BACKGROUND

Neonates with Down syndrome (DS) are often admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) after birth. Specifics regarding differences in outcomes compared with neonates without DS by gestational age are unknown. The objective of this study was to describe outcomes of neonates with DS compared with those without DS in the NICU by gestational age.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2022, including neonates with a gestational age of 22 to 42 weeks and a NICU stay at one of 47 participating centers in the Pediatric Health Information System database. The primary exposure was the presence of DS. Neonates were stratified into the following 4 groups based on completed weeks of gestation at birth: extremely preterm, very preterm, moderate/late preterm, and term/post term. Outcomes were compared between neonates with and without DS within gestational age groups using linear probability models.

RESULTS

A total of 7037 neonates with DS were compared with 460 635 neonates without DS within gestational age groups. Necrotizing enterocolitis, pulmonary hypertension, and unplanned readmission within 30 days were higher for neonates with DS versus those without DS in all groups. Retinopathy of prematurity was lower for extremely preterm neonates with DS compared with those without DS. Median length of stay was longer and in-hospital mortality was higher in neonates with DS compared with those without DS in all gestational age groups.

CONCLUSION

Neonates with DS admitted to the NICU have increased morbidity and mortality compared with neonates without DS. Further research is needed to examine specific barriers to discharge and cause of death to identify areas for improvement in therapies and interventions.

What’s Known on This Subject:

Neonates with Down syndrome (DS) are often admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit after birth. Previous analyses of neonates with DS have shown increased morbidity and mortality during the neonatal period.

What This Study Adds:

Compared with neonates without DS, those with DS had higher rates of necrotizing enterocolitis, pulmonary hypertension, unplanned readmission, and mortality across all gestational age groups. Retinopathy of prematurity was lower for extremely preterm neonates with DS compared with those without DS.

Down syndrome (DS) is the most common viable trisomy and affects approximately 6000 births in the United States each year.1,2 A significant proportion of these neonates may require admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) after delivery due to assorted comorbidities.3–9 Previous analyses of neonates with DS have shown increased morbidity and mortality during this time period due to various factors; however, analyses have usually been limited due to single-institution or specific regional investigations.10–13 Epidemiological trends support that the burden of a DS diagnosis varies by region and socioeconomic status.14 

National data regarding outcomes in the neonatal period are sparse, as this group is often excluded from studies. In addition, minimal data exist comparing outcomes in neonates with vs those without DS.11 The neonatal time period has the highest risk for adverse outcomes in the population with DS.12 Comparative data in neonatal outcomes between those with and without DS would be beneficial for counseling purposes in this high-risk population, as well as for targets for improvement in therapies and care.

The goal of this study was to determine whether there were gestational age-based differences in characteristics, morbidities, and mortality in neonates with vs those without DS to the NICU using contemporary data from US children’s hospitals.

Data for this study were obtained from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS), an administrative database that contains inpatient, emergency department, ambulatory surgery, and observation encounter-level data from not-for-profit, tertiary care pediatric hospitals in the United States. These hospitals are affiliated with the Children’s Hospital Association (Lenexa, Kansas). Data quality and reliability are assured through a joint effort between the Children’s Hospital Association and participating hospitals. For the purposes of external benchmarking, participating hospitals provide discharge/encounter data, including demographics, diagnoses, and procedures. Nearly all of these hospitals also submit resource use data (eg, pharmaceuticals, imaging, and laboratory) into PHIS. Data are deidentified at the time of data submission, and data are subjected to several reliability and validity checks before being included in the database. The PHIS database represents 10.6% of all pediatric discharges nationwide and 15.8% of all pediatric discharges, excluding normal newborns.

Neonates discharged between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2022, from 47 participating PHIS sites were identified. Neonates were included if they were aged 30 days or younger at admission and their index hospitalization included time in the NICU. Those missing gestational age or with a gestational age less than 22 weeks or greater than 42 weeks were excluded. Data were collapsed to the unique hospital and medical record number level to account for multiple hospitalizations from the same neonate.

Because this study used deidentified data, the investigational review board determined this study was not human subjects research under 45 CFR part 46.102(f), and evaluation was waived.

Neonates were characterized overall and by presence of DS (identified using International Classification of Diseases [ICD], Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes; Supplemental Table 1) and stratified by gestational age. Gestational age was categorized according to the World Health Organization’s definition of prematurity: less than 28 weeks (extremely preterm), 28 to 31 weeks (very preterm), 32 to 36 weeks (moderate/late preterm), and 37 weeks or older (term).15 Characteristics recorded included gestational age, race and ethnicity, urbanicity, zip code-level median household income (2010), birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA) status (derived according to Fenton growth charts),16 Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes, and presence of the following: atrioventricular septal defect, atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), duodenal atresia/stenosis, and Hirschsprung disease (Supplemental Table 1). Birth weight was set to missing if it was less than 300 g or the first percentile or greater than the 99th percentile, as assessed using Fenton growth charts.16 A variety of in-hospital outcomes were recorded based on included ICD-9/ICD-10 diagnosis codes, procedure codes, or facility charges or as defined by PHIS. These include disposition (ie, death or discharge to hospice, discharge home, or transferred), length of stay, unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), pulmonary hypertension (PH) or persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn, nitric oxide (NO) use, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), NEC (Bells 2+), periventricular leukomalacia, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), interventricular hemorrhage or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), hydrops, any central line use, central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), total parental nutrition (TPN), any infection, tracheostomy use, gastrostomy use, ventilator use, oscillator use, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) use, and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) use.

Outcomes were compared among neonates with and without DS using linear probability (ie, risk difference) models, stratified by gestational age as the absolute risk facilitates clinical interpretability. Risk differences were reported as a percentage. When examining unplanned readmission within 30 days, analysis was limited to those who were discharged home. Data were processed using SAS Enterprise Guide 8.1 (SAS Institute, Inc). Analysis was conducted using R version 4.3.1 (R Project for Statistical Computing).17 Owing to the exploratory nature of our analysis, we present the estimate and CI with no adjustment for multiple comparisons.18 

There were 575 116 NICU stays with admission aged 30 days or younger from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2022. A total of 1.5% (n = 8598) of these were neonates diagnosed with DS. Excluding those who were missing gestational age, 7037 neonates with DS were compared with 460 635 neonates without DS within gestational age groups (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

Study flow diagram.

FIGURE 1.

Study flow diagram.

Close modal

Baseline characteristics were similar between groups for sex and race and ethnicity (Table 1). In each gestational age group, the percentage of SGA neonates was higher in the group with DS compared with the group without DS. Apgar scores were similar between groups across all gestational ages. The prevalence of congenital heart defects was significantly higher in the neonates with DS compared with those without DS for all gestational age groups. This was also generally true for the diagnosis of duodenal atresia/stenosis and Hirschsprung disease.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of Infants With and Without DS Admitted to the NICU Stratified by Gestational Age, 2008 to 2022.

GA at Birth (Weeks)<2828–3132–36≥37
n (%) or Median (IQR)OverallDSWithout DSDSWithout DSDSWithout DSDSWithout DS
No. of infants 467 672 95 30 481 304 39 265 2168 145 024 4470 245 865 
Gestational age 37 (34, 39) 26 (25, 27) 25 (24, 26) 30 (29, 31) 30 (29, 31) 35 (34, 36) 34 (33, 36) 38 (37, 39) 39 (38, 40) 
Male sex 262 295 (56) 54 (57) 16 470 (54) 165 (54) 21 226 (54) 1246 (58) 80 235 (55) 2456 (55) 140 443 (57) 
Racec 
 Asian 17 462 (4) 3 (3) 882 (3) 10 (3) 1211 (3) 69 (3) 4864 (3) 139 (3) 10 284 (4) 
 Black 77 083 (17) 18 (19) 9377 (31) 44 (15) 9086 (23) 267 (12) 23 849 (16) 510 (11) 33 932 (14) 
 Multiracial 8058 (2) 4 (4) 448 (2) 4 (1) 562 (1) 53 (2) 2422 (2) 80 (2) 4485 (2) 
 White 269 518 (58) 48 (51) 13 868 (46) 184 (61) 20 929 (53) 1,315 (61) 84 346 (58) 2856 (64) 145 972 (59) 
 Other 63 247 (14) 15 (16) 3988 (13) 44 (15) 5201 (13) 356 (16) 19 107 (13) 651 (15) 33 885 (14) 
Ethnicityc 
 Hispanic 83 186 (20) 17 (21) 5123 (19) 67 (24) 6220 (18) 562 (28) 23 875 (19) 1090 (27) 46 232 (21) 
 Non-Hispanic 326 725 (80) 64 (79) 21 600 (81) 207 (76) 28 061 (82) 1417 (72) 101 298 (81) 2974 (73) 171 104 (79) 
Urbanicity 
 Rural 67 538 (15) 19 (20) 4546 (15) 50 (16) 5915 (15) 365 (17) 21 754 (15) 794 (18) 34 095 (14) 
 Urban/suburban 393 932 (85) 75 (80) 25 530 (85) 252 (83) 32 781 (85) 1782 (83) 121 187 (85) 3618 (82) 208 707 (86) 
2010 zip code income, USD 40 536 (32 687, 52 511) 37 356 (29 882, 44 987) 38 778 (31 633, 49 901) 39 721 (32 382, 50 625) 39 484 (32 278, 51 340) 41 733 (33 141, 52 554) 40 580 (32 692, 52 550) 41 018 (33 319, 52 511) 40 997 (32 853, 53 121) 
Primary payor 
 Commercial only 188 553 (41) 32 (36) 10 160 (34) 116 (38) 14 751 (38) 916 (42) 59 694 (41) 1933 (44) 100 951 (41) 
 Government only 261 036 (56) 54 (60) 19 226 (63) 177 (58) 23 351 (60) 1194 (55) 80 207 (56) 2348 (53) 134 479 (55) 
 Othera 15 228 (3) 4 (4) 952 (3) 10 (3) 919 (2) 52 (2) 4212 (3) 156 (4) 8923 (4) 
Birth weight, g 2800 (2050, 3350) 739 (630, 895) 770 (640, 930) 1326 (1100, 1650) 361 (1150, 1590) 2353 (2000, 2707) 2280 (1960, 2640) 3097 (2770, 3425) 3290 (2950, 3640) 
SGAb 52 898 (12) 20 (24) 2676 (9) 46 (17) 3145 (8) 388 (19) 17 280 (13) 693 (17) 28 650 (13) 
Apgarc 
 1 min 8 (5, 8) 5 (2, 6) 4 (2, 6) 6 (3, 7) 6 (4, 8) 7 (5, 8) 8 (6, 8) 8 (6, 8) 8 (6, 8) 
 5 min 9 (8, 9) 7 (6, 8) 7 (5, 8) 8 (6, 9) 8 (7, 9) 8 (8, 9) 9.0 (8, 9) 8 (8, 9) 9 (8, 9) 
AVSD 7381 (2) 13 (14) 70 (<1) 67 (22) 248 (1) 586 (27) 1487 (1) 1198 (27) 3712 (2) 
ASD 96 086 (21) 51 (54) 12 553 (41) 181 (60) 10 575 (27) 1249 (58) 22 838 (16) 2620 (59) 46 019 (19) 
VSD 25 615 (6) 26 (27) 1141 (4) 91 (30) 1747 (4) 748 (35) 6608 (5) 1433 (32) 13 821 (6) 
PDA 81 448 (17) 63 (66) 17 114 (56) 185 (61) 9022 (23) 1300 (60) 15 872 (11) 2736 (61) 35 156 (14) 
Duodenal atresia 5310 (1) 8 (8) 153 (1) 53 (17) 328 (1) 406 (19) 1980 (1) 496 (11) 1886 (1) 
Hirschsprung disease 2930 (1) 2 (2) 31 (<1) 5 (2) 44 (<1) 85 (4) 309 (<1) 259 (6) 2195 (1) 
GA at Birth (Weeks)<2828–3132–36≥37
n (%) or Median (IQR)OverallDSWithout DSDSWithout DSDSWithout DSDSWithout DS
No. of infants 467 672 95 30 481 304 39 265 2168 145 024 4470 245 865 
Gestational age 37 (34, 39) 26 (25, 27) 25 (24, 26) 30 (29, 31) 30 (29, 31) 35 (34, 36) 34 (33, 36) 38 (37, 39) 39 (38, 40) 
Male sex 262 295 (56) 54 (57) 16 470 (54) 165 (54) 21 226 (54) 1246 (58) 80 235 (55) 2456 (55) 140 443 (57) 
Racec 
 Asian 17 462 (4) 3 (3) 882 (3) 10 (3) 1211 (3) 69 (3) 4864 (3) 139 (3) 10 284 (4) 
 Black 77 083 (17) 18 (19) 9377 (31) 44 (15) 9086 (23) 267 (12) 23 849 (16) 510 (11) 33 932 (14) 
 Multiracial 8058 (2) 4 (4) 448 (2) 4 (1) 562 (1) 53 (2) 2422 (2) 80 (2) 4485 (2) 
 White 269 518 (58) 48 (51) 13 868 (46) 184 (61) 20 929 (53) 1,315 (61) 84 346 (58) 2856 (64) 145 972 (59) 
 Other 63 247 (14) 15 (16) 3988 (13) 44 (15) 5201 (13) 356 (16) 19 107 (13) 651 (15) 33 885 (14) 
Ethnicityc 
 Hispanic 83 186 (20) 17 (21) 5123 (19) 67 (24) 6220 (18) 562 (28) 23 875 (19) 1090 (27) 46 232 (21) 
 Non-Hispanic 326 725 (80) 64 (79) 21 600 (81) 207 (76) 28 061 (82) 1417 (72) 101 298 (81) 2974 (73) 171 104 (79) 
Urbanicity 
 Rural 67 538 (15) 19 (20) 4546 (15) 50 (16) 5915 (15) 365 (17) 21 754 (15) 794 (18) 34 095 (14) 
 Urban/suburban 393 932 (85) 75 (80) 25 530 (85) 252 (83) 32 781 (85) 1782 (83) 121 187 (85) 3618 (82) 208 707 (86) 
2010 zip code income, USD 40 536 (32 687, 52 511) 37 356 (29 882, 44 987) 38 778 (31 633, 49 901) 39 721 (32 382, 50 625) 39 484 (32 278, 51 340) 41 733 (33 141, 52 554) 40 580 (32 692, 52 550) 41 018 (33 319, 52 511) 40 997 (32 853, 53 121) 
Primary payor 
 Commercial only 188 553 (41) 32 (36) 10 160 (34) 116 (38) 14 751 (38) 916 (42) 59 694 (41) 1933 (44) 100 951 (41) 
 Government only 261 036 (56) 54 (60) 19 226 (63) 177 (58) 23 351 (60) 1194 (55) 80 207 (56) 2348 (53) 134 479 (55) 
 Othera 15 228 (3) 4 (4) 952 (3) 10 (3) 919 (2) 52 (2) 4212 (3) 156 (4) 8923 (4) 
Birth weight, g 2800 (2050, 3350) 739 (630, 895) 770 (640, 930) 1326 (1100, 1650) 361 (1150, 1590) 2353 (2000, 2707) 2280 (1960, 2640) 3097 (2770, 3425) 3290 (2950, 3640) 
SGAb 52 898 (12) 20 (24) 2676 (9) 46 (17) 3145 (8) 388 (19) 17 280 (13) 693 (17) 28 650 (13) 
Apgarc 
 1 min 8 (5, 8) 5 (2, 6) 4 (2, 6) 6 (3, 7) 6 (4, 8) 7 (5, 8) 8 (6, 8) 8 (6, 8) 8 (6, 8) 
 5 min 9 (8, 9) 7 (6, 8) 7 (5, 8) 8 (6, 9) 8 (7, 9) 8 (8, 9) 9.0 (8, 9) 8 (8, 9) 9 (8, 9) 
AVSD 7381 (2) 13 (14) 70 (<1) 67 (22) 248 (1) 586 (27) 1487 (1) 1198 (27) 3712 (2) 
ASD 96 086 (21) 51 (54) 12 553 (41) 181 (60) 10 575 (27) 1249 (58) 22 838 (16) 2620 (59) 46 019 (19) 
VSD 25 615 (6) 26 (27) 1141 (4) 91 (30) 1747 (4) 748 (35) 6608 (5) 1433 (32) 13 821 (6) 
PDA 81 448 (17) 63 (66) 17 114 (56) 185 (61) 9022 (23) 1300 (60) 15 872 (11) 2736 (61) 35 156 (14) 
Duodenal atresia 5310 (1) 8 (8) 153 (1) 53 (17) 328 (1) 406 (19) 1980 (1) 496 (11) 1886 (1) 
Hirschsprung disease 2930 (1) 2 (2) 31 (<1) 5 (2) 44 (<1) 85 (4) 309 (<1) 259 (6) 2195 (1) 

Abbreviations: ASD, atrial septal defect; AVSD, atrioventricular septal defect; DS, Down syndrome; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; SGA, small for gestational age; USD, United States dollars; VSD, ventricular septal defect.

a

Other defined as noncommercial or government payor or >1 payor.

b

Derived from birthweight using Fenton growth curves.16,21 

c

Greater than 5% of values missing (≥23 383).

Extremely preterm neonates with DS (n = 95) had a higher risk of death and unplanned readmission within 30 days vs those without DS (n = 30 481; Figure 2, Table 2). There was a higher percentage of PH, NO usage, and gastrostomy tube (GT) placement among those with DS compared with those without DS at this gestational age. ROP was lower for extremely preterm neonates with DS. Median length of stay among survivors was 123 days for extremely preterm neonates with DS and 99 days for those without DS.

FIGURE 2.

Risk difference (95% CI) in percentage of NEC Bells 2+, PH, IVH/ICH, ventilator usage, readmission within 30 days, and death/discharge to hospice for neonates with DS admitted to the NICU, stratified by gestational age, 2008 to 2022 (reference group: without DS). Readmission is an unplanned readmission within 30 days and is presented for infants alive and not discharged to hospice at the end of all stays. Abbreviations: DS, Down syndrome; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; IVH, interventricular hemorrhage; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; PH, pulmonary hypertension; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity.

FIGURE 2.

Risk difference (95% CI) in percentage of NEC Bells 2+, PH, IVH/ICH, ventilator usage, readmission within 30 days, and death/discharge to hospice for neonates with DS admitted to the NICU, stratified by gestational age, 2008 to 2022 (reference group: without DS). Readmission is an unplanned readmission within 30 days and is presented for infants alive and not discharged to hospice at the end of all stays. Abbreviations: DS, Down syndrome; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; IVH, interventricular hemorrhage; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; PH, pulmonary hypertension; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity.

Close modal
TABLE 2.

Outcomes of Neonates With and Without DS Admitted to the NICU, Stratified by Gestational Age, 2008 to 2022

Infant Outcomes Among Those Aged <28 Weeks
n (%) or Median (IQR)OverallDSWithout DSRisk Difference (95% CI)a
No. of infants 30 576 95 30 481  
Disposition 
 Died/discharge hospice 6263 (21) 38 (40) 6225 (20) 20 (10 to 30) 
 Discharged home 20 440 (67) 46 (48) 20 394 (70) −19 (−28 to −9) 
 Transfer/other 3873 (13) 11 (12) 3862 (13) −1 (−7 to 6) 
Length of stay, days 
 Among died/discharged hospice 6 (1, 20) 12 (3, 32) 6 (1, 20)  
 Among survivors 99 (74, 130) 123 (82, 176) 99 (74, 130)  
Readmission within 30 daysb 2899 (12) 16 (28) 2883 (12) 16 (6 to 29) 
ECMOc 34 (<1) 1 (1) 33 (<1) 
PHg 3575 (12) 26 (27) 3549 (12) 16 (7 to 25) 
NO 4636 (15) 30 (32) 4606 (15) 17 (8 to 26) 
NEC (Bells 2+) 2719 (9) 14 (15) 2705 (9) 6 (−0.3 to 14) 
PVL 1853 (6) 5 (5) 1848 (6) −1 (−4 to 5) 
HIE 197 (1) 1 (1) 196 (1)  
IVH/ICH 13 269 (43) 34 (36) 13 235 (43) −8 (−17 to 2) 
ROP 18 159 (59) 41 (43) 18 118 (59) −16 (−26 to −6) 
BPD 15 140 (50) 34 (36) 15 106 (50) −14 (−23 to −4) 
Hydrops 423 (1) 4 (4) 419 (1)  
Any central line 19 724 (65) 67 (71)  19 657 (65) 6 (−4 to 15) 
CLABSI 705 (2) 4 (4) 701 (2)  
TPN 28 715 (94) 86 (91) 28 629 (94) −3 (−10 to 1) 
Infection 19 379 (64) 67 (71) 19 312 (63) 7 (−3 to 16) 
Tracheostomy 314 (1) 1 (1) 313 (1)  
Gastrostomy 2831 (9) 16 (17) 2815 (9) 8 (1 to 16) 
Ventilator use 25 462 (83) 75 (79) 25 387 (83) −4 (−13 to 3) 
Oscillator use 8797 (29) 32 (34) 8765 (29) 5 (−4 to 15) 
NPPV use 17 928 (59) 52 (55) 17 876 (59) −4 (−14 to 6) 
HFNC use 6233 (20) 17 (18) 6216 (20) −3 (−9 to 6) 
Infant Outcomes Among Those Aged <28 Weeks
n (%) or Median (IQR)OverallDSWithout DSRisk Difference (95% CI)a
No. of infants 30 576 95 30 481  
Disposition 
 Died/discharge hospice 6263 (21) 38 (40) 6225 (20) 20 (10 to 30) 
 Discharged home 20 440 (67) 46 (48) 20 394 (70) −19 (−28 to −9) 
 Transfer/other 3873 (13) 11 (12) 3862 (13) −1 (−7 to 6) 
Length of stay, days 
 Among died/discharged hospice 6 (1, 20) 12 (3, 32) 6 (1, 20)  
 Among survivors 99 (74, 130) 123 (82, 176) 99 (74, 130)  
Readmission within 30 daysb 2899 (12) 16 (28) 2883 (12) 16 (6 to 29) 
ECMOc 34 (<1) 1 (1) 33 (<1) 
PHg 3575 (12) 26 (27) 3549 (12) 16 (7 to 25) 
NO 4636 (15) 30 (32) 4606 (15) 17 (8 to 26) 
NEC (Bells 2+) 2719 (9) 14 (15) 2705 (9) 6 (−0.3 to 14) 
PVL 1853 (6) 5 (5) 1848 (6) −1 (−4 to 5) 
HIE 197 (1) 1 (1) 196 (1)  
IVH/ICH 13 269 (43) 34 (36) 13 235 (43) −8 (−17 to 2) 
ROP 18 159 (59) 41 (43) 18 118 (59) −16 (−26 to −6) 
BPD 15 140 (50) 34 (36) 15 106 (50) −14 (−23 to −4) 
Hydrops 423 (1) 4 (4) 419 (1)  
Any central line 19 724 (65) 67 (71)  19 657 (65) 6 (−4 to 15) 
CLABSI 705 (2) 4 (4) 701 (2)  
TPN 28 715 (94) 86 (91) 28 629 (94) −3 (−10 to 1) 
Infection 19 379 (64) 67 (71) 19 312 (63) 7 (−3 to 16) 
Tracheostomy 314 (1) 1 (1) 313 (1)  
Gastrostomy 2831 (9) 16 (17) 2815 (9) 8 (1 to 16) 
Ventilator use 25 462 (83) 75 (79) 25 387 (83) −4 (−13 to 3) 
Oscillator use 8797 (29) 32 (34) 8765 (29) 5 (−4 to 15) 
NPPV use 17 928 (59) 52 (55) 17 876 (59) −4 (−14 to 6) 
HFNC use 6233 (20) 17 (18) 6216 (20) −3 (−9 to 6) 
Infant Outcomes Among Those Aged 28–31 Weeks
n (%) or Median (IQR)OverallDSNon-DSRisk Difference (95% CI)a
No. of infants 39 569 304 39 265  
Disposition 
 Died/discharge hospice 2,297 (6) 87 (29) 2210 (6) 23 (18 to 28) 
 Discharged home 33 154 (84) 185 (61) 32 969 (84) −23 (−29 to −18) 
 Transfer/other 4118 (10) 32 (11) 4086 (10) 0.1 (−3 to 4) 
Length of stay, days 
 Among died/discharged hospice 7 (1, 30) 24 (7, 83) 7 (1, 28)  
 Among survivors 49 (35, 67) 79 (51, 110) 48 (35, 67)  
Readmission within 30 daysb 2835 (8) 38 (18) 2797 (8) 10 (5 to 15) 
ECMOd 74 (<1) 5 (2) 69 (<1) 2 (0.4 to 3) 
PHg 1912 (5) 86 (28) 1826 (5) 24 (19 to 29) 
NO 2013 (5) 83 (27) 1930 (5) 22 (18 to 28) 
NEC (Bells 2+) 1414 (4) 19 (6) 1395 (4) 3 (0.3 to 6) 
PVL 928 (2) 7 (2) 921 (2) 0 (−1 to 2) 
HIE 362 (1) 1 (<1) 361 (1)  
IVH/ICH 7876 (20) 61 (20) 7815 (20) 0.2 (−4 to 5) 
ROP 14 666 (37) 117 (39) 14 549 (37) 1 (−4 to 7) 
BPD 6,203 (16) 86 (28) 6,117 (16) 13 (8 to 18) 
Hydrops 690 (2) 48 (16) 642 (2) 14 (10 to 19) 
Any central line 19 111 (48) 198 (65) 18 913 (48) 17 (12 to 22) 
CLABSI 301 (1) 12 (4) 289 (1) 3 (1 to 6) 
TPN 35 754 (90) 286 (94) 35 468 (90) 4 (1 to 6) 
Infection 13 832 (35) 180 (59) 13 652 (35) 24 (19 to 30) 
Tracheostomy 170 (<1) 8 (3) 162 (< 1) 2 (1 to 4) 
Gastrostomy 2,053 (5) 56 (18) 1,997 (5) 13 (9 to 18) 
Ventilator use 21 290 (54) 220 (72) 21 070 (54) 19 (14 to 24) 
Oscillator use 2,541 (6) 44 (15) 2,497 (6) 8 (5 to 13) 
NPPV use 23 474 (59) 155 (51) 23 319 (59) −8 (−14 to −3) 
HFNC use 7,093 (18) 53 (17) 7,040 (18) −1 (−5 to 4) 
Infant Outcomes Among Those Aged 28–31 Weeks
n (%) or Median (IQR)OverallDSNon-DSRisk Difference (95% CI)a
No. of infants 39 569 304 39 265  
Disposition 
 Died/discharge hospice 2,297 (6) 87 (29) 2210 (6) 23 (18 to 28) 
 Discharged home 33 154 (84) 185 (61) 32 969 (84) −23 (−29 to −18) 
 Transfer/other 4118 (10) 32 (11) 4086 (10) 0.1 (−3 to 4) 
Length of stay, days 
 Among died/discharged hospice 7 (1, 30) 24 (7, 83) 7 (1, 28)  
 Among survivors 49 (35, 67) 79 (51, 110) 48 (35, 67)  
Readmission within 30 daysb 2835 (8) 38 (18) 2797 (8) 10 (5 to 15) 
ECMOd 74 (<1) 5 (2) 69 (<1) 2 (0.4 to 3) 
PHg 1912 (5) 86 (28) 1826 (5) 24 (19 to 29) 
NO 2013 (5) 83 (27) 1930 (5) 22 (18 to 28) 
NEC (Bells 2+) 1414 (4) 19 (6) 1395 (4) 3 (0.3 to 6) 
PVL 928 (2) 7 (2) 921 (2) 0 (−1 to 2) 
HIE 362 (1) 1 (<1) 361 (1)  
IVH/ICH 7876 (20) 61 (20) 7815 (20) 0.2 (−4 to 5) 
ROP 14 666 (37) 117 (39) 14 549 (37) 1 (−4 to 7) 
BPD 6,203 (16) 86 (28) 6,117 (16) 13 (8 to 18) 
Hydrops 690 (2) 48 (16) 642 (2) 14 (10 to 19) 
Any central line 19 111 (48) 198 (65) 18 913 (48) 17 (12 to 22) 
CLABSI 301 (1) 12 (4) 289 (1) 3 (1 to 6) 
TPN 35 754 (90) 286 (94) 35 468 (90) 4 (1 to 6) 
Infection 13 832 (35) 180 (59) 13 652 (35) 24 (19 to 30) 
Tracheostomy 170 (<1) 8 (3) 162 (< 1) 2 (1 to 4) 
Gastrostomy 2,053 (5) 56 (18) 1,997 (5) 13 (9 to 18) 
Ventilator use 21 290 (54) 220 (72) 21 070 (54) 19 (14 to 24) 
Oscillator use 2,541 (6) 44 (15) 2,497 (6) 8 (5 to 13) 
NPPV use 23 474 (59) 155 (51) 23 319 (59) −8 (−14 to −3) 
HFNC use 7,093 (18) 53 (17) 7,040 (18) −1 (−5 to 4) 
Infant Outcomes Among Those Aged 32–36 Weeks
n (%) or Median(IQR)OverallDSNon-DSRisk Difference (95% CI)a
No. of infants 147 192 2168 145 024  
Disposition 
 Died/discharge hospice 4596 (3) 203 (9) 4393 (3) 6 (5 to 8) 
 Discharged home 133 583 (91) 1836 (85) 131 747 (91) −6 (−8 to −5) 
 Transfer/other 9013 (6) 129 (6) 8884 (6) −0.2 (−1 to 1) 
Length of stay, days 
 Among died/discharged hospice 10 (2, 34) 24 (9, 57) 9 (2, 33)  
 Among survivors 15 (8, 25) 31 (17, 55) 14 (8, 25)  
Readmission within 30 daysb 8501 (6) 290 (15) 8211 (6) 9 (7 to 11) 
ECMOe 929 (1) 42 (2) 887 (1) 1 (1 to 2) 
PHg 6253 (4) 417 (19) 5836 (4) 15 (14 to 17) 
NO 5552 (4) 269 (12) 5283 (4) 9 (7 to 10) 
NEC (Bells 2+) 1430 (1) 38 (2) 1392 (1) 1 (0 to 1) 
PVL 605 (< 1) 12 (1) 593 (<1) 0.1 (−0.1 to 1) 
HIE 2828 (2) 27 (1) 2801 (2) −1 (−1 to −0.2) 
IVH/ICH 6217 (4) 108 (5) 6109 (4) 1 (−0.1 to 2) 
ROP 2845 (2) 61 (3) 2784 (2) 1 (0.2 to 2) 
BPD 1613 (1) 89 (4) 1524 (1) 3 (2 to 4) 
Hydrops 1587 (1) 129 (6) 1458 (1) 5 (4 to 6) 
Any central line 35 237 (24) 1053 (49) 34 184 (24) 25 (23 to 27) 
CLABSI 487 (< 1) 9 (<1) 478 (< 1) 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.4) 
TPN 66 018 (45) 1453 (67) 64 565 (45) 23 (21 to 25) 
Infection 29 797 (20) 767 (35) 29 030 (20) 15 (13 to 17) 
Tracheostomy 539 (< 1) 22 (1) 517 (<1) 1 (0 to 1) 
Gastrostomy 6059 (4) 390 (18) 5669 (4) 14 (13 to 16) 
Ventilator use 41 845 (28) 1049 (48) 40 796 (28) 20 (18 to 22) 
Oscillator use 3335 (2) 92 (4) 3243 (2) 2 (1 to 3) 
NPPV use 40 892 (28) 586 (27) 40 306 (28) −1 (−3 to 1) 
HFNC use 14 091 (10) 436 (20) 13 655 (9) 11 (9 to 12) 
Infant Outcomes Among Those Aged 32–36 Weeks
n (%) or Median(IQR)OverallDSNon-DSRisk Difference (95% CI)a
No. of infants 147 192 2168 145 024  
Disposition 
 Died/discharge hospice 4596 (3) 203 (9) 4393 (3) 6 (5 to 8) 
 Discharged home 133 583 (91) 1836 (85) 131 747 (91) −6 (−8 to −5) 
 Transfer/other 9013 (6) 129 (6) 8884 (6) −0.2 (−1 to 1) 
Length of stay, days 
 Among died/discharged hospice 10 (2, 34) 24 (9, 57) 9 (2, 33)  
 Among survivors 15 (8, 25) 31 (17, 55) 14 (8, 25)  
Readmission within 30 daysb 8501 (6) 290 (15) 8211 (6) 9 (7 to 11) 
ECMOe 929 (1) 42 (2) 887 (1) 1 (1 to 2) 
PHg 6253 (4) 417 (19) 5836 (4) 15 (14 to 17) 
NO 5552 (4) 269 (12) 5283 (4) 9 (7 to 10) 
NEC (Bells 2+) 1430 (1) 38 (2) 1392 (1) 1 (0 to 1) 
PVL 605 (< 1) 12 (1) 593 (<1) 0.1 (−0.1 to 1) 
HIE 2828 (2) 27 (1) 2801 (2) −1 (−1 to −0.2) 
IVH/ICH 6217 (4) 108 (5) 6109 (4) 1 (−0.1 to 2) 
ROP 2845 (2) 61 (3) 2784 (2) 1 (0.2 to 2) 
BPD 1613 (1) 89 (4) 1524 (1) 3 (2 to 4) 
Hydrops 1587 (1) 129 (6) 1458 (1) 5 (4 to 6) 
Any central line 35 237 (24) 1053 (49) 34 184 (24) 25 (23 to 27) 
CLABSI 487 (< 1) 9 (<1) 478 (< 1) 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.4) 
TPN 66 018 (45) 1453 (67) 64 565 (45) 23 (21 to 25) 
Infection 29 797 (20) 767 (35) 29 030 (20) 15 (13 to 17) 
Tracheostomy 539 (< 1) 22 (1) 517 (<1) 1 (0 to 1) 
Gastrostomy 6059 (4) 390 (18) 5669 (4) 14 (13 to 16) 
Ventilator use 41 845 (28) 1049 (48) 40 796 (28) 20 (18 to 22) 
Oscillator use 3335 (2) 92 (4) 3243 (2) 2 (1 to 3) 
NPPV use 40 892 (28) 586 (27) 40 306 (28) −1 (−3 to 1) 
HFNC use 14 091 (10) 436 (20) 13 655 (9) 11 (9 to 12) 
Infant Outcomes Among Those Aged ≥37 Weeks
n (%) or Mediad (IQR)OverallDSNon-DSRisk Difference (95% CI)a
No. of infants 250 335 4470 245 865  
Disposition     
 Died/discharge hospice 5898 (2) 145 (3) 5753 (2) 1 (0 to 2) 
 Discharged home 228 119 (91) 4098 (92) 224 021 (91) 1 (−0.3 to 1) 
 Transfer/other 16 318 (7) 227 (5) 16 091 (7) −2 (−2 to −0.8) 
Length of stay, days     
 Among died/discharged hospice 24 (8, 65) 10 (3, 31) 24 (8, 65)  
 Among survivors 6 (3, 13) 18 (9, 33) 5 (3, 13)  
Readmission within 30 daysb 14 477 (6) 549 (13) 13 928 (6) 7 (6 to 8) 
ECMOf 3876 (2) 105 (2) 3771 (2) 1 (0 to 1) 
PHd 18 303 (7) 1109 (25) 17 194 (7) 18 (17 to 19) 
NO 14 610 (6) 449 (10) 14 161 (6) 4 (3 to 5) 
NEC (Bells 2+) 900 (<1) 43 (1) 857 (<1) 1 (0 to 1) 
PVL 415 (<1) 17 (<1) 398 (<1) 0 (0 to 0) 
HIE 11 026 (4) 71 (2) 10 955 (5) −3 (−3 to −3) 
IVH/ICH 6741 (3) 75 (2) 6666 (3) −1 (−1 to −1) 
ROP 229 (<1) 5 (<1) 224 (<1) 0 (0 to 00) 
BPD 857 (<1) 42 (1) 815 (<1) 1 (0 to 1) 
Hydrops 1133 (1) 57 (1) 1076 (<1) 1 (1 to 1) 
Any central line 55 929 (22) 1659 (37) 54 270 (22) 15 (14 to 17) 
CLABSI 685 (<1) 22 (1) 663 (<1) 0 (0 to 1) 
TPN 72 389 (29) 2215 (50) 70 174 (29) 21 (20 to 23) 
Infection 56 491 (23) 1159 (26) 55 332 (23) 3 (2 to 5) 
Tracheostomy 894 (<1) 24 (1) 870 (<1) 0 (0 to 0) 
Gastrostomy 8,673 (4) 552 (12) 8121 (3) 9 (8 to 10) 
Ventilator use 57 309 (23) 1573 (35) 55 736 (23) 13 (11 to 14) 
Oscillator use 5416 (2) 91 (2) 5325 (2) −0.1 (−0.5 to 0.3) 
NPPV use 33 467 (13) 756 (17) 32 711 (13) 4 (3 to 5) 
HFNC use 21 095 (8) 774 (17) 20 321 (8) 9 (8 to 10) 
Infant Outcomes Among Those Aged ≥37 Weeks
n (%) or Mediad (IQR)OverallDSNon-DSRisk Difference (95% CI)a
No. of infants 250 335 4470 245 865  
Disposition     
 Died/discharge hospice 5898 (2) 145 (3) 5753 (2) 1 (0 to 2) 
 Discharged home 228 119 (91) 4098 (92) 224 021 (91) 1 (−0.3 to 1) 
 Transfer/other 16 318 (7) 227 (5) 16 091 (7) −2 (−2 to −0.8) 
Length of stay, days     
 Among died/discharged hospice 24 (8, 65) 10 (3, 31) 24 (8, 65)  
 Among survivors 6 (3, 13) 18 (9, 33) 5 (3, 13)  
Readmission within 30 daysb 14 477 (6) 549 (13) 13 928 (6) 7 (6 to 8) 
ECMOf 3876 (2) 105 (2) 3771 (2) 1 (0 to 1) 
PHd 18 303 (7) 1109 (25) 17 194 (7) 18 (17 to 19) 
NO 14 610 (6) 449 (10) 14 161 (6) 4 (3 to 5) 
NEC (Bells 2+) 900 (<1) 43 (1) 857 (<1) 1 (0 to 1) 
PVL 415 (<1) 17 (<1) 398 (<1) 0 (0 to 0) 
HIE 11 026 (4) 71 (2) 10 955 (5) −3 (−3 to −3) 
IVH/ICH 6741 (3) 75 (2) 6666 (3) −1 (−1 to −1) 
ROP 229 (<1) 5 (<1) 224 (<1) 0 (0 to 00) 
BPD 857 (<1) 42 (1) 815 (<1) 1 (0 to 1) 
Hydrops 1133 (1) 57 (1) 1076 (<1) 1 (1 to 1) 
Any central line 55 929 (22) 1659 (37) 54 270 (22) 15 (14 to 17) 
CLABSI 685 (<1) 22 (1) 663 (<1) 0 (0 to 1) 
TPN 72 389 (29) 2215 (50) 70 174 (29) 21 (20 to 23) 
Infection 56 491 (23) 1159 (26) 55 332 (23) 3 (2 to 5) 
Tracheostomy 894 (<1) 24 (1) 870 (<1) 0 (0 to 0) 
Gastrostomy 8,673 (4) 552 (12) 8121 (3) 9 (8 to 10) 
Ventilator use 57 309 (23) 1573 (35) 55 736 (23) 13 (11 to 14) 
Oscillator use 5416 (2) 91 (2) 5325 (2) −0.1 (−0.5 to 0.3) 
NPPV use 33 467 (13) 756 (17) 32 711 (13) 4 (3 to 5) 
HFNC use 21 095 (8) 774 (17) 20 321 (8) 9 (8 to 10) 

Abbreviations: BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia; CLABSI, central line-associated bloodstream infection; DS, Down syndrome; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula; HIE, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; IVH, interventricular hemorrhage; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; NO, nitric oxide; NPPV, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation; PH, pulmonary hypertension; PVL, periventricular leukomalacia; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity; TPN, total parental nutrition.

a

Results are presented if there are at least 5 events in each group (with and without DS).

b

Readmission within 30 days is defined as an unplanned readmission within 30 days and is reported only for infants who did not die/discharge to hospice.

c

Among neonates without DS admitted to the NICU with ECMO, 15 (45.5%) died or were discharged to hospice. The percentage for those with DS is not presented due to there being less than 5 infants with ECMO.

d

Among neonates with and without DS admitted to the NICU with ECMO, 5 (100%) and 39 (56.5%) died or were discharged to hospice, respectively.

e

Among neonates with and without DS admitted to the NICU with ECMO, 26 (61.9%) and 419 (47.2%) died or were discharged to hospice, respectively.

f

Among neonates with and without DS admitted to the NICU with ECMO, 33 (31.4%) and 1,192 (31.6%) died or were discharged to hospice, respectively.

g

PH is defined as presence of PH or persistent PH.

Very preterm neonates with DS (n = 304) had a higher risk of death and unplanned readmission within 30 days vs those without DS (n = 39 265; Figure 2, Table 2). Very preterm neonates with DS had a higher percentage PH, NO usage, tracheostomy placement, ventilator use, and high-frequency oscillator use but a lower percentage of nonpositive pressure use. Those with DS had a higher percentage of developing NEC (Bells ≥ 2), GT placement, central venous line (CVL) placement, and TPN use vs those without DS. Very preterm neonates with DS also had a higher percentage of infection, CLABSI, developing hydrops, and being placed on ECMO. The median length of stay among survivors was 79 days for very preterm neonates with DS and 48 days for those without DS.

Moderate/late preterm neonates with DS (n = 2168) had a higher risk of death and unplanned readmission within 30 days vs those without DS (n = 145 024; Figure 2, Table 2). Moderate/late preterm neonates with DS had a higher percentage PH, NO use, ventilator use, high-frequency oscillator use, and HFNC use. Among moderate/late preterm neonates, those with DS had a higher percentage of GT placement, CVL placement, and TPN use vs those without DS. Moderate/late preterm neonates with DS also had a higher percentage of infection, developing hydrops, and being placed on ECMO. Median length of stay among survivors was 31 days and 14 days, respectively, for moderate/late preterm neonates with and without DS.

For term neonates with DS, there was a small increased risk of death and moderately increased risk of unplanned readmission within 30 days among those with DS (n = 4470) vs those without DS (n = 245 865; Table 2). Risk of PH, NO use, ventilator use, nonpositive pressure use, and HFNC use was higher among neonates with DS relative to those without DS. There was a slightly lower percentage HIE and ICH among those with DS vs those without DS. GT use remained higher in the term neonates with DS vs those without DS. Term neonates with DS had a higher percentage of CVL placement, TPN use, infection, and developing hydrops relative to those without DS. The median length of stay among survivors was 18 and 5 days for term neonates with and without DS, respectively.

This is the largest US database study to date examining demographics, socioeconomics, morbidities, and mortality rates in neonates with DS compared with neonates without DS admitted to the NICU. Previous literature on increased risk has been limited by region and center.10,19 In this national study, neonates with DS had increased morbidity and mortality vs neonates without DS across all gestational age groups.

Baseline characteristics were similar between those with DS and those without DS within gestational age groups. There was a higher percentage of SGA neonates and increased percentage of congenital malformations in those with DS in all gestational age groups. It is well known that neonates with DS have lower birth weights and slower growth than those without DS; however, the specifics by gestational age have not been well described.20 Currently there is no standardized growth curve for premature neonates with DS, and, often, NICUs will use the Fenton growth curve until a corrected gestational age of 50 weeks is reached before switching to DS-specific growth curves.16,21–23 In addition, the risk for congenital heart defects and abdominal malformations are also well known to be increased in the DS population. Both these findings therefore were not surprising to document.

The increased rate of cardiac anomalies in the neonates with DS compared with those without DS was prevalent in all gestational age groups. Congenital heart disease is present in up to 50% of neonates with DS and is one of the leading causes of morbidity.4,24 The rate of PDA detection was greater than 50% for both those with and without DS in the extremely preterm group. For very preterm, moderate/late preterm, and term neonates with DS, this rate of PDA detection remained similar, at around 60%. However, the rate of PDA detection in neonates without DS in the very preterm, moderate/late preterm, and term groups was all less than 25%. This difference could be partially explained by increased surveillance in this population, as an echocardiogram is recommended for all neonates with DS, and, if admitted to the NICU, it will likely be completed there to aid in clinical management.25 Neonates without DS in the NICU, particularly late preterm and term gestations, are less likely to have an echocardiogram completed and, therefore, are less likely to have a PDA discovered by imaging. However, the increased incidence of PH in neonates with DS compared with those without DS in all gestational age groups was mirrored by the increased rates in NO usage. This argues that neonates with DS not only had echo findings compatible with PH but also clinical signs and symptoms prompting treatment. Previous research has reported an increased incidence of PH in neonates with DS compared with the general neonatal population using published incidences,8 but none have described the differences by gestational age group as our study has. The mechanism of PH in neonates with DS is thought to be multifactorial, including genetic, congenital, and environmental causes.26 Although large prospective studies focused on the etiology of PH in those with DS are minimal, multiple risk factors in this population for developing PH have been identified, including cardiac malformations, pulmonary conditions, thyroid abnormalities.26,27 The specific etiology is likely related to challenges on the pulmonary vascular system likely related to abnormal lung development, intrinsic endothelial dysfunction, increases in pulmonary vascular resistance, and increases in pulmonary venous pressures.26 These changes could be related to overexpression of chromosome 21-related genes involved in vasoactive regulation. A recent review of the Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension Network Registry, including 158 pediatric patients with DS, reported similar survival rates to those without DS-associated PH.27 Although one-half of the infants with DS were born prematurely, this study did not differentiate degrees of prematurity, and median gestational age was 37 weeks. Thus, it is possible that, with increasing prematurity, outcomes may differ.

Neonates with DS are at risk of multiple pulmonary comorbidities that can necessitate invasive support, including upper airway problems, lower airway disease, including respiratory distress syndrome, as well as vascular and lymphatic defects.28 In our study, the extremely preterm neonates with DS did not have increased ventilator usage compared with neonates without DS in the NICU, which is overall not surprising given the high risk of intubation due to various factors for all neonates when born at this gestation.29 However, the increased ventilator usage for neonates with DS compared with those without DS in the 3 more mature gestational age groups emphasizes that pulmonary-related morbidities persist in this group regardless of gestational age, as neonates born at these later gestational ages typically have higher rates of success with noninvasive respiratory support.30 Although we are unable to determine reason for escalation to invasive ventilation based on our dataset, it is known that pneumonia and respiratory tract infections are more common and more severe in those with DS compared with healthy control individuals, providing one possible rationale for the increased level of support in older gestational age groups of neonates with DS compared with those without DS.31 

Neonates with DS are also at risk of structural and functional gastrointestinal (GI) complications, which often lead to feeding problems and delay discharge home from the NICU.32 The rates of NEC in our study were modestly higher in the neonates with DS in the extremely preterm and very preterm groups compared with those without DS but similar in the moderate/late preterm and term groups. The pathophysiology of NEC, although not completely understood, is thought to be related to inflammation of the intestine leading to bacterial invasion, in turn leading to damage and necrosis of the bowel.33 It is possible that the GI comorbidities of neonates with DS, such as Hirschsprung disease, put them at higher risk for NEC, as these conditions can promote higher levels of inflammation in the bowels and increase risk of bacterial invasion. The immature gut of premature infants adds another layer of risk but potentially follow a similar mechanism of inflammation along with lack of underdeveloped vascular system leading to ischemia and decreased immune function.34,35 Additionally, baseline factors already known to be associated with higher risk of NEC, including CHD and low birth weight, are found more commonly in neonates with DS, which could also infer higher threats of NEC.36 The explanation behind increased rates of GT placement in neonates with DS compared with those without DS in all gestational age groups is likely multifactorial given the multiple GI complications neonates with DS often face in the NICU and the fact that patients with DS are known to have feeding issues.32,37–39 These data reinforces the need for further investigation of optimal nutritional support and to explore early feeding interventions for this high-risk population.

The diagnosis of DS has previously been shown to decrease the odds of ROP in very low birth weight survivors in smaller studies.40 This study also found a negative association between DS and ROP in the extremely preterm group. It has been theorized that the extra copy of HSA21 leads to increased expression of genes that are potentially antiangiogenic or ROP-protectant, including endostatin, superoxide dismutase, and regulator of calcineurin 1.40–42 However, the specifics have not been well demonstrated but do provide potential for screening and therapeutic targets in the future if this finding were to be confirmed in additional studies.

Across all gestational age groups, neonates with DS had a longer length of stay and higher risk of unplanned readmissions relative to neonates without DS. Previous studies describing hospitalization patterns for infants with DS have found risk of hospital admission 3 to 5 times higher in this population than the public, with upper and lower respiratory problems as one of the most common causes of unplanned readmissions.43–45 These previous studies did not distinguish premature neonates or NICU graduates, who typically have more hospital readmissions.46 Shimokaze et al reviewed death rate and cause for neonates with DS in a NICU in Japan over a 27-year period and found a 40% mortality rate in infants aged younger than 34 weeks, with the main causes attributed to BPD and PH.13 Our study found a significantly higher risk of mortality among neonates with DS compared with those without DS across all gestational groups, with the most severe difference being in the 2 most premature groups. The cause of death was unable to be determined, although it is likely multifactorial considering the previously mentioned morbidities associated with DS. Regardless of cause of death, these data may provide useful information for counseling purposes.

There are multiple limitations to our study. This was a retrospective study using administrative data with inherent shortcomings of such a design. Data were limited by what was available via the PHIS database, which included only children’s hospitals contributing to the database. Because these hospitals are usually not birth hospitals, patients were presumably transferred for specialized care; thus, not all neonates with DS are represented, and our findings may not be generalizable to all NICU populations. Maternal information was not available given the nature of the data collection. In general, severity of medical conditions could not be ascertained. Because clinical information is primarily from ICD-9/IDC-10 codes, nonbillable data are likely to not be recorded. The dataset used for this study was unable to distinguish between presence of a complete additional chromosome and partial translocations, limiting genotype-phenotype correlations. PHIS has a robust quality control procedure; however, we cannot verify that diagnoses were made and coded in a similar way across hospitals. We did not adjust for multiple testing and the results should be used to motivate future research rather than definitively conclude that DS is a causal effect of mortality or morbidity.

In conclusion, neonates with DS have increased morbidity and mortality compared with neonates without DS in the NICU. Prematurity is associated with a higher risk of adverse in-hospital outcomes for this vulnerable population across all gestational ages. Further research is needed to examine specific barriers to discharge and cause of death to identify areas for improvement in therapies and intervention.

Drs Messick, Hart, Cua, and Backes conceptualized the study. Drs Messick, Hart, Cua, Backes, and Conroy and Ms Strominger designed the statistical analysis. Dr Hart obtained the data for analysis. Ms Strominger and Dr Conroy performed the statistical analysis. Drs Messick and Cua and Ms Strominger drafted the initial manuscript. Drs Messick, Hart, Cua, Backes, and Conroy and Ms Strominger reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

FUNDING: The authors had no funding to disclose.

This research was supported by the Ohio Perinatal Research Network (OPRN) at Nationwide Children’s Hospital. OPRN is supported by the Center for Perinatal Research at Nationwide Children’s Hospital. Funding is provided by the Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (IRB10-00035). The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

ASD

atrial septal defect

BPD

bronchopulmonary dysplasia

CLABSI

central line-associated blood stream infection

CVL

central venous line

DS

Down syndrome

ECMO

extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

GI

gastrointestinal

GT

gastrostomy tube

HFNC

high-flow nasal cannula

HIE

hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy

ICD

International Classification of Diseases

ICH

intracranial hemorrhage

NEC

necrotizing enterocolitis

NICU

neonatal intensive care unit

NO

nitric oxide

PDA

patent ductus arteriosus

PH

pulmonary hypertension

PHIS

Pediatric Health Information System

ROP

retinopathy of prematurity

SGA

small for gestational age

TPN

total parental nutrition

1.
O’Connor
C
.
Chromosomal abnormalities: aneuploidies
.
Nat Educ.
2008
;
1
(
1
)
172
.
2.
Mai
CT
,
Isenburg
JL
,
Canfield
MA
, et al;
National Birth Defects Prevention Network
.
National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010–2014
.
Birth Defects Res
.
2019
;
111
(
18
):
1420
1435
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1589
3.
Seither
K
,
Tabbah
S
,
Tadesse
DG
,
Suhrie
KR
.
Neonatal complications of Down syndrome and factors necessitating intensive care
.
Am J Med Genet A
.
2021
;
185
(
2
):
336
343
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61948
4.
Dimopoulos
K
,
Constantine
A
,
Clift
P
, et al;
for Down Syndrome International (DSi)
.
Cardiovascular complications of down syndrome: scoping review and expert consensus
.
Circulation
.
2023
;
147
(
5
):
425
441
. PubMed doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059706
5.
Cua
CL
,
Haque
U
,
Miao
Y
,
Backes
CH
.
Necrotizing enterocolitis incidence, characteristics, and outcomes in neonatal down syndrome patients
.
Am J Perinatol
.
2017
;
34
(
13
):
1368
1374
. PubMed doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603688
6.
Kwendakwema
N
,
Al-Dulaimi
R
,
Presson
AP
, et al
.
Enterocolitis and bowel function in children with Hirschsprung disease and trisomy 21
.
J Pediatr Surg
.
2016
;
51
(
12
):
2001
2004
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.026
7.
Weijerman
ME
,
van Furth
AM
,
van der Mooren
MD
, et al
.
Prevalence of congenital heart defects and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the neonate with Down syndrome
.
Eur J Pediatr
.
2010
;
169
(
10
):
1195
1199
. PubMed doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1200-0
8.
Cua
CL
,
Blankenship
A
,
North
AL
,
Hayes
J
,
Nelin
LD
.
Increased incidence of idiopathic persistent pulmonary hypertension in Down syndrome neonates
.
Pediatr Cardiol
.
2007
;
28
(
4
):
250
254
. PubMed doi: 10.1007/s00246-006-0011-6
9.
Cua
CL
,
Haque
U
,
Santoro
S
,
Nicholson
L
,
Backes
CH
.
Differences in mortality characteristics in neonates with Down's syndrome [published correction appears in J Perinatol. 2017 Apr;37(4):465. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.16]
.
J Perinatol.
2017
;
37
(
4
):
427
431
. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.246
10.
Messick
EA
,
Backes
CH
,
Jackson
K
,
Conroy
S
,
Hart
SA
,
Cua
CL
.
Morbidity and mortality in neonates with Down syndrome based on gestational age
.
J Perinatol
.
2023
;
43
(
4
):
445
451
. PubMed doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01514-2
11.
Boghossian
NS
,
Hansen
NI
,
Bell
EF
, et al;
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network
.
Survival and morbidity outcomes for very low birth weight infants with Down syndrome
.
Pediatrics
.
2010
;
126
(
6
):
1132
1140
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1824
12.
Kucik
JE
,
Shin
M
,
Siffel
C
,
Marengo
L
,
Correa
A
;
Congenital anomaly multistate prevalence and survival collaborative
.
Trends in survival among children with Down syndrome in 10 regions of the United States
.
Pediatrics
.
2013
;
131
(
1
):
e27
e36
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1616
13.
Shimokaze
T
,
Toyoshima
K
,
Saito
T
, et al
.
Death of children with Down syndrome by gestational age and cause
.
Pediatr Res.
2023
. PubMed doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02870-1
14.
Chen
L
,
Wang
L
,
Wang
Y
, et al
.
Global, regional, and national burden and trends of Down syndrome from 1990 to 2019
.
Front Genet
.
2022
;
13
:
908482
. PubMed doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.908482
15.
Quinn
JA
,
Munoz
FM
,
Gonik
B
, et al;
Brighton Collaboration Preterm Birth Working Group
.
Preterm birth: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunisation safety data
.
Vaccine
.
2016
;
34
(
49
):
6047
6056
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.045
16.
Fenton
TR
,
Kim
JH
.
A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants
.
BMC Pediatr
.
2013
;
13
(
1
):
59
. PubMed doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-59
17.
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
.
R Foundation for Statistical Computing
;
2023
. https://www.R-project.org
18.
Lesko
CR
,
Fox
MP
,
Edwards
JK
.
A framework for descriptive epidemiology
.
Am J Epidemiol
.
2022
;
191
(
12
):
2063
2070
. PubMed doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac115
19.
Ergaz-Shaltiel
Z
,
Engel
O
,
Erlichman
I
,
Naveh
Y
,
Schimmel
MS
,
Tenenbaum
A
.
Neonatal characteristics and perinatal complications in neonates with Down syndrome
.
Am J Med Genet A
.
2017
;
173
(
5
):
1279
1286
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38165
20.
Cronk
CE
.
Growth of children with Down’s syndrome: birth to age 3 years
.
Pediatrics
.
1978
;
61
(
4
):
564
568
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.61.4.564
21.
Fenton
TR
,
Griffin
IJ
,
Hoyos
A
, et al
.
Accuracy of preterm infant weight gain velocity calculations vary depending on method used and infant age at time of measurement
.
Pediatr Res
.
2019
;
85
(
5
):
650
654
. PubMed doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0313-z
22.
Fenton
TR
,
Senterre
T
,
Griffin
IJ
.
Time interval for preterm infant weight gain velocity calculation precision
.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
.
2019
;
104
(
2
):
F218
F219
. PubMed doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314843
23.
Murray
YL
,
Paul
IM
,
Miller
JR
,
Thrash
SZ
,
Kaiser
JR
.
Variability in the use of growth curves between preterm and term infants in NICUs and newborn nurseries
.
Pediatr Res
.
2021
;
89
(
4
):
711
713
. PubMed doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0972-9
24.
Stoll
C
,
Dott
B
,
Alembik
Y
,
Roth
MP
.
Associated congenital anomalies among cases with Down syndrome
.
Eur J Med Genet
.
2015
;
58
(
12
):
674
680
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2015.11.003
25.
Al-Biltagi
MA
.
Echocardiography in children with Down syndrome
.
World J Clin Pediatr
.
2013
;
2
(
4
):
36
45
. PubMed doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v2.i4.36
26.
Bush
DS
,
Ivy
DD
.
Pulmonary hypertension in the population with Down syndrome
.
Cardiol Ther
.
2022
;
11
(
1
):
33
47
. PubMed doi: 10.1007/s40119-021-00251-5
27.
Hopper
RK
,
Abman
SH
,
Elia
EG
, et al;
Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension Network Investigators
.
Pulmonary hypertension in children with Down syndrome: results from the Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension Network Registry
.
J Pediatr.
2023
;
252
:
131
140.e3
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.08.027
28.
Danopoulos
S
,
Deutsch
GH
,
Dumortier
C
,
Mariani
TJ
,
Al Alam
D
.
Lung disease manifestations in Down syndrome
.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
.
2021
;
321
(
5
):
L892
L899
. PubMed doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00434.2020
29.
Schulzke
SM
,
Stoecklin
B
.
Update on ventilatory management of extremely preterm infants-A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit perspective
.
Paediatr Anaesth
.
2022
;
32
(
2
):
363
371
. PubMed doi: 10.1111/pan.14369
30.
Mahmoud
RA
,
Schmalisch
G
,
Oswal
A
,
Christoph Roehr
C
.
Non-invasive ventilatory support in neonates: an evidence-based update
.
Paediatr Respir Rev
.
2022
;
44
:
11
18
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2022.09.001
31.
Santoro
SL
,
Chicoine
B
,
Jasien
JM
, et al
.
Pneumonia and respiratory infections in Down syndrome: a scoping review of the literature
.
Am J Med Genet A
.
2021
;
185
(
1
):
286
299
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61924
32.
Ravel
A
,
Mircher
C
,
Rebillat
AS
,
Cieuta-Walti
C
,
Megarbane
A
.
Feeding problems and gastrointestinal diseases in Down syndrome
.
Arch Pediatr
.
2020
;
27
(
1
):
53
60
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2019.11.008
33.
Ginglen
JG
,
Butki
N
. Necrotizing enterocolitis. In:
StatPearls
.
Treasure Island (FL)
:
StatPearls Publishing
, August 8,
2023
.
34.
Tanner
SM
,
Berryhill
TF
,
Ellenburg
JL
, et al
.
Pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis: modeling the innate immune response
.
Am J Pathol
.
2015
;
185
(
1
):
4
16
. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.08.028
35.
Thompson
AM
,
Bizzarro
MJ
.
Necrotizing enterocolitis in newborns: pathogenesis, prevention and management
.
Drugs
.
2008
;
68
(
9
):
1227
1238
. PubMed doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868090-00004
36.
Su
Y
,
Xu
RH
,
Guo
LY
, et al
.
Risk factors for necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates: a meta-analysis
.
Front Pediatr
.
2023
;
10
:
1079894
. PubMed doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1079894
37.
Anil
MA
,
Shabnam
S
,
Narayanan
S
.
Feeding and swallowing difficulties in children with Down syndrome
.
J Intellect Disabil Res
.
2019
;
63
(
8
):
992
1014
. PubMed doi: 10.1111/jir.12617
38.
Baumer
NT
,
Hojlo
MA
,
Pawlowski
KG
, et al
.
Co-occurring conditions in Down syndrome: findings from a clinical database
.
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet
.
2023
;
193
(
4
):
e32072
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.32072
39.
Poskanzer
SA
,
Hobensack
VL
,
Ciciora
SL
,
Santoro
SL
.
Feeding difficulty and gastrostomy tube placement in infants with Down syndrome
.
Eur J Pediatr
.
2020
;
179
(
6
):
909
917
. PubMed doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03591-x
40.
Movsas
TZ
,
Spitzer
AR
,
Gewolb
IH
.
Trisomy 21 and risk of retinopathy of prematurity
.
Pediatrics
.
2015
;
136
(
2
):
e441
e447
. PubMed doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0623
41.
Sommer
C
,
Henrique-Silva
F
.
Trisomy 21 and Down syndrome: a short review
.
Braz J Biol
.
2008
;
68
(
2
):
447
452
. PubMed doi: 10.1590/S1519-69842008000200031
42.
Fuentes
JJ
,
Pritchard
MA
,
Estivill
X
.
Genomic organization, alternative splicing, and expression patterns of the DSCR1 (Down syndrome candidate region 1) gene
.
Genomics
.
1997
;
44
(
3
):
358
361
. PubMed doi: 10.1006/geno.1997.4866
43.
Fitzgerald
P
,
Leonard
H
,
Pikora
TJ
,
Bourke
J
,
Hammond
G
.
Hospital admissions in children with down syndrome: experience of a population-based cohort followed from birth
.
PLoS One
.
2013
;
8
(
8
):
e70401
. PubMed doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070401
44.
Esperanza
RA
,
Evans
A
,
Tucker
D
,
Paranjothy
S
,
Hurt
L
.
Hospital admissions in infants with Down syndrome: a record-linked population-based cohort study in Wales
.
J Intellect Disabil Res
.
2022
;
66
(
3
):
225
239
. PubMed doi: 10.1111/jir.12903
45.
Blake
JM
,
Estrada Gomez
D
,
Skotko
BG
,
Torres
A
,
Santoro
SL
.
Pneumonia and respiratory infection in Down syndrome: a 10-year cohort analysis of inpatient and outpatient encounters across the lifespan
.
Am J Med Genet A
.
2021
;
185
(
10
):
2878
2887
. PubMed doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62355
46.
Hebballi
NB
,
Avritscher
EB
,
Garcia
E
, et al
.
Healthcare utilization among infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit: a descriptive cost analysis
.
Health Serv Insights
.
2023
;
16
:
11786329231169604
. PubMed doi: 10.1177/11786329231169604
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Supplementary data