):
1359
1364
34
Kellogg
ND
,
Melville
JD
,
Lukefahr
JL
,
Nienow
SM
,
Russell
EL
.
Genital and extragenital gonorrhea and chlamydia in children and adolescents evaluated for sexual abuse
.
Pediatr Emerg Care
.
2018
;
34
(
11
):
761
766
35
Stevens-Simon
C
,
Nelligan
D
,
Breese
P
,
Jenny
C
,
Douglas
JM
 Jr
.
The prevalence of genital human papillomavirus infections in abused and nonabused preadolescent girls
.
Pediatrics
.
2000
;
106
(
4
):
645
649
36
Bussen
S
,
Sütterlin
M
,
Schmidt
U
,
Bussen
D
.
Anogenital warts in childhood–always a marker for sexual abuse?
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd
.
2012
;
72
(
1
):
43
48
37
Crawford-Jakubiak
JE
,
Alderman
EM
,
Leventhal
JM
.
Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect
;
Committee on Adolescence
.
Care of the adolescent after an acute sexual assault
.
Pediatrics
.
2017
;
139
(
3
):
e20164243
38
Roesler
TA
,
Jenny
C
.
Medical Child Abuse: Beyond Munchausen by Proxy
.
American Academy of Pediatrics
;
2008
39
Feldman
KW
,
Ambartsumyan
L
,
Goldin
A
, et al
.
Gastrointestinal problems and nonoral feeding in children evaluated for medical child abuse (fabricated and induced illness)
.
Child Abuse Rev
.
2022
;
31
(
3
):
1
10
40
Olczak-Kowalczyk
D
,
Wolska-Kusnierz
B
,
Bernatowska
E
.
Fabricated or induced illness in the oral cavity in children. A systematic review and personal experience
.
Cent Eur J Immunol
.
2015
;
40
(
1
):
109
114
41
Yates
G
,
Bass
C
.
The perpetrators of medical child abuse (Munchausen syndrome by proxy)–a systematic review of 796 cases
.
Child Abuse Negl
.
2017
;
72
:
45
53
42
Flaherty
EG
,
Macmillan
HL
.
Committee On Child Abuse And Neglect
.
Caregiver-fabricated illness in a child: a manifestation of child maltreatment
.
Pediatrics
.
2013
;
132
(
3
):
590
597
43
Silva
RHA
,
de Oliveira Musse
J
,
Melani
RFH
,
Oliveira
RN
.
Human bite mark identification and DNA technology in forensic dentistry
.
Braz J Oral Sci
.
2006
;
5
(
19
):
1193
1197
44
Jessee
S
,
Deinard
S
.
Dentalcare.com
.
Child abuse and neglect: implications for the dental professional
. Available at: https://i-med.sk/sites/default/files/viaco/child_abuse_and_neglect._implications_for_the_dental_professional.pdf. Accessed November 29, 2023
45
Wagner
GN
.
Bitemark identification in child abuse cases
.
Pediatr Dent
.
1986
;
8
(
1 Spec No
):
96
100
46
Barsley
RE
,
Bernstein
ML
,
Brumit
PC
, et al
.
Epidermis and enamel: insights into gnawing criticisms of human bitemark evidence
.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol
.
2018
;
39
(
2
):
87
97
47
Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention
.
Policy statement–role of the pediatrician in youth violence prevention
.
Pediatrics
.
2009
;
124
(
1
):
393
402
48
Seehra
J
,
Fleming
PS
,
Newton
T
,
DiBiase
AT
.
Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion, self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life
.
J Orthod
.
2011
;
38
(
4
):
247
256
, quiz 294
49
Al-Bitar
ZB
,
Al-Omari
IK
,
Sonbol
HN
,
Al-Ahmad
HT
,
Cunningham
SJ
.
Bullying among Jordanian schoolchildren, its effects on school performance, and the contribution of general physical and dentofacial features
.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
.
2013
;
144
(
6
):
872
878
50
Islam
MI
,
Chadwick
V
,
Esgin
T
,
Martiniuk
A
.
Bullied because of their teeth: evidence from a longitudinal study on the impact of oral health on bullying victimization among Australian Indigenous children
.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
.
2022
;
19
(
9
):
4995
51
Hunt
O
,
Burden
D
,
Hepper
P
,
Stevenson
M
,
Johnston
C
.
Self-reports of psychosocial functioning among children and young adults with cleft lip and palate
.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
.
2006
;
43
(
5
):
598
605
52
Al-Omari
IK
,
Al-Bitar
ZB
,
Sonbol
HN
,
Al-Ahmad
HT
,
Cunningham
SJ
,
Al-Omiri
M
.
Impact of bullying due to dentofacial features on oral health-related quality of life
.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
.
2014
;
146
(
6
):
734
739
53
Seehra
J
,
Newton
JT
,
DiBiase
AT
.
Bullying in schoolchildren–its relationship to dental appearance and psychosocial implications: an update for GDPs
.
Br Dent J
.
2011
;
210
(
9
):
411
415
54
Kvist
T
,
Annerbäck
EM
,
Sahlqvist
L
,
Flodmark
O
,
Dahllöf
G
.
Association between adolescents’ self-perceived oral health and self-reported experiences of abuse
.
Eur J Oral Sci
.
2013
;
121
(
6
):
594
599
55
Earnshaw
VA
,
Reisner
SL
,
Juvonen
J
,
Hatzenbuehler
ML
,
Perrotti
J
,
Schuster
MA
.
LGBTQ bullying: translating research to action in pediatrics
.
Pediatrics
.
2017
;
140
(
4
):
320170432
56
Lumeng
JC
,
Forrest
P
,
Appugliese
DP
,
Kaciroti
N
,
Corwyn
RF
,
Bradley
RH
.
Weight status as a predictor of being bullied in third through sixth grades
.
Pediatrics
.
2010
;
125
(
6
):
e1301
e1307
57
Gage
NA
,
Katsiyannis
A
,
Rose
C
,
Adams
SE
.
Disproportionate bullying victimization and perpetration by disability status, race, and gender: a national analysis
.
Adv Neurodev Disord
.
2021
;
5
(
3
):
256
268
58
Van Cleave
J
,
Davis
MM
.
Bullying and peer victimization among children with special health care needs
.
Pediatrics
.
2006
;
118
(
4
):
e1212
e1219
59
US Department of State
.
Trafficking in persons report
. Available at: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/TIPR-GPA-upload-07222021.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2022
60
Smith
LA
,
Vardaman
SH
,
Snow
MA
.
Shared Hope International
.
The national report on domestic minor sex trafficking: America’s prostituted children
. Available at: http://sharedhope.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/SHI_National_Report_on_DMST_2009.pdf. Accessed May 23, 2016
61
US Department of Education
.
Human trafficking of children in the United States: a fact sheet for schools
. Available at: http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osdfs/factsheet.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2016
62
Swaner
R
,
Labriola
M
,
Rempel
M
,
Walker
A
,
Spadafore
J
.
Youth Involvement in the Sex Trade: A National Study
.
Center for Court Innovation
;
2016
63
Middleton
JS
,
Gattis
MN
,
Frey
LM
,
Roe-Sepowitz
D
.
Youth experiences survey (YES): exploring the scope and complexity of sex trafficking in a sample of youth experiencing homelessness
.
J Soc Serv Res
.
2018
;
44
:
141
157
64
Greenbaum
J
,
Crawford-Jakubiak
JE
.
Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect
.
Child sex trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation: health care needs of victims
.
Pediatrics
.
2015
;
135
(
3
):
566
574
65
Zimmerman
C
,
Hossain
M
,
Yun
K
, et al
.
The health of trafficked women: a survey of women entering posttrafficking services in Europe
.
Am J Public Health
.
2008
;
98
(
1
):
55
59
66
Lederer
LJ
,
Wetzel
CA
.
The health consequences of sex trafficking and their implications for identifying victims in healthcare facilities
.
Ann Health Law
.
2014
;
23
(
1
):
61
91
67
Crane
PA
,
Moreno
M
.
Human trafficking: what is the role of the health care provider?
J Appl Res Child
.
2011
;
2
(
1
):
7
68
Hornor
G
,
Sherfield
J
.
Commercial sexual exploitation of children: health care use and case characteristics
.
J Pediatr Health Care
.
2018
;
32
(
3
):
250
262
69
Chisolm-Straker
M
,
Baldwin
S
,
Gaïgbé-Togbé
B
,
Ndukwe
N
,
Johnson
PN
,
Richardson
LD
.
Health care and human trafficking: we are seeing the unseen
.
J Health Care Poor Underserved
.
2016
;
27
(
3
):
1220
1233
70
Greenbaum
VJ
,
Dodd
M
,
McCracken
C
.
A short screening tool to identify victims of child sex trafficking in the health care setting
.
Pediatr Emerg Care
.
2018
;
34
(
1
):
33
37
71
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry
. Policy on social determinants of children’s oral health and health disparities. In:
The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry
.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry
;
2022
:
29
33
72
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry
. Definition of dental neglect. In:
The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry
.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry
;
2021
:
16
73
Sanger
RG
,
Bross
DC
.
Clinical Management of Child Abuse and Neglect: A Guide for the Dental Profession
.
Quintessence Publishing Company
;
1984
74
Kilpatrick
NM
,
Scott
J
,
Robinson
S
.
Child protection: a survey of experience and knowledge within the dental profession of New South Wales, Australia
.
Int J Paediatr Dent
.
1999
;
9
(
3
):
153
159
75
Kiran
K
,
Kamala
BK
.
Child abuse and the role of a dental professional–the Indian scenario
.
Child Abuse Negl
.
2011
;
35
(
3
):
157
158
76
Krol
DM
,
Whelan
K
.
Section on Oral Health
.
Maintaining and improving the oral health of young children
.
Pediatrics
.
2023
;
151
(
1
):
e2022060417
77
Farrell
M
,
Erickson
MH
,
Labella
BE
. Child neglect. In:
Klika
JB
,
Conte
JR
, eds.
The APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment
, 4th ed.
Sage Publications
;
2017
:
127
144
78
California Society of Pediatric Dentists
.
Dental neglect: when to report
.
California Pediatrician
.
1989
;(
Fall
):
31
32
79
Krug
EG
,
Dahlberg
LL
,
Mercy
JA
,
Zwi
AB
,
Lozano
R
.
World Health Organization
.
World report on violence and health
. Available at: www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/world_report/en/. Accessed May 23, 2016
80
Bhatia
SK
,
Maguire
SA
,
Chadwick
BL
, et al
.
Characteristics of child dental neglect: a systematic review
.
J Dent
.
2014
;
42
(
3
):
229
239
81
National Maternal and Child Health Resource Center
.
Oral health supervision module 3.4: child abuse and neglect
. Available at: https://www.mchoralhealth.org/SpecialCare/3-supervision/3-4.php. Accessed June 7, 2024
82
Mouden
LD
,
Bross
DC
.
Legal issues affecting dentistry’s role in preventing child abuse and neglect
.
J Am Dent Assoc
.
1995
;
126
(
8
):
1173
1180
83
Katner
DR
,
Brown
CE
.
Mandatory reporting of oral injuries indicating possible child abuse
.
J Am Dent Assoc
.
2012
;
143
(
10
):
1087
1092
84
Blain
SM
,
Skerber
N
,
Shanel-Hogan
KA
. Oral and dental aspects of child abuse and neglect. In:
Peterson
MS
,
Durfee
M
, eds.
Child Abuse and Neglect: Guidelines for Identification, Assessment, and Case Management
.
Volcano Press
;
2003
:
58
60
85
Brown
R
,
Hines
L
. Maxillofacial, Neck, and Dental Manifestations of Child Abuse. In:
Laskey
A
,
Sirotnak
A
, eds.
Child Abuse: Medical Diagnosis and Management
.
American Academy of Pediatrics
;
2020
:
167
197