To provide contraceptive care to adolescents, pediatricians need a working knowledge about counseling basics as well as a full range of contraceptive methods. Pediatricians may provide contraception for pregnancy prevention or for menstrual suppression and other medical indications. This clinical report is a companion to the revised policy statement “Contraception for Adolescents,” and it provides updates for pediatricians on adolescent-centered counseling approaches and contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible contraceptives, hormonal contraceptives, barrier methods, and emergency contraceptives. Together, these documents provide the pediatrician with evidence-informed and equity-informed practices in counseling and prescribing contraception for adolescents.

It is important for pediatricians to be knowledgeable about basic contraceptive counseling and the range of contraceptive methods. Adolescents have an unmet need for contraception. In 2021, 30% of all high school students reported ever having sex.1 Among sexually active students in 2021, 52% reported using a condom at last sexual intercourse and 33% reported that they or a partner used an effective form of contraception (either long acting reversible method [LARC] or hormonal method) at last sexual intercourse; of those, 10% reported dual use of condom and a more effective hormonal or LARC method together.1 Almost 14% of sexually active youth used no method of contraception at last sexual intercourse.2 

Contraception is an important tool in optimizing adolescent reproductive health, and the majority of the declines in adolescent pregnancy since the 1990s are attributable to increased use of contraception.3 However, many adolescents continue to face barriers to accessing effective, equitable contraceptive care.4 As trusted health care professionals, many with long-term relationships with adolescents, pediatricians are often the first health care provider that adolescents speak to about sexual and reproductive health concerns5,6 and pediatricians are well-positioned to meet adolescents’ contraceptive needs with patient-centered, evidence-informed, developmentally tailored, equity-focused counseling. In addition to using contraception for pregnancy prevention, many adolescents, particularly adolescents with medical complexity, use hormonal contraception for menstrual regulation and other medical indications.

This clinical report is a companion to the revised policy statement “Contraception for Adolescents,”7 provides an overview of contraceptive methods available to adolescents in the United States, and expands on counseling guidance in the policy statement. This report builds on the series of method-specific statements and clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) on LARCs,8 barrier methods,9 and emergency contraception (EC).10 It also includes new information on progestin-only pills (POPs) as well as combined hormonal, barrier, and other methods not included in the method-specific statements. Together, this family of documents supports the pediatrician in providing evidence-informed and equity-informed practices in counseling and prescribing contraception for adolescents. Table 1 lists contraceptive methods and the effectiveness of each. Other sources of information on contraception that may be useful to the pediatrician are listed in Table 2, including the contraceptive guidance documents from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the US Medical Eligibility Criteria (US MEC)11 and its companion document, the US Selected Practice Recommendations (US SPR).12 Both are available online and as free applications for mobile devices. The US-MEC reviews data on medical conditions and contraceptives and categorizes methods as 1 – no restrictions; 2 – advantages generally outweigh theoretical or proven risks; 3 – theoretical or proven risks usually outweigh advantages, but may be used with a specific patient using a shared decision making approach; and 4 – unacceptable health risk.11 The most recent version of the US-MEC, released in August 2024, includes many important updates. Even experienced clinicians are advised to consult this reference when prescribing for adolescents with ongoing medical conditions, using it in conjunction with shared decision making and consideration of an adolescent’s preferences and circumstances to make an individualized treatment plan.

TABLE 1.

Contraception Effectiveness and Continuation

Effectiveness for Pregnancy Prevention
Method Typical Use Failure Rate,aContinuation Rate,b
Contraceptive implant 0.1 81 
Hormonal IUD 0.1–0.4 82 
Copper IUD 0.8 76 
Progestin-only injection 47 
Pill,c patch, ring 47 (pills), 41 (patch), and 31 (ring) 
External condom 13 — 
Sponge 17 (overall), 14 (nulliparous), 27 (parous) — 
Diaphragm 17 — 
Cervical cap 17–23b — 
Fertility awareness 17 (range 2–23) — 
Internal condom 21 — 
No method 85 — 
Effectiveness for Pregnancy Prevention
Method Typical Use Failure Rate,aContinuation Rate,b
Contraceptive implant 0.1 81 
Hormonal IUD 0.1–0.4 82 
Copper IUD 0.8 76 
Progestin-only injection 47 
Pill,c patch, ring 47 (pills), 41 (patch), and 31 (ring) 
External condom 13 — 
Sponge 17 (overall), 14 (nulliparous), 27 (parous) — 
Diaphragm 17 — 
Cervical cap 17–23b — 
Fertility awareness 17 (range 2–23) — 
Internal condom 21 — 
No method 85 — 

—, not applicable.

Hormonal contraception effectiveness from the CDC,133 and continuation rates from Rosenstock.49 

a

The number of pregnancies expected per 100 pregnancy-capable individuals who use a method for 1 year.

b

The proportion of individuals who continue a method for 1 year.

c

Combined estrogen-progestin and progestin-only pills not distinguished in the data.

TABLE 2.

Online Contraception Resources for Pediatricians

Resource (Sponsor)Where to Find It
US Medical Eligibility Criteria, 2024 (CDC) U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024 (U.S. MEC) | Contraception | CDC 
US Selected Practice Recommendations, 2024 (CDC) U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024 (U.S. SPR) | Contraception | CDC 
CDC Contraception Information Contraception and Birth Control Methods | Contraception | CDC 
FDA Birth Control Information https://www.fda.gov/consumers/free-publications-women/birth-control 
Bedsider Providers (Power Through Choices) https://providers.bedsider.org/ 
Reproductive Health Access Project https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/contraception/ 
Resource (Sponsor)Where to Find It
US Medical Eligibility Criteria, 2024 (CDC) U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024 (U.S. MEC) | Contraception | CDC 
US Selected Practice Recommendations, 2024 (CDC) U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024 (U.S. SPR) | Contraception | CDC 
CDC Contraception Information Contraception and Birth Control Methods | Contraception | CDC 
FDA Birth Control Information https://www.fda.gov/consumers/free-publications-women/birth-control 
Bedsider Providers (Power Through Choices) https://providers.bedsider.org/ 
Reproductive Health Access Project https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/contraception/ 

Effective contraceptive counseling with adolescents applies principles of shared decision making and person-centered care within a sexual and reproductive health equity framework.13–15 The pediatrician provides medical knowledge about contraception, while the adolescent offers perspective on their goals, preferences and life circumstances, and together they make a collaborative decision about contraception initiation, continuation, or discontinuation.14 Shared decision-making may involve a parent/caregiver or trusted adult as preferred by the adolescent, as adolescents frequently identify family as sources of sexual health values, information, and support for method choice.16 Additionally, peers and partners can be sources of influence or support for contraceptive choice and continuation.6,17–20 If the adolescent chooses, a partner can be included in contraceptive visits and decision making.21 

Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents, 4th edition, recommends that pediatricians obtain a developmentally tailored sexual history from the adolescent alone, assess STI and pregnancy risk, and provide appropriate screening, counseling, and, when needed, contraception.22 Taking a sexual history is facilitated by an honest, caring, nonjudgmental attitude and a comfortable, matter-of-fact approach to asking questions. Tools for sexual history taking include the “5 Ps” of sexual history: partners, practices, protection from STIs, past history of STIs, and pregnancy intention23 and motivational interviewing focused on future goals, validating adolescents’ capacity to reach those goals, and engaging adolescents in adoption of health-promoting behaviors.23–25 

Gender-inclusive language ensures that adolescents maintain trust and confidence with their care team.26 Providers may introduce themselves with their personal pronouns and inquire about the adolescent’s gender identity, pronouns, and sexual identity as part of the confidential interview. Pediatricians may consider using terms like “a person who can become pregnant” or “someone with a uterus” rather than “women” to include those individuals who identify as transmasculine or nonbinary and have contraceptive needs. Beyond pregnancy-capable individuals, pediatricians can ensure that contraceptive information and counseling is available to all individuals who can contribute to a pregnancy, including those who make sperm, such as birth-assigned males (ie, cisgender males, transgender females, and gender diverse youth with testicles).21 

If adolescents have experienced prior sexual abuse, sexual assault, human trafficking, and other forms of trauma, a healing-centered approach may be necessary.27 Of particular importance, adolescents involved in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have high rates of sexual trauma and high rates adverse sexual health outcomes; many have also experienced biases from providers.28–30 A healing-centered approach includes using language and skills to promote trust building, as well as screening for trauma, and referring to trauma-specific health care services as indicated.31,32 

For adolescents and young adults with diminished decision-making capacity due to cognitive impairment or intellectual disability, the pediatrician can involve a parent/caregiver to partner in decision-making that centers the best interests of the adolescent. An alternative framework is supported decision-making, in which the adolescent or young adult with cognitive impairment identifies a trusted adult (frequently a parent) to help communicate their preferences to the clinician.33,34 

Research suggests that adolescents make decisions differently than adults—for example, adolescents may be less risk averse, have more challenges considering multiple perspectives, and make different decisions in “hot” (high emotion and distraction) decision-making scenarios.35–37 Nonetheless, studies of overall capacity for health decisions demonstrate that adolescents have adult-type capacity to understand health information, weigh risks and benefits, and make rational, voluntary choices.35,38–41 In a study of contraceptive decision making, by 14 years of age, participants demonstrated the capacity to self-screen for medical contraindications, understand contraceptive information, appreciate how it affects them personally, balance risks and benefits, and make voluntary decisions.41,42 

An adolescent-centered counseling approach within a sexual and reproductive health equity framework starts with a pediatrician reflecting on their own biases and assumptions about an adolescent’s contraceptive needs. Pediatricians who choose not to provide contraceptive care because of claims of conscience are directed to the AAP policy statement, “Physician Refusal to Provide Information or Treatment on the Basis of Claims of Conscience.”43 Referrals need to be time-sensitive, respectful, nonjudgmental and done with an awareness of the power differential between adolescents and providers.

Self-reflection is followed by assessing the adolescent’s stated goals and preferences, (independent of the preferences of interested family members, partners, or friends), developmental needs and contextual factors. Stated preferences might include how a method is used (and whether it requires a prescription or procedure) or method efficacy at preventing pregnancy. Developmental needs and contextual factors might include an adolescent’s prior (or lack of) contraceptive experiences, need for more interactive counseling, school and family characteristics, social norms, and relevant cultural perspectives.44–46 

After this assessment, the pediatrician can then present method options based on the adolescent’s stated preferences, developmental needs, and context. Ideally, a pediatrician will be able to provide a range of methods based on access, from over-the-counter (OTC) options like emergency contraception, condoms, and progestin-only contraceptive pills, which do not require a prescription and are not disclosed to guardians through the EHR or EOB, to prescription-based options such as combined hormonal contraceptive methods, the contraceptive injection, and long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) devices such as implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs). Important guidance on counseling about LARC methods using sexual and reproductive equity principles can be found in the Patient-Centered LARC Counseling Section of the AAP Clinical Report on Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.8 Pediatricians additionally need to take into account and educate adolescents about access to contraception and abortion services based on state law, which may limit options an adolescent might have if they become pregnant.47 

Pediatricians may use contraceptive decision aids to improve knowledge and provide additional support to adolescents making contraception decisions.48 (See Table 3 for examples of decision aids.) For many adolescents seeking contraception, pregnancy prevention is a key priority, and counseling should proceed from most effective to least effective methods.46 Other adolescents may prioritize menstrual control, not taking a daily pill, or privacy; for these adolescents, method preferences will be different.

TABLE 3.

Contraceptive Counseling for Adolescents Within a Sexual and Reproductive Health Equity Framework

StepActions
(1) Reflect upon your own biases and assumptions about an adolescent’s contraceptive need prior to counseling 
  • Assume a position of curiosity and empathy

  • Ask yourself:

    • - What personal values and beliefs about adolescent sexuality and contraception may influence how I counsel this adolescent?

    • - What structural factors may impact this adolescent’s reproductive health goals, behaviors, and comfort discussing these with a healthcare provider?

 
(2) Assess the adolescent’s stated goals and preferences 
  • Mirror the adolescent’s language regarding gender and body parts and normalize adolescent sexuality57 

  • Ask the adolescent:

    • - Have you had or are you thinking about having sex with someone who makes sperm?

    • - How do you feel about becoming pregnant?

    • - Why or why isn’t it important for you to avoid pregnancy right now?

    • - What things are important to you in a birth control method? (Prompts: Effectiveness, how often used, start and stop it when you’d like, confidential from partner and/or parents, non-contraceptive benefits like helping acne or cramps?)

    • - What concerns or questions do you have about birth control risks or side effects? What experiences have you had using birth control (positive or negative)?

 
(3) Assess the adolescent’s developmental needs and contextual factors 
  • What is this adolescent’s maturity level and prior experience with pregnancy and/or contraception?

  • What circumstances might this adolescent face if they experience pregnancy?

  • Who in their life supports their health decisions and can help them follow through on reproductive health goals? (eg, friend, partner, parent/caregiver or other family member)

  • Are there individuals who are trying to control this adolescent’s sexual behaviors, ability to become pregnant or access birth control?

 
(4) Present method options based on the adolescent’s stated goals, preferences, and needs 
  • Consider using a visual tool like the CDC’s “Birth Control Methods” webpage,133 Bedsider’s “Explore Birth Control Options,”134 Reproductive Health Access Project’s “Your Birth Control Choices Fact Sheet,”135 or Pharmacy Access Forms Provider Toolkit.136 

  • Highlight the role of condoms for STI prevention throughout your discussion of contraceptive methods.

  • Motivational interviewing approaches can be useful.23,25 

 
(5) Assess for and address any barriers to method choice and continuation 
  • Are they able to maintain confidentiality when obtaining method?

  • Do they need financial support to start, continue, or change the method?

  • Follow up visits can reassess:

    • - Contraceptive needs, method choice, satisfaction, and adherence.

    • - Relationship safety and sexual behaviors.

    • - STI surveillance and prevention counseling, and other sexual health prevention measures (eg, HPV immunization).

 
StepActions
(1) Reflect upon your own biases and assumptions about an adolescent’s contraceptive need prior to counseling 
  • Assume a position of curiosity and empathy

  • Ask yourself:

    • - What personal values and beliefs about adolescent sexuality and contraception may influence how I counsel this adolescent?

    • - What structural factors may impact this adolescent’s reproductive health goals, behaviors, and comfort discussing these with a healthcare provider?

 
(2) Assess the adolescent’s stated goals and preferences 
  • Mirror the adolescent’s language regarding gender and body parts and normalize adolescent sexuality57 

  • Ask the adolescent:

    • - Have you had or are you thinking about having sex with someone who makes sperm?

    • - How do you feel about becoming pregnant?

    • - Why or why isn’t it important for you to avoid pregnancy right now?

    • - What things are important to you in a birth control method? (Prompts: Effectiveness, how often used, start and stop it when you’d like, confidential from partner and/or parents, non-contraceptive benefits like helping acne or cramps?)

    • - What concerns or questions do you have about birth control risks or side effects? What experiences have you had using birth control (positive or negative)?

 
(3) Assess the adolescent’s developmental needs and contextual factors 
  • What is this adolescent’s maturity level and prior experience with pregnancy and/or contraception?

  • What circumstances might this adolescent face if they experience pregnancy?

  • Who in their life supports their health decisions and can help them follow through on reproductive health goals? (eg, friend, partner, parent/caregiver or other family member)

  • Are there individuals who are trying to control this adolescent’s sexual behaviors, ability to become pregnant or access birth control?

 
(4) Present method options based on the adolescent’s stated goals, preferences, and needs 
  • Consider using a visual tool like the CDC’s “Birth Control Methods” webpage,133 Bedsider’s “Explore Birth Control Options,”134 Reproductive Health Access Project’s “Your Birth Control Choices Fact Sheet,”135 or Pharmacy Access Forms Provider Toolkit.136 

  • Highlight the role of condoms for STI prevention throughout your discussion of contraceptive methods.

  • Motivational interviewing approaches can be useful.23,25 

 
(5) Assess for and address any barriers to method choice and continuation 
  • Are they able to maintain confidentiality when obtaining method?

  • Do they need financial support to start, continue, or change the method?

  • Follow up visits can reassess:

    • - Contraceptive needs, method choice, satisfaction, and adherence.

    • - Relationship safety and sexual behaviors.

    • - STI surveillance and prevention counseling, and other sexual health prevention measures (eg, HPV immunization).

 

Table 3 provides a step-by-step summary of this sexual and reproductive equity-informed counseling framework. Shared contraception decision-making with adolescents is often an iterative process. Adolescents may need to try more than one method, working together with their pediatrician to address barriers and facilitators to effective use, including access, payment, transportation for continuity of care, burden of use, and side effects. It may be helpful to schedule a follow-up visit 1 to 3 months after starting a contraceptive method to check in on this process.

For the pediatrician, comprehensive contraceptive counseling relies on familiarity with the full range of contraceptive methods. The purpose of this clinical report is to provide pediatricians with an updated review of effectiveness and method characteristics to help inform shared decision making with their patients.

LARCs (ie, intrauterine devices [IUDs] and contraceptive implants) are safe and provide the most effective pregnancy prevention for adolescents. Although only one aspect of an adolescent-centered approach to contraceptive decision making, effectiveness has become particularly salient given recent restrictions on access to safe abortion care.47 Compared with other methods, LARCs have both higher effectiveness and higher continuation. In the CHOICE study, the 14- to 19-year-old participants (who had parental permission to participate and a higher rate of prior pregnancy than teens in the general population) had a 12-month continuation rate of LARCs of 81%, compared with 44% for non-LARC methods.49 Also from the CHOICE study, the contraceptive failure rate was 20 times higher in women 14 to 45 years of age who used combined hormonal pills, patches, or rings than in those using LARC methods.50 This was an especially notable finding in those women younger than 21 years in whom the pill, patch, and ring contraceptive failure rates were twice as high as in women 21 years or older.50 Permanent contraception (eg, tubal ligation, hysterectomy, vasectomy), although listed in many adult-oriented resources, raises legal, ethical, and medical concerns for adolescents and is addressed in a separate AAP policy statement.51 

Shorter-acting contraceptives include combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) methods and progestin-only methods. CHC methods contain a combination of progestin and estrogen and include pills, vaginal rings, and transdermal patches. All progestin-only methods, including levonorgestrel IUDs, implants, injections, and pills, are safer for health conditions in which estrogen use is contraindicated. Shorter-acting hormonal contraceptives (pills, patches, rings) are highly effective but are often discontinued after less than 6 months of use, most commonly because of reported side effects.52 Emergency contraception (EC [eg, designated oral products, IUDs, pills]) are important tools and account for a significant part of the decrease in adolescent pregnancy rates. Pediatricians should be aware of any restrictions on contraceptive methods for minors in their states. With states considering legislation restricting EC, IUDs, and other methods, the AAP State Advocacy team can provide pediatricians with an update on their state’s legal landscape and opportunities for advocacy by pediatricians at the state level ([email protected]).

Contraception should always be started on the day of visit (“quick start”) if the health care provider is reasonably certain the adolescent is not pregnant, remembering that menstrual periods can be irregular in adolescents and the urine pregnancy tests may not detect a very early pregnancy, especially prior to missed menses. (See the CDC algorithm in the US selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 202412). However, even when the health care provider is not reasonably certain the adolescent is not pregnant, the benefit of starting almost all contraceptive methods may outweigh the risks of delaying contraceptive initiation, and shared decision making with the adolescent is recommended. To prevent pregnancy as soon as possible after unprotected intercourse, EC is indicated and can be provided with oral levonorgestrel, oral ulipristal acetate or an IUD (see EC and IUD method sections below).10 

If a pediatrician is unable to provide a specific method, the pediatrician should be knowledgeable about adolescent-friendly locations where patients can access the full range of methods.43 A “bridge method” that is easily accessed can be useful for any patients experiencing a delay in obtaining their preferred method of ongoing contraception—for example, prescribing oral contraceptive pills that can be procured at a local pharmacy and used until a patient can obtain a clinician-placed LARC method. Online resources exist to help identify the nearest health center offering LARCs—for example, https://www.bedsider.org/find-health-care/clinics.

Providers should counsel adolescents to use a backup method (ie, condom or other barrier method) for 7 days after initiation of a hormonal contraceptive method and encourage adolescents to use a condom and/or latex sheet for all sexual encounters to protect against sexually transmitted infections (STIs).9 Contraception should be provided within the context of routine sexual health care, and pediatricians should address topics such as human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and routine screening for STIs.22 Except for IUD placement, a pelvic examination is not necessary to start contraception. Following contraception initiation, patients should be provided with clear instructions on how to contact the office with problems or questions and with additional sources of information about their method, including how to manage missed doses, in the format (eg, online links, QR codes, or taking a photo of the instructions) preferred by the patient. Some adolescents do not want to receive paper copies of instructions that may be discovered by others. Contraception counseling can be an iterative process, and some patients may need to try multiple contraceptive methods to find the one that best fits their needs. Scheduling a routine follow-up visit can help address the management of side effects or minimize a gap prior to changing to a different method if necessary or desired. Virtual visits (telehealth or telephonic) are well-suited to these types of visits.

Nexplanon (Organon, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey) is a single-rod implant that contains 68 mg of etonogestrel, the active metabolite of the progestin desogestrel, that provides highly effective pregnancy prevention for up to 2 years beyond the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved 3 years (5 years total).53–55 Nexplanon is currently the only available subdermal contraceptive implant in the United States. Implants are suitable for adolescents who prefer a method that does not require regularly scheduled adherence and who desire an extended length of protection.8,56 Training is widely available at no cost through the manufacturer, and increasing numbers of general pediatricians are learning to place and remove implants.57 Additional information can be found in the AAP clinical report on LARC methods.8 

The IUD is a LARC medical device inserted into the uterus. There are 6 FDA-approved IUDs (Table 4). IUDs are safe for nulliparous individuals, do not cause infertility, and provide rapid return to fertility after removal.58,59 The copper T380-A IUD has been shown to be effective emergency contraception within 5 days of unprotected intercourse,10 and a study of adult patients showed similar effectiveness of the 52-mg levonorgestrel IUD as emergency contraception.60 Patients desiring an IUD after the EC window but before pregnancy can be reliably ruled out may choose to quick start another contraceptive method that can be more easily discontinued as a bridge method until pregnancy can be reliably excluded and an IUD can be safely placed. If an IUD is placed, providers may recommend another pregnancy test 2 weeks after the last episode of unprotected intercourse. If an IUD user is found to be pregnant, the increased risks of spontaneous abortion and preterm delivery can be decreased by IUD removal.12 Menstrual cups have been shown to increase the risk of IUD expulsion, whereas tampons have not been shown to do so.61–63 The AAP clinical report on LARC methods and the ACOG provide additional information on risks, benefits, and counseling for implants and IUDs.8,64 Because IUD insertion can cause severe cramping, pain management options, including insertion under sedation for select patients, should be included in counseling. There is no consensus on a single, evidence-informed, best practice. However, options for pain management are presented in the SPR.12 

TABLE 4.

IUDs Available in the United States, 2025

DeviceHormoneLength of Use56,137,138 Manufacturer
Liletta 52 mg levonorgestrel 6 y AbbVie and Medicines360 
Mirena 52 mg levonorgestrel 8 y Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc 
Kyleena 19.5 mg levonorgestrel 5 y Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc 
Skyla 13.5 mg levonorgestrel 3 y Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc 
Copper T380-A, ParaGard None 10 y Cooper 
Miudella (175 mm2 copper in nitinol frame)a None 3 y Sebela Women’s Health Inc 
DeviceHormoneLength of Use56,137,138 Manufacturer
Liletta 52 mg levonorgestrel 6 y AbbVie and Medicines360 
Mirena 52 mg levonorgestrel 8 y Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc 
Kyleena 19.5 mg levonorgestrel 5 y Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc 
Skyla 13.5 mg levonorgestrel 3 y Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc 
Copper T380-A, ParaGard None 10 y Cooper 
Miudella (175 mm2 copper in nitinol frame)a None 3 y Sebela Women’s Health Inc 
a

US Food and Drug Administration. Miudella Full Prescribing Information. Updated February 2025. Accessed May 14, 2025. https://sebelapharma.com/assets/media/miudella-PI.pdf

Depo medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA, Depo-Provera [Pfizer, New York, New York]) is a long-acting progestin that is injected every 3 months, using a dose of either 150 mg intramuscularly or 104 mg subcutaneously.12 As an off-label use, patients can self-inject the subcutaneous formulation after instruction, which has demonstrated improved contraceptive continuation rates.12,65 Both regimens have similar side effects and are highly effective in preventing pregnancy.65,66 DMPA may be administered up to 2 weeks late (15 weeks after last injection) without requiring backup contraception, and there is no time limit for early injections.12 

DMPA advantages include easy use, reduction of uterine bleeding, and improvement in dysmenorrhea. Disadvantages include the need for regular injections and menstrual cycle irregularities that occur in nearly all patients initially but typically improve over time.66 Other potential side effects include headache, mastalgia, hair loss, change in libido, and weight gain. Studies in both adolescents and adults suggest that DMPA-related weight gain occurs in a minority of users and that weight gain status at 6 months after initiation is a strong predictor of future excessive weight gain with ongoing DMPA use.67,68 

In 2004, the FDA issued a “boxed warning” (the highest safety-related warning that medications can have) regarding the risk of decreased bone mineral density (BMD) among DMPA users. The ACOG, citing substantial recovery of BMD after discontinuing DMPA, does not advise limiting the duration of DMPA use nor routinely monitoring bone density but does recommend a shared decision-making approach.69 With the emergence of limited data linking bone fracture to more than 2 years of DMPA use, the risk-benefit discussion for hormonal contraception may be more challenging when prescribing DMPA for teens for medical uses rather for contraception.70,71 It is good practice to include counseling to promote skeletal health, including meeting recommended daily intake of 1300 mg of calcium and 600 IU of vitamin D, and regular weight-bearing exercise.72 

There are 3 progestin-only oral contraceptives (sometimes called “mini-pill”) currently available in the United States. Norethindrone 0.35 mg has been available since the late 1960s. In July 2023, norgestrel 0.75 mg (brand name Opill, Perrigo, Dublin, Ireland) became the first oral birth control pill approved by the FDA to be available in the US without a prescription and without age restrictions.73 Both of these POPs have no placebo interval. They prevent pregnancy by thickening cervical mucus and do not reliably inhibit ovulation.74 It is recommended they are taken within the same 3-hour window each day to maintain efficacy. Adolescents’ access to over-the-counter contraceptive options will be affected by retail pricing and insurance coverage which warrant ongoing attention, particularly as more options become available.75 

A newer POP containing the progestin drospirenone (brand name Slynd, Exeltis USA Inc, Florham Park, New Jersey) provides another POP alternative for individuals with estrogen contraindications (eg, migraine headaches with aura, severe and uncontrolled hypertension) who struggle with traditional POPs because of breakthrough bleeding or adherence issues. Similar to the mechanism of action of CHC, Slynd suppresses ovulation, including even when a pill is delayed by 24 hours, and has a built in 4-day placebo interval intended to create more predictable monthly bleeding.76 Slynd contains an analog of spironolactone and, thus, has the potential to cause hyperkalemia in those at risk, for example patients with renal disorders or using medications with elevated potassium as a potential side effect.77 

CHC methods (pills, transdermal patches, and vaginal rings) are the most used methods of hormonal contraception for adolescents. Although more data are available from studies of combined oral contraceptive (COC) pills than the other modalities, all have the same mechanism of action and similar contraindications to use, which are minimal in healthy adolescents. CHCs are identified as an unacceptable health risk (MEC category 4) for adolescents with severe and uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic pressure ≥100 mm Hg), <21 days postpartum, peripartum cardiomyopathy (with normal or mildly impaired cardiac function <6 months postpartum or with moderately or severely impaired cardiac function) liver tumors (hepatocellular adenoma or malignant hepatoma), severe (decompensated) cirrhosis, acute viral hepatitis, nephrotic syndrome, dialysis, major surgery with prolonged immobilization, current history of thromboembolism or thrombophilia, sickle cell disease, lupus (with positive or unknown antiphospholipid antibodies), history of and current ischemic heart disease, history of cerebrovascular accident (stroke), complications of diabetes (eg, nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, or other vascular disease), migraines with aura or focal neurologic symptoms, and continuation in a patient with multiple risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.11,78,79 Given the frequency of headache symptoms, careful attention to headache classification80 will prevent unnecessarily limiting access to CHC. Complicated valvular heart disease (pulmonary hypertension, risk for atrial fibrillation or history of subacute bacterial endocarditis), and complicated solid organ transplant are additionally identified as an unacceptable health risk (MEC category 4),11 and collaboration with the patient’s specialty team is prudent. Smoking, although discouraged, is not a contraindication for adolescents or adults younger than 35 years of age (MEC category 2).11 

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most serious adverse event associated with CHC, which increases from a baseline risk of 1 per 10 000 to 3 to 4 per 10 000 person-years during CHC use.81–83 In comparison, the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and postpartum is 10 to 20 per 10 000 person-years, of which 1% to 2% are fatal.84 Although there are some conflicting data suggesting higher VTE risk using the patch85 and other data showing small differences in VTE risk with different progestins, the absolute VTE risk for CHC is low and similar across CHC methods.86 

Numerous studies have investigated the risk of breast cancer associated with use of hormonal contraception with inconsistent findings, but overall, the additional risk of premenopausal breast cancer conferred by hormonal contraception is generally thought to be low and a family history of breast cancer is not considered a contraindication to any hormonal contraceptive method.11,87 In contrast, there is a demonstrated decrease in the risk of ovarian and endometrial and possibly colon cancer with the use of COC pills.88 

CHCs have similar common side effects including transient irregular bleeding, headache, and nausea. Recommendations for managing adverse effects are available elsewhere and online.12,89–91 Pediatricians are advised to use caution to avoid drug interactions with CHCs, particularly with medications that decrease contraceptive effectiveness (eg, some anticonvulsants and rare antiretroviral drugs).12,92,93 Antibiotics, except for rifamycin antibiotics such as rifampin, are unlikely to affect the contraceptive effectiveness.94 

All CHC methods can be started on the day of visit (quick start as described above) in healthy, nonpregnant adolescents with advice to use a back-up method (eg, condoms) for at least the first 7 days if sexually active. The US SPR has clear and comprehensive guidance on managing late or missed doses of pills, patches, and rings.12 

Providers may authorize sufficient refills for a full year (13 four-week cycles). Method continuation is higher when patients receive a full-year prescription at one time, a practice recommended by the CDC12 and legally required in some states when requested by patients (see, for example, the state of Washington95). A routine follow-up visit at 1 to 3 months may be useful for addressing adverse effects or adherence issues but is not necessary.

In most COC pills, the estrogen component is ethinyl estradiol in amounts varying from 10 to 50 μg. A common approach is to begin with a COC containing 30 to 35 μg of ethinyl estradiol (EE). Lower doses of EE are available and not contraindicated but may have an adverse impact on bone mineral density acquisition72 and be associated with more irregular bleeding compared with higher doses of estrogen.96 Higher doses (ie, 50 μg EE) increase thrombotic risk.86 In addition, one pill (Nextstellis, Mayne Pharma LLC, Raleigh, North Carolina) combines a plant-synthesized version of the naturally occurring estrogen, estetrol, with drospirenone. Although theoretically it has the potential for an improved safety profile, based on the currently available data, prescribing considerations are the same as for all other COC pills.97,98 

Pill packs typically include a combination of hormone-containing pills and hormone-free or “reminder” pills. While taking reminder pills, uterine bleeding occurs because of the absence of hormones. Pills are packaged to support a variety of regimens, from monthly cycling (4–7 hormone-free days per month) to extended cycling to continuous active pills with zero hormone-free pills per year.99 For example, a commonly used extended cycling regimen includes 12 weeks of hormone pills and 7 hormone-free pills. Any commonly prescribed brands of monophasic COC pills can be used in any of the aforementioned regimens. Comprehensive counseling includes strategies to promote daily adherence, such as mobile device alarms, tracker mobile applications, and support from a family member or partner.

There are 2 vaginal rings. NuvaRing (Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ) requires insertion of a new ring each month. Patients insert the contraceptive ring into the vagina and leave it in place for 3 weeks, with removal for 1 week to induce withdrawal bleeding. A new ring is inserted after 7 days even if bleeding continues. Annovera, a ring that can be used for up to a year, is a similar diameter (2.25” vs 2.13”) to the Nuvaring but twice as thick (0.33” vs 0.16”). It is removed after 21 days of use and stored unrefrigerated for 7 days to allow a withdrawal bleed, and then reinserted each month. In addition to other CHC side effects, ring users may experience vaginal discharge or discomfort and problems related to the device (eg, expulsion or inability to locate).100 The NuvaRing contains sufficient medication for use up to 35 days101 and, thus, can be used continuously and replaced without a period of removal to skip menses.99 There are no data on continuous use of Annovera. Patients do not need to remove rings for tampon use, menstrual cup use, or intercourse, but if the adolescent chooses, they can remove them for up to 2 hours for Annovera and 3 hours for NuvaRing without diminished efficacy for pregnancy prevention.102 

There are 2 types of transdermal patches available in the United States; beige/peach is the only color available. The square patch (Xulane, Viatris Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, and Zafemy, Amneal, Bridgewater, New Jersey) delivers 150 μg/d norelgestromin and 35 μg/d ethinyl estradiol, but its labeling notes that overall estrogen exposure is about 60% higher than with an oral birth control pill containing 35 μg of ethinyl estradiol. The larger (28 cm2 vs 14 cm2) circular patch (Twirla, Agile Therapeutics, Princeton, New Jersey) delivers 120 μg/d levonorgestrel and 30 μg/d ethinyl estradiol. Both patches are labeled for use only by individuals with a body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2. Patches are placed on the abdomen, upper torso, or buttocks (and also upper outer arm for Xulane), using 1 patch per week for 3 weeks in a row, followed by 1 week off the patch, during which time a withdrawal bleed usually occurs. Similarly to the pill and ring, the patch-off week can be eliminated for continuous use to reduce bleeding.99,103 In addition to other CHC side effects, users may also experience dislodged patches and skin effects (hyperpigmentation, contact dermatitis, and other irritation).104,105 

Barrier methods include the external (formerly called “male”) condom, internal (formerly “female”) condom, latex sheets (dental dams), diaphragms, cervical caps, sponges, spermicides, and vaginal pH modulators. A recent AAP policy statement and technical report on barrier methods provides detailed information for the pediatrician on external and internal condoms and dental dams.9 

Diaphragms are shallow, dome-shaped silicone cups used with spermicide and placed inside the vagina prior to intercourse. The Milex diaphragm (Cooper Surgical, Trumbull, Connecticut) requires fitting by a provider. A newer contoured diaphragm (Caya, HPSRx Enterprises, Salem, Virginia) is one-size-fits-most and does not require fitting. Both can remain in the vagina for up to 24 hours. Cervical caps are 1.5 × 1 inch silicone cups that fit over the cervix with spermicide inside. Contraceptive sponges are 2-inch pieces of plastic foam impregnated with spermicide. The single-use sponge is wetted to activate the spermicide, can be placed up to 24 hours prior to sex, and remains in for up to 30 hours. All 3 methods (diaphragm, cervical cap, sponge) require remaining in for at least 6 hours after intercourse. The typical use failure rates for diaphragms and sponges are high (see Table 1), and they do not protect from STIs. Younger adolescents use these methods less frequently, but older adolescents may desire these event-specific and hormone-free methods.106 

Two contraceptive vaginal gels are available. Nonoxynol-9 spermicide is available OTC as gel, cream, foam, film, or suppository. Nonoxynol-9 gels are used with diaphragms and cervical caps, and nonoxynol-9 is impregnated in sponges. The typical use failure rate of nonoxynol-9 alone is 21%.90 Nonoxynol-9 does not protect against STIs. Because repeated and high-dose use may cause vaginal or anal lesions that may increase HIV transmission, the CDC considers its use an unacceptable health risk (MEC category 4) for individuals at risk for HIV.11 For individuals living with HIV, use of nonoxynol-9 is usually not recommended unless other more appropriate methods are not available or acceptable (MEC category 3).11 A newer vaginal pH modulator (Phexxi, Evofem Biosciences, San Diego, California) is a prescription contraceptive acidifying gel with active ingredients lactic acid 1.8%, citric acid 1%, and sodium bitartrate 0.4%. It prevents pregnancy by modulating vaginal pH and impairing sperm motility. It is applied immediately before or up to an hour before sexual intercourse and reapplied every hour thereafter. Population-based effectiveness data are not available; clinical trials from the manufacturer reported a typical use failure rate of 14%.76,107 A new applicator should be used for each vaginal sexual act,76 and the vaginal pH modulator may be used with other methods except the vaginal ring.

When used within 120 hours after unprotected intercourse, EC reduces the risk of pregnancy, and the sooner EC is initiated, the more effective it is. ECs include FDA-indicated oral EC products, levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate (a progesterone receptor modulator), and IUDs. Oral levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate are more effective the sooner they are taken after unprotected intercourse and may be less effective in individuals with higher BMI.108 While individuals may start another hormonal contraceptive method immediately after taking oral levonorgestrel EC, starting another hormonal method within 5 days of using ulipristal acetate may decrease the effectiveness of ulipristal.12 Shared decision-making is recommended to weigh this risk against potentially delaying care for patients who choose an ongoing contraceptive method that requires an office visit (LARC or DMPA) to start. A recent study demonstrated that the levonorgestrel IUD was noninferior to the copper IUD for use as EC,60 an off-label use for both. Body weight and timing (≤5 days) do not affect the effectiveness of the IUD as EC. The AAP policy statements on LARC methods8 and emergency contraception10 provide additional detailed information.

Withdrawal, abstinence, and fertility awareness-based methods are less effective methods but are practiced by many adolescents.2 Withdrawal, or coitus interruptus, is a method in which the penis is pulled out of the vagina before ejaculation. Withdrawal has limited effectiveness, with a 20% overall failure rate (adolescent data not available).109 Although less than 4% of individuals report currently using withdrawal,110 lifetime use is common, and 65% of sexually active 15- to 19-year-old adolescents reported ever using withdrawal.111 In fertility awareness-based methods, individuals abstain during fertile days of their menstrual cycle, identified via menstrual calendar, basal body temperature, observations of cervical mucus, or a combination of these three. Fertility awareness places a high responsibility on users, and it may be less effective for adolescents, as ovulation is often not predictable in the first few years after menarche. Fertility awareness-based mobile applications are available but have not been tested in people younger than 18 years and are not indicated for persons with irregular periods.112 

As a contraceptive method, abstinence has a perfect use efficacy of 100%; however, in nationally representative surveys, many adolescents who plan to be abstinent become sexually active,113,114 making the typical use effectiveness much lower. These data suggest that pediatricians should not rely on abstinence counseling alone and need to provide comprehensive sexual health information including when and how to access to EC.

An estimated 16% to 25% of adolescents have special health care needs, including physical disability, intellectual disability, and medically complex conditions.115 Sexuality and sexual health care needs in this population are often overlooked, yet compared with healthy adolescents, adolescents with chronic medical conditions have similar levels of sexual behaviors and STIs.116 In addition to pregnancy prevention, medically complex adolescents may have medical indications for contraceptives. For example, patients with intellectual disability or mobility limitations may benefit from menstrual suppression.117 Collaboration with a patient’s managing subspecialist about contraception can enhance a pediatrician’s knowledge of the underlying condition, how that may impact contraceptive effectiveness, and side effects (such as hypertension with renal disease, low bone density with celiac disease, or seizure management).79,81,118 When applicable, adolescents with medical complexity should be made aware of the additional risks that an unplanned pregnancy could pose to their health.

Medications that are teratogenic are commonly prescribed for adolescents, and many teenagers are not counseled about contraceptives.119,120 Pediatricians prescribing teratogens or caring for adolescents who are prescribed teratogenic medications, such as isotretinoin, spironolactone, or mycophenolate, should discuss pregnancy prevention with patients120–122 For example, anticonvulsants are widely prescribed for both seizure disorder and behavioral indications and interact with many contraceptives.79,120 The CDC addresses contraception considerations for certain medical conditions and medication interactions in the US MEC (see Table 2),11 and the ACOG provides guidance on the hormonal contraception use for adolescents and adults with coexisting medical conditions as well as medical management of menstrual suppression.81,99,120,123 

Contraceptive care in adolescents with a uterus who are transgender and gender diverse (TGD) includes pregnancy prevention and menstrual regulation as desired by the patient. For both these indications, all hormonal methods, including those including estrogen, can be used by patients also taking testosterone. Testosterone may or may not provide amenorrhea and is not to be used as a contraceptive method. Ideally, communication around amenorrhea, anatomy, and physical examinations will be healing centered and consider individual dysphoria.124 The Society for Family Planning published clinical recommendations for contraceptive counseling with individuals who are TGD.26 

Many adolescents need or desire menstrual regulation or suppression, and contraceptives can treat medical conditions such as anemia, acne, severe dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, bleeding disorders, abnormal or heavy menstrual bleeding, and thrombocytopenia related to chemotherapy.81,118,125–127 Given the relative safety of hormonal contraceptives, adolescents may use them to reduce bleeding or move toward amenorrhea. Contraceptives may be useful for ovarian suppression for conditions with catamenial exacerbation, such as migraines, epilepsy, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and some psychiatric and behavioral symptoms.79,118,120,123 

Menstrual management involves a variety of methods, and providers can use shared decision-making approaches in counseling. CHC methods offer patients some control over when withdrawal bleeding occurs. When using continuously or with extended cycling, there is the “tailored approach” of taking active pills until bleeding reoccurs, and the “scheduled approach” of a break every 3 to 4 months to reduce unscheduled breakthrough bleeding.103,128,129 In the tailored approach, patients stop pills for 3 to 5 days when they begin spotting and then reinitiate active pills. Some pills are packaged and marketed for 3-month cycles or continuously. The most common adverse effect of extended/continuous cycles is unscheduled bleeding.130 A common approach to continuous and extended cycling with COC pills is to use monophasic, 30-μg or 35-μg ethinyl estradiol pills and a second- (levonorgestrel or norgestrel) or third-generation (desogestrel or norgestimate) progestin.103 Prescribers can indicate extended cycling to help the pharmacy and insurance dispense refills earlier. See Table 5 for rates of amenorrhea and anovulation for contraceptive methods.

TABLE 5.

Rates of No Bleeding for 90 Days and Anovulation for Medical Uses Contraception

MethodAmenorrhea Rate at 1 YearAnovulation Rate
Continuous combined oral contraceptive pills 49–88%139  95–99%140  
Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) 50–70%141  Over 99%142  
Oral progestins Up to 76%143  98.75% (desogestrel),
67% (norethindrone 0.35 and norgestrel 0.75)140,144  
Levonorgestrel IUD (52 mg) 0.2–30%145  50%131  
Contraceptive implant 21.4%146  99%132  
MethodAmenorrhea Rate at 1 YearAnovulation Rate
Continuous combined oral contraceptive pills 49–88%139  95–99%140  
Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) 50–70%141  Over 99%142  
Oral progestins Up to 76%143  98.75% (desogestrel),
67% (norethindrone 0.35 and norgestrel 0.75)140,144  
Levonorgestrel IUD (52 mg) 0.2–30%145  50%131  
Contraceptive implant 21.4%146  99%132  

For those with contraindications to estrogens or who wish to avoid estrogen, progestin-only options can be used for menstrual suppression and extended cycling. Users can start and stop POPs more quickly than progestin-only shots, implants, or IUDs; however, adolescents using POPs may experience more breakthrough bleeding. DMPA effectively suppresses ovulation and menstruation, is safe for most patients with chronic illness,11 and is used for medical conditions such as anemia126 and seizure disorders,79,120 as described above. The 19.5-mg and 52-mg levonorgestrel IUDs can reduce uterine bleeding with minimal hormonal exposure but do not reliably suppress ovulation; in contrast, the implant suppresses ovulation but has higher rates of breakthrough bleeding.8,131,132 

Access to a full range of contraceptive methods is an important component of safe, equitable, and adolescent-centered health care, and pediatricians are well-placed to address contraceptive needs. Together with the companion policy statement, “Contraception for Adolescents,” and the family of policy statements and clinical reports on contraception and sexual health, the AAP provides guidance for a comprehensive, equity-informed approach to contraception for adolescents.

Mary A. Ott, MD, MA, FAAP

Gina S. Sucato, MD, MPH, FSAHM, FAAP

Maayan Leroy-Melamed, MD, MPH, FAAP

Andrea J. Hoopes MD, MPH, FAAP

Elizabeth M. Alderman, MD, FSAHM, FAAP, Chairperson

Elise Berlan, MD, MPH, FAAP

Richard J. Chung, MD, FAAP

Michael Colburn, MD, MEd, FAAP

Laura K. Grubb, MD, MPH, FAAP

Janet Lee, MD, FAAP

Stephenie B. Wallace, MD, MSPH, FAAP

Anne-Marie Amies, MD – American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Liwei L. Hua, MD, PhD – American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Seema Menon, MD – North American Society of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

Maria H. Rahmandar, MD, FAAP – AAP Section on Adolescent Health

Ellie Vyver, MD – Canadian Pediatric Society

Karen Smith

James Baumberger, MPP

Drs Ott, Sucato, Leroy-Melamed and Hoopes conceptualized the manuscript, reviewed the literature, drafted sections of the manuscript, and provided critical review.

FINANCIAL/CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors have filed conflict of interest statements with the American Academy of Pediatrics. Any conflicts have been resolved through a process approved by the Board of Directors. The American Academy of Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any commercial involvement in the development of the content of this publication.

Clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics benefit from expertise and resources of liaisons and internal (AAP) and external reviewers. However, clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics may not reflect the views of the liaisons or the organizations or government agencies that they represent.

The guidance in this report does not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate.

All clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffirmed, revised, or retired at or before that time.

FUNDING: No external funding.

COMPANION PAPER: A companion to this article can be found online at www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2025-072217.

AAP

American Academy of Pediatrics

ACOG

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

BMD

bone mineral density

BMI

body mass index

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CHC

combined hormonal contraceptive

COC

combined oral contraceptive

IUD

intrauterine device

DMPA

depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

EC

emergency contraception

LARC

long-acting reversible contraceptive

MEC

Medical Eligibility Criteria

POP

progestin-only pill

SPR

Selected Practice Recommendations

STI

sexually transmitted infection

VTE

venous thromboembolism

1
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data Summary and Trends Report 2011–2021
. Published 2023. Accessed July 24, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/yrbs/dstr/pdf/YRBS_Data-Summary-Trends_Report2023_508.pdf
2
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
High School YRBS - United States 2021 Results
. Published
2023
. Accessed August 5, 2023. https://nccd.cdc.gov/Youthonline/App/Results.aspx
3
Lindberg
L
,
Santelli
J
,
Desai
S
.
Understanding the decline in adolescent fertility in the United States, 2007–2012
.
J Adolesc Health.
2016
;
59
(
5
):
577
583
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.024
4
Brittain
AW
,
Loyola Briceno
AC
,
Pazol
K
, et al
.
Youth-friendly family planning services for young people: a systematic review update
.
Am J Prev Med.
2018
;
55
(
5
):
725
735
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.010
5
Sieving
RE
,
McRee
AL
,
Mehus
C
, et al
.
Sexual and reproductive health discussions during preventive visits
.
Pediatrics.
2021
;
148
(
2
):
e2020049411
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-049411
6
Mahony
H
,
Spinner
C
,
Vamos
CA
,
Daley
EM
.
Social network influences on young women’s choice to use long-acting reversible contraception: a systematic review
.
J Midwifery Womens Health.
2021
;
66
(
6
):
758
771
. PubMed doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13280
7
Ott
MA
,
Hoopes
AJ
,
Sucato
GS
,
Leroy-Melamed
M
;
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence
.
Contraception for adolescents: policy statement
.
Pediatrics.
2025
;
156
(
1
):
e2025072217
. doi: 10.1542/peds.2025-072217
8
Menon
S
,
Alderman
EM
,
Chung
RJ
, et al;
COMMITTEE ON ADOLESCENCE
.
Long-acting reversible contraception: specific issues for adolescents
.
Pediatrics.
2020
;
146
(
2
):
e2020007252
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-007252
9
Grubb
LK
,
Alderman
EM
,
Chung
RJ
, et al;
COMMITTEE ON ADOLESCENCE
.
Barrier protection use by adolescents during sexual activity
.
Pediatrics.
2020
;
146
(
2
):
e2020007237
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-007237
10
Upadhya
KK
,
Breuner
CC
,
Alderman
EM
, et al;
COMMITTEE ON ADOLESCENCE
.
Emergency Contraception
.
Pediatrics.
2019
;
144
(
6
):
e20193149
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3149
11
Nguyen
AT
,
Curtis
KM
,
Tepper
NK
, et al;
Contributors
.
U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2024
.
MMWR Recomm Rep.
2024
;
73
(
4
):
1
126
. PubMed doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7304a1
12
Curtis
KM
,
Nguyen
AT
,
Tepper
NK
, et al;
Contributors
.
U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2024
.
MMWR Recomm Rep.
2024
;
73
(
3
):
1
77
. PubMed doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7303a1
13
Holt
K
,
Reed
R
,
Crear-Perry
J
,
Scott
C
,
Wulf
S
,
Dehlendorf
C
.
Beyond same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive access: a person-centered framework for advancing high-quality, equitable contraceptive care
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2020
;
222
(
4S
):
S878.e871
S878.e876
. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1279
14
Dehlendorf
C
,
Grumbach
K
,
Schmittdiel
JA
,
Steinauer
J
.
Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling
.
Contraception.
2017
;
95
(
5
):
452
455
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.010
15
Hart
J
,
Crear-Perry
J
,
Stern
L
.
US sexual and reproductive health policy: which frameworks are needed now, and next steps forward
.
Am J Public Health.
2022
;
112
(
S5
):
S518
S522
. PubMed doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306929
16
Ghobadzadeh
M
,
Sieving
RE
,
Gloppen
K
.
Positive youth development and contraceptive use consistency
.
J Pediatr Health Care.
2016
;
30
(
4
):
308
316
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.08.006
17
Cohen
R
,
Sheeder
J
,
Kane
M
,
Teal
SB
.
Factors associated with contraceptive method choice and initiation in adolescents and young women
.
J Adolesc Health.
2017
;
61
(
4
):
454
460
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.04.008
18
Hoopes
AJ
,
Teal
SB
,
Akers
AY
,
Sheeder
J
.
Low acceptability of certain contraceptive methods among young women
.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol.
2018
;
31
(
3
):
274
280
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2017.11.008
19
Yee
L
,
Simon
M
.
The role of the social network in contraceptive decision-making among young, African American and Latina women
.
J Adolesc Health.
2010
;
47
(
4
):
374
380
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.03.014
20
Sucato
GS
,
Bhatt
SK
,
Murray
PJ
,
Ott
MA
.
Transdermal contraception as a model for adolescent use of new methods
.
J Adolesc Health.
2011
;
49
(
4
):
357
362
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.01.008
21
Grubb
LK
,
Powers
M
;
COMMITTEE ON ADOLESCENCE
.
Emerging issues in male adolescent sexual and reproductive health care
.
Pediatrics.
2020
;
145
(
5
):
e20200627
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0627
22
Hagan
JF
,
Shaw
JS
,
Duncan
PM
, eds.
Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents
. 4th ed.
American Academy of Pediatrics
;
2017
.
23
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
A Guide to Taking a Sexual History
. Published
2022
. Accessed January 28, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/sti/hcp/clinical-guidance/taking-a-sexual-history.html
24
Barnes
AJ
,
Gold
MA
.
Promoting healthy behaviors in pediatrics: motivational interviewing
.
Pediatr Rev.
2012
;
33
(
9
):
e57
e68
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/pir.33.9.e57
25
Lopez
LM
,
Grey
TW
,
Chen
M
,
Tolley
EE
,
Stockton
LL
.
Theory-based interventions for contraception
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2016
;
11
(
11
):
CD007249
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd007249.pub5
26
Bonnington
A
,
Dianat
S
,
Kerns
J
, et al
.
Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: Contraceptive counseling for transgender and gender diverse people who were female sex assigned at birth
.
Contraception.
2020
;
102
(
2
):
70
82
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.001
27
Blaustein
ME
,
Kinniburgh
KM
.
Treating Traumatic Stress in Children and Adolescents: How to Foster Resilience Through Attachment, Self-Regulation, and Competency
. 2nd ed.
The Guilford Press
;
2018
.
28
Wilson
E
,
Casanueva
C
,
Smith
KR
,
Koo
H
,
Tueller
SJ
,
Webb
MB
.
Risk of early sexual initiation and pregnancy among youth reported to the child welfare system
.
Child Welfare.
2014
;
93
(
1
):
127
147
. PubMed
29
Barnert
E
,
Sun
A
,
Abrams
L
,
Chung
PJ
.
Reproductive health needs of recently incarcerated youth during community reentry: a systematic review
.
BMJ Sex Reprod Health.
2020
;
46
(
3
):
161
171
. PubMed doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200386
30
Romero
EG
,
Teplin
LA
,
McClelland
GM
,
Abram
KM
,
Welty
LJ
,
Washburn
JJ
.
A longitudinal study of the prevalence, development, and persistence of HIV/sexually transmitted infection risk behaviors in delinquent youth: implications for health care in the community
.
Pediatrics.
2007
;
119
(
5
):
e1126
e1141
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0128
31
Racine
N
,
Killam
T
,
Madigan
S
.
Trauma-informed care as a universal precaution: beyond the adverse childhood experiences questionnaire
.
JAMA Pediatr.
2020
;
174
(
1
):
5
6
. PubMed doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3866
32
American Academy of Family Practice
.
The National Child Traumatic Stress Network: Screening and Assessment
. Published
2017
. Accessed July 17, 2022. https://www.nctsn.org/treatments-and-practices/screening-and-assessment
33
Kripke
C
.
Adults with developmental disabilities: a comprehensive approach to medical care
.
Am Fam Physician.
2018
;
97
(
10
):
649
656
. PubMed
34
Turchi
RM
,
Kuo
DZ
,
Rusher
JW
, et al;
COUNCIL ON CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES; COMMITTEE ON MEDICAL LIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT
.
Considerations for alternative decision-making when transitioning to adulthood for youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities: policy statement
.
Pediatrics.
2024
;
153
(
6
):
e2024066841
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-066841
35
Andrews
JL
,
Ahmed
SP
,
Blakemore
SJ
.
Navigating the social environment in adolescence: the role of social brain development
.
Biol Psychiatry.
2021
;
89
(
2
):
109
118
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.09.012
36
Prencipe
A
,
Kesek
A
,
Cohen
J
,
Lamm
C
,
Lewis
MD
,
Zelazo
PD
.
Development of hot and cool executive function during the transition to adolescence
.
J Exp Child Psychol.
2011
;
108
(
3
):
621
637
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.008
37
Strang
NM
,
Chein
JM
,
Steinberg
L
.
The value of the dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking
.
Front Hum Neurosci.
2013
;
7
:
223
. PubMed doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00223
38
Maslowsky
J
,
Owotomo
O
,
Huntley
ED
,
Keating
D
.
Adolescent risk behavior: differentiating reasoned and reactive risk-taking
.
J Youth Adolesc.
2019
;
48
(
2
):
243
255
. PubMed doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0978-3
39
Steinberg
L
.
Does recent research on adolescent brain development inform the mature minor doctrine?
J Med Philos.
2013
;
38
(
3
):
256
267
. PubMed doi: 10.1093/jmp/jht017
40
Grootens-Wiegers
P
,
Hein
IM
,
van den Broek
JM
,
de Vries
MC
.
Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects
.
BMC Pediatr.
2017
;
17
(
1
):
120
. PubMed doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0869-x
41
Wilkinson
TA
,
Meredith
AH
,
Katz
AJ
,
Meagher
CG
,
Ott
MA
.
Assessment of adolescent decision-making capacity for pharmacy access to hormonal contraception
.
Contraception.
2023
;
123
:
110002
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110002
42
Wilkinson
TA
,
Meredith
AH
,
Rafie
S
, et al
.
Adolescents’ and young adults’ ability to self-screen for contraindications to hormonal contraception and the role of chronic illness
.
J Adolesc Health.
2021
;
69
(
4
):
566
573
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.04.032
43
Committee on Bioethics
.
Policy statement--Physician refusal to provide information or treatment on the basis of claims of conscience
.
Pediatrics.
2009
;
124
(
6
):
1689
1693
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2222
44
Shneyderman
Y
,
Schwartz
SJ
.
Contextual and intrapersonal predictors of adolescent risky sexual behavior and outcomes
.
Health Educ Behav.
2013
;
40
(
4
):
400
414
. PubMed doi: 10.1177/1090198112447800
45
White
CN
,
Warner
LA
.
Influence of family and school-level factors on age of sexual initiation
.
J Adolesc Health.
2015
;
56
(
2
):
231
237
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.017
46
Ti
A
,
Soin
K
,
Rahman
T
,
Dam
A
,
Yeh
PT
.
Contraceptive values and preferences of adolescents and young adults: A systematic review
.
Contraception.
2022
;
111
:
22
31
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.05.018
47
Guttmacher Institute
.
An Overview of Consent to Reproductive Health Services by Young People
. Published
2023
. Accessed July 25, 2024. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-minors-consent-law
48
Jones
A
,
Allison
BA
,
Perry
M
.
Effectiveness of contraceptive decision aids in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review
.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol.
2022
;
35
(
1
):
7
17
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2021.08.005
49
Rosenstock
JR
,
Peipert
JF
,
Madden
T
,
Zhao
Q
,
Secura
GM
.
Continuation of reversible contraception in teenagers and young women
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2012
;
120
(
6
):
1298
1305
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827499bd
50
Winner
B
,
Peipert
JF
,
Zhao
Q
, et al
.
Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception
.
N Engl J Med.
2012
;
366
(
21
):
1998
2007
. PubMed doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110855
51
Geis
GM
,
Saunders
BS
,
Hillard
P
, et al;
COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS; COUNCIL ON CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES
.
Examining permanent contraception for children, adolescents, and young adults with intellectual developmental disorder: ethical, legal, and medical considerations: Clinical report
.
Pediatrics.
2024
;
154
(
5
):
e2024068955
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-068955
52
Raine
TR
,
Foster-Rosales
A
,
Upadhyay
UD
, et al
.
One-year contraceptive continuation and pregnancy in adolescent girls and women initiating hormonal contraceptives
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2011
;
117
(
2 Pt 1
):
363
371
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820563d3
53
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
.
Practice Bulletin No. 186 Summary: Long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2017
;
130
(
5
):
1173
1175
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002394
54
Ali
M
,
Akin
A
,
Bahamondes
L
, et al;
WHO study group on subdermal contraceptive implants for women
.
Extended use up to 5 years of the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal contraceptive implant: comparison to levonorgestrel-releasing subdermal implant
.
Hum Reprod.
2016
;
31
(
11
):
2491
2498
. PubMed doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew222
55
McNicholas
C
,
Swor
E
,
Wan
L
,
Peipert
JF
.
Prolonged use of the etonogestrel implant and levonorgestrel intrauterine device: 2 years beyond Food and Drug Administration-approved duration
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2017
;
216
(
6
):
586 e581
586 e586
. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.036
56
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
.
Committee Opinion No. 735: Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2018
;
131
(
5
):
e130
e139
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002632
57
Berlan
E
,
Valenti
O
,
Long
W
, et al
.
Practice facilitation improves adolescent reproductive health preventive services in primary care
.
Pediatrics.
2022
;
149
(
1
):
e2020035774
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-035774
58
Hubacher
D
,
Lara-Ricalde
R
,
Taylor
DJ
,
Guerra-Infante
F
,
Guzmán-Rodríguez
R
.
Use of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid women
.
N Engl J Med.
2001
;
345
(
8
):
561
567
. PubMed doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010438
59
Girum
T
,
Wasie
A
.
Return of fertility after discontinuation of contraception: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Contracept Reprod Med.
2018
;
3
(
1
):
9
. PubMed doi: 10.1186/s40834-018-0064-y
60
Turok
DK
,
Gero
A
,
Simmons
RG
, et al
.
Levonorgestrel vs. copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception
.
N Engl J Med.
2021
;
384
(
4
):
335
344
. PubMed doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022141
61
Bowman
N
,
Thwaites
A
.
Correction: Menstrual cup and risk of IUD expulsion - a systematic review
.
Contracept Reprod Med.
2023
;
8
(
1
):
23
. PubMed doi: 10.1186/s40834-023-00219-x
62
Bowman
N
,
Thwaites
A
.
Menstrual cup and risk of IUD expulsion - a systematic review
.
Contracept Reprod Med.
2023
;
8
(
1
):
15
. PubMed doi: 10.1186/s40834-022-00203-x
63
van Eijk
AM
,
Zulaika
G
,
Lenchner
M
, et al
.
Menstrual cup use, leakage, acceptability, safety, and availability: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Lancet Public Health.
2019
;
4
(
8
):
e376
e393
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30111-2
64
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Gynecologic PracticeLong-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Expert Work Group
.
Committee Opinion No 672: Clinical challenges of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2016
;
128
(
3
):
e69
e77
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001644
65
Kennedy
CE
,
Yeh
PT
,
Gaffield
ML
,
Brady
M
,
Narasimhan
M
.
Self-administration of injectable contraception: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
BMJ Glob Health.
2019
;
4
(
2
):
e001350
. PubMed doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001350
66
Kaunitz
AM
,
Darney
PD
,
Ross
D
,
Wolter
KD
,
Speroff
L
.
Subcutaneous DMPA vs. intramuscular DMPA: a 2-year randomized study of contraceptive efficacy and bone mineral density
.
Contraception.
2009
;
80
(
1
):
7
17
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.02.005
67
Lopez
LM
,
Ramesh
S
,
Chen
M
, et al
.
Progestin-only contraceptives: effects on weight
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2016
;
2016
(
8
):
CD008815
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008815.pub4
68
Dianat
S
,
Fox
E
,
Ahrens
KA
, et al
.
Side effects and health benefits of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: a systematic review
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2019
;
133
(
2
):
332
341
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003089
69
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
.
Committee Opinion No. 602: Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone effects
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2014
;
123
(
6
):
1398
1402
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000450758.95422.c8
70
Raine-Bennett
T
,
Chandra
M
,
Armstrong
MA
,
Alexeeff
S
,
Lo
JC
.
Depot Medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral contraceptive, intrauterine device use, and fracture risk
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2019
;
134
(
3
):
581
589
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003414
71
Lopez
LM
,
Chen
M
,
Mullins Long
S
,
Curtis
KM
,
Helmerhorst
FM
.
Steroidal contraceptives and bone fractures in women: evidence from observational studies
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2015
;
2015
(
7
):
CD009849
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009849.pub3
72
Weaver
CM
,
Gordon
CM
,
Janz
KF
, et al
.
The National Osteoporosis Foundation’s position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations
.
Osteoporos Int.
2016
;
27
(
4
):
1281
1386
. PubMed doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3440-3
73
US Food and Drug Administration
.
FDA Approves First Nonprescription Daily Oral Contraceptive
. Published
2023
. Accessed July 30, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-nonprescription-daily-oral-contraceptive
74
Han
L
,
Creinin
MD
,
Hemon
A
,
Glasier
A
,
Chen
MJ
,
Edelman
A
.
Mechanism of action of a 0.075 mg norgestrel progestogen-only pill 2. Effect on cervical mucus and theoretical risk of conception
.
Contraception.
2022
;
112
:
43
47
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.03.016
75
Otto
AK
,
Klein
DA
,
Lau
M
, et al
.
It’s time for over-the-counter oral contraceptive pills
.
J Adolesc Health.
2023
;
72
(
6
):
829
830
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.02.035
76
Baker
CC
,
Chen
MJ
.
New Contraception Update - Annovera, Phexxi, Slynd, and Twirla
.
Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep.
2022
;
11
(
1
):
21
27
. PubMed doi: 10.1007/s13669-021-00321-4
77
US Food and Drug Administration
.
Multi-disciplinary Review and Evaluation NDA 211367 Slynd (drospirenone
). Published
2019
. Accessed April 15, 2023. www.fda.gov/media/129539/download
78
Ardura
MI
,
Coscia
LA
,
Meyers
MR
.
Promoting safe sexual practices and sexual health maintenance in pediatric and young adult solid organ transplant recipients
.
Pediatr Transplant.
2021
;
25
(
1
):
e13949
. PubMed doi: 10.1111/petr.13949
79
Kirkpatrick
L
,
Van Cott
AC
,
Kazmerski
TM
,
Bravender
T
.
Contraception and reproductive health care for adolescent and young adult women with epilepsy
.
J Pediatr.
2022
;
241
:
229
236
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.10.056
80
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders. 3rd edition.
Cephalalgia
.
2018
;
38
(
1
):
1
211
. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202
81
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
.
Practice Bulletin No. 206: Use of hormonal contraception in women with coexisting medical conditions
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2019
;
133
(
2
):
e128
e150
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003072
82
Trenor
CC
III
,
Chung
RJ
,
Michelson
AD
, et al
.
Hormonal contraception and thrombotic risk: a multidisciplinary approach
.
Pediatrics.
2011
;
127
(
2
):
347
357
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2221
83
Vandenbroucke
JP
,
Rosing
J
,
Bloemenkamp
KW
, et al
.
Oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thrombosis
.
N Engl J Med.
2001
;
344
(
20
):
1527
1535
. PubMed doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105173442007
84
Walker
ID
.
Venous and arterial thrombosis during pregnancy: epidemiology
.
Semin Vasc Med.
2003
;
3
(
1
):
25
32
. PubMed doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38330
85
Tepper
NK
,
Dragoman
MV
,
Gaffield
ME
,
Curtis
KM
.
Nonoral combined hormonal contraceptives and thromboembolism: a systematic review
.
Contraception.
2017
;
95
(
2
):
130
139
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.10.005
86
Dragoman
MV
,
Tepper
NK
,
Fu
R
,
Curtis
KM
,
Chou
R
,
Gaffield
ME
.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of venous thrombosis risk among users of combined oral contraception
.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet.
2018
;
141
(
3
):
287
294
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12455
87
Mørch
LS
,
Skovlund
CW
,
Hannaford
PC
,
Iversen
L
,
Fielding
S
,
Lidegaard
Ø
.
Contemporary hormonal contraception and the risk of breast cancer
.
N Engl J Med.
2017
;
377
(
23
):
2228
2239
. PubMed doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700732
88
Iversen
L
,
Sivasubramaniam
S
,
Lee
AJ
,
Fielding
S
,
Hannaford
PC
.
Lifetime cancer risk and combined oral contraceptives: the Royal College of General Practitioners’ Oral Contraception Study
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2017
;
216
(
6
):
580 e581
580 e589
. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.002
89
Dickey
RP
,
Seymour
ML
.
Managing Contraceptive Pill Patients
. 17th ed.
EMIS, Inc, Medical Publishers
;
2021
.
90
Hatcher
RA
,
Nelson
AL
,
Trussell
J
, et al
.
Contraceptive Technology
. 21st ed.
Ayer Co Publishers, Inc
;
2018
.
91
Zieman
M
,
Hatcher
RA
,
Allen
AZ
,
Haddad
L
.
Managing Contraception
. 16th ed.
Bridging the Gap Publications
;
2021
.
92
Sun
H
,
Sivasubramanian
R
,
Vaidya
S
,
Barve
A
,
Jarugula
V
.
Drug-drug interaction studies with oral contraceptives: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and study design considerations
.
J Clin Pharmacol.
2020
;
60
(
S2)(suppl 2
):
S49
S62
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/jcph.1765
93
Nanda
K
,
Stuart
GS
,
Robinson
J
,
Gray
AL
,
Tepper
NK
,
Gaffield
ME
.
Drug interactions between hormonal contraceptives and antiretrovirals
.
AIDS.
2017
;
31
(
7
):
917
952
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001392
94
Simmons
KB
,
Haddad
LB
,
Nanda
K
,
Curtis
KM
.
Drug interactions between non-rifamycin antibiotics and hormonal contraception: a systematic review
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2018
;
218
(
1
):
88
97.e14
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.003
95
Washington State Legistlature
.
RCW 48.43.195. Contraceptive drugs—Twelve-month refill coverage
. Published
2017
. Accessed January 28, 2022. https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=48.43.195
96
Bitzer
J
,
Simon
JA
.
Current issues and available options in combined hormonal contraception
.
Contraception.
2011
;
84
(
4
):
342
356
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.013
97
Chen
MJ
,
Jensen
JT
,
Kaunitz
AM
, et al
.
Tolerability and safety of the estetrol/drospirenone combined oral contraceptive: Pooled analysis of two multicenter, open-label phase 3 trials
.
Contraception.
2022
;
116
:
44
50
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.10.004
98
US Food and Drug Administration
.
Nextellis Prescribing Information
. Published
2021
. Accessed April 21, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/214154s000lbl.pdf
99
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Clinical Consensus–Gynecology
.
General approaches to medical management of menstrual suppression: ACOG Clinical Consensus No. 3
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2022
;
140
(
3
):
528
541
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004899
100
Edwardson
J
,
Jamshidi
R
.
The contraceptive vaginal ring
.
Semin Reprod Med.
2010
;
28
(
2
):
133
139
. PubMed doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248138
101
Timmer
CJ
,
Mulders
TM
.
Pharmacokinetics of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol released from a combined contraceptive vaginal ring
.
Clin Pharmacokinet.
2000
;
39
(
3
):
233
242
. PubMed doi: 10.2165/00003088-200039030-00005
102
US Food and Drug Administration
.
Annovera Prescribing Information
. Published
2022
. Accessed April 21, 2023. https://www.annovera.com/pi.pdf
103
Edelman
A
,
Micks
E
,
Gallo
MF
,
Jensen
JT
,
Grimes
DA
.
Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2014
;
2014
(
7
):
CD004695
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd004695.pub3
104
Stricker
T
,
Sennhauser
FH
.
Allergic contact dermatitis due to transdermal contraception patch
.
J Pediatr.
2006
;
148
(
6
):
845
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.12.010
105
Harel
Z
,
Riggs
S
,
Vaz
R
,
Flanagan
P
,
Dunn
K
,
Harel
D
.
Adolescents’ experience with the combined estrogen and progestin transdermal contraceptive method Ortho Evra
.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol.
2005
;
18
(
2
):
85
90
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2004.11.016
106
Berglas
NF
,
Kimport
K
,
Mays
A
,
Kaller
S
,
Biggs
MA
.
“It’s worked well for me”: young women’s reasons for choosing lower-efficacy contraceptive methods
.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol.
2021
;
34
(
3
):
341
347
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.12.012
107
Evofem Inc
.
Phexxi Full Prescribing Information
. Revised June
2023
. Accessed May 14, 2025. https://22077562.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/22077562/PhexxiUSPI.pdf
108
Shen
J
,
Che
Y
,
Showell
E
,
Chen
K
,
Cheng
L
.
Interventions for emergency contraception
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2019
;
1
(
1
):
CD001324
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd001324.pub6
109
Sundaram
A
,
Vaughan
B
,
Kost
K
, et al
.
Contraceptive Failure in the United States: Estimates from the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth
.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health.
2017
;
49
(
1
):
7
16
. PubMed doi: 10.1363/psrh.12017
110
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
Key Statistics from the National Survey of Family Growth - Contraception
. Published
2020
. Accessed July 25, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/c-keystat.htm#contraception
111
Martinez
G
,
Abma
JC
.
Sexual activity and contraceptive use among teenagers aged 15–19 in the United States, 2015–2019
.
National Center for Health Statistics
;
2023
.
112
Berglund Scherwitzl
E
,
Lundberg
O
,
Kopp Kallner
H
,
Gemzell Danielsson
K
,
Trussell
J
,
Scherwitzl
R
.
Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app
.
Contraception.
2017
;
96
(
6
):
420
425
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.014
113
Brückner
H
,
Bearman
P
.
After the promise: the STD consequences of adolescent virginity pledges
.
J Adolesc Health.
2005
;
36
(
4
):
271
278
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.01.005
114
Pinkerton
SD
.
A relative risk-based, disease-specific definition of sexual abstinence failure rates
.
Health Educ Behav.
2001
;
28
(
1
):
10
20
. PubMed doi: 10.1177/109019810102800102
115
Bethell
CD
,
Read
D
,
Blumberg
SJ
,
Newacheck
PW
.
What is the prevalence of children with special health care needs? Toward an understanding of variations in findings and methods across three national surveys
.
Matern Child Health J.
2008
;
12
(
1
):
1
14
. PubMed doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0220-5
116
McRee
AL
,
Haydon
AA
,
Halpern
CT
.
Reproductive health of young adults with physical disabilities in the U.S
.
Prev Med.
2010
;
51
(
6
):
502
504
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.09.006
117
Quint
EH
,
O’Brien
RF
,
Braverman
PK
, et al;
COMMITTEE ON ADOLESCENCE; North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
.
Menstrual management for adolescents with disabilities
.
Pediatrics.
2016
;
138
(
1
):
e20160295
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0295
118
Scott
N
,
Maslyanskaya
S
.
Contraceptive needs of adolescents with chronic illness
.
Pediatr Ann.
2019
;
48
(
2
):
e78
e85
. PubMed doi: 10.3928/19382359-20190121-01
119
Stancil
SL
,
Miller
M
,
Briggs
H
,
Lynch
D
,
Goggin
K
,
Kearns
G
.
Contraceptive provision to adolescent females prescribed teratogenic medications
.
Pediatrics.
2016
;
137
(
1
):
e20151454
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1454
120
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
.
Committee Opinion No. 806, Summary: Gynecologic management of adolescents and young women with seizure disorders
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2020
;
135
(
5
):
1242
1243
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003828
121
Carandang
K
,
Mruk
V
,
Ardoin
SP
, et al
.
Reproductive health needs of adolescent and young adult women with pediatric rheumatic diseases
.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J.
2020
;
18
(
1
):
66
. PubMed doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-00460-7
122
Zaenglein
AL
,
Pathy
AL
,
Schlosser
BJ
, et al
.
Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris
.
J Am Acad Dermatol.
2016
;
74
(
5
):
945
73.e33
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.037
123
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Adolescent Health Care
.
Committee Opinion No. 668: Menstrual manipulation for adolescents with physical and developmental disabilities
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2016
;
128
(
2
):
e20
e25
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001585
124
Rafferty
J
,
Yogman
M
,
Baum
R
, et al;
COMMITTEE ON PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF CHILD AND FAMILY HEALTH; COMMITTEE ON ADOLESCENCE; SECTION ON LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER HEALTH AND WELLNESS
.
Ensuring comprehensive care and support for transgender and gender-diverse children and adolescents
.
Pediatrics.
2018
;
142
(
4
):
e20182162
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2162
125
Williams
NM
,
Randolph
M
,
Rajabi-Estarabadi
A
,
Keri
J
,
Tosti
A
.
Hormonal contraceptives and dermatology
.
Am J Clin Dermatol.
2021
;
22
(
1
):
69
80
. PubMed doi: 10.1007/s40257-020-00557-5
126
Bellizzi
S
,
Ali
MM
.
Effect of oral contraception on anemia in 12 low- and middle-income countries
.
Contraception.
2018
;
97
(
3
):
236
242
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.11.001
127
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
.
Committee Opinion No. 747: Gynecologic issues in children and adolescent cancer patients and survivors
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2018
;
132
(
2
):
e67
e77
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002763
128
MacGregor
EA
,
Guillebaud
J
.
The 7-day contraceptive hormone-free interval should be consigned to history
.
BMJ Sex Reprod Health.
2018
;Jun
26
:
bmjsrh
2017–200036
. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2017-200036
129
Stephenson
J
,
Shawe
J
,
Panicker
S
, et al
.
Randomized trial of the effect of tailored versus standard use of the combined oral contraceptive pill on continuation rates at 1 year
.
Contraception.
2013
;
88
(
4
):
523
531
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.03.014
130
Sulak
PJ
,
Smith
V
,
Coffee
A
,
Witt
I
,
Kuehl
AL
,
Kuehl
TJ
.
Frequency and management of breakthrough bleeding with continuous use of the transvaginal contraceptive ring: a randomized controlled trial
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2008
;
112
(
3
):
563
571
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181842071
131
Alvarez
F
,
Brache
V
,
Fernandez
E
, et al
.
New insights on the mode of action of intrauterine contraceptive devices in women
.
Fertil Steril.
1988
;
49
(
5
):
768
773
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59881-1
132
Croxatto
HB
.
Mechanisms that explain the contraceptive action of progestin implants for women
.
Contraception.
2002
;
65
(
1
):
21
27
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00294-3
133
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
.
Contraception: Birth Control Methods
. Published
2024
. Updated Aug 6, 2024. Accessed August 30, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/contraception/about/index.html
134
Bedsider
.
Explore Birth Control Options
. Published
2024
. Accessed July 22, 2024. https://www.bedsider.org/birth-control
135
Reproductive Health Access Project
.
Your Birth Control Choices Fact Sheet
. Published
2022
. Accessed July 22, 2024. https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/resource/birth-control-fact-sheet/
136
Pharmacy Access Forms
.
Provider Toolkit
. Published
2021
. Accessed July 22, 2024. https://www.pharmacyaccessforms.org/toolkit-materials
137
McNicholas
C
,
Maddipati
R
,
Zhao
Q
,
Swor
E
,
Peipert
JF
.
Use of the etonogestrel implant and levonorgestrel intrauterine device beyond the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved duration
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2015
;
125
(
3
):
599
604
. PubMed doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000690
138
Heinemann
K
,
Reed
S
,
Moehner
S
,
Minh
TD
.
Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices
.
Contraception.
2015
;
91
(
4
):
280
283
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.011
139
Miller
L
,
Hughes
JP
.
Continuous combination oral contraceptive pills to eliminate withdrawal bleeding: a randomized trial
.
Obstet Gynecol.
2003
;
101
(
4
):
653
661
. PubMed10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00014-0
140
Milsom
I
,
Korver
T
.
Ovulation incidence with oral contraceptives: a literature review
.
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care.
2008
;
34
(
4
):
237
246
. PubMed doi: 10.1783/147118908786000451
141
Schwallie
PC
,
Assenzo
JR
.
Contraceptive use--efficacy study utilizing medroxyprogesterone acetate administered as an intramuscular injection once every 90 days
.
Fertil Steril.
1973
;
24
(
5
):
331
339
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)39669-8
142
Jain
J
,
Dutton
C
,
Nicosia
A
,
Wajszczuk
C
,
Bode
FR
,
Mishell
DR
Jr
.
Pharmacokinetics, ovulation suppression and return to ovulation following a lower dose subcutaneous formulation of Depo-Provera
.
Contraception.
2004
;
70
(
1
):
11
18
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.01.011
143
Mölsä
PK
.
Inducement of therapeutic amenorrhea in mentally retarded women: two-year follow-up study
.
Am J Ment Defic.
1986
;
90
(
5
):
591
593
. PubMed
144
US Food and Drug Administration
.
OPill Label and Patient Information
. Revised August
2017
. Accessed May 14, 2025. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/017031s035s036lbl.pdf
145
Sergison
JE
,
Maldonado
LY
,
Gao
X
,
Hubacher
D
.
Levonorgestrel intrauterine system associated amenorrhea: a systematic review and metaanalysis
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2019
;
220
(
5
):
440
448.e8
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.008
146
Hohmann
H
.
Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the etonogestrel implantable contraceptive
.
Patient Prefer Adherence.
2009
;
3
:
205
211
. PubMed doi: 10.2147/PPA.S4299