TABLE 3

Associations of Picky-Eating Trajectories With Maternal Feeding-Behavior Trajectories

Picky-Eating Trajectory Membership, n (%)P
Low (N = 92)Medium (N = 181)High (N = 44)
CFQ restriction trajectory    .01
Low 11 (13.8)a,c 4 (2.6)b,c 2 (5.3)a,b,c
Decreasing 39 (48.8)a,d 73 (47.0)a,c,d 14 (36.8)a,c
High 30 (37.5)a,d 78 (50.3)a,d 22 (57.9)a,c
CFQ pressure-to-eat trajectory    .21
Low 36 (44.4) 49 (31.6) 10 (26.3)
Decreasing 34 (42.0) 75 (48.4) 22 (57.9)
High 11 (13.6) 31 (20.0) 6 (15.8)
CFSQ demandingness trajectory, decreasing    <.001
Low 20 (24.4)a,c 19 (11.6)a,b,c 2 (5.3)b,c
Medium 53 (64.6)a,c 89 (54.3)a,c 18 (47.4)a,c
High 9 (11.0)a,d 46 (28.0)b,c 18 (47.4)b,d
Picky-Eating Trajectory Membership, n (%)P
Low (N = 92)Medium (N = 181)High (N = 44)
CFQ restriction trajectory    .01
Low 11 (13.8)a,c 4 (2.6)b,c 2 (5.3)a,b,c
Decreasing 39 (48.8)a,d 73 (47.0)a,c,d 14 (36.8)a,c
High 30 (37.5)a,d 78 (50.3)a,d 22 (57.9)a,c
CFQ pressure-to-eat trajectory    .21
Low 36 (44.4) 49 (31.6) 10 (26.3)
Decreasing 34 (42.0) 75 (48.4) 22 (57.9)
High 11 (13.6) 31 (20.0) 6 (15.8)
CFSQ demandingness trajectory, decreasing    <.001
Low 20 (24.4)a,c 19 (11.6)a,b,c 2 (5.3)b,c
Medium 53 (64.6)a,c 89 (54.3)a,c 18 (47.4)a,c
High 9 (11.0)a,d 46 (28.0)b,c 18 (47.4)b,d

Fisher’s exact was test used for all comparisons. Superscripts a and b that differ from one another denote significant differences between low, medium, and high picky-eating trajectories proportionally represented by the row and/or column trajectory. Superscripts c and d that differ from one another denote significant differences between trajectories of each type in proportion represented by the column trajectory of picky eating.

Close Modal