The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) is a cooperative surveillance system between the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state, territorial, and local health departments established in 1987 to monitor factors responsible for infant morbidity and mortality.1 PRAMS utilizes a combination of telephone and mail surveys to collect information from mothers between 2 and 6 months after giving birth. States, territories, and local health departments have increased participation over the years, and some have worked with the CDC to add optional survey questions for targeted issues such as breastfeeding and safe sleep. The response rate is on average around 60%, and the CDC’s threshold for participation is 55%, accounting for 1000 to 3000 participants per year. PRAMS offers strengths and opportunities to inform policymakers, public health officials, researchers, and clinicians about ways to improve infant outcomes by decreasing maternal morbidity and mortality, conditions that continue to rise in the US and are affected by social drivers of health. PRAMS also provides essential data to potentially improve maternal behaviors associated with poor infant outcomes.2 Improvements in methods of survey delivery and timeliness of data capture and analysis have been suggested as opportunities to improve this surveillance system in order to be more responsive to emerging public health concerns or public health interventions that benefit from more immediate analysis, such as inability to access prenatal and postpartum care during the COVID-19 outbreak. Furthermore, potential participants from underserved communities may be unaware of PRAMS and/or refuse completion of the survey due to mistrust and/or concerns related to confidentiality.3 A study by Decker et al, published in this issue of Pediatrics,4 utilized PRAMS data to inform the Pennsylvania Department of Health (PADOH) about the effectiveness of a statewide safe sleep intervention.
The PADOH implemented a hospital-based safe sleep initiative that bundled an updated policy; nursing staff education; parental education with posters, videos, and brochures; and modeling of safe infant sleep throughout the hospital stay and determined whether this initiative improved individual maternal behaviors postdischarge by utilizing the PRAMS survey. Given that PRAMS uses the birth certificate to identify potential participants, researchers were able to identify whether the mothers had delivered at one of the 27 intervention hospitals or, as a comparator, were delivered elsewhere. The exposure to the intervention was presumed if the hospital was one of the 27 hospitals in the program, although actual modeling or exposures to the education materials and curriculum were not tested. Four safe sleep practice questions were analyzed: placing the infant on their back to sleep vs side, stomach, or combination; always placing the infant on a separate approved sleep surface (such as a crib) vs often, sometimes, rarely, or never; placing their infant to sleep without soft bedding or objects such as toys or pillows; and usually placing infant alone in their crib in the same room as mother. The Core Question for 9th Phase of PRAMS (2022 to present) for the last item is, “In the past 2 weeks, was your baby’s crib or bed in the same room where you or another adult slept?” There is an additional question, “In the past 2 weeks, where have you placed your new baby to sleep at night or during naps?” with option of crib, bassinet, mattress or bed, couch or sofa, etc., but it does not appear that this question was used in the data analysis by Decker et al. Furthermore, the 8th Phase (used in years 2016-2022, and for this study) had different questions: “In the past 2 weeks, how often has your new baby slept alone in his or her own crib or bed?” (response options: Always, Often, Sometimes, Rarely, Never); if never, the following was to be answered: “When your new baby sleeps alone, is his or her crib or bed in the same room where you sleep?” (response options: Yes, No). It appears authors have combined responses to both of these questions to determine the composite room sharing without bedsharing.5 Although the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends “room sharing without bed sharing,”6 there is no specific question in the PRAMS survey that asks about bedsharing; therefore, it is difficult to ascertain how mothers who either sometimes or routinely bedshared interpreted and responded to this set of questions.
Opportunities to improve prams questions for safe sleep
We believe PRAMS survey questions may be flawed when it comes to understanding infant sleep practices. Room sharing without bedsharing is a compound question asking both of the following: “Does your infant sleep in the same room in which you sleep?” and “Does your infant sleep on a separate sleep surface or do you share a sleep surface?” Some families may be room sharing and bedsharing, which would imply they would say “no” to room sharing without bedsharing but may in fact be at lower risk of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) or sudden infant death syndrome, particularly if they are exclusively breastfeeding,7 compared with infants sleeping in a separate room and not breastfeeding at all. There is an indication in the study by Decker et al that this question is problematic given that there are lower, independent odds of the breastfeeding population affirming separate approved sleep surface and room sharing without bedsharing, whereas there were higher, independent odds of the breastfeeding population usually placing their infant to sleep without soft bedding, or objects such as toys or pillows. The presumption is that the mothers in this case adopted the message about soft bedding but chose to bedshare to facilitate breastfeeding.8–11 We suggest that future PRAMS survey iterations instead divide the questions about room sharing and bedsharing into 2 separate questions and explicitly ask about bedsharing:
i. Usually sleep in the same room with their infant vs sleep in separate rooms
ii. Any bedsharing vs no bedsharing
Furthermore, a “yes” to any bedsharing can be broken down into a further subset of questions to determine whether bedsharing is for the entire night or part of the night; is for the purpose of breastfeeding, after which the infant is returned to a separate sleep space (consistent with AAP recommendations); or is for a reason other than breastfeeding. Additionally, it is important to know whether bedsharing is practiced intentionally or unintentionally, such as accidentally for feeding or consoling.
For example, if there is any bedsharing, it is practiced:
i. intentionally most of the time
ii. intentionally some of the time
iii. unintentionally most of the time
iv. unintentionally some of the time
Researchers could then stratify analyses by infant feeding type because the risk of bedsharing alone for the purpose of breastfeeding in the absence of no other risk factors is significantly lower compared with infants who are formula feeding only and bedsharing.7 The current PRAMS infant sleep questions significantly limit our understanding of true, nighttime infant care practices and therefore limit our ability to design interventions that will help keep infants safe and healthy by encouraging and supporting breastfeeding and also empowering families to practice safe infant sleep recommendations.
Opportunities to query fathers and partners about safe sleep
Another opportunity to expand PRAMS has been recommended and effectively utilized in Georgia to address safe infant sleep and breastfeeding.12 Very often, father and/or partners and others in the support system influence maternal behaviors and outcomes. Fathers may also play important roles in nighttime practices that potentially pose a risk for SUID.13 Both the intervention and the outcomes revealed through “PRAMS for Dads” may help health care practitioners understand effective methods to improve safe sleep and potentially reduce infant mortality. The role of fathers and support persons in supporting breastfeeding is already widely recognized, yet it is often ignored in the clinical setting.14
PRAMS is a robust dataset and provides useful information related to infant care practices across the US, and it would benefit from a revision of the questions related to safe infant sleep. Only when we truly understand what is happening at night and why will we be able to help new families keep their babies as safe and as healthy as possible.
Dr Feldman-Winter conceptualized topics for the commentary, drafted the commentary, and reviewed it critically for important intellectual content. Dr Kellams drafted the commentary and reviewed it critically for important intellectual content. Both authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
FUNDING: No funding was secured for this study.
COMPANION PAPER: A companion to this article can be found online at www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2024-067659.
Comments