Context

The proportion of US adolescents experiencing mental health or substance use disorders continues to rise. Pediatricians are expected to deliver evidence-based screening and counseling, but multiple barriers impede implementation.

Objective

This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies—activities to enhance implementation, service, and health outcomes—to support integration of screening and counseling for mental health and substance use disorders (MHSUD) into primary care for children and adolescents.

Data Sources

We searched multiple databases for literature published since 2010.

Study Selection

Eligible studies compared any strategy to support implementation of a recommended intervention to prevent MHSUD among individuals ≤18 years in primary care to another strategy or no strategy.

Data Extraction

We extracted data on study designs, populations, settings, clinical interventions, barriers and facilitators to implementation, implementation interventions and comparators, and results.

Results

Eleven studies focused on implementing screening and counseling for depression, eating disorders, substance use disorders, and general behavioral health risk factors. Implementation approaches were multifaceted and consisted of incorporating behavioral health providers into primary care, facilitating learning collaboratives, providing support to clinicians, and using technology. These approaches generally resulted in increased screening, taking steps to address a positive screen, and initiation of treatment compared to using only minimal or no strategy.

Limitations

Multifaceted and overlapping implementation approaches evaluated in few studies with limited evidence on patient outcomes constrained our ability to make inferences.

Conclusions

The identified implementation approaches may improve some aspects of identifying and addressing MHSUD in primary care. The evidence, however, is limited.

This content is only available via PDF.

Competing Interests

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.