TABLE 5

Association (Adjusted Binary Logistic Regressions) of W7 Extreme Binge Drinking With W1 to W3 Binge Drinking and Parenting Variables Among Emerging Adults

W7 (N = 2285)
aOR95% CIP
Binge drinking in W3, yes versus no 2.0 0.2 to 3.6 <.05 
Binge drinking    
 3 times versus none 2.6 0.3 to 5.0 .0001 
 Twice versus none 1.6 1.1 to 2.3 .0093 
 Once versus none 1.2 0.7 to 1.8 .4923 
W1 to W3 father monitoring knowledge (grand mean) 1.0 −0.5 to 1.0 >.05 
W1 to W3 mother monitoring knowledge (grand mean) 1.0 −1.7 to 0.6 >.05 
W1 to W3 parental support of not using alcohol (grand mean) 0.9 −0.9 to 0.2 >.05 
W7 (N = 2285)
aOR95% CIP
Binge drinking in W3, yes versus no 2.0 0.2 to 3.6 <.05 
Binge drinking    
 3 times versus none 2.6 0.3 to 5.0 .0001 
 Twice versus none 1.6 1.1 to 2.3 .0093 
 Once versus none 1.2 0.7 to 1.8 .4923 
W1 to W3 father monitoring knowledge (grand mean) 1.0 −0.5 to 1.0 >.05 
W1 to W3 mother monitoring knowledge (grand mean) 1.0 −1.7 to 0.6 >.05 
W1 to W3 parental support of not using alcohol (grand mean) 0.9 −0.9 to 0.2 >.05 

Less than or greater than P values are reported when there are no pairwise comparisons, and exact P values are reported when there are pairwise comparisons. Controlling for race and/or ethnicity, parent highest education, family affluence, urbanicity, current residence, and sex. N was the total number of participants who had valid values for extreme binge drinking in the corresponding wave. W1 to W3: 10th grade to 12th grade; W4 to W7: 1 to 4 y after high school. aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal