Average Ratings of Research Impact, Need and Urgency, and Family Centeredness for Research Topics Within Each Rank
| . | Summary of Research Topics . | Rating Domains . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Need and Urgency . | Research Impact . | Family Centeredness . | ||
| Rank 1 | Social determinants, family caregiving, clinical-model refinement, youth-adult transitions, value | 7.9 | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| Rank 2 | Meaningful outcomes, behavioral health, home environment, peer-peer support, family engagement, family economics | 7.0 | 7.1 | 7.9 |
| Rank 3 | Linking family and child health, school and peers, dental health, youth-adult transitions, professional competencies, clinical staffing | 6.8 | 6.4 | 7.2 |
| Rank 4 | Technology, research methods, provider-centered concepts | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| . | Summary of Research Topics . | Rating Domains . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Need and Urgency . | Research Impact . | Family Centeredness . | ||
| Rank 1 | Social determinants, family caregiving, clinical-model refinement, youth-adult transitions, value | 7.9 | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| Rank 2 | Meaningful outcomes, behavioral health, home environment, peer-peer support, family engagement, family economics | 7.0 | 7.1 | 7.9 |
| Rank 3 | Linking family and child health, school and peers, dental health, youth-adult transitions, professional competencies, clinical staffing | 6.8 | 6.4 | 7.2 |
| Rank 4 | Technology, research methods, provider-centered concepts | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.7 |
Each research topic was rated in 3 domains (need and urgency, research impact, and family centeredness) by using a 9-point Likert scale: 1 to 3 (low) was used when a research topic represented a domain to a low degree; 4 to 6 was used when a research topic represented an uncertain domain; and 7 to 9 (high) was used when a research topic represented a domain to a high degree. Shown are the average RAM round 2 ratings in each rank group. Rank 2 had lower need and urgency ratings than rank 1. Rank 3 had lower research impact and family centeredness ratings than rank 2. Average ratings of topics in ranks 3 and 4 were primarily in the uncertain range (4–6).