TABLE 4

Use of Professional Interpretation by Communication Event Characteristic

Event CharacteristicUsed Professional Interpretation, n of N (%)Pa
Overall 113 of 312 (36)  
 Health professional  <.001 
  Attending 24 of 51 (47)  
  Consultant 13 of 32 (41)  
  Resident or nurse practitioner 54 of 95 (57)  
  Nurse 20 of 128 (16)  
  Tech or other 2 of 6 (33)  
 Content  <.001 
  Detailed history 24 of 27 (89)  
  Update and/or check-in 19 of 53 (36)  
  Medication administration 2 of 26 (8)  
  Vitals 3 of 36 (8)  
  Examination only 2 of 36 (6)  
  Procedure 4 of 35 (11)  
  Explanation and/or plan 59 of 99 (60)  
 Length of communicationb  <.001 
  0–122 s (0–2 min) 2 of 79 (3)  
  123–292 s (2–4.9 min) 24 of 77 (31)  
  293–514 s (4.9–8.6 min) 39 of 78 (50)  
  >514 s (>8.6 min) 48 of 78 (62)  
Event CharacteristicUsed Professional Interpretation, n of N (%)Pa
Overall 113 of 312 (36)  
 Health professional  <.001 
  Attending 24 of 51 (47)  
  Consultant 13 of 32 (41)  
  Resident or nurse practitioner 54 of 95 (57)  
  Nurse 20 of 128 (16)  
  Tech or other 2 of 6 (33)  
 Content  <.001 
  Detailed history 24 of 27 (89)  
  Update and/or check-in 19 of 53 (36)  
  Medication administration 2 of 26 (8)  
  Vitals 3 of 36 (8)  
  Examination only 2 of 36 (6)  
  Procedure 4 of 35 (11)  
  Explanation and/or plan 59 of 99 (60)  
 Length of communicationb  <.001 
  0–122 s (0–2 min) 2 of 79 (3)  
  123–292 s (2–4.9 min) 24 of 77 (31)  
  293–514 s (4.9–8.6 min) 39 of 78 (50)  
  >514 s (>8.6 min) 48 of 78 (62)  
a

Based on Fisher’s exact test.

b

Divided into quartiles.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal